Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
ShotGrid
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
ShotGrid is a production management and review toolset for VFX, animation, and games teams. ShotGrid is equipped to handle creative production tracking needs, supporting teams from large to smaller studios.
$45
per month per user
BugTracker.net
Score 7.5 out of 10
N/A
N/AN/A
Gemini
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
N/A
$10
Per User Per Month
Pricing
Autodesk ShotGridBugTracker.netGemini
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Gemini Express
$10.00
Per User Per Month
Gemini Enterprise
$850.00
Per 10 Users Per Month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ShotGridBugTracker.netGemini
Free Trial
YesNoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Autodesk ShotGridBugTracker.netGemini
Best Alternatives
Autodesk ShotGridBugTracker.netGemini
Small Businesses
Frame.io
Frame.io
Score 9.1 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.7 out of 10
Polarion ALM
Polarion ALM
Score 9.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies

No answers on this topic

GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.7 out of 10
Polarion ALM
Polarion ALM
Score 9.9 out of 10
Enterprises

No answers on this topic

GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.7 out of 10
Polarion ALM
Polarion ALM
Score 9.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Autodesk ShotGridBugTracker.netGemini
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(1 ratings)
6.4
(2 ratings)
6.3
(7 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(1 ratings)
7.2
(2 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
5.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(4 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Autodesk ShotGridBugTracker.netGemini
Likelihood to Recommend
Autodesk
ShotGrid seems to be well suited for a video team for reviews and project tracking. It may not be well suited for Project managers who need to see the bigger picture of the project.
Read full review
Open Source
See above. Recommended questions: What type of feedback or tracking will we be doing? Will this need to be client-facing? How will we track content edits? How many users will be assigned to issues in a given project?
Read full review
CounterSoft
Gemini is well suited to help track issues and change requests, projects, bugs, time logs, etc. It is less appropriate for reporting needs or general office management needs.
Read full review
Pros
Autodesk
  • Uploads videos efficiently
  • allows annotation within the video
  • setting custom filters
  • creating Gantt chart with inputs from each editor and animator
  • adding versions to shot/asset
  • adding assets to a shot
Read full review
Open Source
  • Ability to split our multiple projects and assign a user base.
  • Ability to set permissions based on user base/ roles.
  • Customization of fields on a project level.
Read full review
CounterSoft
  • It has been pretty good with rewrites and slight edits.
  • It has been helpful in project management.
  • It has been helpful with easy writing tasks like social media captions or holiday descriptions.
Read full review
Cons
Autodesk
  • Ordering comments made by different people by timecode/frame number, instead by the time and date the comment was made
  • Being able to move an uploaded video from shots to assets and vice versa. Right now we have to re-upload but lose any comments made already if they were in the wrong place
  • Custom filters are great but they could get a little confusing with all the options. Might help with guidelines or a place we could ask what we want and someone could answer with the best way to achieve those specific filters we want
Read full review
Open Source
  • User interface for client-facing feedback
  • Content and design updates tracking
Read full review
CounterSoft
  • Speed of processing (on pro model)
  • Accuracy of answers (on flash model)
  • Veo 3 should be able to use picture prompts when creating videos (without errors)
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Autodesk
For education, we can't see ourselves using anything else that comes at a cost
Read full review
Open Source
I would plan on renewing and staying with BugTracker.net simply because it is a no nonsense easy to use tool. Once you get it set up and understand the small nuances with this custom piece of software, it really is a great tool to help your organization get started with Defect Management and BugTracking without having to drop several thousands of dollars on tools that are more fluff than function.
Read full review
CounterSoft
Gemini's development team continues to improve the product and provides a comprehensive roadmap of upcoming features that makes you want to upgrade as soon as a new version comes out.
Read full review
Usability
Autodesk
It's UI/UX is very robust. There's a lot of functionality but it's not very intuitive or intuitive. I spend time with new hires and contractors to overview ShotGrid for a day and revisit after a week or two. Questions always arise down the line
Read full review
Open Source
No answers on this topic
CounterSoft
Like learning to play checkers, the interface is easy, but the strategy has more of a learning curve. Figuring out the best prompts to use to get the desired outcome with less tries is taking me awhile to develop that skill. The images that I am able to generate are close to "camera-ready", but most do require some tweaking in image editing software to fix AI artifacts like distorted faces and randomly spelled words.
Read full review
Support Rating
Autodesk
No answers on this topic
Open Source
No answers on this topic
CounterSoft
I've never had any problems with the support for the Gemini application itself, but it seems every time I re-install (on a single machine), I run into a licensing issue. As a result, I need to go to the app's website and request that my activation key gets reset or resent. In either case, it's a pain, but as I have to reinstall infrequently, it's a small price to pay for an otherwise solid application.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Autodesk
Wipster had limitations on video uploads, which was a major drawback. One thing we liked with Wipster was how we can see comments made in order on the timeline while watching the video.
Read full review
Open Source
I didn't choose the product or evaluate other options, but I've been satisified with it except for tracking content changes.
Read full review
CounterSoft
In my case, it's not that Gemini won; I simply use Gemini regularly as a backup plan to compare results obtained with the leading AI in my corporate environment. I believe it's important to have this comparison of results, especially when dealing with critical issues. I think the most powerful AIs for the general public today are ChatGPT and Gemini, in that order, although CoPilot is very well positioned due to its integration with widely used Microsoft products in the corporate world.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Autodesk
  • We spend less time going back and forth with different stakeholders on shots and assets
  • We don't have to pay services that only provided trial versions
  • There is unlimited video uploading which was not the case with wiz
Read full review
Open Source
  • Decreased turn around time for defect fixes.
  • Smoother builder deploys
  • Clearer communication from QA to Dev Team
Read full review
CounterSoft
  • It's sped up some workflows
  • It's provided not accurate information sometimes
  • It's a great tool when used in the GSuite with sheets and other drive functions
Read full review
ScreenShots