AutomationHQ vs. BrowserStack

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
AutomationHQ
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
AutomationHQ™ (AHQ) is a complete TAAS (Test Automation As Service) solution. Its NLP driven, cloud-based No-Code test automation platform is presented as ideal for agile delivery team. Any one in agile team can develop In-Sprint test automation in plain English with AHQ. User can create virtual test robots in AHQ and assign test scripts to them. These test robots works as virtual testers for the agile team. TestBots can be executed on…
$69
per month Organisation
BrowserStack
Score 8.3 out of 10
N/A
BrowserStack is a test platform built for developers and QAs to expand test coverage, scale and optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability. BrowserStack states it currently powers over a billion tests a year for customers who include Amazon, Paypal, Well Fargo Bank, Nvidia, MongoDB, Pfizer, GE, Discovery, React JS, Apache, JQuery and several others rely on BrowserStack to test their web and mobile apps.
$0
per month Unlimited users and 5000 free screenshots
Pricing
AutomationHQBrowserStack
Editions & Modules
Startup & E-commerce Package
$69
per month Organisation
Percy - Free
$0
per month Unlimited users and 5000 free screenshots
App Percy - Free
$0
per month 5000 free screenshots and 100 minutes of infrastructure
Test Observability - Unlimited Free
$0
Accessibility Testing - Free
$0
Test Observability - Observability Pro
$0.01
per month per test execution
Percy - Desktop
$0.02
per month per screenshot
App Percy - Visual Core
$0.02
per month per screenshot
Percy - Desktop & Mobile
$0.02
per month per screenshot
App Percy - Visual Cloud
$0.03
per month per screenshot
Live - Desktop
$29
per month per user
Live - Desktop & Mobile
$39
per month per user
App Live - Individual
$39
per month per user
Automate - Desktop
$129
per month 1 parallel test
Live - Team
$150
per month 5 users
App Live - Team
$150
per month 5 users
Automate - Desktop & Mobile
$199
per month 1 parallel test
App Automate - Device Cloud
$199
per month 1 parallel test
App Live - Team Pro
$199
per month 5 users
Accessibility Testing - Team
$199
per month 5 users
App Automate - Device Cloud Pro
$249
per month 1 parallel test
Automate - Enterprise
Contact sales team
Percy - Enterprise
Contact Sales
App Automate - Enterprise
Contact Sales
App Live - Enterprise
Contact sales team
Live - Enterprise
Contact sales team
App Automate - Device Cloud Pro + Visual Cloud
Contact Sales
App Percy - Enterprise
Contact Sales
Test Observability - Enterprise
Contact Sales
Accessibility Testing - Enterprise
Contact Sales
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AutomationHQBrowserStack
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
AutomationHQBrowserStack
Top Pros
Top Cons
Best Alternatives
AutomationHQBrowserStack
Small Businesses
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.3 out of 10
TestComplete
TestComplete
Score 7.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 8.1 out of 10
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 8.1 out of 10
Enterprises
ignio AIOps
ignio AIOps
Score 8.2 out of 10
ignio AIOps
ignio AIOps
Score 8.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
AutomationHQBrowserStack
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(1 ratings)
8.7
(146 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
8.1
(11 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.9
(17 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(3 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
7.9
(77 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(19 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(1 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
7.7
(2 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(4 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
7.8
(3 ratings)
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
-
(0 ratings)
4.8
(2 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(1 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
8.4
(3 ratings)
Professional Services
-
(0 ratings)
4.3
(2 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
8.6
(2 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
8.6
(2 ratings)
User Testimonials
AutomationHQBrowserStack
Likelihood to Recommend
AutomationHQ Inc
The AutomationHQ tool is well suited for small to medium size projects, but sometimes there is difficulty in the case of complex elements which are present within multiple Iframes.
Read full review
BrowserStack
I didn't have problems working with BrowserStack. The tool is stable, there are a lot of different devices and OS. It's really useful. I only had a problem in the past while working with a company that had geolocation activated on the app. The app only works in the USA, and I was in Brazil. I faced many many issues working on this circumstances. I tried to get in touch with BrowserStack, but I leave the company before get the problem solved. But that one was the only big problem that I've faced while using BrowserStack.
Read full review
Pros
AutomationHQ Inc
  • The best thing I liked about AutomationHQ is that it intelligently identify web elements and track changes in real-time applications
  • It supports Data driven testing from mainly three data sources from Excel/XML/JSON
  • There are myriad pre-build test steps, which we can use to built our own scripts.
Read full review
BrowserStack
  • BrowserStack App Automate dashboard gives us video, screenshots and logs of what exactly happened during the test run. This helps us easily analyse failures in our automation test and figure out the root cause for failures.
  • BrowserStack App Live provides us with lot of devices to test on. This is specifically useful in case of high end iPhone devices which are costly for us to procure in house.
  • BrowserStack App Automate provides parallel threads which can be shared across multiple teams. This has helped us scale our mobile test automation effort across the organisation.
  • In house mobile lab might be cost effective initially but when it comes to maintaining it and add new devices as and when it comes in market makes it less cost effective than cloud solution like BrowserStack
Read full review
Cons
AutomationHQ Inc
  • AutomationHQ doesn’t have test cases version control, we have to currently manually do this by copying the test script and [renaming] with the version. I wish AHQ can implement the version control so I don’t have to keep test script copies
  • Complex elements like within multiple iframes have difficulty at run time. It seems we have to run it multiple time until AHQ's AI algorithm "learn" what is the right way
Read full review
BrowserStack
  • Overall performance of usability of the device
  • Overheating conditions could be a useful feature to be included
  • Downloading the app to the Home screen for quick selection would be helpful
  • Screen orientation feature
  • Tablets for additional devices to be tested against
  • Add in a feature to test against wearables
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
AutomationHQ Inc
No answers on this topic
BrowserStack
This decisions mostly taken by senior management at VP and CEO level, they also need approval from many other teams like dev, design according to the use, and finance due to competitive cost, They do check other product as well, and I am just a single person from QA team, and not a decision maker
Read full review
Usability
AutomationHQ Inc
No answers on this topic
BrowserStack
It integrates directly in internal networks and local development. The point and click interface of choosing your device, pick the browser/version and you have a working emulation of that exact environment. What else could you ask for? I've set our least computer savvy users up with BrowserStack for testing in minutes. It feels like it's just part of your local environemnt.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
AutomationHQ Inc
No answers on this topic
BrowserStack
Its always available in our organisation. Just a click away from testing on the exact devices we require.
Read full review
Performance
AutomationHQ Inc
No answers on this topic
BrowserStack
The tests are fast considering the fact that they're Appium tests. I've seen tests reliably pass or fail when they're supposed to, with next to zero issues on the BrowserStack side of things. Tests launch only seconds after I kick off them off from my CLI.
Read full review
Support Rating
AutomationHQ Inc
No answers on this topic
BrowserStack
I'm saying a 10 for support for BrowserStack only based on feedback from the development team. I myself have never had to reach out to support for any questions or issues, but others in the company have. From my conversations with them, the support was fantastic and had been a pleasure working with the BrowserStack team.
Read full review
In-Person Training
AutomationHQ Inc
No answers on this topic
BrowserStack
Yes, it was online training on meet, and trainer looks like skilled and technical strong, he has covered end to end all the features and he has answers all the queries. because of this trainings we are able to implement it by our own in the organization, thank you for support and training.
Read full review
Online Training
AutomationHQ Inc
No answers on this topic
BrowserStack
It was a quick training from the support of browserstack, it was nice and easy to understand, thanks again for the support given by the team. and regularly I used to receive mails for training from support for any new feature they launch, I was able to spread same training to all my team and dev.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
AutomationHQ Inc
No answers on this topic
BrowserStack
It was new learning for me, till the time I was not aware of such tools are available for manual CBT testing and for automation integration caue I was using some VM for testing, it has increase my knowledge and skill set. It was a fun while implementation and I enjoyed it.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
AutomationHQ Inc
Read full review
BrowserStack
BrowserStack's library of devices and browsers is way bigger than Chrome DevTools. Additionally, I find that BrowserStack is more accurate than Chrome DevTools in regards to how pages render on the various devices I need to test on. Overall, BrowserStack is far better than Chrome DevTools.
Read full review
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
AutomationHQ Inc
No answers on this topic
BrowserStack
Not sure about all this billing details, I am not part of that discussion.
Read full review
Scalability
AutomationHQ Inc
No answers on this topic
BrowserStack
It provides us with the latest technology in the market, which enable us to make sure that the software we create is accessible on them.
Read full review
Professional Services
AutomationHQ Inc
No answers on this topic
BrowserStack
Not used
Read full review
Return on Investment
AutomationHQ Inc
  • We have received gains for about 150% over a long period of time
Read full review
BrowserStack
  • Saves a lot of money, by providing several devices at our disposal
  • It gives you devices like, mobile phones, tabs and desktops of various Operating Systems
  • Only Challenge is it might consume more time for development, but testing should be fast and easy
Read full review
ScreenShots

AutomationHQ Screenshots

Screenshot of AHQ Test Script Development Module

BrowserStack Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of