Automox vs. BlackBerry UEM

It is perfectly suited for organizations with a small IT staff and large amount of devices. It's also perfect for pushing software to machines that are not on the network or VPN. It's less effective for server patch management. I like to have a little more control of my server patching

Incentivized

If you want to connect securely, connect the mobile android or iOS devices to your network for communication purposes, where you have control over all the devices, who can access the network and remove the corporate data from those same devices if the need arises.

Incentivized

• Excellent support for Windows-based systems. Rarely have any issues updating those systems.
• When issues do arise, the Automox support team has been very responsive and informative of solutions (or where projects are on potential roll out dates).
• The user interface is intuitive and easy to use.

Incentivized

• Security and Web Filtering are easy to set up and maintain
• Initial set up and install of company profile onto Android/iOS devices

Incentivized

• initial deployment of agents to all end points was a challenge, would have been great if there was a way for Automox to discover and install.
• Sometimes upgrading the Automox client which becomes old due to an end point not connecting for a long time becomes challenging as it becomes incompatible and has to be upgraded manually
• It would good to have a functionality where an end point device can be turned into a brick if desired in cases where the device is not returned back after an employee is terminated. This should also have the option of turning it back into an active device if we choose to

Incentivized

• One thing which is annoying to me is that after every 5-10 minutes, I need to log in again with my credentials to access emails. It could be from a security perspective but in that case the auto log out time should be user configurable.
• It's not possible to save or forward attachments from my inbox on my device
• Good does allow for synchronizing of contacts in your personal corporate email address book to your personal device address book.

The system is really simple. We pushed the installer out through Group policy. Devices connected can get further defined by Tags or Groups.

Incentivized

I will renew use of this product for as long as the company supports its use.

After using a combination of WSUS and group policy to manage patching on a large number of devices, it was excellent to move to a single-pane experience where patch policies, restart schedules, reports, and device status can be seen easily and quickly. Its pre-patch report on policies is particularly handy so you can check if devices will take the appropriate action before it's run.

Incentivized

In my experience, they were responsive but the fixes were more like bandaids than a fix for the underlying problems which they admitted were on their end.

Incentivized

If you have a serious issue with your on-premise installation, access to support can take a bit to get someone on the phone, and it can take some time to rectify, given the complexity of the software. In my experience, the support team does get you back up and running in critical scenarios, but you more than likely will be on some marathon calls, unless it is a very simple and known issue.

Incentivized

We stoppped using PDQ because it required our users to connect to the corporate VPN. It might take months for some remote users to receive a patch, and often we would have to schedule time with them one-on-one to ensure that it got done. With Automox, we don't have to do any of that - it just happens silently in the background.

Incentivized

Well, selecting Good was an organization level decision and not my personal one. I like Good from the security perspective and that it helps our IT department avoid worrying about data theft. Otherwise, from the perspective of user convenience, Outlook scores way over Good with it's real time delivery of email, real time syncing and a host of other features

• Automox allows us to fix vulnerabilities in the shortest amount of time ever.
• The automated patching and end point management features have made our jobs much easier.
• We get to focus on more important tasks and not have to manually patch the operating systems.

Incentivized

• Security profiles have been effective in managing user devices.
• Location tracking has helped locate lost and stolen devices.

Incentivized