TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Contact about BrowserStack

Please fill out the form below to get in touch.

BrowserStack

Connect with BrowserStack

What are you interested in?

Already have an account?

You hereby consent to have TrustRadius share the information supplied on this form with BrowserStack so that BrowserStack and TrustRadius may contact you in regard to the information requested.

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    BrowserStack

    Score8.5 out of 10
    N/ABrowserStack is a test platform built for developers and QAs to expand test coverage, scale and optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability. BrowserStack states it currently powers over a billion tests a year for customers who include Amazon, Paypal, Well Fargo Bank, Nvidia, MongoDB, Pfizer, GE, Discovery, React JS, Apache, JQuery and several others rely on BrowserStack to test their web and mobile apps.

    $0

    per month Unlimited users and 5000 free screenshots

    Oracle GlassFish Server

    Score9 out of 10
    N/AOracle GlassFish Server was originally developed by Sun Microsystems and is available open source or supported by Oracle. It is an application server.N/A
    Pricing
    BrowserStackOracle GlassFish Server
    Editions & Modules
    Percy - Free
    $0
    per month Unlimited users and 5000 free screenshots
    App Percy - Free
    $0
    per month 5000 free screenshots and 100 minutes of infrastructure
    Test Observability - Unlimited Free
    $0
    Accessibility Testing - Free
    $0
    Test Observability - Observability Pro
    $0.01
    per month per test execution
    Percy - Desktop
    $0.02
    per month per screenshot
    App Percy - Visual Core
    $0.02
    per month per screenshot
    Percy - Desktop & Mobile
    $0.02
    per month per screenshot
    App Percy - Visual Cloud
    $0.03
    per month per screenshot
    Live - Desktop
    $39
    per month per user
    Live - Desktop & Mobile
    $49
    per month per user
    App Live - Individual
    $49
    per month per user
    Automate - Desktop
    $129
    per month 1 parallel test
    Live - Team
    $175
    per month 5 users
    App Live - Team
    $175
    per month 5 users
    Accessibility Testing - Team
    $199
    per month 5 users
    Automate - Desktop & Mobile
    $225
    per month 1 parallel test
    App Automate - Device Cloud
    $249
    per month 1 parallel test
    App Live - Team Pro
    $289
    per month 5 users
    App Automate - Device Cloud Pro
    $299
    per month 1 parallel test
    Automate - Enterprise
    Contact sales team
    Percy - Enterprise
    Contact Sales
    App Automate - Enterprise
    Contact Sales
    App Live - Enterprise
    Contact sales team
    Live - Enterprise
    Contact sales team
    App Automate - Device Cloud Pro + Visual Cloud
    Contact Sales
    App Percy - Enterprise
    Contact Sales
    Test Observability - Enterprise
    Contact Sales
    Accessibility Testing - Enterprise
    Contact Sales
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    BrowserStackOracle GlassFish Server
    Free Trial
    YesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    BrowserStackOracle GlassFish Server
    Considered Both Products
    BrowserStack
    No answer on this topic
    Oracle
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    97%
    Would buy again
    255 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    96%
    Delivers good value for the price
    214 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    98%
    Happy with the feature set
    259 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    97%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    176 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    98%
    Implementation went as expected
    217 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    BrowserStackOracle GlassFish Server
    Application Servers
    Comparison of Application Servers features of BrowserStack and Oracle GlassFish Server
    Feature
    BrowserStack
    -
    Ratings
    Oracle GlassFish Server
    8.8
    3 Ratings
    10% above category average
    IDE support00 Ratings9.03 Ratings
    Security management00 Ratings9.03 Ratings
    Administration and management00 Ratings8.03 Ratings
    Application server performance00 Ratings10.03 Ratings
    Installation00 Ratings7.03 Ratings
    Open-source standards compliance00 Ratings9.82 Ratings
    User Ratings
    BrowserStackOracle GlassFish Server
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.8
    (285 ratings)
    9.0
    (3 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    9.1
    (19 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Usability
    8.3
    (23 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Availability
    9.8
    (5 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Performance
    6.0
    (78 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    8.0
    (25 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    In-Person Training
    7.3
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Online Training
    4.1
    (3 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    9.2
    (8 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Configurability
    8.4
    (6 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Contract Terms and Pricing Model
    9.0
    (4 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    8.1
    (3 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    9.9
    (6 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Professional Services
    9.0
    (4 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    9.0
    (4 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    8.1
    (4 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    BrowserStackOracle GlassFish Server
    Likelihood to Recommend
    BrowserStack
    BrowserStack is very useful if you need to troubleshoot a client's reported experience from using an older device or browser version that you do not own and can not personally replicate in-house. For instance, if you are in a Windows environment and your client has a Mac, or if you have iPhones and they have Android. It's also great for ensuring that above-the-fold content is presented effectively across a variety of mobile devices and optimizing visitor experiences. If you are a small business with lower client volumes where these services are needed, then the price point may be high.
    Read full review
    Oracle
    Glassfish is well suited for large-scale cluster deployments and integrates well with F5 load balancers.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    BrowserStack
    • Tests Android and iOS on real devices on cloud, without the need to purchase the devices.
    • Run Maestro tests and other frameworks on real devices, reporting the errors to be fixed to developers or the test workflows that failed to the QA team.
    • The quality reports at the end of the tests are really good, because they contain videos of the tests being performed on the devices. So, not only text, I can check the behavior of the application exactly how it runs.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    • The product offers Java EE support.
    • As the version supported by Oracle we have an extensive documentation, the Oracle GlassFish server online documentation library, patches ,and support from the supplier.
    • Ease of use through the administration console.
    • Integration with the NetBeans development interface.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    BrowserStack
    • The documentation needs to improve for browser edge cases, such as "approving permissions automatically". There are several "solutions" posted, none of which worked. I needed to go to Discord to get the real solution.
    • Documentation in general seems to provide answers that are unclear or flaky
    • There needs to be a more reliable way to programmatically choose device, platform, and window size by being able to query a 'plan' endpoint instead of just 'failing the combination.'
    Read full review
    Oracle
    • One of the areas where we found Glassfish adaptation difficult for our company was the lack of documentation and community forums covering important issues.
    • We ran into a roadblock with OAuth 2.0 implementation and did not get great support on that issue.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    BrowserStack
    It's almost the 3rd year for us and it's renewal time for us. So yes, we are already discussing how many licenses we need to increase as users are increasing internally. So it's 100% sure that we are already planning renewal this year as well BrowserStack with live and app automate.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    No answers on this topic
    Usability
    BrowserStack
    So many options that it can be a little overwhelming, but the core functions are easy to find and use and it's usually not too hard to figure things out for the more complex tasks. Very easy to boot up a device and a specific browser from the dashboard to begin a manual website test.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    No answers on this topic
    Reliability and Availability
    BrowserStack
    I rated BrowserStack's availability a 10 because it is consistently reliable, with minimal to no downtime or unplanned outages. The platform is accessible whenever needed, ensuring uninterrupted testing. Its robust infrastructure and proactive monitoring ensure a seamless experience, allowing us to meet deadlines without delays caused by availability issues and all
    Read full review
    Oracle
    No answers on this topic
    Performance
    BrowserStack
    The tests are fast considering the fact that they're Appium tests. I've seen tests reliably pass or fail when they're supposed to, with next to zero issues on the BrowserStack side of things. Tests launch only seconds after I kick off them off from my CLI.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    BrowserStack
    I've not had much direct interaction with the BrowserStack support team. The help and community are great and we've not run into any issue that has really required us to reach out. I guess having a stable and easy to use system means you may never need to contact support.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    No answers on this topic
    In-Person Training
    BrowserStack
    Yes, it was online training on meet, and trainer looks like skilled and technical strong, he has covered end to end all the features and he has answers all the queries. because of this trainings we are able to implement it by our own in the organization, thank you for support and training.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    No answers on this topic
    Online Training
    BrowserStack
    It was a quick training from the support of browserstack, it was nice and easy to understand, thanks again for the support given by the team. and regularly I used to receive mails for training from support for any new feature they launch, I was able to spread same training to all my team and dev.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation Rating
    BrowserStack
    I rated the implementation satisfaction an 8 because while it went smoothly overall, there were some challenges during the initial learning phase and integration with existing tools. Key insights include the importance of providing sufficient training upfront and ensuring seamless integration with other systems to minimize disruptions and improve adoption speed.
    Read full review
    Oracle
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    BrowserStack
    BrowserStack is simpler and more user friendly than Sauce Labs and can be easily learned by any individual who is new to it and does not require much efforts. Also, BrowserStack is more trusted by the clients that we offer services to, and is always considered the best option among others.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    At the time we did a small proof of concept with both platforms and Oracle Glassfish had more intuitive administration and configuration functions
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Contract Terms and Pricing Model
    BrowserStack
    No Vendors were involved, directly dealt with Browserstack
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    No answers on this topic
    Scalability
    BrowserStack
    I may not be the best person to answer this as I am only using it for 1 department and at 1 site but will still try my best As far as Scalability for Devices for Mobile Automation is concerned, it gets a Solid 10, as the users can run cases on upto 10 device parallel and also have the best choices of devices to choose
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    No answers on this topic
    Professional Services
    BrowserStack
    Not used
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    BrowserStack
    • Browserstack improved our internal confidence level when it came to signing off on testing
    • Browserstack improved the confidence level of our clients by decreasing the number of bugs found during PVT and providing an entry level opportunity for our clients to perform UAT using the same tools.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    • Glassfish which initially spun off from an Open Source project has a community edition which is free to use and offers great ROI.
    • In comparison to cloud offerings like AWS and Google App Engine, Glassfish requires more cost upfront for installation and management.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    BrowserStack Screenshots

    Product screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshot