Likelihood to Recommend It's a decent system if you're a pure IT shop and want to become ITIL-aligned. It forces everyone into an ITIL mentality - service level agreements, change management, and asset tracking. It's very rote, for better and for worse. It's not appropriate at all as a customer-facing or non-IT facing self-service tool. You will never get your end users to really understand how to use the interface.
Read full review I believe the scenarios we used it for were quite well covered, from the executive perspective. The downtime alarms worked very well and were easy to setup, uptime monitoring tools were clear and easy to use, even for non-technical people (C-level) and the SLA management tools allowed us to spend less time, and have less friction, with our clients
Read full review Pros ITIL ticketing (incidents, problems, etc.). Change orders. Matching up its asset management system with incidents/change orders. Read full review The alerts are very responsive offering quite detailed timing information The UI for reports is very clear and set up of reports is very intuitive Customer service was good when there were problems - e.g. lapsing billing causing reporting to go down Read full review Cons The user interface (UX) is antiquated and clunky. Compared to ServiceNow, it feels like it's 15 years behind. It's complicated - We do routine internal training just to get people to use it correctly. It doesn't have an automated way of discovering assets. Everything has to be force-fed. Read full review The PagerDuty integration could be a lot better. When you use the PagerDuty integration, it doesn't send any information about which check failed! It just sends a message like "Timeout (> 30s)" -- this isn't very helpful when we have hundreds of checks. We've worked around this by using both the PagerDuty and Slack integrations and having them both post to the same Slack channel. But this means that when an engineer is paged from PagerDuty, they have to go to Slack (or Pingdom) to find the details about the page; it's not available on the page itself. Read full review Likelihood to Renew Recently added features have made Pingdom less intuitive for our requirements. While Pingdom has a broad offering and remains a good value, it is becoming more than we need. Our customer base is becoming more and more global and Pingdom still lacks Asia-Pacific monitoring, which we will need within a year.
Ted White Sr. Mgr., Information Systems Production Operations
Read full review Usability Pingdom is easy to use, very intuitive and has a very short learning curve. From the onset, we've been able to jump in and leverage the tool to accomplish our goals for page speed performance and discover the insights we need to make improvements. Its a well-designed tool and makes for a good user experience.
Read full review Performance Interface is unnecessarily complicated and frequently responds slowly.
Ted White Sr. Mgr., Information Systems Production Operations
Read full review Support Rating We have to hire 2 full-time 3rd-party consultants to run this application. That tells me it's not a very IT-friendly, vendor-supported application. Compare that with, say, SolarWinds, which is much easier for regular IT staff to customize without sacrificing features and capability. Sure, we have to bring in Loop1 to consult for us when we need to do a major SolarWinds config change or need a really unusual custom query built, but we never need more than 10 hours of consulting per month.
Read full review Support responded the same day to my query, as I was setting the product up but couldn't find the setting I needed. This was successfully resolved in a short time frame, so I was pleased with how quickly we were able to get this resolved. I haven't needed to contact support since.
Read full review Alternatives Considered I did not select CA. If it were up to me, I would migrate us to
ServiceNow . The user interface on
ServiceNow is 100% more modern and 200% more user friendly. With
ServiceNow , the front page for end users makes it clear: one button that says "Ask for something" and one button that says "Report a problem". That's what our end users need. The biggest problem we have in our organization is that our end users don't report issues to the Help Desk often enough and rarely ask for things through the Help Desk. A clean, simple self-service option like this would open up a world of new information for our customer service team.
Read full review PRTG Network Monitor was a far more complicated tool to use and set up albeit it does both Internal and External monitoring. The setup wasn't intuitive and there are too many configuration options to complete to form an alertAmazon CloudWatch is specific to AWS resources and cannot be easily use outside of the AWS EcosystemRead full review Return on Investment It helped make us an ITIL shop. It was integral during our large IT consolidation 10 years ago in merging 10 different IT departments into one by converging on one ticketing system for all IT issues. Its lack of user-friendliness has gated us from being able to deploy a true self-service IT help desk. Read full review Honestly, we have 4 other products that overlap this functionality whose organizations provide far superior support. At this point it is an unnecessary expense. In my opinion, their lack of support responsiveness and commitment has impacted our IT agility. Its time to explore other alternatives. Read full review ScreenShots SolarWinds Pingdom Screenshots