TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

CAD Exchanger vs. ScienceLogic AI Platform vs. Splunk Enterprise

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    CAD Exchanger

    N/AN/AN/A

    $0

    ScienceLogic AI Platform

    Score8.2 out of 10
    Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
    ScienceLogic provides a unified IT Operations platform designed to manage operational workflows using high-fidelity Telemetry Data and explainable automation. The ScienceLogic AI Platform is deployable across On-Premises, Cloud, and Hybrid Environments. The platform consolidates monitoring tools to provide Observability and enables engineers to automate manual processes using Machine Learning capabilities. The platform utilizes automation for Closed-Loop Remediation and provides insights…N/A

    Splunk Enterprise

    Score8.6 out of 10
    N/ASplunk is software for searching, monitoring, and analyzing machine-generated big data, via a web-style interface. It captures, indexes and correlates real-time data in a searchable repository from which it can generate graphs, reports, alerts, dashboards and visualizations.N/A
    Pricing
    CAD ExchangerScienceLogic AI PlatformSplunk Enterprise
    Editions & Modules
    Perpetual
    $0
    Subscription
    $590
    per year
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    CAD ExchangerScienceLogic AI PlatformSplunk Enterprise
    Free Trial
    YesNoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNoYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoYesNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeRequiredNo setup fee
    Additional DetailsScienceLogic SL1 offers four tiers: SL1 Advanced – Application Health, Automated Troubleshooting and Remediation Workflows SL1 Base – Infrastructure Monitoring, Topology & Event Correlation SL1 Premium – AI/ML-driven Analytics, Low-Code Automated Workflow Authoring SL1 Standard – Infrastructure Monitoring – with Agents, Business Services, Incident Automation, CMDB Synchronization, Behavioral Correlation
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    CAD ExchangerScienceLogic AI PlatformSplunk Enterprise
    Considered Multiple Products
    CADEX
    No answer on this topic
    ScienceLogic
    Chose ScienceLogic AI Platform
    ScienceLogic SL1 is a great addition. I haven’t used the other ones, but it seems like SL1 does offer more in terms of network monitoring.
    Incentivized
    Chose ScienceLogic AI Platform
    When it comes to transferring massive volumes of data between different Cloud platforms, ScienceLogic SL1 is the way to go. To sum up, ScienceLogic SL1's automation is highly efficient, and the report-making process is rapid and painless for the user. The metrics are spot-on, …
    Incentivized
    Chose ScienceLogic AI Platform
    ScienceLogic SL1 is the only platform that provides a complete solution beyond monitoring and alerting. The cost to deploy is much lower than all of the products listed. While each of them have their strengths over some aspect of SL1, ScienceLogic SL1 brings all of the …
    Incentivized
    Chose ScienceLogic AI Platform
    Comparable. Difference is that it covers about 60-70% of needs.
    Incentivized
    Chose ScienceLogic AI Platform
    The coverage and ease for what we need is just better. Most of the other solutions are just point tools that don't bring many functions together or are missing pieces to be successful.
    Incentivized
    Chose ScienceLogic AI Platform
    Solarwinds initially looked like a good value for the money. We are now revisiting our earlier decision.
    Incentivized
    Chose ScienceLogic AI Platform
    ScienceLogic exceeded in both price and capabilities across all of these competitors.
    Incentivized
    Chose ScienceLogic AI Platform
    Modular architecture, ability to scale.
    Incentivized
    Chose ScienceLogic AI Platform
    Of all the monitoring tools I've used at various jobs, ScienceLogic has been the most steady, easy-to-learn, and cost-effective product. CA Spectrum seemed to work better for network equipment. NetIQ was costly, slow, and required a lot of maintenance. System Center Operations …
    Incentivized
    Cisco
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    87%
    Would buy again
    81 Answers
    97%
    Would buy again
    59 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    91%
    Delivers good value for the price
    71 Answers
    94%
    Delivers good value for the price
    49 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    92%
    Happy with the feature set
    86 Answers
    97%
    Happy with the feature set
    59 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    85%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    44 Answers
    93%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    43 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    81%
    Implementation went as expected
    58 Answers
    96%
    Implementation went as expected
    50 Answers
    Features
    CAD ExchangerScienceLogic AI PlatformSplunk Enterprise
    AIOps Features
    Comparison of AIOps Features features of CAD Exchanger and ScienceLogic AI Platform and Splunk Enterprise
    Feature
    CAD Exchanger
    -
    Ratings
    ScienceLogic AI Platform
    7.5
    26 Ratings
    2% below category average
    Splunk Enterprise
    -
    Ratings
    Monitoring and Alerting00 Ratings8.225 Ratings00 Ratings
    Performance Analytics00 Ratings7.726 Ratings00 Ratings
    Incident Management00 Ratings6.626 Ratings00 Ratings
    Service Desk Integration00 Ratings7.525 Ratings00 Ratings
    Root Cause Analysis00 Ratings7.721 Ratings00 Ratings
    Capacity Planning Tool00 Ratings7.222 Ratings00 Ratings
    Configuration and Change Management00 Ratings7.723 Ratings00 Ratings
    Automated Remediation00 Ratings7.620 Ratings00 Ratings
    Collaboration and Communication00 Ratings7.920 Ratings00 Ratings
    Threat Intelligence00 Ratings7.319 Ratings00 Ratings
    Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
    Comparison of Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) features of CAD Exchanger and ScienceLogic AI Platform and Splunk Enterprise
    Feature
    CAD Exchanger
    -
    Ratings
    ScienceLogic AI Platform
    -
    Ratings
    Splunk Enterprise
    8.2
    91 Ratings
    3% above category average
    Centralized event and log data collection00 Ratings00 Ratings9.085 Ratings
    Correlation00 Ratings00 Ratings8.487 Ratings
    Event and log normalization/management00 Ratings00 Ratings8.488 Ratings
    Deployment flexibility00 Ratings00 Ratings8.081 Ratings
    Integration with Identity and Access Management Tools00 Ratings00 Ratings8.282 Ratings
    Custom dashboards and workspaces00 Ratings00 Ratings8.887 Ratings
    Host and network-based intrusion detection00 Ratings00 Ratings7.865 Ratings
    Data integration/API management00 Ratings00 Ratings8.334 Ratings
    Behavioral analytics and baselining00 Ratings00 Ratings7.732 Ratings
    Rules-based and algorithmic detection thresholds00 Ratings00 Ratings7.933 Ratings
    Response orchestration and automation00 Ratings00 Ratings7.529 Ratings
    Reporting and compliance management00 Ratings00 Ratings8.634 Ratings
    Incident indexing/searching00 Ratings00 Ratings8.737 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    CAD ExchangerScienceLogic AI PlatformSplunk Enterprise
    Small Businesses
    Onshape
    Score6.4 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    Onshape
    Score6.4 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    IBM Security QRadar SIEM
    Score8.9 out of 10
    Enterprises
    PTC Creo
    Score7.6 out of 10
    ignio AIOps
    Score8.1 out of 10
    SolarWinds Security Event Manager (SEM)
    Score8 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    CAD ExchangerScienceLogic AI PlatformSplunk Enterprise
    Likelihood to Recommend
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (228 ratings)
    8.7
    (112 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.4
    (24 ratings)
    8.5
    (25 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.6
    (15 ratings)
    8.5
    (45 ratings)
    Availability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.2
    (14 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Performance
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.2
    (14 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.5
    (20 ratings)
    8.0
    (19 ratings)
    In-Person Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.8
    (6 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Online Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.7
    (8 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.4
    (99 ratings)
    7.0
    (3 ratings)
    Configurability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (7 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (15 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.1
    (7 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.4
    (7 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    CAD ExchangerScienceLogic AI PlatformSplunk Enterprise
    Likelihood to Recommend
    CADEX
    No answers on this topic
    ScienceLogic
    For Windows, the issue is in higher resource consumption related to WinRM monitoring, which provides better options then the SNMP monitoring, which on the other hand is less resource intensive. The problem is also with support for OS with other than English language.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cisco
    I'm liking the newer products, and I'm looking forward to how they integrate with the overall product when they come together. Just log in and be able to query a large number of systems for similar issues or a unique one. That is a great fit for Splunk Enterprise, looking for a simple case or a simple String or something of that nature across multiple machines. It's a great fit for that to identify issues or particular software, whatever your scenario is, String, to find it across any particular server or group of servers, so that you can update or do a deployment or whatever it is you're looking to do.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    CADEX
    No answers on this topic
    ScienceLogic
    • Best overall coverage of montioring different technologies.
    • Easy to use in any environment
    • Customizable being able to generate your own reports, dashboards, DA's, RBA's, etc.
    • Have very good out of the box integrations with other monitoring solutions such as ServiceNow
    • Always improving and regularly releasing new versions and upgrades to the system/DA's.
    • Interactive community
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cisco
    • It is very useful in creating custom rules for analyzing system logs and display relevant information. The query language is very easy to learn.
    • We can create custom UI to visualize the output of our data. The interface is very flexible. It also allows the sharing of rules among users.
    • There is an open online community to help others. Stackoverflow also has a splunk community. These resources make it more convenient to learn.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    CADEX
    No answers on this topic
    ScienceLogic
    • Dashboards are quite old and are of Iron age. Need to have AP2 dashboards only instead of AP1 and consistent new design across all functionalities.
    • Reporting is not improved since Y2020 and need to revamp completely. Need to integrate Dashboards and Reporting. PowerBI Like functionality to be given OOTB. Reports should be extracted in Excel, PDF, HTML and should be heavily automated.
    • Create and Open APIs for basic and advanced monitoring data extraction.
    • Topology based Event Correlation and Suppression should be improved drastically. Need to identify critical network interfaces based on Topology and monitor them. Basic customization of Dynamic App and/or Powerpack to exclude/include certain metrics/events to be permitted OOTB instead of customizations.
    • Integration with ServiceNow to be improved and to be taken to next level. Automation Powerpack should be made available OOTB as part of base product and to be priced attractively.
    • Take product to next level where we can monitor actual impacted IT or Business Service instead of metrics and events BSM and Topology map to be auto discovered and identify the network dependencies and alternate paths automatically instead of manual creation of BSM.
    Read full review
    Cisco
    • Splunk light limits number of users to 5. Wish there was a flexible license, where one could add more users.
    • Splunk light does not let you add > few realtime alerts. Wish there was a flexible license, where one could add as many realtime alerts as wanted.
    • Better insight into daily ingestion values
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    CADEX
    No answers on this topic
    ScienceLogic
    It is simply because of all the best possible autonomy solutions it is providing and getting better day by day. Using AI and Devops along with handy automation, The monitoring and Management of devices becomes much easier and the way it is growing in all the aspects is one the best reasons too. Evolution of the SL1 platform in the autonomy monitoring and management is quite appreciable.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cisco
    We are using Splunk extensively in our projects and we have recently upgraded to Splunk version 6.0 which is quite efficient and giving expected results. We keep track of updates and new features Splunk introduces periodically and try to introduce those features in our day to day activities for improvement in our reporting system and other tasks.
    Read full review
    Usability
    CADEX
    No answers on this topic
    ScienceLogic
    The core functions are there.
    The complexity is due to the complexity of the space.
    The score is based on comfort (I no longer notice the legacy UI) and the promise that I see in the 8.12 Unified UI (a vast improvement).
    It is also based on the fact that with 8.12, you can now do everything in the new UI but you still have the legacy UI as a fallback (which should now be unnecessary for new installations)
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cisco
    You can literally throw in a single word into Splunk and it will pull back all instances of that word across all of your logs for the time span you select (provided you have permission to see that data). We have several users who have taken a few of the free courses from Splunk that are able to pull data out of it everyday with little help at all.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Reliability and Availability
    CADEX
    No answers on this topic
    ScienceLogic
    SL is always there and online when you need to get info from it. The only times when SL was not available in our own data center, was when network links from out side of the data center was down and those links were not in our controll. Having a central database and people accessing it all over the world, may put a bit of constarin on the performance of the dashboards when reports gets generated, but that is far and few n between.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cisco
    When properly setup and configured, Splunk is extremely reliable.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Performance
    CADEX
    No answers on this topic
    ScienceLogic
    SceinceLogic SL1 architecture helps the platform to give a top-notch performance in every respect, Data collection to reporting happens very smoothly. With the new user interface pages load much faster. Individual appliances carrying the individual task ensure things are working without lag. Integration with ticketing tool(SNOW) is well managed by the ScienceLogic, no issue or much delay has been observed while interacting with an external tool.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cisco
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    CADEX
    No answers on this topic
    ScienceLogic
    So far, it's good as part of my overall experience, except for a couple of use cases. The support team is well knowledgeable, has technical sound, and is efficient. When support escalates to engineering, the issue gets stuck and takes months to resolve.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cisco
    Splunk maintains a well resourced support system that has been consistent since we purchased the product. They help out in a timely manner and provide expert level information as needed. We typically open cases online and communicate when possible via e-mail and are able to resolve most issues with that method.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    In-Person Training
    CADEX
    No answers on this topic
    ScienceLogic
    It was good, Do the online training first and understand it and you will get the most out of the in-person training that way. This also takes you to an advanced level which is very good and the training as been overhauled once again along with new product coming in such as Zebruim / Skylar, worth going through again if it a while back that you first did this.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cisco
    No answers on this topic
    Online Training
    CADEX
    No answers on this topic
    ScienceLogic
    There are a lot of educational materials and courses on the SL1 training site (Litmos university). However the recording quality is sometimes not very good - screen resolution is low. There is a lack of professional rather than user-oriented documents and there are mistakes in documentation and education is not well structured.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cisco
    The online course was simple clear and described the main capabilities of the solution. There is also an initial module that can be done for free so anyone can familiarize themselves with the functionality of this solution. On the other hand, however, there could be more free online courses. Maybe even with a certificate, this would broaden the group of people who are familiar with the platform while increasing familiarity with the solution itself.
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    CADEX
    No answers on this topic
    ScienceLogic
    Implementation is smooth if we are to just support the out-of-the-box features available in ScienceLogic. For any custom requirement, having to go to SL1 Professional Services is the worst part of procuring this suite. And more often than not, SL1 Professional Services also ask to raise feature request. So, you subscribe to Professional Services to only hear back from them that "This feature is not supported and needs to have a separate feature request". At times frustrating.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cisco
    Smooth without too many major issues.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    CADEX
    No answers on this topic
    ScienceLogic
    Science logic SL1 is so user friendly and it's really easy to navigate between function. I would recommend Sciene logic SL1 to all of them who are looking for really useful monitoring tool and expecting easy way of managing it.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cisco
    A lot of products have natively inside their own dashboards and or their own logging repositories. And each one is difficult to learn or they're too complex or they're not verbose in the sense that they're not easy to mine the data that you're looking for. So that could be anything from the native logging that you find in other Cisco products. It's easier to use Splunk to draw the data that you're looking for as opposed to going to the individual's products themselves to get the logs that you're looking for.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Scalability
    CADEX
    No answers on this topic
    ScienceLogic
    Our deployment model is vastly different from product expectations. Our global / internal monitoring foot print is 8 production stacks in dual data centers with 50% collection capacity allocated to each data center with minimal numbers of collection groups. General Collection is our default collection group. Special Collection is for monitoring our ASA and other hardware that cannot be polled by a large number of IP addresses, so this collection group is usually 2 collectors). Because most of our stacks are in different physical data centers, we cannot use the provided HA solution. We have to use the DR solution (DRBD + CNAMEs). We routinely test power in our data centers (yearly). Because we have to use DR, we have a hand-touch to flip nodes and change the DNS CNAME half of the times when there is an outage (by design). When the outage is planned, we do this ahead of the outage so that we don't care that the Secondary has dropped away from the Primary. Hopefully, we'll be able to find a way to meet our constraints and improve our resiliency and reduce our hand-touch in future releases. For now, this works for us and our complexity. (I hear that the HA option is sweet. I just can't consume that.)
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cisco
    Splunk can scale in to the petabyte per day range which of course is awesome
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    CADEX
    No answers on this topic
    ScienceLogic
    • Once a powerpack is developed and configured for a device for one customer, it is easy to deploy the same powerpack on a second customer estate and configure specifically for that customer without having to reinvent the powerpack. This saves time and therefore money.
    • Once the customer estate tuning is complete, the Operations team have come trust the alerts. This is especially true when transient or self-correcting alerts are automatically cleared without ops team involvement, but a record is still available for audit and debugging purposes. This saves time and therefore money.
    • When setup correctly, it provides good visibility into applications, devices and whole customer estates. This saves time and therefore money when issues arise.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cisco
    • Splunk has allowed developers to diagnose production issues when access of control was taken away from them to be allowed to view items in production environments and I believe that is invaluable.
    • At times some developers weren't super happy about using it, but it was more of the fact that they were used to having production access and not creating their splunk queries to get information.
    • Going one place to view logs was very beneficial to have.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    ScienceLogic AI Platform Screenshots

    Screenshot of Unified Observability and Contextual IntelligenceScreenshot of Relationship Mapping & Service VisibilityScreenshot of ITSM and Collaboration IntegrationsScreenshot of Low-Code Workflow BuilderScreenshot of Dynamic Application DevelopmentScreenshot of Executive Overview Dashboard