CData API Server vs. Workato

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
CData API Server
Score 5.0 out of 10
N/A
CData's API Server enables users to create APIs from existing enterprise data. Users cna hook up any SQL or NoSQL database and the API Server generates what the vendor states will be flexible, comprehensive, and fully documented APIs.
$2,499
per year
Workato
Score 9.2 out of 10
N/A
Workato is a cloud or on-premise automation and integration platform with enterprise-grade capabilities and no coding required. Workato provides pre-built connectors to integrate with over 300 business applications and enables task automation across apps.N/A
Pricing
CData API ServerWorkato
Editions & Modules
Standard
$2,499
per year
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
CData API ServerWorkato
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
CData API ServerWorkato
Considered Both Products
CData API Server

No answer on this topic

Workato
Chose Workato
Workato is much more advanced than Zapier, and although less apps/integrations are offered - but the ones offered are really deep ones. This is also geared towards enterprises is what I believe whereas Zapier focuses more on SMEs and Mid-Market. Although learning curve is steep …
Chose Workato
Workato is definitely the easiest tool to work with. We found other tools more challenging when there are no pre-built connectors, and it requires coding knowledge to extract objects from JSON payload for example.
In Workato, the payload is auto parse and each object can be …
Chose Workato
Workato is useful for the rapid development of simple workflow-oriented integrations. It was not designed for large, enterprise integrations like Boomi. Their target audiences and target use cases overlap in some areas, but there are very important differences. We selected …
Chose Workato
Our developers are certified in Workato, Mulesoft and Boomi.We tested Workato and compared it to Mulesoft and Boomi for an IPaaS solution. Workato claims that anyone off the street with no IT training whatsoever can build integrations with their tool. This is absurd. No, …
Chose Workato
Offers many, if not all, of the same capabilities that competitors have. Zapier is more user friendly, and cost effective for many organizations. Not needing to have technology experience is also attractive. Mule soft is usually overkill for some of the more straight forward …
Chose Workato
Both products were much more complicated to configure and get started with. With Workato, we had simple integrations set up and running without a couple of hours. With Jitterbit and SnapLogic it required some training just to evaluate it, and also required a lot of …
Chose Workato
Workato proved to be the most user-friendly integration platform, showing the most promise in the area of no-code or low-code analyst-capable interface configuration.
Chose Workato
Workato has a faster deployment cycle and no formal training needed to start using it. You may start creating recipes from day one.
Chose Workato
We have experience using MS Flow, Zapier, Pervasive, Talend, .net, and others. After extensive research and testing, Workato has shown itself as a clear leader in the iPaas space.
Chose Workato
Workato beats the competition pound for pound, not even close. It's a much more enterprise-grade tool, designed from the ground up to be stable, solid, and secure. The other tools I've tried were either buggy, lacking in capability, felt like toys, or were really hard to scale.
Chose Workato
We ended up choosing Workato because of how easy it was to get started and because it did everything we needed it to do. It was one of the first products we trialed specifically for this use case even though we had used other products in the past. The trial was enough time to …
Chose Workato
I use Workato for the full view of my process. Both the console on errors and debugging as well as the unified view of each task I'm automating. In addition, I know that Workato has all the power necessary for enterprise integration.
Chose Workato
Zapier's integration tools are impressive, especially considering the cost. Their connectors are lacking functionality vs Workato, which ultimately leads to more development time and cost. Workato's built-in functionality, like lookup tables, are extremely impressive. They …
Chose Workato
A market leader when it comes to an out of the box/do it yourself integration tool. It is very user-friendly with an excellent track record for new connectors and reliability.
Chose Workato
We ended up using Workato for the functional user abilities as well as the flexibility in the platform. Our business is agile and an integration build today may not have a lifecycle longer than 6 months without modification. We wanted the ability to maintain these ourselves …
Chose Workato
Zapier was great for simple integrations, however, error handling and recipe writing isn't as strong. We also found the pricing to be deceiving once working on more complex integrations.
Chose Workato
CA Automic offers everything under the sun and it's a little harder to use for someone that doesn't know coding. With Workato there is a smaller learning curve and their support team has be instrumental in our success.
Chose Workato
I've used and explored others. Workato was the quickest to learn and deploy at a reasonable cost. The others had large learning curves and were more expensive.
Chose Workato
We found Workato to be easier to use, more powerful and more robust than other solutions we tested at the time. It simply does the trick and allowed us to implement all that we needed in all the precise details we needed. It gave us all the power, flexibility and autonomy we …
Chose Workato
We use multiple integration platforms for various use cases. Workato did not replace anything. We believe in having the best tool for the job/persona and thus employ multiple tools with some overlapping functionality aside from the unique strengths/trade-offs of each.
Chose Workato
From what I could see, Zapier was very limited against what Workato was offering. The model of Zapier, at first sight, was very easy to understand: you pick 2 connectors and create a process in the middle, but that's where Workato made the difference, on how easy the recipe …
Chose Workato
Workato is much simpler to learn and configure than Dell Boomi. While powerful, I struggled with Boomi's interface. I know Boomi is powerful and trusted by many enterprises, but it seems a little inaccessible to me - the learning curve is a little too steep and I don't have the …
Features
CData API ServerWorkato
Cloud Data Integration
Comparison of Cloud Data Integration features of Product A and Product B
CData API Server
-
Ratings
Workato
8.0
Ratings
0% above category average
Pre-built connectors00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Connector modification00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Support for real-time and batch integration00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Data quality services00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Data security features00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Monitoring console00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
CData API ServerWorkato
Small Businesses
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.1 out of 10
Make
Make
Score 9.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.1 out of 10
IBM App Connect
IBM App Connect
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.1 out of 10
IBM App Connect
IBM App Connect
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
CData API ServerWorkato
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
1.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
3.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
CData API ServerWorkato
Likelihood to Recommend
No answers on this topic
Well Suited
  • Business Process Work Flows, File Management, Small/Medium # of Records Queried (<~1000)
  • Closing a sales deal in system one kicks off work flows in system two for implementation
  • Notification of key events in system one via text, outlook event, etc
  • While I note management of two-way integrations needs improvement, it is a strength of Workato and easier to set up here than in any other tool.
  • Support for connectors business processes require (Docusign, Dropbox, Outlook, Quick Base, Salesforce, etc)
Needs Improvement -
  • Management of two-way integrations. It's often a bit of a struggle to create the appropriate fields in both systems to ensure redundant jobs are not run nor infinite loops created. That said, Workato does provide some documentation to counter this.
  • Working with Large Data Sets (1000+)
Read full review
Pros
No answers on this topic
  • Workato is very easy to pick up and use. You'll be creating complex recipes within days. The UI, workflow, formulas, and other features are very intuitive.
  • Workato is very powerful. The native connectors it has to hundreds of software already, allows users to make substantial automation and integrations, but the HTTP connector makes it seem like it has no boundaries. If you are using software that isn't a native Workato connector but it has an API, you can use their HTTP connector to make calls to and from.
  • Workato is always making improvements to its platform. This includes adding more connectors, more features, updating current connectors to be more powerful, or expanding on other tools it offers.
Read full review
Cons
No answers on this topic
  • Customization has a bit of a learning curve associated with it. Be prepared to expand your programming knowledge for any deep customization, however having the option to customize is critical
  • Online training material is out there, but can be a bit cumbersome to read through and retain. More straight-forward online training material would help 10 fold
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
We need to develop Enterprise Application Integrations and Workato was not designed for this
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
The sheer work Workato eliminates from people's daily jobs is simply a great contribution to people's productivity and a boost to capability. It actually strikes the balance between business and tech teams. It also reduces dependency on developers, and speeds up their delivery too. The only reason it's not a full 10/10 is for the price - it's a bit expensive for what we'd like, and their batch or high data volume processing can be improved.
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
They employ an extremely knowledgeable team of problem solvers. I've never had a disappointing interaction or one that has left me still searching for answers. I know that when I ask for help, they'll partner with me until we find a solution together
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
We discovered that we could not use Workato for our more complex, large enterprise integrations. It was useful for simple workflows that matched the prebuilt recipes.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
We found Workato to be easier to use, more powerful and more robust than other solutions we tested at the time. It simply does the trick and allowed us to implement all that we needed in all the precise details we needed. It gave us all the power, flexibility and autonomy we needed without bogging us down with unjustified complexity. Workato came through for us and that's why we keep using it after three intense years.
Read full review
Return on Investment
No answers on this topic
  • Workato is an unusual type of software in that it’s very much middle-wear, which means it’s extra important for stake holders in your company (especially those who won’t be interacting with Workato on a daily basis) to see the ROI that Workato can provide. Typically ROI is in developer time, as well as replacements for other SaaS tools. For our team, we move 2X as fast and need 1/2 the developers, so the ROI is just incredible.
Read full review
ScreenShots