Cipherise vs. WatchGuard AuthPoint

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Cipherise
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
N/AN/A
WatchGuard AuthPoint
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
AuthPoint Total Identity Security provides businesses with a solution to protect user accounts and credentials. With multi-factor authentication and dark web credential monitoring, AuthPoint mitigates the risks associated with workforce credential attacks. AuthPoint adds an extra layer of security by monitoring for potential credential exposure in the dark web for both personal and corporate accounts.N/A
Pricing
CipheriseWatchGuard AuthPoint
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
CipheriseWatchGuard AuthPoint
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
CipheriseWatchGuard AuthPoint
Considered Both Products
Cipherise

No answer on this topic

WatchGuard AuthPoint
Chose WatchGuard AuthPoint
AuthPoint came at a much better price than many of the other competitors.
Chose WatchGuard AuthPoint
Using WatchGuard AuthPoint provides an independent layer of restriction with a different vendor than Microsoft. It syncs well with Microsoft active directly and provides a single pane of glass for security insights. It balances security and usability well so that it is easy to …
Chose WatchGuard AuthPoint
WatchGuard is superior in one way that is very important for our small team, and that is price, it is much cheaper than intune. It also offers most of the same suite of features as well as some extra (dark web monitoring is the only one I can think of) however the fact that it …
Chose WatchGuard AuthPoint
I chose Watchguard for the bundle of features and customer support, not to mention the transparency you get with a paid program versus an open-source version. Mainly, I liked having so many of the solutions I needed in one place without having to find separate programs.
Chose WatchGuard AuthPoint
WatchGuard AuthPoint is easier to manage on a company-wide scale than Google Authenticator. We do use AuthPoint in conjunction with the Microsoft Authenticator but for different services. WatchGuard also has other features available, like dark web monitoring and device …
Chose WatchGuard AuthPoint
They are very similar. There are more direct integrations available with Duo.
Chose WatchGuard AuthPoint
Google Authenticator
Chose WatchGuard AuthPoint
WG offers some of the best network equipment, it's a no brainer to wrap it all together.
Chose WatchGuard AuthPoint
I really like the ease of use of the WatchGuard AuthPoint and it has been a good move when our previous VPN appliance went out of support. Working with and using the WatchGuard AuthPoint has been a very easy transition and great improvement over the Sonicwall we previously …
Chose WatchGuard AuthPoint
I find that WatchGuard AuthPoint has less interruptions and is much easier to use.
Chose WatchGuard AuthPoint
We use different 2FA providers to secure different things. We are actively using Duo now, as well as WatchGuard AuthPoint. Each provider has different strengths, and you must test the applicability of a service in your own environment.
Chose WatchGuard AuthPoint
Started looking at Yubikeys and RSA, but WatchGuard AuthPoint had complete package instead of piecemealing tokens with one vendor and then using softkeys from Microsoft or another vendor.
Chose WatchGuard AuthPoint
Easier to use and manage. More straightforward for users
Chose WatchGuard AuthPoint
Fortinet is free for MFA connections as WatchGuard AuthPoint is not.
Chose WatchGuard AuthPoint
NordLayer did not provide the connections we needed, which WatchGuard AuthPoint did, allowing me to sync our on-site devices to the Cloud.
Chose WatchGuard AuthPoint
The biggest reason we selected Watchguard was support. We already use Watchguard firewall products and have received excellent support from our third-party vendor, Watchguard.
Chose WatchGuard AuthPoint
If you already have WatchGuard firewall, this just integrates a lot better than any other product. We tried Microsoft Authenticator but not nearly as seemless for the experience as it is with WatchGuard AuthPoint. It is all built into the same portal as the firewall and can be …
Chose WatchGuard AuthPoint
WatchGuard AuthPoint offer'd functionalities that each of these fell short on. Rather that be pre login MFA or app based support or cost.
Chose WatchGuard AuthPoint
Because we have Watchguard Firewall it becomes easier to manage everything in the cloud.
Chose WatchGuard AuthPoint
WatchGuard AuthPoint is less expensive than most competitors, easier to manage through WatchGuard Cloud, and the MFA solutions is rock solid and secure. We do not worry about vulnerabilities with WatchGuard AuthPoint.
Best Alternatives
CipheriseWatchGuard AuthPoint
Small Businesses
WatchGuard AuthPoint
WatchGuard AuthPoint
Score 9.0 out of 10
IBM Cloud App ID
IBM Cloud App ID
Score 10.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Cisco Duo
Cisco Duo
Score 9.5 out of 10
Cisco Duo
Cisco Duo
Score 9.5 out of 10
Enterprises
Cisco Duo
Cisco Duo
Score 9.5 out of 10
Cisco Duo
Cisco Duo
Score 9.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
CipheriseWatchGuard AuthPoint
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
8.6
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
6.4
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
6.1
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
5.1
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
6.4
(0 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
8.7
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
6.5
(0 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
6.4
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
5.4
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
CipheriseWatchGuard AuthPoint
Likelihood to Recommend
No answers on this topic
We use multiple authenticators at my company. We use WatchGuard AuthPoint just for our VPN for security purposes. The app works very well and over the past year we've only had a handful of issues with the authentication service, and these were resolved relatively quickly. We do have to remind people to enable push notifications from the app, or have the app open when they need to use it to authenticate, otherwise they won't get the push to approve. The biggest issue I've found is that people will forget to do this and then say that the VPN isn't working - the VPN is working, it's just that they didn't get/approve the push from AuthPoint in time.
Read full review
Pros
No answers on this topic
  • Works well with the free Authpoint client and the OpenVPN clinet.
  • Token management is simple and hosted completely in the cloud to reduce overall complexity
  • Setup was simple and and staighforward
  • Suppports several authentication methods we have used both RADIUS and SAML effectively, but ADFS, IDP, RDWeb, and RESTful API, and other custom apps are supported.
  • Geofencing for RDP has been very useful as it is independant of our firewall geofencing. This is quite useful for organizations like us who do not Geofence at at the firewall level so as to provide global access to resources on the DMZ.
Read full review
Cons
No answers on this topic
  • Email support is SLOW unless I want to allow a stranger to access my production firewall. That is never allowed here, so our hands are tied in terms of being able to get support in less than 48 hours.
  • Again, support takes far too long because you refuse to employ any staff that works in US time zones during normal business hours.
  • There has to be another option besides: 1) you take full control of my systems or 2) I wait on SLOW email support that isn't that great.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
We are very happy with Authpoint and see no reason to make any change to it. If only there was a policy to set minimum password strength requirements and to force users change their password every xx days, then it would be a 10!!!
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
After initial setup, it practically runs itself. Onboarding new users is fast and easy as it should be. The AuthPoint mobile app is small and simple to use. The only reason I do not give it a 10 is that I frequently get complaints from end users that the AuthPoint app is "constantly downloading". In fact, it's not downloading anything and that what the users are seeing in the app is a timer for the 6-digit code that changes every minute.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
No answers on this topic
Has rarely been unable to use; if that were the case, it was operator error
Read full review
Performance
No answers on this topic
No apparent problem besides a couple of times that systems weren't working
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
WatchGuard support is always quick and reliable. They have urgency levels that you are able to select when creating your support ticket, and they respond in accordance to the severity that you have set. I have never had an issue with getting someone on the phone in the same business day, even for very low priority issues.
Read full review
In-Person Training
No answers on this topic
It was an Onsite demo at the ditributor with the benefits of Watchguard Authpoint. Was very nice to see the abilities of the product. This Demo was a few years back, since then Authpoint changed allot. It is very nice for partners that you can get this demo without any aditional cost.
Read full review
Online Training
No answers on this topic
We use the online training for all our employees. There are both sales and technical trainings available and there even is a technical certification. You can use this for the Watchguard Partner Program which can give you aditional benefits. Every now and then you have a webinar that discusses multiple Watchguard products.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
the first time it takes more effort. It is helpful to already understand how each authentication type works. Then it's much easier to understand the MFA solution that you implement. It is useful to check the release notes from time to time and update the key parts of the Watchguard Authpoint. Authpoint Gateway, Logon App, RDWeb... Also, it's useful to set up notifications when something goes wrong or sometimes check the statistics of how many requests are being approved/denied, etc.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
I chose Watchguard for the bundle of features and customer support, not to mention the transparency you get with a paid program versus an open-source version. Mainly, I liked having so many of the solutions I needed in one place without having to find separate programs.
Read full review
Scalability
No answers on this topic
We are a medium-sized company. We don't need rapid scaling.
Read full review
Return on Investment
No answers on this topic
  • We currently have 300 users on Authpoint, and most of them use insecure passwords. Authpoint gives us peace of mind that we don't have to police individual employee passwords.
  • In line with the comment above, with so many people in our organization using insecure passwords, I'm sure that Authpoint has already saved us from many potential security breaches.
  • Security breaches can cost a lot of money. Preventing them saves the company money and helps to achieve our bottom line.
Read full review
ScreenShots

WatchGuard AuthPoint Screenshots

Screenshot of AuthPoint app - tokensScreenshot of Cloud management - dashboardScreenshot of AuthPoint app - push notificationScreenshot of AuthPoint - TokensScreenshot of AuthPoint Sign-In ScreenScreenshot of AuthPoint Users