ClientSuccess vs. Fin

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
ClientSuccess
Score 6.0 out of 10
N/A
ClientSuccess, from the company of the same name in Lehi, is presented by the vendor as a simple yet sophisticated solution for CSMs, and the Executive team. For the CSMs, ClientSuccess brings together the tools, best practices, insights and analytics needed to proactively manage customers. For the Executives, they deliver analytics, metrics and reports to provide a comprehensive view of the health of a SaaS business.N/A
Fin
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
Fin is an AI Agent for customer service. It automates complex queries, improves resolution times, and delivers consistently high-quality support at scale.
$0.99
one-time fee per outcome
Pricing
ClientSuccessFin
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Fin with your current helpdesk
$0.99
one-time fee per outcome
Copilot add-on
$35
per month per user
Pro add-on
$99
per month For analysis of 1,000 conversations
Fin with Intercom’s Helpdesk
from $39 + $0.99 per Fin outcome
per month per seat
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ClientSuccessFin
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsFin comes with a 90-day money-back guarantee. Here's how it works: Intercom states that users who sign up for the Fin Guarantee Success Program and do not achieve at least a resolution rate of 65% will be paid $1M. This program is designed for high volume customers. Eligibility criteria: High volume customers (over 250k monthly conversions) in North America and Europe. Intercom states that phase one of this program will admit customers on Intercom Helpdesk or Zendesk.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
ClientSuccessFin
Considered Both Products
ClientSuccess
Chose ClientSuccess
Before we evaluated ClientSuccess, we took a look at Gainsight. It is a power customer success tool and it definitely covered all the features a Customer Success team could need, but ultimately we selected ClientSuccess as a better fit for our company where we were at the …
Chose ClientSuccess
Personally, I think I have a fondness for Woopra that isn't shared by my team. ClientSuccess is clean, efficient and easy to use, but I have love for Woopra that I can't shake. That being said, we are comparing diamonds to diamonds, and I think you should go with the one that …
Fin
Chose Fin
Compared to most of the competitive market, Intercom seems to be the most human/personable approach to customer success, customer service, and technical support. The alternatives are primarily built on an archaic approach - "take a ticket and wait in line" - that we worried …
Features
ClientSuccessFin
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
ClientSuccess
8.2
15 Ratings
6% below category average
Fin
-
Ratings
Role-based user permissions8.215 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform & Infrastructure
Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Product A and Product B
ClientSuccess
8.4
13 Ratings
3% below category average
Fin
-
Ratings
API10.010 Ratings00 Ratings
Integration with Salesforce.com9.012 Ratings00 Ratings
Integration with Marketo7.32 Ratings00 Ratings
Integration with Eloqua7.32 Ratings00 Ratings
Customer Data Extraction / Integration
Comparison of Customer Data Extraction / Integration features of Product A and Product B
ClientSuccess
8.9
16 Ratings
1% above category average
Fin
-
Ratings
Product usage8.414 Ratings00 Ratings
Help desk / support tickets9.412 Ratings00 Ratings
Customer Success Management
Comparison of Customer Success Management features of Product A and Product B
ClientSuccess
8.6
17 Ratings
0% above category average
Fin
-
Ratings
NPS surveys7.09 Ratings00 Ratings
Sponsor tracking9.411 Ratings00 Ratings
Customer profiles9.017 Ratings00 Ratings
Automated workflow8.917 Ratings00 Ratings
Internal collaboration7.716 Ratings00 Ratings
Customer health scoring9.017 Ratings00 Ratings
Customer segmentation9.016 Ratings00 Ratings
CSM Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of CSM Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
ClientSuccess
8.4
17 Ratings
0% below category average
Fin
-
Ratings
Customer health trends9.015 Ratings00 Ratings
Engagement analytics8.113 Ratings00 Ratings
Revenue forecasting7.614 Ratings00 Ratings
Dashboards9.017 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
ClientSuccessFin
Small Businesses
ChurnZero
ChurnZero
Score 8.0 out of 10
LocaliQ
LocaliQ
Score 8.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
CustomerSuccessBox
CustomerSuccessBox
Score 9.5 out of 10
Piper the AI SDR by Qualified
Piper the AI SDR by Qualified
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Gainsight CS
Gainsight CS
Score 8.8 out of 10
Conversica
Conversica
Score 4.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
ClientSuccessFin
Likelihood to Recommend
7.6
(18 ratings)
8.7
(383 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(21 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.7
(294 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
10.0
(1 ratings)
5.7
(10 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
7.4
(2 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
6.6
(5 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
ClientSuccessFin
Likelihood to Recommend
ClientSuccess
Client Success is well suited to both growing and established companies who know what they want and need to track for their clients. With the broad ability to support numerous accounts, have multiple users, and its custom success cycles to map a clients progress, it would be a great solution for any Client Success team. I think that teams that are unaware of what they need to track wouldn't find Client Success as useful, and organizations that require a large number of custom client descriptions and variables would find certain limitations a barrier to successfully using this tool.
Read full review
Intercom
A prospect lands on my site to ask about building profile sizes, wind/snow ratings, installation timelines, or warranty coverage.
What Fin does well is deliver instant, consistent answers, pull from approved specs and positioning, and keep the conversation moving without human involvement.
Read full review
Pros
ClientSuccess
  • ClientSuccess makes it easy for our customer success managers to manage their workflows and provides excellent visibility into our company's customer activity and engagement. We're able to log into CS and regularly check segments of our customers that need to be engaged with on a daily basis, log customer health, and be aware of approaching subscription renewals in order to pay appropriate attention to the right customers.
  • The user interface is easy to use, friendly in design, and quick to learn. They make it look attractive with bright color schemes without overdoing it too much.
  • As a customer success manager myself, I am appreciative of how this tool has kickstarted our fairly-new Customer Success department and made us much more organized and knowledgeable as a customer-facing entity.
  • Their customer success/support teams are excellent as well - which is to be expected. We've felt very well taken care of since we became customers of ClientSuccess.
Read full review
Intercom
  • It is very easy to train
  • It does a great job of recommending answers when little context is given.
  • I love the ability to create a snippet to address issues in the moment or in the long term, based on FAQs.
Read full review
Cons
ClientSuccess
  • The support view takes a few steps to get to the meat and potatoes.
  • The success score model can be improved to include smaller one-off campaigns. Success score is good for a campaign that has existed for a while but not for the one-off projects.
Read full review
Intercom
  • It seems some users really struggle to figure out how to escalate to a human (especially through email).
  • Not excited about how "soft" resolutions still count as resolutions and are paid for. Though some abandoned cases appear to be able to be concluded as "the user got the answer they needed", there are others where they clearly didn't, because they just open up another chat (or even more), trying to get more info. This pads the resolution stats and makes it seem more effective than it actually is.
  • Cost -- Fin is quite expensive. It helps us with scaling coverage, but we're not really saving money.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
ClientSuccess
No answers on this topic
Intercom
We have been and will be continuing our journey with Intercom and nothing too concerning has happened that I have experienced or heard of that has us on the edge yet. If it ever happens it will be something along the lines of "Outgrowing" the use of need of the platform.
Read full review
Usability
ClientSuccess
No answers on this topic
Intercom
The platform is overall clear and intuitive. As with any new platform, there's a learning curve, but that wasn't an issue for our team (and it shouldn't be an issue for others). Fin options are scattered across several submenus, and I'd like them grouped together, but I also like having all those training-related tabs open at all times, so it's not much of a real issue for me.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
ClientSuccess
No answers on this topic
Intercom
always there
Read full review
Performance
ClientSuccess
No answers on this topic
Intercom
works perfect
Read full review
Support Rating
ClientSuccess
They are SUPER responsive...even for late night inquiries.
Read full review
Intercom
I can get help by asking Fin questions about itself. It answers accurately, citing its own Help Center resources with visuals. It can reason and dialogue well. But when it comes to getting human support for Fin, it is not as quick. It can sometimes take a few days. They are polite and well-meaning. Some things aren't their fault (product limitations), but there was one occasion where something took a long time to resolve with lots of back and forth but it was I who found out the error in the end that they missed, so they didn't really help resolve it.
Read full review
Online Training
ClientSuccess
No answers on this topic
Intercom
Easy to know the learning path
Read full review
Implementation Rating
ClientSuccess
No answers on this topic
Intercom
The implementation was surprisingly easy but we are having to adapt from our old process to work well with Intercom.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
ClientSuccess
HubSpot is excellent as it was an easy expansion from the sales and marketing work we were using it for. It meets our needs but isn't entirely as geared towards customer success like ClientSuccess. ClientSuccess has more bells and whistles that are out of the box vs. HubSpot, where the capabilities may exist but require a little more leg work.
Read full review
Intercom
There are so many AI platforms available, and you could theoretically build a system using the available AI API's from any of the big platforms. However, I dont think it's as easy as this. Intercom is deliberately built for customer service, the features they are releasing a based on providing the best customer experience. If we were to build this ourselves or to use another platform we would be taking on the upkeep, using Fin is just much simpler as it's also our chosen ticketing platform so anything that Fin is not able to answer yet and escalated directly to our team with no extra effort required from our side.
Read full review
Return on Investment
ClientSuccess
  • Within the first week, leadership was able to have more visibility into the lifestage and health score of each client
  • We needed to become more proactive as an organization and this platform has allowed us to do so with real-time metrics and reporting.
  • We needed to find a way to scale our approach, especially as our Client Success organization continues to grow, and this is already helping.
Read full review
Intercom
  • New role opportunities — Using the “Fin-first” approach has reduced the workload for our Tier 1 team, giving them more time to focus on their own career growth. It’s also opened the door to a dedicated, AI-focused role, where a team member regularly reviews Fin’s answers and makes updates to help it perform even better.
  • Enabling Fin has also reduced our response time and allowed us to meet SLA's.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Fin Screenshots

Screenshot of Fin, delivering conversational support experience to customers.Screenshot of the dashboard to monitor, analyze, and optimize Fin by spotting trends, filling content gaps, and fixing quality issues topic by topic.Screenshot of the interface to customize Fin's tone of voice, teach it support knowledge and policies, and configure how it handles complex tasks in over 45 languages.Screenshot of where to test answers, review the sources and settings that shape them, and get tailored recommendations to optimize performance.Screenshot of Fin, as it appears across email and live chat to phone, SMS, and social. Fin can answer any question, across any channel, any time.