Close.io is a customer relationship management (CRM) software with call management and sales workflow automation capabilities.
$19
per month includes 1 user
Oracle CPQ
Score5.5 out of 10
N/A
Oracle CPQ is a cloud-based application that helps sellers configure the right mix of products or services and create accurate, professional quotes to quickly meet their customers’ pricing needs.
$240
per month per user
Pricing
Close CRM
Oracle CPQ
Editions & Modules
Solo
$9
per month (paid annually) per user
Essentials
$35
per month (paid annually) per user
Growth
$99
per month (paid annually) per user
Scale
$139
per month (paid annually) per user
CPQ Pricing
$240.00
per month per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Close CRM
Oracle CPQ
Free Trial
Yes
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
Optional
No setup fee
Additional Details
The pricing listed here reflects up to a 35% discount for paying annually. Monthly billing is available at of $19 per user for the Solo plan (only 1 user allowed), $49 per user for the Essentials plan, $109 per user for the Growth plan, and $149 per user for the Scale plan.
—
More Pricing Information
Features
Close CRM
Oracle CPQ
Sales Force Automation
Comparison of Sales Force Automation features of Close CRM and Oracle CPQ
Feature
Close CRM
8.9
8 Ratings
13% above category average
Oracle CPQ
-
Ratings
Customer data management / contact management
8.08 Ratings
00 Ratings
Workflow management
7.78 Ratings
00 Ratings
Territory management
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Opportunity management
10.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integration with email client (e.g., Outlook or Gmail)
9.38 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract management
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Interaction tracking
8.38 Ratings
00 Ratings
Channel / partner relationship management
9.73 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customer Service & Support
Comparison of Customer Service & Support features of Close CRM and Oracle CPQ
Feature
Close CRM
8.5
6 Ratings
10% above category average
Oracle CPQ
-
Ratings
Case management
8.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Call center management
7.45 Ratings
00 Ratings
Help desk management
10.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Marketing Automation
Comparison of Marketing Automation features of Close CRM and Oracle CPQ
Feature
Close CRM
9.0
6 Ratings
15% above category average
Oracle CPQ
-
Ratings
Lead management
8.76 Ratings
00 Ratings
Email marketing
9.35 Ratings
00 Ratings
CRM Project Management
Comparison of CRM Project Management features of Close CRM and Oracle CPQ
Feature
Close CRM
7.9
6 Ratings
3% above category average
Oracle CPQ
-
Ratings
Task management
8.35 Ratings
00 Ratings
Billing and invoicing management
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting
5.45 Ratings
00 Ratings
CRM Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of CRM Reporting & Analytics features of Close CRM and Oracle CPQ
Feature
Close CRM
7.5
6 Ratings
2% below category average
Oracle CPQ
-
Ratings
Forecasting
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Pipeline visualization
8.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customizable reports
4.44 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Close CRM and Oracle CPQ
Feature
Close CRM
8.6
8 Ratings
12% above category average
Oracle CPQ
-
Ratings
Custom fields
10.07 Ratings
00 Ratings
Custom objects
10.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Scripting environment
8.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
API for custom integration
6.47 Ratings
00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Close CRM and Oracle CPQ
Feature
Close CRM
8.0
8 Ratings
5% below category average
Oracle CPQ
-
Ratings
Single sign-on capability
8.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
8.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
Social CRM
Comparison of Social CRM features of Close CRM and Oracle CPQ
Feature
Close CRM
10.0
1 Ratings
28% above category average
Oracle CPQ
-
Ratings
Social data
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Social engagement
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integrations with 3rd-party Software
Comparison of Integrations with 3rd-party Software features of Close CRM and Oracle CPQ
Feature
Close CRM
6.4
4 Ratings
16% below category average
Oracle CPQ
-
Ratings
Marketing automation
6.44 Ratings
00 Ratings
Platform
Comparison of Platform features of Close CRM and Oracle CPQ
Feature
Close CRM
10.0
1 Ratings
27% above category average
Oracle CPQ
-
Ratings
Mobile access
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
CPQ
Comparison of CPQ features of Close CRM and Oracle CPQ
Excellent software to increase sales and follow up with existing and new customers. Email and SMS handling are really easy for the sales team, managing leads is really great, and Close merges duplicate leads to help our Data Leads avoid repetitive and unnecessary calls. As mentioned in some comments before, must improve in reports, Close is not appropriate to handle or track agents' hours making it necessary to implement additional software to cover this area.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I think CPQ had worked so well for our company because of the widespread nature of our associates and tracking orders that were being placed in multiple time zones. My team specifically needed a way of analyzing these orders to track our progress in real time and sort out any supply orders before they became an issue. If you are in a centralized location with a smaller team then this may not yield much use to you.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
Email sequences. Create and send a sequence of emails until the sequence finishes or the contact replies to your email. You can also pause the sequence manually.
Email sync. Syncs in real time with your email account, which is huge.
Zapier integration. We've automated a lot of our pipeline management through the Zapier integration. This saves us soooo much time.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Significant setup time, cost, and maintenance. We have to use an implementation partner
Does not always play well with other software, even Oracle software. While this is improved and being further improved, that it was a third party acquisition means things sometimes require a little extra care
Additional setup documentation and first walkthroughs would be helpful, especially if it was all in one place
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
So far it is all good with BigMachines, looking for new features since Oracle acquisition has created a lot of expectations. We have outlined our limitations (out of box functionality) in our periodic customer successor advice meetings for a while, hope we get a resolution soon. Also, the BigMachines user license fee has increased a lot in the last three years.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
It's my favorite CRM to recommend to sales organizations. Robust Telephony options including a Power Dialer, SMS, and Voice Drop, are completely integrated into the CRM. The kicker is you can have "Unlimited" contacts where many platforms charge based on the number of users. This can make a huge difference in monthly billing.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The software UI can be as complex or as simple as you need it to be (depending on the business). It does require training others on quote configuration and the order in which to build out order positions prior to configuring a quote. Once users are trained;however, it is fairly straight-forward. The UI is still more static than other new wizard/drag-and-drop models, but it get's the job done
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
It depends upon the day however there are so many failure points with online services, including our internet service, that this is probably closer to 9 with the latest version
I haven't really had the need to use their support, but the only time I had an issue with the platform, the Close team was very attentive and responded in a short span of time. Also they take minimal time to solve issues. The only con here is there is no way to reach out to them apart from email.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Some specific support personal was good and fixed some problems fast using proper solutions. But when one of them went to sleep when we had critical issues and they do unreported commits to our production environment which caused issues and they were hiding it?? you can not give more than a two (maybe even that is too much). They also failed to add a feature for us which also bring the grade down.
They have pretty good training. Our business analysts have been able to go to entry and advanced level training. They have a train the trainer model. Our business analyst attended training, then trained the rest of our staff.
It was a much more technical implementation than we thought. It involved much more code.
Future releases have made and will make administering the tool easier.
EDL consulting had one good developer, but when he was moved off, they were horrible to work with.
The BMI sales team does a “BOA” or a “Business Operation Assessment” which is extremely valuable, not only for them to scope an implementation and get more reach within the organization, but it is also a documentation of business process that most organizations don’t have. It highlights inefficiencies and allows for correction during implementation.
Having a dedicated team (in-house) for implementation is key
Pipedrive was great for us for a long time. We used it for over 4 years. Our product and process was simple. When things got more complex, we needed something that could handle our growing needs and Pipedrive kept falling short. We built our own custom solution in Airtable and though it worked, we spend a lot of time managing it. Close was able to solve all our issues and save us hours per week in admin work.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Oracle engagement is ahead. They are active in the development of the tool and provide great support after implementation. They also listen to their customers and offer opportunities to feedback and provide input through activities like the customer advisory board forum.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Increased Sales Rep efficiency. Being able to create multiple quotes ACCURATELY and quickly was a game changer.
Large implementation time. It's a little difficult to fit BMI into a SCRUM style build, with multiple working models and prototypes of all 3 simultaneously.
A larger fee for licensing and implementation cost. ROI wouldn't be realized in the first year.