CoConstruct vs. Microsoft Dynamics GP

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
CoConstruct
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
CoConstruct, from Buildertrend since the November 2021 acquisition, is a custom builder & remodeler software. It allows users to enter data once and have that information flow through the estimate, specs, selections, bids, proposals, change orders, and budgets, including to and from QuickBooks. In addition, CoConstruct includes scheduling and 3-way communication between builder, client, and trade partners. Everything is captured via email and texting. Login isn't required for…
$49
per month
Microsoft Dynamics GP
Score 5.2 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Dynamics GP is an ERP software with accounting capabilities. It includes various packs for customizability and features tailored to specific industries’ needs. GP is offered as a perpetual license or subscription.N/A
Pricing
CoConstructMicrosoft Dynamics GP
Editions & Modules
Ramp
$49
per month
Plus 5
$299
per month
Plus 10
$399
per month
Plus 15
$499
per month
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
CoConstructMicrosoft Dynamics GP
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsCoConstruct pricing is based on active job sites that have client access online, which means it is adaptable to builders & remodelers businesses. This means that there are an unlimited amount of projects available for estimates and proposals, so that customers only pay when they win a contract. Also built into the pricing are a myriad of services: a dedicated implementation coach, free estimate & scheduling templates based on industry best practices from successful builders and the NAHB, unlimited storage and users, software branded with the customer's logo, unlimited amount of warranty projects, and unlimited phone & email support. The vendor offers a money-back guarantee that is good for the first 90 days of service.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
CoConstructMicrosoft Dynamics GP
Features
CoConstructMicrosoft Dynamics GP
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
CoConstruct
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.4
20 Ratings
17% below category average
Pay calculation00 Ratings6.319 Ratings
Benefit plan administration00 Ratings5.915 Ratings
Direct deposit files00 Ratings7.518 Ratings
Salary revision and increment management00 Ratings6.517 Ratings
Reimbursement management00 Ratings6.016 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
CoConstruct
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics GP
4.3
27 Ratings
55% below category average
API for custom integration00 Ratings2.526 Ratings
Plug-ins00 Ratings6.021 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
CoConstruct
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics GP
7.1
40 Ratings
14% below category average
Single sign-on capability00 Ratings5.932 Ratings
Role-based user permissions00 Ratings8.240 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
CoConstruct
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics GP
5.4
41 Ratings
36% below category average
Dashboards00 Ratings3.529 Ratings
Standard reports00 Ratings6.239 Ratings
Custom reports00 Ratings6.539 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
CoConstruct
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics GP
5.1
48 Ratings
39% below category average
Accounts payable00 Ratings6.445 Ratings
Accounts receivable00 Ratings5.936 Ratings
Cash management00 Ratings6.436 Ratings
Bank reconciliation00 Ratings5.741 Ratings
Expense management00 Ratings4.531 Ratings
Time tracking00 Ratings8.014 Ratings
Fixed asset management00 Ratings4.628 Ratings
Multi-currency support00 Ratings2.919 Ratings
Multi-division support00 Ratings3.026 Ratings
Regulations compliance00 Ratings3.314 Ratings
Electronic tax filing00 Ratings9.012 Ratings
Self-service portal00 Ratings7.012 Ratings
Global Financial Support00 Ratings6.07 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers00 Ratings4.721 Ratings
Intercompany Accounting00 Ratings3.918 Ratings
Localizations00 Ratings4.513 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations00 Ratings4.726 Ratings
Enterprise Accounting00 Ratings2.916 Ratings
Configurable Accounting00 Ratings4.117 Ratings
Centralized Rules Framework00 Ratings3.814 Ratings
Standardized Processes00 Ratings6.219 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
CoConstruct
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics GP
4.6
26 Ratings
46% below category average
Inventory tracking00 Ratings6.324 Ratings
Automatic reordering00 Ratings1.013 Ratings
Location management00 Ratings4.018 Ratings
Manufacturing module00 Ratings4.615 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
CoConstruct
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics GP
3.7
25 Ratings
68% below category average
Pricing00 Ratings3.518 Ratings
Order entry00 Ratings3.521 Ratings
Credit card processing00 Ratings1.012 Ratings
Cost of goods sold00 Ratings5.225 Ratings
Order Orchestration00 Ratings5.49 Ratings
End-to-end order visibility00 Ratings3.812 Ratings
Order exception Resolution00 Ratings3.57 Ratings
Best Alternatives
CoConstructMicrosoft Dynamics GP
Small Businesses
Procore
Procore
Score 8.7 out of 10
QuickBooks Self-Employed (discontinued)
QuickBooks Self-Employed (discontinued)
Score 6.4 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Procore
Procore
Score 8.7 out of 10
Zoho Books
Zoho Books
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
Oracle Aconex
Oracle Aconex
Score 7.0 out of 10
SAP Cloud ERP
SAP Cloud ERP
Score 8.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
CoConstructMicrosoft Dynamics GP
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(14 ratings)
6.0
(51 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.9
(7 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
6.0
(7 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(2 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
9.8
(10 ratings)
7.0
(5 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(3 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
CoConstructMicrosoft Dynamics GP
Likelihood to Recommend
Buildertrend
Having the ability to completely manage a project from start to finish with one app is super helpful. The time reporting feature (when it works correctly) is a nice added bonus as it allows employees to switch from one task to another on the same project or to another project and task with ease, aiding in the accounting process of the total project. This was helpful for running analytics to see where we were spending too much time on certain tasks, thus allowing us to assess any training needs.
Read full review
Microsoft
Microsoft Dynamics GP is well-suited for our environment, as we pay a diverse group of employees, including on-the-road drivers, shop employees (some in other locations), and office employees. It easily tracks time off, taxes, pay, etc. The reporting allows us to verify with our drivers how they are paid each week, whether it be through mileage or stop-offs.
Read full review
Pros
Buildertrend
  • The integration of all aspects needed to run a remodeling company efficiently: project scheduling and management, financial planning and customer service. Since it’s an all-in-one suite and cloud-based, it enables our team to keep track of all our projects in real-time. Communication breakdown is the last thing we want, so being on the same page is not only desirable but makes for the best possible relationship with our clients.
  • Product education - We like how CoConstruct helps new users and get them to start using the tool right away. The dashboard resource materials are incredibly useful. We don’t have to spend a lot of time training new hires on the system and onboarding new clients.
Read full review
Microsoft
  • Great Plains started as back office/accounting, and that is still it's strong suit.
  • SQL and the GP programming language, Dexterity, provide a robust, scalable, and stable platform with well documented maintenance and repair procedures. Relatively easy to manage, tune, and support.
  • Microsoft support for GP verges on "particularly well". Doesn't quite get there but good enough once you know what you're doing
  • Strong partner network, including the GP User Group (GPUG)
Read full review
Cons
Buildertrend
  • Internal Communication - CoConstruct lacks the ability to tag-team members for internal communication using @mentions or any other means. This has been crippling for us and forced us to use alternative software for communicating among our team members.
  • Pipeline Management - CoConstruct's lead-tracking system feels clunky and hard to navigate and doesn't provide a pipeline view that's easy to navigate. We have moved our Pipeline Management outside of CoConstruct to make it easier for our sales team to track leads.
  • CRM - CoConstruct doesn't offer anything for customer follow-up after projects are completed. This, in addition to the lack of an effective pipeline system, has led to our decision to use Hubspot as our CRM. Moving projects into CoConstruct for Design and back our after Production.
Read full review
Microsoft
  • With respect to the allocations, once the expense is entered into the allocation account, you lose the ability to run any detail on just the total of the expense. It would be nice if you could run a trial balance on the allocation accounts the same way you can with regular accounts.
  • I've always thought security set up could be a bit simpler. It actually has gotten better through the years. Specifically, with eight separate entities, it would be nice to have a "master" setup where you could call up one group entity, assign the users rights, and then be finished. Currently, whenever I have a new user, I have to call up each individual entity and select all of the features I want the user to have. That means I have to do eight steps for each user.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Buildertrend
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
Due the economic challenges that Puerto Rico is having, the company has had to merge some companies in order to be more efficient. It has been easy in GP to process those merges, even thought we had to spend days to accomplish that the process was smooth and accurate. In addition we were able to streamline the purchasing and sales process and the organization is confident to keep renewing GP for the future versions.
Read full review
Usability
Buildertrend
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
Though it is a basic accounting package, I believe some users do not find the old style menus and navigation options intuitive. There is also a great lack of training resources in the market, so users have to learn the product without guidance a lot, resulting in inefficient workflows and misuse or misunderstanding of many features.
Read full review
Support Rating
Buildertrend
The support staff is brilliant; they don't operate on Australian time, so you can't just dial up support when you need it. The response times are quick, and the staff is knowledgeable. They are also well versed in most of the differences between buildings in the US and the building in Australasia. Despite their funny accents and strange use of the English language, we get by just fine!
Read full review
Microsoft
The rating is directed to the thrid party serive provider that we use. I do not now how good the Microsoft direct support is.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Buildertrend
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
Basically the challenge with this implementation was the Business Portal, too many errors and even the aplication is up and running the users are still having issues. We will start planning the migraton to GP 2015 soon.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Buildertrend
Products like Procore and PlanGrid are geared towards projects with huge projects teams, multiple stakeholders and dozens of subcontractors. CoConstruct can be used for projects big and small (value) and also with small project teams or large projects teams. For small partial renovation or addition projects CoConstruct is a good more cost effective option.
Read full review
Microsoft
I come from a strong background of using SAP. SAP doesn't have the flexibility of GP, an example would be SAP doesn't allow core mods, if they catch you, you lose support. Microsoft doesn't really care about mods, but they will be quick to have the vendor you used support your issue if it is caused by those mods. With SAP your company adapts to the software, where with GP you adapt the software to you.
Read full review
Scalability
Buildertrend
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
The functionality that GP and related ISV solutions offer and the ease of integration of GP to other systems makes it an extremely scalable solution
Read full review
Return on Investment
Buildertrend
  • It made time recording much easier and much more reliable
  • With its GPS feature, we would be able to track when an employee left a job to help ensure accurate time recording
  • Having the ability to give the homeowners their own custom home building app to watch the progress helped to put us ahead of the game in the industry
  • Running job cost reports as easily as CoConstruct allows helped to curb some of our administrative fees
Read full review
Microsoft
  • Microsoft Dynamics GP allows my clients to move from a paper or spreadsheet based company to an integrated, electronic, streamlined business. I love being able to help clients gain efficiencies through the use of Microsoft Dynamics GP.
  • Microsoft Dynamics GP allows for better customer service because everything is at our fingertips. If someone calls questioning an invoice, we can easily look it up. If someone calls stating they paid an invoice with a certain check number, we can quickly run a query to find that particular check number to see where it was applied.
  • Having everything on a single platform provides ease of use for upgrades, backups and end user training. There is only one software to learn!
Read full review
ScreenShots

CoConstruct Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of