CoConstruct, from Buildertrend since the November 2021 acquisition, is a custom builder & remodeler software. It allows users to enter data once and have that information flow through the estimate, specs, selections, bids, proposals, change orders, and budgets, including to and from QuickBooks. In addition, CoConstruct includes scheduling and 3-way communication between builder, client, and trade partners. Everything is captured via email and texting. Login isn't required for…
$49
per month
Microsoft Dynamics GP
Score 5.2 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Dynamics GP is an ERP software with accounting capabilities. It includes various packs for customizability and features tailored to specific industries’ needs. GP is offered as a perpetual license or subscription.
N/A
Pricing
CoConstruct
Microsoft Dynamics GP
Editions & Modules
Ramp
$49
per month
Plus 5
$299
per month
Plus 10
$399
per month
Plus 15
$499
per month
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
CoConstruct
Microsoft Dynamics GP
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
CoConstruct pricing is based on active job sites that have client access online, which means it is adaptable to builders & remodelers businesses. This means that there are an unlimited amount of projects available for estimates and proposals, so that customers only pay when they win a contract. Also built into the pricing are a myriad of services: a dedicated implementation coach, free estimate & scheduling templates based on industry best practices from successful builders and the NAHB, unlimited storage and users, software branded with the customer's logo, unlimited amount of warranty projects, and unlimited phone & email support. The vendor offers a money-back guarantee that is good for the first 90 days of service.
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
CoConstruct
Microsoft Dynamics GP
Features
CoConstruct
Microsoft Dynamics GP
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
CoConstruct
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.4
20 Ratings
17% below category average
Pay calculation
00 Ratings
6.319 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
00 Ratings
5.915 Ratings
Direct deposit files
00 Ratings
7.518 Ratings
Salary revision and increment management
00 Ratings
6.517 Ratings
Reimbursement management
00 Ratings
6.016 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
CoConstruct
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics GP
4.3
27 Ratings
55% below category average
API for custom integration
00 Ratings
2.526 Ratings
Plug-ins
00 Ratings
6.021 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
CoConstruct
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics GP
7.1
40 Ratings
14% below category average
Single sign-on capability
00 Ratings
5.932 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
00 Ratings
8.240 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
CoConstruct
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics GP
5.4
41 Ratings
36% below category average
Dashboards
00 Ratings
3.529 Ratings
Standard reports
00 Ratings
6.239 Ratings
Custom reports
00 Ratings
6.539 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
CoConstruct
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics GP
5.1
48 Ratings
39% below category average
Accounts payable
00 Ratings
6.445 Ratings
Accounts receivable
00 Ratings
5.936 Ratings
Cash management
00 Ratings
6.436 Ratings
Bank reconciliation
00 Ratings
5.741 Ratings
Expense management
00 Ratings
4.531 Ratings
Time tracking
00 Ratings
8.014 Ratings
Fixed asset management
00 Ratings
4.628 Ratings
Multi-currency support
00 Ratings
2.919 Ratings
Multi-division support
00 Ratings
3.026 Ratings
Regulations compliance
00 Ratings
3.314 Ratings
Electronic tax filing
00 Ratings
9.012 Ratings
Self-service portal
00 Ratings
7.012 Ratings
Global Financial Support
00 Ratings
6.07 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
00 Ratings
4.721 Ratings
Intercompany Accounting
00 Ratings
3.918 Ratings
Localizations
00 Ratings
4.513 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations
00 Ratings
4.726 Ratings
Enterprise Accounting
00 Ratings
2.916 Ratings
Configurable Accounting
00 Ratings
4.117 Ratings
Centralized Rules Framework
00 Ratings
3.814 Ratings
Standardized Processes
00 Ratings
6.219 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
CoConstruct
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics GP
4.6
26 Ratings
46% below category average
Inventory tracking
00 Ratings
6.324 Ratings
Automatic reordering
00 Ratings
1.013 Ratings
Location management
00 Ratings
4.018 Ratings
Manufacturing module
00 Ratings
4.615 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
Having the ability to completely manage a project from start to finish with one app is super helpful. The time reporting feature (when it works correctly) is a nice added bonus as it allows employees to switch from one task to another on the same project or to another project and task with ease, aiding in the accounting process of the total project. This was helpful for running analytics to see where we were spending too much time on certain tasks, thus allowing us to assess any training needs.
Microsoft Dynamics GP is well-suited for our environment, as we pay a diverse group of employees, including on-the-road drivers, shop employees (some in other locations), and office employees. It easily tracks time off, taxes, pay, etc. The reporting allows us to verify with our drivers how they are paid each week, whether it be through mileage or stop-offs.
The integration of all aspects needed to run a remodeling company efficiently: project scheduling and management, financial planning and customer service. Since it’s an all-in-one suite and cloud-based, it enables our team to keep track of all our projects in real-time. Communication breakdown is the last thing we want, so being on the same page is not only desirable but makes for the best possible relationship with our clients.
Product education - We like how CoConstruct helps new users and get them to start using the tool right away. The dashboard resource materials are incredibly useful. We don’t have to spend a lot of time training new hires on the system and onboarding new clients.
Great Plains started as back office/accounting, and that is still it's strong suit.
SQL and the GP programming language, Dexterity, provide a robust, scalable, and stable platform with well documented maintenance and repair procedures. Relatively easy to manage, tune, and support.
Microsoft support for GP verges on "particularly well". Doesn't quite get there but good enough once you know what you're doing
Strong partner network, including the GP User Group (GPUG)
Internal Communication - CoConstruct lacks the ability to tag-team members for internal communication using @mentions or any other means. This has been crippling for us and forced us to use alternative software for communicating among our team members.
Pipeline Management - CoConstruct's lead-tracking system feels clunky and hard to navigate and doesn't provide a pipeline view that's easy to navigate. We have moved our Pipeline Management outside of CoConstruct to make it easier for our sales team to track leads.
CRM - CoConstruct doesn't offer anything for customer follow-up after projects are completed. This, in addition to the lack of an effective pipeline system, has led to our decision to use Hubspot as our CRM. Moving projects into CoConstruct for Design and back our after Production.
With respect to the allocations, once the expense is entered into the allocation account, you lose the ability to run any detail on just the total of the expense. It would be nice if you could run a trial balance on the allocation accounts the same way you can with regular accounts.
I've always thought security set up could be a bit simpler. It actually has gotten better through the years. Specifically, with eight separate entities, it would be nice to have a "master" setup where you could call up one group entity, assign the users rights, and then be finished. Currently, whenever I have a new user, I have to call up each individual entity and select all of the features I want the user to have. That means I have to do eight steps for each user.
Due the economic challenges that Puerto Rico is having, the company has had to merge some companies in order to be more efficient. It has been easy in GP to process those merges, even thought we had to spend days to accomplish that the process was smooth and accurate. In addition we were able to streamline the purchasing and sales process and the organization is confident to keep renewing GP for the future versions.
Though it is a basic accounting package, I believe some users do not find the old style menus and navigation options intuitive. There is also a great lack of training resources in the market, so users have to learn the product without guidance a lot, resulting in inefficient workflows and misuse or misunderstanding of many features.
The support staff is brilliant; they don't operate on Australian time, so you can't just dial up support when you need it. The response times are quick, and the staff is knowledgeable. They are also well versed in most of the differences between buildings in the US and the building in Australasia. Despite their funny accents and strange use of the English language, we get by just fine!
Basically the challenge with this implementation was the Business Portal, too many errors and even the aplication is up and running the users are still having issues. We will start planning the migraton to GP 2015 soon.
Products like Procore and PlanGrid are geared towards projects with huge projects teams, multiple stakeholders and dozens of subcontractors. CoConstruct can be used for projects big and small (value) and also with small project teams or large projects teams. For small partial renovation or addition projects CoConstruct is a good more cost effective option.
I come from a strong background of using SAP. SAP doesn't have the flexibility of GP, an example would be SAP doesn't allow core mods, if they catch you, you lose support. Microsoft doesn't really care about mods, but they will be quick to have the vendor you used support your issue if it is caused by those mods. With SAP your company adapts to the software, where with GP you adapt the software to you.
Microsoft Dynamics GP allows my clients to move from a paper or spreadsheet based company to an integrated, electronic, streamlined business. I love being able to help clients gain efficiencies through the use of Microsoft Dynamics GP.
Microsoft Dynamics GP allows for better customer service because everything is at our fingertips. If someone calls questioning an invoice, we can easily look it up. If someone calls stating they paid an invoice with a certain check number, we can quickly run a query to find that particular check number to see where it was applied.
Having everything on a single platform provides ease of use for upgrades, backups and end user training. There is only one software to learn!