Contractor Foreman is an online construction management software for contractors and boasts users among contractors in more than 75 countries.
$588
per year
Planview ProjectPlace
Score 8.3 out of 10
N/A
Projectplace is a collaborative work management solution. The vendor says the product is built with teams of all sizes and complexity in mind, from virtual teams of five to entire global enterprises with tens of thousands of active users. It is also designed to incorporate waterfall and agile workflows.
N/A
Pricing
Contractor Foreman
Planview ProjectPlace
Editions & Modules
Basic
$588
per year
Standard
$948
per year
Plus
$1,497
per year
Pro
$1,990
per year
Unlimited
$2,988
per year
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Contractor Foreman
Planview ProjectPlace
Free Trial
Yes
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
Plans are based on features and licenses needed. Plus, Pro, and Unlimited plans include a 100-day money back guarantee.
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Contractor Foreman
Planview ProjectPlace
Features
Contractor Foreman
Planview ProjectPlace
Human Resource Management
Comparison of Human Resource Management features of Product A and Product B
Contractor Foreman
7.5
69 Ratings
7% above category average
Planview ProjectPlace
-
Ratings
Employee demographic data
7.33 Ratings
00 Ratings
Employment history
8.458 Ratings
00 Ratings
Job profiles and administration
8.766 Ratings
00 Ratings
Workflow for transfers, promotions, pay raises, etc.
7.83 Ratings
00 Ratings
Organizational charting
7.33 Ratings
00 Ratings
Organization and location management
8.43 Ratings
00 Ratings
Compliance data (COBRA, OSHA, etc.)
4.55 Ratings
00 Ratings
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Contractor Foreman
5.9
4 Ratings
13% below category average
Planview ProjectPlace
-
Ratings
Pay calculation
4.53 Ratings
00 Ratings
Support for external payroll vendors
3.64 Ratings
00 Ratings
Off-cycle/On-Demand payment
4.51 Ratings
00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Direct deposit files
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Salary revision and increment management
6.43 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reimbursement management
6.52 Ratings
00 Ratings
Asset Management
Comparison of Asset Management features of Product A and Product B
Contractor Foreman
7.5
2 Ratings
10% above category average
Planview ProjectPlace
-
Ratings
Tracking of all physical assets
7.52 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Contractor Foreman
8.8
89 Ratings
14% above category average
Planview ProjectPlace
-
Ratings
Dashboards
8.987 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standard reports
8.883 Ratings
00 Ratings
Custom reports
8.878 Ratings
00 Ratings
Data exportability
8.776 Ratings
00 Ratings
Construction Project & Field Management
Comparison of Construction Project & Field Management features of Product A and Product B
Contractor Foreman
7.9
93 Ratings
6% above category average
Planview ProjectPlace
-
Ratings
Plan distribution & viewing
5.55 Ratings
00 Ratings
Plan markups & sharing
6.561 Ratings
00 Ratings
Issue tracking & punchlists
8.380 Ratings
00 Ratings
Photo documentation
8.591 Ratings
00 Ratings
Jobsite reports
9.082 Ratings
00 Ratings
Document sharing
8.787 Ratings
00 Ratings
RFI tools
8.769 Ratings
00 Ratings
Collaboration & approvals
8.579 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mobile app
8.792 Ratings
00 Ratings
Submittal design and management
7.567 Ratings
00 Ratings
Checklists
8.678 Ratings
00 Ratings
Meeting Minutes
8.13 Ratings
00 Ratings
Specifications
5.54 Ratings
00 Ratings
Change orders
8.982 Ratings
00 Ratings
Estimating
Comparison of Estimating features of Product A and Product B
Contractor Foreman
7.8
87 Ratings
3% above category average
Planview ProjectPlace
-
Ratings
Takeoff tools
7.52 Ratings
00 Ratings
Job costing
8.080 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost databases
7.875 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost calculator
8.175 Ratings
00 Ratings
Bid creation
7.878 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
If we are working with an architect on a highly complex, custom-built home that requires 50 versions of a floor plan. The Limitation: While Contractor Foreman handles documents well, it isn't a dedicated "Blueprinting" or CAD-markup tool like Procore or specialized architectural software. If the job is more "design" than "construction," the tool's document versioning can feel a bit basic. The Scenario: A crew leader identifies $1,200 in structural repairs needed before the new siding can go up. The Contractor Foreman Solution: Instead of "calling the office" and waiting, the lead creates a Change Order on their tablet, attaches a photo of the rot, and has the homeowner sign it on the spot. The project doesn't stop, and the billing is updated automatically.
Planview ProjectPlace is a vibrant platform that manages all activities and schedules different roles based on their urgency, importance, and requests. Further, Planview ProjectPlace outlines the need for proper documentation with the aim of accurate referencing. Tasks are credibly shared, and proper reporting is enhanced to transform firms' work environment. ; Lastly, Planview ProjectPlace brings sustainable email integration for enterprises.
In the CDB, I'd like to be able to create a line item with a specified percentage, and when I pull that line item into an estimate or proposal, I'd like the system to automatically calculate it based on that contract value. (Example, Contingency line is always going to be 15% of the contract value).
I'd like to be able to rearrange "blocks" on a page when I'm getting ready to send or print it. Lots of dead space on pages. Estimates 4 pages in total when it could be 2.
I'd like to be able to create budget summaries. Where the line items are grouped into their respective master format categories, and the category has the sum of all the line items in that category.
Under the time tracking, it would be nice to have a set template that would load each week and not have to click a button to load the previous week's template.
Somehow making it more intuitive.
Having to add in each service line and each detail that I cover for every service line each week is a bit ridiculous.
We have compiled so much information on CF it would be counterproductive to move to another software. We have also sold a lot of clients on the client portal feature. It is crucial for our communication between customers. The only reason we wouldn't renew the service is if somewhere offered the exact same service but at a lower cost
We're committed now & have >50 users on Projectplace. All our projects are now tracked in the tool. We this investment of time & training, the cost of maintaining Projectplace is relatively low for the benefit. So we will renew, even if there are some idiosyncrasies in the tool & there are opportunities for improvement.
Overall, Contractor Foreman is a great product, and I’m sure we’ve only scratched the surface of everything it has to offer. It can be a little quirky at times, occasionally displaying a 'Bad Gateway' message, but we haven’t experienced any timeout issues in the past few months. As we continue to use it, I’m confident we’ll uncover even more ways to streamline our workflow
Easy to use platform and provides the user with an amazing experience and straightforward tools that empower and help execute tasks with fast performances that allow quick and easy service delivery. Easy on implementation and get started immediately with enterprise-ready Planview Projectplace and start to connect with teams and departments at once.
Many times we had issues that turned out to be errors and bugs. At first, we would be told forcefully that there were no bugs, then we would document them, and we would get an acknowledgement but no apology for essentially either gaslighting us or being ignorant of their system
We have only had one issue the entire time we have had Contractor Foreman and that was that we had the hardest time getting the platform to allow us to log in, but we called our support and within 5 mins we able to log back in
I haven't needed to get in touch with support because the product is quite well structured and understandable. There were no issues initially when making payments or later for monthly payments. The project manager using the software is quite skilled in the software and has not needed much help. New licenses are easy to acquire, and there is no delay in getting them. I know there are several ways of support available, so that's a plus.
Contractor Foreman’s pricing is much more cost-effective for small to mid-sized construction businesses, making it a better fit for my company’s budget. It offers an intuitive interface with pre-built construction templates, minimizing setup time and making it easier at least for my team to adopt and start using. The platform’s focus on project tracking, financial management, and nice integrations that makes it highly efficient for tracking project progress, staying on budget, and managing subcontractors/bills. These factors combined made it the ideal choice for meeting my company's specific needs efficiently and cost-effectively.
[In my experience] Jira is more refined, better looking, and easier to become familiar with. Also, the massive market share of Jira helps in consultancy as you can switch between clients easily. Projectplace has many powerful tools but so does Jira, and Jira integrates with our suite of software much easier compared to Projectplace.
Prior to using Contractor Foreman we had to wait until the end to capture all change orders in one summary. Now, with the client portal, we can capture in real time and the client has visibility.
We have been trying to reduce administration time in tracking field expenses and with Contractor Foreman our field crew can uplaod reciepts and track expenses right from their mobile phones.
Punchlist - the punch list and To Do features are so robust we have drastically improved getting punchlists and small tasks completed in single trips without the wasted time and travel of multiple trips due to missed/forgotten items.
[We have the] ability to support remote work through projects that scale across multiple groups
We have large-scale quarterly projects, so the ability to save and duplicate project templates are helpful for us to keep track of tasks down to the specific card