Cornerstone’s PiiQ was an SMB offering that included core learning management and performance management systems, based on Sonar6 which was acquired by Cornerstone in 2012, and ultimately discontinued in 2022.
$8
per user per month
Leapsome
Score 7.5 out of 10
N/A
Leapsome is a platform for Performance Management & Employee Engagement. CEOs and HR / People Operations teams in companies such as Trivago, Babbel and Mercedes-Benz choose Leapsome to enhance their people management processes. With Leapsome, you develop employees across your organisation.
Leapsome combines tools for Goals & OKRs Management, Performance Reviews and 360s, Employee Engagement Surveys, Instant Feedback & Praise, and 1-on-1 Meetings into one easy to use and customizable…
$6
per month
Pricing
PiiQ by Cornerstone (discontinued)
Leapsome
Editions & Modules
PiiQ Performance
$8.00
per user per month
PiiQ Learning + Content
$8.00
per user per month
PiiQ Learning + Content & Performance
$15.00
per user per month
Modular
$6
per month
Enterprise
custom pricing
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
PiiQ by Cornerstone (discontinued)
Leapsome
Free Trial
Yes
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
$1,000 per installation
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
PiiQ by Cornerstone (discontinued)
Leapsome
Features
PiiQ by Cornerstone (discontinued)
Leapsome
Learning Management
Comparison of Learning Management features of Product A and Product B
PiiQ by Cornerstone (discontinued)
6.6
11 Ratings
21% below category average
Leapsome
-
Ratings
Course authoring
6.011 Ratings
00 Ratings
Course catalog or library
6.811 Ratings
00 Ratings
Player/Portal
6.810 Ratings
00 Ratings
Learning content
6.611 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mobile friendly
7.98 Ratings
00 Ratings
Progress tracking & certifications
6.210 Ratings
00 Ratings
Assignments
6.711 Ratings
00 Ratings
Compliance management
5.89 Ratings
00 Ratings
Learning administration
6.611 Ratings
00 Ratings
Learning reporting & analytics
6.911 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance and Goals
Comparison of Performance and Goals features of Product A and Product B
PiiQ by Cornerstone (discontinued)
-
Ratings
Leapsome
6.2
3 Ratings
20% below category average
Corporate goal setting
00 Ratings
7.03 Ratings
Subordinate goal setting
00 Ratings
5.03 Ratings
Individual goal setting
00 Ratings
8.03 Ratings
Line-of sight-visibility
00 Ratings
4.03 Ratings
Performance tracking
00 Ratings
7.03 Ratings
Performance Management
Comparison of Performance Management features of Product A and Product B
It will be an apt tool where only performance management is the requirement of the company in case there is no such tool in place. Like for a startup where the tool is yet to implement, this can help in managing the performance management with ease and a simple interface. Within a large organization where the requirements are beyond performance management, this tool will fall short
Enables employees to draft work goals and collaborate with their supervisors on a final version - improves mutual understanding right up front.
Combines performance goal ratings with competency ratings and provides a blended score. Simplifies the goal weighting so you don't have to do any calculations.
9-box matrix provides useful definitions and descriptions so managers can prepare development notes or plans for individual employees.
Would be good to have have a virtual "top level" (eg board) user built in to allow senior execs without a direct manager to be able to be set up with KPIs instead of having to create a dummy user
Reports have difficulty downloading if pop ups disabled or in some browser environments
When competencies are updated while a cycle is open, any changes don't effect that open cycle but only future ones. Would be nice to be able to have the option to apply changes to existing "open" cycles
It's not that CSB isn't a decent performance management system, but we have decided to go with just one vendor (Workday) for an HRIS/performance management/payroll system so we can directly relate pay to performance. We are more interested in having just one system that "talks" to the other pieces instead of having to work with several vendors. It reduces the hassle of having to communicate with different support teams, having different contracts, and so on.
There are specific things within the goals and competencies that are user-friendly. For example, the rating slider isn't great in my opinion. You can slide in between ratings which can create some odd scoring (if you use scoring). It seems a better solution would be a drop down where you select your rating. There are also some glitches in the system and have been told Cornerstone is aware of them but are focused on delivering new features. There are workarounds, but that doesn't seem to be a great answer.
The saving process slows it down. It doesn’t auto save. If you leave a page, it will sometimes warn you, but not always. When you hit the save button, a window pops up that says creating/saving packets. It feels very archaic.
My assistant could better address this issue. My perception is that there is not immediate assistance, and that there can be a wait for help. That is not a negative, just a perception. I have not used support in two years.
I think we could have done a better job of rolling out the tool to our managers. We were under a tight timeline. In the training, we showed them everything and said go do it by this date. Looking back, I would have done it in pieces: for example, 2 weeks to write goals, 2 weeks to get sign-off from direct reports. I just let them go at it. Since then we’ve moved to agile development environment and are applying the technique to everything. In future would only do through change sprint. It is a big change I didn’t take it seriously enough.
I had a team of 3 project managing. You need a champion from every department to make sure you’re getting it right and to make sure what’s happening is communicated. It’s not something you can do without input from department heads
Lesson.ly has been great to work with but it is a very clear and simple, user-friendly system that anyone can pick up with very little training as it is self-explanatory. It also has a great mobile interface and lots of different features that are easy to add for the admin but really impactful for the user.
I didn’t select over workday since this was used in the previous organization. The major difference is that workday provides multiple functions which leapsome currently doesn’t have or have it and I am not aware of it may be. However, I still recommend Leapsome over workday since its simple interface is effective to users. It is a user friendly tool that can still produce multiple KPI and reports which are required for people management
It's tool and it's only as good as the person wielding it. The investment in PiiQ was accompanied by a quarterly cadence and manager feedback training. We feel like our employees are given regular feedback and bonuses are tied to objective accomplishment.