Desk.com vs HelpSpot

• Desk.com makes tracking customer inquiries easy. A ticket is created for each customer email by linking to our main customer support email address, and we can create tickets manually for logging phone calls. This allows us to have more than one person keeping track of all inquiries, and we can ensure that everyone in our customer support group is fully aware of all inquiries that particular customer has made, since all are tracked under the customer.
• Desk.com allows us to put metrics around our customer inquires and IT problems by allowing each ticket to be categorized by subjects of our choosing. This way, we are able to track items of importance to our group, running reports on the different labels used for our tickets, and giving us an overall view of what is being inquired about most, allowing us to see any problems or major concerns in real time.
• Desk.com provides much flexibility for our needs as a company, allowing us to tailor the software for our everyday use. We are able to set up our own email templates, macros, and information site, as well as labels that are more specific to the work we do.

Read full review

• HelpSpot was great for organization. Having different queues allowed each of my team members to organize their conversations with the customer and quickly retrieve the history of the ticket.
• HelpSpot is a fairly simple tool that has a friendly user interface. With it's more modern look, it made it easier for me personally to navigate and train team members on how to use it successfully.
• HelpSpot allowed our team to view the responses section, which allowed our team to cut down on the time we spent responding to a ticket.

Read full review

• Internal knowledge tools are clunky and annoying to access, outside the regular workflow of everyday staff
• Arbitrary and confusing limitations in business rules and custom fields
• Arbitrary and confusing limitations in case handling - for example, if you begin a case as a phone call you CANNOT email the customer from the case. As though no one working at Desk has ever sent a follow-up email...?
• Not very good for B2B, mid-to-large businesses. Difficult to set business rules based on company information (for example, service level/tier) and nearly impossible to track key stakeholders and get clear insight into the relationship at a high level
• Reporting tools are clunky, slow, and just all-around pretty useless

Read full review

• The UI is a little dated but to be fair, shows most of the pertinent information at a glance on a well designed dashboard.
• The UI can also be buggy at times with controls appearing in strange places. These glitches are usually corrected within a reasonable amount of time.

Read full review

• Better customer service and employee efficiency when dealing with cases
• It's so universal, meaning that everyone can use it and it's easy to understand.
• The only negative impact is that our IT department who is assigned tickets has responded to customers instead of to the local reps and we have to ensure they know to change the email if it's assigned to them.

Read full review

• Improved ticket response time
• Workload reporting to upper management
• Ticket category reporting to identify training opportunities

Read full review