Engagedly is a cloud-based talent management platform that unifies performance, engagement, learning, growth, and recognition into a single connected experience. With Marissa, its Agentic AI agent, Engagedly aims to turn strategic intent into intelligent actions. Organizations can also use Engagedly to boost engagement, improve retention, and develop high performing teams. Founded in 2015, Engagedly is headquartered in St. Louis, Missouri.
$8,500
per year per installation
Varicent
Score 7.9 out of 10
N/A
From quotas to sales and compensation, Varicent helps revenue leaders in enterprise organizations chart a more effective, connected path to revenue by providing vital data, insights, and sales go-to-market planning tools.
N/A
Pricing
Engagedly
Varicent
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Engagedly
Varicent
Free Trial
Yes
No
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
$1,000 one-time fee per installation (starting cost)
No setup fee
Additional Details
Pricing is customized based on the suite/modules implemented and the size of the organization
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Engagedly
Varicent
Features
Engagedly
Varicent
Performance and Goals
Comparison of Performance and Goals features of Product A and Product B
Engagedly
8.1
16 Ratings
10% above category average
Varicent
-
Ratings
Corporate goal setting
8.715 Ratings
00 Ratings
Subordinate goal setting
7.713 Ratings
00 Ratings
Individual goal setting
7.015 Ratings
00 Ratings
Line-of sight-visibility
8.010 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance tracking
9.015 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance Management
Comparison of Performance Management features of Product A and Product B
Engagedly
8.0
16 Ratings
15% above category average
Varicent
-
Ratings
Performance plans
9.015 Ratings
00 Ratings
Plan weighting
8.010 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manager note taking
7.315 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance improvement plans
6.713 Ratings
00 Ratings
Review status tracking
7.714 Ratings
00 Ratings
Rater nomination workflow
8.09 Ratings
00 Ratings
Review reminders
8.315 Ratings
00 Ratings
Workflow restrictions
9.011 Ratings
00 Ratings
Multiple review frequency
9.012 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting
7.014 Ratings
00 Ratings
Sales ICM
Comparison of Sales ICM features of Product A and Product B
Engagedly has a huge range of possibilities and we chose it because of all the functionalities it offers. I'm not marking my rating a 9 or 10 because of the UI. If you're an active user (e.g. in the people department) then you get used to the UI fast enough. However, if you only use it twice per year (like all our other users) it can be difficult to find what you need. That being said, Engagedly offers a truly broad range of HR-related functionalities and we're very happy about that!
For the use cases we have at the bank, ICM is a perfect solution. For any bank or institution that has similar requirements, ICM would be a perfect solution. But I also think for any use case that has any sort of incentives based on Sales done, this would work amazing, as both Calculations and reports are handled by ICM very well; it's an all-in-one solution, I feel like.
As [the] model gets more and more transactional data, the calculation time increases. This should/can be handled internally with better model optimization.
Migrating from one env to other sometimes is challenging. There can be better 'Alerts' or 'Explanation' provided to handle it or at least to give a hint of the error.
For managers viewing their rep's report, the access part can be made easier. It should be linked to Payee hierarchy and access can be done automatically.
Customer support from IBM is impeccable. They are quick to respond and they don't nickel and dime you for every request you make. Their goal is to ensure your success and as a user, I really feel like they listen to my concerns. That's not to say there are no problems. All software has its issues, but I don't feel like those issues fall on deaf ears.
The amount of features available is a lot, but they are hard to navigate due to the UI not being on par with them. Still if used properly, Engagedly is useful to keep track of multiple individuals and their personal goals.
Any calculations can be implemented as there are hardly any limitations on complexity. However, online real-time usability is lacking - a simple user enters, and the system calculates work in a way that it is in the browser and hence still needs overnight to be properly reflected in the batch calculations and backend tables.
All is fast, but with API's it is sometimes slower due to the application we are pulling data from. Reports are loaded directly or within seconds and our reports are very detailed with many columns and rows.
Absolutely! We love engagedly because we haven't faced any kind of lagging or such issues in website. It also has a convenient app through which you can access everything. They are very polite and address to each and every query relating to software which may cause hinderence in the process.
Giving a 10 would suggest there is no room for improvement. I don't feel like their support is perfect. However, I have never met another team that was more dedicated to making sure we get what we want and need.
Test test test. Make sure that the product is calculating everyone 100% correctly. DO NOT accept a 70% pass rate as some companies would like to have you believe is acceptable. This means conducting thorough testing by providing 100% of all expected results, but it will be worth it when you know that the compensation plans are working entirely as expected.
We used SharePoint Forms to make customized forms for ourselves but it did not work well. Our IT needed to build a system from scratch with a help of an external developer team and they were simply not capable of creating something that complicated. Engagedly already has a great platform and it was a life saver for us that we can just start using after the streamlined implementation period for a brief period of time. With SharePoint, we kept having weekly meetings for over 1.5 years to fix bugs, add necessary functions, etc. after the implementation.
In 2015, we used a scorecard containing 80 attributes in our review of Oracle, Callidus, and Xactly & Varicent. Oracle did not have true self serve capabilities- programming was heavily required, not intuitive, out of the box functionality was limited. Callidus & Xactly could not provide us a demo using our data, statements could not be sent out in bulk form, difficulty in importing/exporting to CRM. Varicent excelled in most areas and was the clear winner.
It is very scalable and adaptable to changing complexities of calculations and business rules under a variety of different scenarios. It does not get full points because in large data loads the time needed to calculate and import the data increases exponentially and may cause issues related to timing potentially.
We haven't used it long enough to calculate ROI (YET), but - we've had EEs who never engaged with performance management before who are excited to use the program
It has already provided a better framework to set up goals for our teams
Neg impact - limited feed of info from HRIS - requires some manual data to uploaded.
Compliance - with a central system used for calculation incentive payments and commissions, we are able to provide reports and data showing every detail of how payments are calculated and why they are justified. We can also identify anomalies and outliers.
Integration with our payroll system is seamless. Except for regular pay, nothing goes to payroll without going through ICM. The process for paying incentives/bonuses/commissions is now very structured and efficient.