Epicor Kinetic vs. IFS Cloud

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Epicor Kinetic
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Epicor Kinetic is a customizable, scalable, product-centric cloud ERP designed specifically for manufacturers.N/A
IFS Cloud
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
IFS is a low-code / no-code approach to IFS solution suite, supporting various industries including aerospace & defense, construction, energy & utilities, and manufacturing with ERP, EAM and field service management functionality. IFS Cloud can be run as a service from IFS, or in a location of choice including on-premise as a containerized application.N/A
Pricing
Epicor KineticIFS Cloud
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Epicor KineticIFS Cloud
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Epicor KineticIFS Cloud
Features
Epicor KineticIFS Cloud
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
7.9
52 Ratings
7% above category average
IFS Cloud
6.2
4 Ratings
17% below category average
Pay calculation8.250 Ratings5.64 Ratings
Benefit plan administration8.129 Ratings5.14 Ratings
Direct deposit files7.537 Ratings5.14 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
8.0
151 Ratings
6% above category average
IFS Cloud
8.0
5 Ratings
6% above category average
API for custom integration8.3145 Ratings8.05 Ratings
Plug-ins7.7120 Ratings8.05 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
8.4
177 Ratings
0% above category average
IFS Cloud
8.5
5 Ratings
1% above category average
Single sign-on capability8.8149 Ratings8.75 Ratings
Role-based user permissions8.1174 Ratings8.45 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
7.6
186 Ratings
3% above category average
IFS Cloud
8.2
5 Ratings
10% above category average
Dashboards7.2178 Ratings8.45 Ratings
Standard reports7.4183 Ratings8.05 Ratings
Custom reports8.1174 Ratings8.05 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
7.3
199 Ratings
5% below category average
IFS Cloud
8.7
5 Ratings
12% above category average
Accounts payable8.7189 Ratings9.54 Ratings
Accounts receivable8.6184 Ratings9.04 Ratings
Global Financial Support7.8103 Ratings8.65 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers8.2126 Ratings9.54 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations7.6151 Ratings7.54 Ratings
Configurable Accounting8.1136 Ratings8.04 Ratings
Standardized Processes8.0159 Ratings8.05 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
8.4
186 Ratings
5% above category average
IFS Cloud
8.7
5 Ratings
9% above category average
Inventory tracking8.0185 Ratings8.35 Ratings
Automatic reordering7.9111 Ratings8.35 Ratings
Location management7.7145 Ratings8.05 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
8.3
189 Ratings
5% above category average
IFS Cloud
8.1
5 Ratings
2% above category average
Pricing8.4176 Ratings8.05 Ratings
Order entry8.3187 Ratings8.45 Ratings
Credit card processing7.688 Ratings5.64 Ratings
Cost of goods sold8.1165 Ratings7.54 Ratings
Order Orchestration7.8119 Ratings7.54 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
8.5
161 Ratings
12% above category average
IFS Cloud
8.3
4 Ratings
10% above category average
Billing Management7.8142 Ratings6.54 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management7.7137 Ratings7.54 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management7.580 Ratings7.54 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting7.981 Ratings7.04 Ratings
Period Close8.2144 Ratings8.04 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
9.2
19 Ratings
19% above category average
IFS Cloud
8.8
2 Ratings
15% above category average
Budgeting and Forecasting9.015 Ratings9.52 Ratings
Project Costing8.016 Ratings9.02 Ratings
Cost Capture10.017 Ratings8.52 Ratings
Capital Project Management9.011 Ratings9.02 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance9.09 Ratings9.02 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition9.012 Ratings9.52 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
7.7
74 Ratings
9% above category average
IFS Cloud
8.9
5 Ratings
24% above category average
Project Planning and Scheduling7.767 Ratings8.35 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers7.154 Ratings8.45 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality7.244 Ratings8.04 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools7.051 Ratings7.74 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
7.9
33 Ratings
6% above category average
IFS Cloud
8.9
4 Ratings
18% above category average
Award Lifecycle Management8.529 Ratings9.04 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
8.0
138 Ratings
13% above category average
IFS Cloud
8.9
5 Ratings
23% above category average
Bids Analyzed and Compared7.559 Ratings8.03 Ratings
Contract Authoring7.456 Ratings8.02 Ratings
Contract Repository7.758 Ratings6.13 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated7.696 Ratings8.54 Ratings
Supplier Management7.6130 Ratings8.05 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
7.8
49 Ratings
15% above category average
IFS Cloud
8.5
4 Ratings
24% above category average
Risk Repository8.139 Ratings8.04 Ratings
Control Management7.744 Ratings8.44 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments7.440 Ratings7.44 Ratings
Issue Detection8.545 Ratings7.14 Ratings
Remediation and Certification7.739 Ratings5.74 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
7.6
103 Ratings
9% above category average
IFS Cloud
7.8
4 Ratings
11% above category average
Transportation Planning and Optimization7.971 Ratings6.64 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management7.965 Ratings6.64 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management7.556 Ratings6.03 Ratings
Fulfillment Management8.086 Ratings5.63 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management7.973 Ratings7.54 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
7.9
148 Ratings
6% above category average
IFS Cloud
8.8
4 Ratings
16% above category average
Production Process Design7.9119 Ratings8.04 Ratings
Production Management8.2139 Ratings8.54 Ratings
Configuration Management7.6106 Ratings8.04 Ratings
Work Execution7.6109 Ratings7.54 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs7.7132 Ratings8.04 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
8.1
134 Ratings
11% above category average
IFS Cloud
7.6
4 Ratings
4% above category average
Forecasting7.1107 Ratings7.04 Ratings
Inventory Planning7.7131 Ratings7.04 Ratings
Performance Monitoring7.8104 Ratings7.54 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Kinetic
7.9
67 Ratings
7% above category average
IFS Cloud
8.9
4 Ratings
19% above category average
Proposal Management8.254 Ratings7.14 Ratings
Product Master Data Management8.063 Ratings8.04 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Epicor KineticIFS Cloud
Small Businesses
Zoho One
Zoho One
Score 9.3 out of 10
Zoho One
Zoho One
Score 9.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Infor VISUAL
Infor VISUAL
Score 7.3 out of 10
Infor VISUAL
Infor VISUAL
Score 7.3 out of 10
Enterprises
24SevenOffice
24SevenOffice
Score 9.0 out of 10
24SevenOffice
24SevenOffice
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Epicor KineticIFS Cloud
Likelihood to Recommend
8.1
(222 ratings)
8.0
(5 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.8
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.1
(182 ratings)
8.7
(5 ratings)
Support Rating
7.3
(3 ratings)
9.5
(2 ratings)
Implementation Rating
7.3
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
8.5
(15 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
7.6
(14 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Epicor KineticIFS Cloud
Likelihood to Recommend
Epicor Software
I think it depends on the industry and complexity of the company. In our situation, we primarily use Epicor for financials, in a relatively simple manner. I don't think that Epicor is the most intuitive or simple to set up for our situation. I think Epicor is better suited for its target industry of manufacturing, where building out the multiple layers let's Epicor's strengths come to bear.
Read full review
IFS
The IFS Cloud has well suited to keeping track from beginning to end and engages from the internal team to the external team very well. It takes everything with them and helps them to grow at a wide pace. It creates a systematic workflow process which helps in achieving the goal more fast and friendly environment
Read full review
Pros
Epicor Software
  • MRP Processing, PO Suggestion processing and maintaining Inventory/Accounting cost consistency.
  • Freighting with speed and precision allows us to ship on time with over 10 shipping stations they all run seamlessly.
  • Using ECM, we've streamlined our AP Invoicing process and increased our teams throughput at least 2x with more speed projected.
  • Using Co-Parts with Advanced Production, we've increased inventory accuracy and accounting for parts cost in a more transparent way.
Read full review
IFS
  • Store data from different domains
  • Integrates efficiently with other systems
  • Easy to migrate data from different systems. Provides good API Documentation.
Read full review
Cons
Epicor Software
  • In Application Studio, there are quite a few things that you just have to know in order to really get it to work right. Such as when you are updating a dataview you have to save them refresh and then go back to the wizard to get the added fields that you may have added from a BAQ.
  • When running MRP it has a tendency to stall or not finish on occasion. This is a problem as we do not get any PO Suggestions when this happens.
Read full review
IFS
  • Rich look of user experience of the web-based interface
  • Some areas like HR and Payroll are not fully-suited within the solution
  • Error and issue handling/debugging is difficult
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Epicor Software
Easy to use, reliable, known product, best product configurator, Epicor continues to offer improvements every year.
Read full review
IFS
No answers on this topic
Usability
Epicor Software
There is always room for improvement! I've used Great Plains ERP/MS Dynamics and Epicor my entire career. both do some things really well. Both could learn from each other. The KInetic user interface is much better than the classic windows overall. Please keep adding more functionality to the core financials!!! You need the accountants to be on your side.
Read full review
IFS
The overall functionality, the feature set that the IFS Cloud offeres is really good (even though it has some flaws / cons), which reduces the time / administrative effort in managing multiple systems to achieve the same goal / to store the required data.
Read full review
Support Rating
Epicor Software
If the answer to your problem is not readily available in an answer book, your response or solution will take months, if you get one at all. Problems need to be sent to support and duplicated by them before they try to fix it. This is extremely frustrating because you have to prove to Epicor that you are having an issue. If by some miracle you get by this barrier, your problem is submitted to development for review. You can't speak to them or communicate in any way directly. This group appears to be completely unconcerned about user issues or customer service. Our experiences have been negative across the board.
Read full review
IFS
The overall support is perfect and efficient.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Epicor Software
Most of my histories with SAP directly. I didn't really have any negative experiences. The only thing I could say is that I always had to go to somebody else to solve the problem that I can solve first person now with Epicor Kinetic.
Read full review
IFS
IFS Cloud is an upgrade of IFS Applications. IFS Applications solution is under extended support and would eventually be replaced by cloud solution in coming years.
Read full review
Scalability
Epicor Software
Using the word Scalability usually implies an increase of use, or adding the use of other features. Making the product put to good/proper use for small companies without the need for full-time support, whilst integrity is maintained it is an entirely different topic. In my view, the current company may have acquired a full truck with options, where initially a small pick-up may have been better suited.
Read full review
IFS
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Epicor Software
  • We have increased our lead time of orders by about a week.
  • We have increased our output of product by 10% with the same amount of staff.
  • We were able to leverage Kinetic to optimize our business while moving two facilities.
Read full review
IFS
  • Reduced the time taken for the users to prepare and generate reports since most are automatic with IFS Cloud
  • Increased the reliability and visibility of the inventory of the products from procurement of raw materials through the manufacturing of final product to delivering to customer's place
  • Took a considerable time configuring the roles and access of the users while implementation
Read full review
ScreenShots

Epicor Kinetic Screenshots

Screenshot of Production ManagementScreenshot of Role-Based Analytics and Business IntelligenceScreenshot of Planning and SchedulingScreenshot of Shipping and ReceivingScreenshot of the General LedgerScreenshot of Training and Development