TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    FIMS

    Score8 out of 10
    N/AFormerly from Blackbaud and based on the former MicroEdge FIMS product, FIMS is a software solution used to manage requests, approvals, and declinations for grantmaking and scholarships.N/A

    GoTo Meeting

    Score8.5 out of 10
    N/AFrom GoTo (formerly LogMeIn), GoToMeeting is an online meeting, desktop sharing, and video conferencing software that enables users to connect via the internet. It hosts a suite of online meeting tools, including real-time screen sharing and integrated audio.

    $12

    per month

    Pricing
    FIMSGoTo Meeting
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Professional
    $12.00
    Per Organizer / Per Month for 150 Participants [billed annually]
    Business
    $16.00
    Per Organizer / Per Month for 250 Participants [billed annually]
    Enterprise
    Custom Pricing
    3,000 Participants
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    FIMSGoTo Meeting
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details—Pricing available by monthly or annual subscription, with discounts for annual commitments.
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    FIMSGoTo Meeting
    Considered Both Products
    NPact
    No answer on this topic
    GoTo formerly LogMeIn
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    84%
    Would buy again
    260 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    92%
    Delivers good value for the price
    239 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    90%
    Happy with the feature set
    277 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    94%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    185 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    97%
    Implementation went as expected
    222 Answers
    Features
    FIMSGoTo Meeting
    Performance & Compatibility of Online Events Software
    Comparison of Performance & Compatibility of Online Events Software features of FIMS and GoTo Meeting
    Feature
    FIMS
    -
    Ratings
    GoTo Meeting
    8.1
    406 Ratings
    2% above category average
    High quality audio00 Ratings8.8406 Ratings
    High quality video00 Ratings8.7399 Ratings
    Low bandwidth requirements00 Ratings7.0374 Ratings
    Mobile support00 Ratings8.0321 Ratings
    Screen Sharing
    Comparison of Screen Sharing features of FIMS and GoTo Meeting
    Feature
    FIMS
    -
    Ratings
    GoTo Meeting
    8.2
    397 Ratings
    3% above category average
    Desktop sharing00 Ratings8.2397 Ratings
    Whiteboards00 Ratings8.1271 Ratings
    Online Meetings / Events
    Comparison of Online Meetings / Events features of FIMS and GoTo Meeting
    Feature
    FIMS
    -
    Ratings
    GoTo Meeting
    8.1
    398 Ratings
    1% below category average
    Calendar integration00 Ratings8.0354 Ratings
    Meeting initiation00 Ratings8.4385 Ratings
    Integrates with social media00 Ratings7.7197 Ratings
    Record meetings / events00 Ratings8.1361 Ratings
    Slideshows00 Ratings8.1311 Ratings
    Online Events Collaboration
    Comparison of Online Events Collaboration features of FIMS and GoTo Meeting
    Feature
    FIMS
    -
    Ratings
    GoTo Meeting
    8.3
    367 Ratings
    3% above category average
    Live chat00 Ratings8.3357 Ratings
    Audience polling00 Ratings8.1260 Ratings
    Q&A00 Ratings8.4284 Ratings
    Online Events Security
    Comparison of Online Events Security features of FIMS and GoTo Meeting
    Feature
    FIMS
    -
    Ratings
    GoTo Meeting
    8.1
    367 Ratings
    0% above category average
    User authentication00 Ratings8.0329 Ratings
    Participant roles & permissions00 Ratings8.2353 Ratings
    Confidential attendee list00 Ratings8.2289 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    FIMSGoTo Meeting
    Small Businesses
    Blackbaud Grantmaking
    Score9 out of 10
    ClickMeeting
    Score9.5 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Submittable
    Score8.9 out of 10
    JioMeet
    Score9.8 out of 10
    Enterprises
    No answers on this topic
    Webex Meetings
    Score8.7 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    FIMSGoTo Meeting
    Likelihood to Recommend
    6.0
    (4 ratings)
    8.3
    (441 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.5
    (51 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    4.9
    (35 ratings)
    Availability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.1
    (2 ratings)
    Performance
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.1
    (2 ratings)
    Support Rating
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    7.6
    (52 ratings)
    Online Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.3
    (3 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.9
    (8 ratings)
    Configurability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    4.5
    (2 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    -
    (0 ratings)
    3.0
    (1 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    4.0
    (1 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    FIMSGoTo Meeting
    Likelihood to Recommend
    NPact
    It is a very robust system and with the various modules you can accomplish much of what is needed for traditional transaction US-based grantmaking. If you have more complicated grantmaking, deal with foreign currencies or want to have tighter alignment of finance and budget numbers, GIFTS may not meet your needs. Additionally, some of their core projects have limited accessibility in terms of various mobile devices or access from outside the organization's network.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    GoTo formerly LogMeIn
    I provide regular training as a big portion of my job. There is weekly training with an infinite number of users in attendance on any given date—GoTo Meeting is not the best option for this because I would have to mute users as they join the meeting. However, I also provide frequent training sessions to a small number of users that feature more individualized content, and having them able to mute/unmute at will is a better fit for a smaller group with in-depth materials.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    NPact
    • Simple layout
    • Duplication reports
    • Lots of fields for organization-specific information
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    GoTo formerly LogMeIn
    • Excellent audio and video quality.
    • Functional and easy-to-use screen-sharing feature for product demonstrations and presentations.
    • Possibility of recording meetings that we can later review and share with those who could not attend.
    • Possibility of managing the microphone of the participants in host mode so as not to disturb the entire event.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    NPact
    • While GIFTS Classic is the most barren interfaces of all MicroEdge products, there are some simple capabilities I wish GIFTS could still perform such as better email integration from outlook to a GIFTS request, more efficient requirement reminders, and a wider use of Microsoft Office and other external product integration (GuideStar).
    • It's disappointing that you have to purchase an additional "Customizer Module" or "Budget Module" in order to access basic functions of a GMS. This seems like a basic system function that MicroEdge takes advantage of, unfortunately.
    • The online application module (IGAM) is still quite antiquated and you have to be knowledgeable of basic HTML in order to really customize your organization's online application. More flexibility and design functions would be greatly appreciated with the online application function, especially since this is a public document and represents your organization.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    GoTo formerly LogMeIn
    • We occasionally experience slow performance during screen sharing.
    • The help center should have detailed tutorials on commonly asked FAQs and also to initially set up the profile.
    • One of my initial thoughts regarding recordings was to edit them in the future when the product changes.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    NPact
    No answers on this topic
    GoTo formerly LogMeIn
    We used other software like goto meetings but found it best because of its user friendly interface and easy interfacing. It helped us in COVID and now we can say we are depending on it and love it. We recommend it to our friends company and they are also using it. It is very affordable and easy to integrate with system
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    NPact
    No answers on this topic
    GoTo formerly LogMeIn
    The simplicity of GoToMeetings desktop, mobile, and web-based applications make it a very robust and user-friendly meeting solution. At times, it may be more complex than needed, but it is nice to have so many features that can be used if needed. Once installed, it is very easy to use and navigate.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Reliability and Availability
    NPact
    No answers on this topic
    GoTo formerly LogMeIn
    This application has always been available. Never an issue
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Performance
    NPact
    No answers on this topic
    GoTo formerly LogMeIn
    This application is fast. Loads fast, no stall
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    NPact
    I typically receive a response to an inquiry within an hour or two, if not sooner. Most tech support people are knowledgeable about our problems, and if not, they will escalate to the proper person.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    GoTo formerly LogMeIn
    When we have issues, they seem to respond quickly and do everything they can to help us. They have even tried to find other ways we could get more use out of their product, or improve the way we are currently using it. Overall, their support has been fairly good for us.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    NPact
    No answers on this topic
    GoTo formerly LogMeIn
    It was very easy and self-explanatory.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    NPact
    It is really a matter of priority. I can see situations where GIFTS Classic is a very strong option! Once an organization determines its priorities then it should definitely consider GIFTS to see how well it compares with mission critical functionality.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    GoTo formerly LogMeIn
    Many times, it seems like GoTo Meeting requires less bandwidth to run. We noticed with a few test machines that if you have over twenty video streams, this product could handle the load better than if we used Microsoft Teams and had many video streams.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    NPact
    • Reporting was difficult on GIFTS - often we had to place data into Excel by hand since we could not create simple customized reports. This increased time spent on tasks GIFTS was supposed to streamline.
    • GIFTS did not alert us to duplicated organization records, so often it was difficult to reflect an organization's full grant history to our Board of Directors, leading to employees spending time searching through paper records to make sure all information was properly reported.
    • GIFTS created duplicate contact records, meaning it was difficult to find out which contact was related to which organization and cluttered our data. This caused decreased processing and response time to "new" contacts who turned out to be previous contacts or contacts whose information was tied to previous organizations. Even when contact information was updated for a new organization, sometimes the program would revert to the first organization contact information, several times leading to checks cashed to incorrect organizations---the very worst consequence of using GIFTS to our organization. Thankfully, the money was recovered upon the few times that error occurred, but it led to me and other employees reading through out 800+ checks before issue to make sure the correct organization was in fact being rewarded.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    GoTo formerly LogMeIn
    • Any collaboration app these days are now a great addition for those organizations which have more than one office and they need to collaborate with each other.
    • GoTo Meeting can contribute to cost savings by reducing the need for extensive travel, accommodation, and related expenses associated with in-person meetings especially in case like us as we have multiple branches.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    GoTo Meeting Screenshots

    Screenshot of GoTo App - Create Meeting (Out of Session)Screenshot of GoTo App - Join Meeting (Out of Session)Screenshot of GoTo App - Meeting (In Session)Screenshot of GoTo App - Mobile Meetings (Out of Session)Screenshot of GoTo App - Screen Share Meeting (In Session)