Hire, by Google, was a recruiting app for G suite customers. The product includes functionality for applicant tracking, candidate relationship management, and candidate sourcing. Google sunsetted the product in late 2020.
N/A
Jive
Score8.7 out of 10
N/A
Jive Software, part of the Aurea family of customer experience solutions, provides the gateway to an organization's most important assets – its knowledge and people. Jive's interactive intranet solution promises to connect people, information and ideas to help businesses outpace their competitors. The vendor says the product has more than 30 million users worldwide across every industry, and is consistently recognized as a leader by top analyst firms.
N/A
Zimyo
Score9.2 out of 10
N/A
Zimyo's HCM platform automates HR processes and helps eliminate payroll errors. Its 50+ modules, including Core HR, Payroll Management, and Learning Management System (LMS), reduce employee onboarding time, lower turnover, enhance Employee Self-Service (ESS), and optimize helpdesk management.
$75
per month 25 users (minimum)
Pricing
Hire by Google (discontinued)
Jive
Zimyo
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Basic
$3
per month per user (25 user minimum)
Standard
$4
per month per user (25 user minimum)
Enterprise
$6
per month per user (25 user minimum)
Enterprise
$2,000
per month (+$20 for additional employees)
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Hire by Google (discontinued)
Jive
Zimyo
Free Trial
No
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
Hire by Google (discontinued)
Jive
Zimyo
Recruiting / ATS
Comparison of Recruiting / ATS features of Hire by Google (discontinued) and Jive and Zimyo
Feature
Hire by Google (discontinued)
8.1
1 Ratings
2% above category average
Jive
-
Ratings
Zimyo
8.6
1 Ratings
8% above category average
Job Requisition Management
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Company Website Posting
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Job Search Site Posting
1.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Customized Application Form
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Resume Management
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Candidate Search
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Applicant Tracking
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Collaboration
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Email Templates
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Notifications and Alerts
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Publish to Social Media
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Duplicate Candidate Prevention
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Human Resource Management
Comparison of Human Resource Management features of Hire by Google (discontinued) and Jive and Zimyo
Feature
Hire by Google (discontinued)
-
Ratings
Jive
-
Ratings
Zimyo
8.6
1 Ratings
5% above category average
Employee demographic data
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Employment history
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Job profiles and administration
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Workflow for transfers, promotions, pay raises, etc.
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Organizational charting
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Organization and location management
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Compliance data (COBRA, OSHA, etc.)
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Hire by Google (discontinued) and Jive and Zimyo
Feature
Hire by Google (discontinued)
-
Ratings
Jive
-
Ratings
Zimyo
8.6
1 Ratings
5% above category average
Pay calculation
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Support for external payroll vendors
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Off-cycle/On-Demand payment
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Direct deposit files
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Salary revision and increment management
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Reimbursement management
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Leave and Attendance Management
Comparison of Leave and Attendance Management features of Hire by Google (discontinued) and Jive and Zimyo
Feature
Hire by Google (discontinued)
-
Ratings
Jive
-
Ratings
Zimyo
8.7
1 Ratings
5% above category average
Approval workflow
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Balance details
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Annual carry-forward and encashment
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Employee Self Service
Comparison of Employee Self Service features of Hire by Google (discontinued) and Jive and Zimyo
Feature
Hire by Google (discontinued)
-
Ratings
Jive
-
Ratings
Zimyo
8.6
1 Ratings
4% above category average
View and generate pay and benefit information
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Update personal information
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
View company policy documentation
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Employee recognition
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
View job history
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Asset Management
Comparison of Asset Management features of Hire by Google (discontinued) and Jive and Zimyo
Feature
Hire by Google (discontinued)
-
Ratings
Jive
-
Ratings
Zimyo
10.0
1 Ratings
22% above category average
Tracking of all physical assets
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
HR Reporting
Comparison of HR Reporting features of Hire by Google (discontinued) and Jive and Zimyo
Feature
Hire by Google (discontinued)
-
Ratings
Jive
-
Ratings
Zimyo
8.0
1 Ratings
5% above category average
Report builder
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
6.01 Ratings
Pre-built reports
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Ability to combine HR data with external data
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Onboarding
Comparison of Onboarding features of Hire by Google (discontinued) and Jive and Zimyo
Feature
Hire by Google (discontinued)
-
Ratings
Jive
-
Ratings
Zimyo
9.0
1 Ratings
11% above category average
New hire portal
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Performance and Goals
Comparison of Performance and Goals features of Hire by Google (discontinued) and Jive and Zimyo
Feature
Hire by Google (discontinued)
-
Ratings
Jive
-
Ratings
Zimyo
8.8
1 Ratings
8% above category average
Corporate goal setting
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Individual goal setting
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Line-of sight-visibility
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Performance tracking
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Performance Management
Comparison of Performance Management features of Hire by Google (discontinued) and Jive and Zimyo
Feature
Hire by Google (discontinued)
-
Ratings
Jive
-
Ratings
Zimyo
8.6
1 Ratings
7% above category average
Performance plans
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Performance improvement plans
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Review status tracking
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Review reminders
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Multiple review frequency
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Succession Planning
Comparison of Succession Planning features of Hire by Google (discontinued) and Jive and Zimyo
Google Hire is very good at doing the basics well. I believe for most internal HR departments at small companies, this is all you need. It also works well for small to medium-sized staffing companies that just want something reliable and easy to use. What Google Hire doesn't do very well is be flexible. They don't have custom options, they don't have a ton of settings, and their development cycle is slow. As a result, it's pretty much what you see is what you get.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
It's definitely worth considering Jive for the type of application we've developed i.e. a central shared repository for all employees to host and discuss information. I can't say I have ever used a superior tool, but they may exist. I'm just not sure I would want to use it exclusively for file hosting, though. It does integrate with various other tools, so perhaps it would be fine if used in conjunction with another tool for that purpose.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
Best suited for automated HR process and effective employee engagement. Not so appropriate for companies who have very specific processes and require customizations that are out of the ordinary.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Google does search well so when I search through our database for candidates, I'm confident that I'm pulling up all the right people from what we have.
They have a modern and nice user interface - this is one of the biggest reasons to use it over other systems, as most ATS' are pretty ancient looking and not very pleasant to use.
Their support is very good at answering and addressing questions.
Their pricing is incredible. I'm sure at some point it will change, but for small companies paying 100+ per user for other ATS' - it's incredible to pay 100/month for the whole company.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Presence of Russian language (localization can be independently established)
You can configure several information tapes with different themes. One for work, the second for communication
A newly-arrived network user immediately receives a prepared block for beginners. After completing several game tasks, the user will receive the basics of using Jive.
There is a template for each scenario. There is even a template for planning R&D, and there are more than twenty of them.
Integrates with MS Office, Google Drive, Google Docs
There are all platforms (even Winphone and blackberry)
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Despite many many months of requests, Google still hasn't implemented ANY custom fields. This makes it tough for an external recruiting firm to track what they want (most importantly: desired salary).
The job board integration is not great for external recruiters, mostly at the fault of Indeed. Indeed flagged us as a recruiting firm and so none of our jobs actually go live. While I know this is an Indeed problem (we had the same problem when using Bullhorn), Breezy ATS never has that problem for us so I don't know what they're doing differently.
Their development cycles are quite frankly very slow. I've requested some features, and while support is great about telling me it's coming or in the pipeline, I honestly don't really see a difference in the product since we started using it. It's still great to use, and we still love the software, but there haven't been too many visible improvements that make any difference to our work.
Being Google, it can sometimes be frustrating that one arm doesn't talk to the other. For example, they announced a Gmail for Works App/Extension integration, but for some reason when they launched it, admins of a domain couldn't install it. Google Hire pointed to the Google for Works team, and it took literally months to fix. Not the end of the world, but just very silly considering they're the same company.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
There are always external factors that can impact this decision but currently, the Jive platform is maintaining its lead in the market place in this area. If the innovation in this space by Jive continues, then this number will remain high. Integration with other systems and adaptability to changes in the market or in client needs will also make this decision hard to predict more then 6 months into the future
It was harder to use that expected. The admin needs to be code savvy to truly customize the system. And users need to trained on the system and the setup. Trainings and monitoring need to continue to enforce use.
Uptime was OK. But there was one day that the system crashed for a whole day. Our company was unable to operate. And all the plugins to word/excel froze causing those systems to freeze.
Jive posted a statement to the media saying all customers were up, but we were not.
They did an OK job when I needed them. Except for the one day the system went down. Jive pointed the finger at the hosting company, and the hosting company pointed the finger at Jive. No reliable information came to us.
Jive online training is there. It is OK/average. I feel some other companies are doing better. It is not a piece that is required to have a successfully implementation, but it could be useful to improve it
I picked Google Hire after spending about 3 months on Bullhorn. I found Bullhorn to be terrible. It's WAY more customizable and theoretically powerful, but it's also a pain to set up and maintain. Even just getting your job page set up on your own site required tech support. Getting it eventually to what you want could be a great benefit, but Google Hire does great right out of the box and is a lot cheaper. Breezy HR is a great system. It's a bit more expensive than Google Hire for multiple job postings, but their system is equally easy to use and straight forward. However, we are all in on Google Products, so it was just a no brainer to go with Hire for a better price and most likely a better search function.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
We had a Google phone number set up before and Jive was a lot better option than that. It is more consistent and can be configured much easier and with more advanced settings. Additionally, based on the pricing as well as working with the rep on our account, it was a perfect option for us
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Google Hire makes, unfortunately, a very little impact on our ROI, but I think in the ATS world that's a good thing. It simply acts as a record that we can put everything in and easily reference, and the fact that it works overall makes it a positive software product in the long run.
While the search works great, I don't know that I've ever specifically found a candidate and placed them due to it. That could be a result of our job reqs though.
The biggest most obvious impact is really just the price. We needed a tool that does what Google Hire does, reliably. Most other companies charge at least 150 or so for 2 people, whereas Google Hire is 100/month for many users. It gives us flexibility for the future and helps minimize what could be a big expense. That definitely helps our bottom line.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
reduce amount of files/documents scattered & lost across shared drives
increased discovery, awareness and interaction of historically more separated individuals & team functions across the organisation
from an IT perspective, we've benefited from improved IT operations (e.g. troubleshooting info shared and easily searched/found with all team members - such that even junior team members can solve technical problems outside of business hours, lessening the burden for standby/call-in for more senior team members)
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info