Google Voice vs. MiVoice Business

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Google Voice
Score 7.8 out of 10
N/A
Google Voice is a free IP telephony service that provides users with one phone number that can be forwarded to multiple phones or devices. It includes features such as call forwarding, voicemail translation, text messaging, and voice calls. Fees may apply for international calling.
$10
per month
MiVoice Business
Score 6.0 out of 10
N/A
MiVoice Business is a unified communications platform from Canadian Mitel Networks Corporation, for businesses with 5 to 65,000 potential users.N/A
Pricing
Google VoiceMiVoice Business
Editions & Modules
Starter
$10
per user/per month
Standard
$20
per user/per month
Premier
$30
per user/per month
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Google VoiceMiVoice Business
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Google VoiceMiVoice Business
Features
Google VoiceMiVoice Business
Cloud PBX
Comparison of Cloud PBX features of Product A and Product B
Google Voice
5.2
53 Ratings
43% below category average
MiVoice Business
6.6
1 Ratings
19% below category average
Hosted PBX6.025 Ratings6.01 Ratings
Multi-level Interactive Voice Response (IVR)3.027 Ratings7.01 Ratings
User templates1.419 Ratings7.01 Ratings
Call reports6.746 Ratings4.01 Ratings
Directory of employee names9.027 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Call Management
Comparison of Call Management features of Product A and Product B
Google Voice
8.4
67 Ratings
0% above category average
MiVoice Business
7.0
1 Ratings
18% below category average
Answering rules8.446 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Call recording8.452 Ratings2.01 Ratings
Call park6.422 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Call screening10.060 Ratings5.01 Ratings
Message alerts9.065 Ratings10.01 Ratings
VoIP system collaboration
Comparison of VoIP system collaboration features of Product A and Product B
Google Voice
7.5
44 Ratings
6% below category average
MiVoice Business
3.3
1 Ratings
83% below category average
Video conferencing6.222 Ratings1.01 Ratings
Audio conferencing7.839 Ratings7.01 Ratings
Video screen sharing8.014 Ratings2.01 Ratings
Instant messaging8.027 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile apps
Comparison of Mobile apps features of Product A and Product B
Google Voice
6.9
63 Ratings
15% below category average
MiVoice Business
-
Ratings
Mobile app for iOS6.645 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile app for Android7.251 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Google VoiceMiVoice Business
Small Businesses
CloudTalk
CloudTalk
Score 7.5 out of 10
CloudTalk
CloudTalk
Score 7.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
CloudTalk
CloudTalk
Score 7.5 out of 10
CloudTalk
CloudTalk
Score 7.5 out of 10
Enterprises
Cisco Unified Communications Manager (Call Manager)
Cisco Unified Communications Manager (Call Manager)
Score 8.6 out of 10
Cisco Unified Communications Manager (Call Manager)
Cisco Unified Communications Manager (Call Manager)
Score 8.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Google VoiceMiVoice Business
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(71 ratings)
6.0
(1 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.3
(7 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(9 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.0
(35 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
10.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
7.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Professional Services
7.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Google VoiceMiVoice Business
Likelihood to Recommend
Google
I do think Google Voice works well for organizations that do not have a support team meant to provide regular telephone support, and instead do so on an ad hoc basis. I would not recommend it for high-volume call activities, such as SDR motions.
Read full review
Mitel Networks Corporation
As a phone system, MiVoice Business is absolutely fantastic. It's equipment and even virtual appliances are extremely stable. Simple auto attendants and making/receiving calls is where the strength is. Where is needs help is the Windows-based software. Upgrading this can be extremely difficult and it frequently fails for no reason. Services stop running and needs frequent reboots. The client has improved greatly with newer releases but can be buggy. Sadly, the old ways of a traditional desktop phone is dying and I think MiVoice Business isn't as good as some other options that provide more. The end user client just isn't as stable as something like Microsoft Teams or Zoom Voice that can provide a more stable soft phone experience.
Read full review
Pros
Google
  • Google Voice has been great for setting up additional phone lines and numbers.
  • The voicemail inbox is a great feature and you can see when messages come in online and listen to the messages from your computer.
  • Google Voice allows us to have multiple phone numbers and lines for specific business purposes.
Read full review
Mitel Networks Corporation
  • Virtual appliances if you have a strong VM infrastructure
  • The user client is decent and has improved since earlier versions of MiVoice Business
  • Extremely easy to setup new extensions/users
  • For the most part, it's an extremely stable system with just making and receiving phone calls.
Read full review
Cons
Google
  • There has not been much innovation since the initial release.
  • It doesn't handle SMS well.
  • It does not natively integrate with CRM without legacy complication
  • It is not supported by Google as it once was
  • Call Recording is non-existent
  • Call-Tree or Virtual Auto-Attendant needs are not available
Read full review
Mitel Networks Corporation
  • Softphone working through a VPN/Work-From-Home has always been a struggle
  • While I'm told an upgrade is near, the Contact Center is outdated and needs work
  • The upgrade process is very flakey and regularly fails on a Window server.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Google
Google Voice has been invaluable for us in our effort to provide exceptional customer service. With Google Voice, we have been able to increase our customer interactions while reducing the wait time to reach a live person on our team. We couldn't be more pleased with the way things have worked out since implementing Google Voice.
Read full review
Mitel Networks Corporation
No answers on this topic
Usability
Google
I think it works really well in the arena it operates in, but not so well in areas where an enterprise system would be more appropriate. It's great for quick solutions that just work, but not so much for more complex call management tasks.
Read full review
Mitel Networks Corporation
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Google
They do not offer support unless you have the Business account for Google Voice under G Suite. This is tough, because Google doesn't really have a customer support team for this service, so when it gets shut down for a few hours, we have no choice but to wait it out. But this doesn't happen that often, which is great.
Read full review
Mitel Networks Corporation
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Google
It is a pretty seamless program to transfer to, even for people who either have little experience with these programs or people who were stuck on Skype
Read full review
Mitel Networks Corporation
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Google
The integrations of Google Voice with all our devices are flawless, Android, iOS, Windows, Linux and Mac. Also, the call performance is far superior on wifi as well as on mobile data. With Skype, we had several problems with personal accounts, performance issues, and in general, it felt awkward to use it.
Read full review
Mitel Networks Corporation
I've used MiVoice Business at multiple employers. Once of them was moving from a very old Avaya PBX, another was with an NEC phone system that was slightly newer. MiVoice was far more easier to setup phones, setup users, manage voicemail, ETC. While we had consultants perform any upgrades with Avaya and NEC, MiVoice we did more collaborative with our support partner but we ran into far more issues with upgrades of MiVoice. My last 2 companies have discussed moving their phone system to Microsoft Teams and my current position they've already done that. All the issues with MiVoice relating to upgrades and issues with the Connect client are not existant with Teams. Teams is the bar, sadly MiVoice Business - while a very good product - falls short. They just haven't yet resolved issues that have long existed and in a pre-covid world it was OK. Now that people are displaced, the office environment has changed and end users are not isolated to a desk with a physical phone. MiVoice Business needs to catch up.
Read full review
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
Google
Google Voice should be also be use to those who have difficulty in speaking English. So the contract term will need to be a little strict as Google Voice is used in navigations as the part of GPRS navigation is personal. The private data need to be in control much more securely and safely.
Read full review
Mitel Networks Corporation
No answers on this topic
Professional Services
Google
It help to connect with the products that we use as a part. We need to get in touch with our professional world. It is like a tool that helps us to get in touch with everything from A to Z in our professional careers. So we need to be in touch with everything as linearly as the jpb can be done.
Read full review
Mitel Networks Corporation
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Google
  • Cost for Google Voice is stellar, starting at $10/mo per user.
  • While it doesn't offer a new Audio/Video conferencing solution it does integrate with GSuite so it makes use of Google Calendar and Hangouts/ Google Meet.
  • Gets the employee's to use their company phone numbers more as texting is easy and deployment is simple.
  • The cell phone app is reliable and easy to deploy.
Read full review
Mitel Networks Corporation
  • Was able to replace our old dying PBX system
  • Softphone, when it's working, allows users to answer phone calls from home
  • Can leverage our existing VM infrastructure to use virtual appliances instead of physical appliances
Read full review
ScreenShots