Greenhouse vs. Mitratech TalentReef

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Greenhouse
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
Greenhouse is an ATS for companies of all sizes. Greenhouse's software supports every stage of the hiring process, from sourcing to onboarding, with the goal of empowering companies to hire top talent quickly, consistently and fairly as their business grows.N/A
Mitratech TalentReef
Score 6.0 out of 10
N/A
Mitratech TalentReef is a recruitment and talent management system optimized for service-sector workforces. It emphasizes its support for regulatory compliance, automated workflows, and mobile accessibility across its functions for recruiting, onboarding, training, and performance management.N/A
Pricing
GreenhouseMitratech TalentReef
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
GreenhouseMitratech TalentReef
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeRequiredNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
GreenhouseMitratech TalentReef
Considered Both Products
Greenhouse
Chose Greenhouse
Interms of price point Greenhouse is placed very well. The pricing is reasonable and affordable compared to its competitors. iCIMS is a lot bigger ATS with higher pricing and lot of features. I would rate Greenhouse higher on ease of usage and pricing
Chose Greenhouse
Greenhouse was far better for us
Chose Greenhouse
I prefer Greenhouse to Workday's built-in talent tool as Greenhouse is significantly more intuitive and easier to use. Our whole recruiting team prefers Greenhouse.
Chose Greenhouse
A lot of new features and Recruiter friendly Interface is what made us to choose Greenhouse over any other competition in Market. Cost is another factor as Greenhouse is available at a very competitive price in Market. This is an overall package for all your recruitment, …
Chose Greenhouse
Greenhouse has mastered the ATS tool and continuously improves features based on soliciting feedback from their customers. They do a great job at listening and adjusting based on the growing needs of their customers in the talent management space.
Chose Greenhouse
Greenhouse is better in terms of usability as it user-friendly and easy to navigate around. It has helped streamline the recruitment process which allows automation of job postings to social sites, candidate search.

From the HR team, it has helped them to provide a better …
Chose Greenhouse
Greenhouse offers more features is more customizable then the other tools mentioned above!
Chose Greenhouse
I prefer using Greenhouse as it's more user friendly and the reporting feature is awesome.
Chose Greenhouse
I've previous used a recruitment tool powered by Salesforce at a previous company. This tool was effective for sourcing through a resume database however not as user-friendly for managing talent pipelines. Greenhouse is one of the best recruitment tools to onboard teams onto …
Chose Greenhouse
Greenhouse definitely compares favorably to its main competitors. The last few years have seen massive investments in recruiting technology companies, leading to a bit of an arms race with each of the top players in the market offering robust roadmaps of forthcoming features. …
Chose Greenhouse
Greenhouse does a much better job making the applying process smoother than other competitors. Specifically, I find that when using Greenhouse the time it takes to fill out the application and submit is significantly less than most other services. I'd even say that I am more …
Chose Greenhouse
I prefer Greenhouse to the other products as their suite of services seems to be much larger and more diverse. By using Greenhouse I know that I can use it for the whole process from introduction to hiring whereas in some others I cannot and will need to loop in other products.
Chose Greenhouse
Well workday has its advantages but Greenhouse solves hiring team challenges.
Chose Greenhouse
Greenhouse is the standard, it is the most expensive but it's worth it. If you wanted to spend less, I'd suggest Lever but that will also mean cutting on some neat features that could improve your recruiting process.
Chose Greenhouse
Far more user friendly, better automation and better at workflow processes through to onboarding candidates
Chose Greenhouse
GH was already there at my work.
GH overall better experience
better customization, more options, more professional and developed compared to recruitee (later/newer stage ATS)
Chose Greenhouse
Tools appears very light to use. It does not take forever to load. the interface is very simple but capable, unlike many ATS's. The tools is Simple yet loaded with very useful functionalities that save a lot of time and expedites the processes. For different stakeholders, the …
Chose Greenhouse
Many startups will end up using Lever or Greenhouse as an ATS system and they are very comparable. I love Lever as well but Greenhouse just has more functionalities and it higher capacities especially working with a bigger company from 500-1000 high growth scale. Lever is a …
Chose Greenhouse
HireEZ is a great system and I am thankful it connects with Greenhouse. It has improved our pipeline and outputs.
Chose Greenhouse
It was the only one which the company provided since I started, so didnt have an option not to use it
Chose Greenhouse
I believe that Lever is slightly better than Greenhouse as it's more convenient and you can communicate with candidates through it. However, I do think Greenhouse is really useful and has almost all the features you may need to track candidates and job postings. My company uses …
Chose Greenhouse
I think Greenhouse is slightly better.
Chose Greenhouse
The design of Greenhouse is straightforward and organized. We evaluated other applicant tracking systems recently and found them to still stand out as one of the most user-friendly. It serves many vital functions that a couple of other applicant tracking systems lacked. The …
Mitratech TalentReef
Chose Mitratech TalentReef
TalentReef is a much more paired down, basic version of both iCIMS and Paylocity; with iCIMS being far and away from the most robust of the three.
Chose Mitratech TalentReef
I have used other software in the past for employee management (PeopleMatter) and TalentReef was easy to train with my management staff, easy to use for application management, and had a low error rate. The ratings for applications and questionnaires are helpful when …
Chose Mitratech TalentReef
TalentReef has a better interface than SnagAJob, but that is just about it. SnagAJob did a very good job in applicant flow, however, they also advertise for other companies during the application process which is a major downside to their system.

Newton is far superior not only …
Chose Mitratech TalentReef
We came from Info PeopleAnswers and used their ATS for years. Prior to going to talentReef, we looked at CareerBuilder's ATS and at Snagajob's ATS. At the time, neither had the integrated onboarding and exporting data components. I also like the feature of the posi-fit …
Chose Mitratech TalentReef
Previously we worked with Unicru. I am not sure why we switched, but talentReef has not been a disappointment.
Chose Mitratech TalentReef
talentReef is a much better solution as it allows for more dynamic job posting, posting to multiple hiring sites, and streamlined on-boarding process.
Chose Mitratech TalentReef
talentReef seemed a better value for the money.
Chose Mitratech TalentReef
ADP, Kronos, SAP

For the price, and for what the organization receives, it really is tough to beat talentReef.
Chose Mitratech TalentReef

I have evaluated several other products in the marketplace and I believe that TalentReef continues to outperform its peers in the following areas:

  • customizable to meet the needs of MY business
  • support team available for same day issue resolution
Chose Mitratech TalentReef
talentReef accessibility and easy to use platform benefited the field management the best.
Chose Mitratech TalentReef
This is our first ATS and we selected it because of ease of use and price.
Chose Mitratech TalentReef
Ease of use, entering data is seamless and functionality is good and saves time. The online hiring paperwork simple for candidates to complete. Reports are easy to create and save. Value for the money is positive and on-boarding of the system was quick and thorough. We selected …
Chose Mitratech TalentReef
Our company has not used a similar program, but we did go through a lengthy process when choosing a vendor. TalentReef's product was more impressive than the others we looked at, but the TalentReef team was what made us choose to partner with them. Again, the culture is …
Features
GreenhouseMitratech TalentReef
Recruiting / ATS
Comparison of Recruiting / ATS features of Product A and Product B
Greenhouse
8.7
Ratings
9% above category average
Mitratech TalentReef
6.8
Ratings
4% below category average
Job Requisition Management9.60 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Company Website Posting9.60 Ratings9.90 Ratings
Publish to Social Media7.30 Ratings4.00 Ratings
Job Search Site Posting7.50 Ratings9.90 Ratings
Customized Application Form7.50 Ratings2.30 Ratings
Resume Management9.80 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Duplicate Candidate Prevention8.00 Ratings1.40 Ratings
Candidate Search7.90 Ratings5.20 Ratings
Applicant Tracking9.40 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Collaboration9.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Task Creation and Delegation9.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Email Templates9.50 Ratings8.00 Ratings
User Permissions9.00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Notifications and Alerts9.50 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Reporting7.50 Ratings7.10 Ratings
Onboarding
Comparison of Onboarding features of Product A and Product B
Greenhouse
-
Ratings
Mitratech TalentReef
6.5
Ratings
11% below category average
New hire portal00 Ratings6.20 Ratings
Manager tracking tools00 Ratings6.20 Ratings
Compliance tracking and reporting00 Ratings7.10 Ratings
Performance and Goals
Comparison of Performance and Goals features of Product A and Product B
Greenhouse
-
Ratings
Mitratech TalentReef
8.0
Ratings
9% above category average
Corporate goal setting00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Subordinate goal setting00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Performance tracking00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Performance Management
Comparison of Performance Management features of Product A and Product B
Greenhouse
-
Ratings
Mitratech TalentReef
6.0
Ratings
13% below category average
Performance plans00 Ratings2.20 Ratings
Manager note taking00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Performance improvement plans00 Ratings2.30 Ratings
Review status tracking00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Multiple review frequency00 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Reporting00 Ratings6.90 Ratings
Best Alternatives
GreenhouseMitratech TalentReef
Small Businesses
Breezy HR
Breezy HR
Score 8.9 out of 10
Paycor
Paycor
Score 7.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Breezy HR
Breezy HR
Score 8.9 out of 10
Engagedly
Engagedly
Score 8.6 out of 10
Enterprises
PeopleStrong
PeopleStrong
Score 10.0 out of 10
PeopleStrong
PeopleStrong
Score 10.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
GreenhouseMitratech TalentReef
Likelihood to Recommend
9.5
(0 ratings)
7.1
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.2
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
10.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
6.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
GreenhouseMitratech TalentReef
Likelihood to Recommend
Greenhouse merges very well with most of the Job Board we use such as Indeed, Linkedin Recruiter and others. It makes it easy to import date from these job boards onto the system. However, more can be done when it comes to bulk candidate import, I think there should be a feature that allows us to adding bulk candidates at a go.
Read full review
I rarely give 10/10, mainly because I have learned that that we can always learn new things and to grow. Thus, I feel that same applies to Talent Reef. While I struggled a bit in the beginning to use this application, It is probably that struggle that has made me a better user for being so persistent at using it. Now that I have more than just the basics I think for any size company the functionality of the program will work for them.
Read full review
Pros
  • Customization of interview plans, questions, interviewer roles for multiple positions
  • Manages efficient and timely candidate, hiring manager, and interviewer communication
  • Integrates with other tools needed in the hiring process such as sourcing tools and onboarding systems
  • Provides analytics and reporting to allow for data insights and process improvements
  • Provides an Onboarding feature that makes the hiring cycle seamless from first interview to hire date
Read full review
  • As an Administrator of the talentReef system, I have access to all applicants for every store across our system all in one location.
  • It is a one-stop function for virtually all of our new hire paperwork.
  • We have not gone entirely paperless with our employee files, but talentReef would be of great benefit to us if/when we choose to move in that direction.
  • The system is relatively easy to learn for store users with all levels of digital expertise.
  • The cost to the organization is extremely reasonable.
Read full review
Cons
  • Greenhouse Security is simple, but not that granular. For example, everytime new recruiter joins, we have to give them access manually one by one. There is no one click or an easy way to auto assign security unlike other systems that we use such as Workday.
  • Greenhouse reporting is very lacking. Even though we are on the highest tier, we cannot extract data through this delivered feature. For example, scorecard custom questions. We have to do this through SQL.
  • Greenhouse Audit Log is also lacking. It is not useful at all. We cannot even see what job info changed and who changed it even though we are on the highest tier now.
Read full review
  • Applicant flow is terrible. You can post jobs on Indeed for free, and receive a better applicant flow than posting through TalentReef. TalentReef was unable to provide any reasoning for this to happen
  • If you want to change/edit your onboarding documents, you need to e-mail them to support. This can sometimes take more than 48 hours to accomplish, and more often than not, was not done as requested
  • Customer Support is terrible. When they respond to you, they do not answer the question fully or provide any alternative solutions
  • Pricing is very high. There are numerous other alternatives in the market that provide better services for half the price
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
I think Greenhouse is an effective, easy way to interview and score recruits -- especially as our organization grows in size
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
The overall interface is very easy to understand and it is capable. There are a lot of very useful functionalities that help in productivity as simple as tags for the coordinators to manage their day to day tasks. The continuous improvements greenhouse brings to the users are really impressive. We use quite a few integrations with it and they help the job even hassle free.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
I have never needed to call Greenhouse for support. I am not the primary account holder, nor do I use Greenhouse enough to merit calling support. I delegate that responsibility to the Recruiting team. They have never mentioned any experience with Greenhouse technical support, either bad or good. I would assume that they would tell me if the support was poor.
Read full review
We have had very few issues with talentReef, but when we did they were resolved quickly and in a timely manner.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
I think we could have used more delivered functionality and less customized which now results in more maintenance
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
A lot of new features and Recruiter friendly Interface is what made us to choose Greenhouse over any other competition in Market. Cost is another factor as Greenhouse is available at a very competitive price in Market. This is an overall package for all your recruitment, Engagement and reporting needs.
Read full review
We came from Info PeopleAnswers and used their ATS for years. Prior to going to talentReef, we looked at CareerBuilder's ATS and at Snagajob's ATS. At the time, neither had the integrated onboarding and exporting data components. I also like the feature of the posi-fit questions.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Streamlined the hiring process and new hire time to value
  • Increased satisfaction for hiring managers and sales account managers
  • Allowed us to gain access to a bigger and more targeted talent pool
  • Saved us time and helped us avoid things falling by the wayside by keeping things in one place and sending automated alerts
Read full review
  • Our initial ROI was having the ability for our applicants to apply online and move away from paper. This was a must, so we can compete for employees in our area.
  • Our next ROI was improving our onboarding process. The TalentReef onboarding process protects us from having incomplete files and it also saves us labor due to the process being quicker and efficient.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Greenhouse Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of