Hippo CMMS vs. IBM Maximo Application Suite

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Hippo CMMS
Score 2.0 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Hippo CMMS is a maintenance management software tool for organizations of all sizes. It is a SaaS solution offering a customized interface designed to suit users' operational maintenance needs. The vendor states that Hippo’s UX design principle has always been the same: features only have value if they're easy to find and use, and so they state their layout is clean and intuitive, making the software a breeze to learn. Hippo CMMS has been providing maintenance software to…
$35
per month per user
IBM Maximo Application Suite
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
IBM Maximo Application Suite is an enterprise asset management (EAM) platform.N/A
Pricing
Hippo CMMSIBM Maximo Application Suite
Editions & Modules
Hippo Starter
$35
per month per user
Hippo Plus
$55
per month per user
Hippo Pro
$75
per month per user
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Hippo CMMSIBM Maximo Application Suite
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesYes
Entry-level Setup Fee$600 Single UserNo setup fee
Additional DetailsHippo CMMS subscription pricing is determined based on the number of users. A user is anyone that needs to log in and access Hippo' s core features. Users include managers, owners, technicians, and supervisors. Maintenance requesters are not users. Price is also determined by required features. We have pricing plans for complex operations that require deeper functionality and plans for simple operations that are new to CMMS.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Hippo CMMSIBM Maximo Application Suite
Top Pros
Top Cons
Best Alternatives
Hippo CMMSIBM Maximo Application Suite
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies

No answers on this topic

IFS Applications
IFS Applications
Score 7.0 out of 10
Enterprises

No answers on this topic

IFS Applications
IFS Applications
Score 7.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Hippo CMMSIBM Maximo Application Suite
Likelihood to Recommend
2.0
(8 ratings)
7.6
(45 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(6 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
7.6
(5 ratings)
Support Rating
8.6
(4 ratings)
6.9
(4 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(3 ratings)
User Testimonials
Hippo CMMSIBM Maximo Application Suite
Likelihood to Recommend
Eptura (formerly Condeco and iOFFICE + SpaceIQ)
I find that Hippo [CMMS] is really well suited for any scenario. Most CMMS are geared toward manufacturing or industrial use, Hippo [CMMS] works as well for a school or church as it would for a factory. The ease of use for the requestor makes it an ideal platform for any institution.
Read full review
IBM
IBM Maximo Application Suite is well suited for organizations looking for an application to track their end-to-end procurement and supply chain process. It can also be used for billing services, but that would mainly be for services provided as part of a work order, not voluminous customer billing. IBM Maximo Application Suite allows us to have one application where someone from procurement can input contracts and details, someone from any various department can create a requisition and superiors can use automated workflow to approve a purchase order, and someone at an operations location can receive and store materials. Subsequently, someone in the field can submit their hours and material used and it be approved via automated workflow for an invoice to be created. Payment functionality is possible, but we did not implement this aspect of IBM Maximo Application Suite. To note, throughout the process, interfacing can be set up to send transactions to your general ledger. As far as interfacing, IBM Maximo Application Suite also offers tools and configuration to set up endpoints. We have been able to set up REST APIs and request/responses without heavy involvement from developers. This is a nice bonus if integrating with multiple applications.
Read full review
Pros
Eptura (formerly Condeco and iOFFICE + SpaceIQ)
  • Simple to use Work requester.
  • Great customer service and support.
  • Not filled with non-essential items like a lot of "Larger" company CMMS systems
Read full review
IBM
  • Delivers Out-of-Box solutions for various industries without the need for customization and configuration
  • Modules and Applications are well developed and linked in an orderly way, with proper documentation and help guides that allow end users to start using the system with ease
  • Powerful Work Management, Contracts, Inventory, and Purchasing applications and features that are a better match to other ERP applications today
Read full review
Cons
Eptura (formerly Condeco and iOFFICE + SpaceIQ)
  • Completed work order reporting can be improved. It seems harder than it should be to get the data I need.
  • I would like to streamline the work order closing procedure. I feel like it takes longer than it should to open various screens and add labor, mark tasks complete, change status, etc. It is a minor inconvenience, but just waiting a few seconds opening up a new window is time-consuming with many WO at a time.
  • Labor tracking and reporting could be improved.
Read full review
IBM
  • Hard to implement. A high number of resources and manpower is necessary to implement and upgrade IBM Maximo due to its robustness and number of functionalities.
  • Version fragmentation. Due to the challenge imposed by a version upgrade, it is common to find systems relying on legacy versions of Maximo which might become a challenge for the support team.
  • Unfriendly UI. The excess of functionalities and services available might become a challenge for a starting user. Although it is possible to customize the UI to fit the exact needs of each user, it is important to map exactly what each user needs.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Eptura (formerly Condeco and iOFFICE + SpaceIQ)
No answers on this topic
IBM
IBM MAS is the leader in the EAM space. They continue to evolve with the newest technology to stay on the forefront of cutting edge asset management. Their continued international growth and market share demonstrate the effectiveness of the product, its ease of use, and the return on investment of new functionalities.
Read full review
Usability
Eptura (formerly Condeco and iOFFICE + SpaceIQ)
No answers on this topic
IBM
The IBM Maximo Application Suite is well known for inventory management solutions. This solution is in use by many corporations but mostly I have seen its use in Ports, defense and aerospace industries. Some of the benefits are 1. asset tracking is amazing 2. Maintenance cost is less 3. Reduced inspection costs 4. Less downtime 5. It allows customization 6 Simplify data management 7. Highly adaptable
Read full review
Support Rating
Eptura (formerly Condeco and iOFFICE + SpaceIQ)
I've used Hippo for several years now. I'm sure other programs have been developed since I did my comparison testing. But Hippo has always done everything we needed it to do. It's very reliable. My guys don't doubt whether or not it's doing its job. The calendar view, ease of use and floor mapping set this program apart from others.
Read full review
IBM
Support is good (since we are business partner and do have direct contact with product development). For customers it might be sometime difficult to address real bugs ("work as designed syndrome") and/or additions, improvements or ideas. Creating them is quite easy, but track them in terms of follow-up can be done better.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Eptura (formerly Condeco and iOFFICE + SpaceIQ)
No answers on this topic
IBM
Implementation of IBM MAS as a service provider has been easy. The functionality in the OEM space has been the best of its class with all related modules and application subject to maintenance
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Eptura (formerly Condeco and iOFFICE + SpaceIQ)
Ease of end-user to put in a task that they would like to have completed. Hippo is really easy to use and to complete tasks. If a person putting in a task includes their email or phone number we can get ahold of them to ask and questions and it lets them know progress of their task.
Read full review
IBM
As a computerized maintenance management system i do not have experience of any other system. The only experience I have is for Maximo and it works excellent for me. I am using many modules available in Maximo and all of these modules are almost fulfilling all of my business needs.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Eptura (formerly Condeco and iOFFICE + SpaceIQ)
  • Allows tracking something that we did not have before
  • Decision making is now with hard data
  • Replacement and repair cost have been reduced with tracking of maintenance.
Read full review
IBM
  • Need multiple IT developers and DBA's to run the software at an enterprise level.
  • We use it for logging and taking repair work orders, handling of parts orders, and fulfillment and job scheduling.
  • The desktop version is very easy to use
Read full review
ScreenShots

Hippo CMMS Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of

IBM Maximo Application Suite Screenshots

Screenshot of where during a collaborative session, an expert technician can create notes to annotate the streaming video feed. These are viewed by the requesting technician through an AR experience during the session.Screenshot of an example work order containing relevant details about the location, asset, and tasks to be done. The technician can conduct inspections, make meter readings, and review historical information.Screenshot of a single view that lets the user understand past, present, and predicted asset performance, know when the asset is going to fail, and take action to reduce risk and minimize costs.Screenshot of where operators can see everything they need to know about their assets at every level across an organization and alerts draw their attention to problems right away.Screenshot of the tool used to label defects, then use labeled images to train deep learning vision models to spot defects in the field.