Hiver is a customer service platform that brings together communication channels, apps, and data to improve customer support operations. Hiver enables real-time collaboration across every customer communication channel, offering AI and automation to resolve issues and help teams work faster. Hiver states that over 10,000 teams of all shapes and sizes globally from Flexport to Harvard University, Vacasa, and Epic Games rely on Hiver to deliver support that wins and retains customers for…
$24
per month per user
Infor CRM
Score6 out of 10
N/A
Infor CRM delivers tools for individuals, teams, and companies focused on increasing sales performance and the insights to optimize sales, marketing, and service strategy and execution. Infor CRM provides sales teams with rich customer information from interactions and transactions across the business and accommodates the modern flexible workforce with multiple access methods. Robust process automation capabilities enable efficiencies and the application of best practices across sales…
N/A
Pricing
Hiver
Infor CRM
Editions & Modules
Lite
$24
per month per user
Growth
$34
per month per user
Pro
$59
per month per user
Elite
Contact Sales
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Hiver
Infor CRM
Free Trial
Yes
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
20% discount for annual pricing.
—
More Pricing Information
Features
Hiver
Infor CRM
Incident and problem management
Comparison of Incident and problem management features of Hiver and Infor CRM
Feature
Hiver
9.0
4 Ratings
9% above category average
Infor CRM
-
Ratings
Organize and prioritize service tickets
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Ticket creation and submission
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Ticket response
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Self Help Community
Comparison of Self Help Community features of Hiver and Infor CRM
Feature
Hiver
8.0
1 Ratings
0% below category average
Infor CRM
-
Ratings
External knowledge base
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Internal knowledge base
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Multi-Channel Help
Comparison of Multi-Channel Help features of Hiver and Infor CRM
Feature
Hiver
8.5
4 Ratings
6% above category average
Infor CRM
-
Ratings
Customer portal
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Email support
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Sales Force Automation
Comparison of Sales Force Automation features of Hiver and Infor CRM
Feature
Hiver
-
Ratings
Infor CRM
7.8
9 Ratings
0% below category average
Customer data management / contact management
00 Ratings
8.48 Ratings
Workflow management
00 Ratings
10.07 Ratings
Territory management
00 Ratings
5.46 Ratings
Opportunity management
00 Ratings
8.46 Ratings
Integration with email client (e.g., Outlook or Gmail)
00 Ratings
5.48 Ratings
Contract management
00 Ratings
5.74 Ratings
Quote & order management
00 Ratings
7.34 Ratings
Interaction tracking
00 Ratings
10.08 Ratings
Channel / partner relationship management
00 Ratings
10.08 Ratings
Customer Service & Support
Comparison of Customer Service & Support features of Hiver and Infor CRM
Feature
Hiver
-
Ratings
Infor CRM
8.3
4 Ratings
8% above category average
Case management
00 Ratings
10.03 Ratings
Call center management
00 Ratings
5.03 Ratings
Help desk management
00 Ratings
10.03 Ratings
Marketing Automation
Comparison of Marketing Automation features of Hiver and Infor CRM
Feature
Hiver
-
Ratings
Infor CRM
2.5
8 Ratings
102% below category average
Lead management
00 Ratings
3.97 Ratings
Email marketing
00 Ratings
1.06 Ratings
CRM Project Management
Comparison of CRM Project Management features of Hiver and Infor CRM
Feature
Hiver
-
Ratings
Infor CRM
4.2
7 Ratings
59% below category average
Task management
00 Ratings
7.17 Ratings
Billing and invoicing management
00 Ratings
3.61 Ratings
Reporting
00 Ratings
2.15 Ratings
CRM Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of CRM Reporting & Analytics features of Hiver and Infor CRM
Feature
Hiver
-
Ratings
Infor CRM
4.2
8 Ratings
58% below category average
Forecasting
00 Ratings
3.64 Ratings
Pipeline visualization
00 Ratings
7.05 Ratings
Customizable reports
00 Ratings
2.18 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Hiver and Infor CRM
Feature
Hiver
-
Ratings
Infor CRM
8.6
9 Ratings
12% above category average
Custom fields
00 Ratings
10.09 Ratings
Custom objects
00 Ratings
7.07 Ratings
Scripting environment
00 Ratings
7.24 Ratings
API for custom integration
00 Ratings
10.06 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Hiver and Infor CRM
Feature
Hiver
-
Ratings
Infor CRM
10.0
8 Ratings
17% above category average
Single sign-on capability
00 Ratings
10.06 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
00 Ratings
10.06 Ratings
Social CRM
Comparison of Social CRM features of Hiver and Infor CRM
Feature
Hiver
-
Ratings
Infor CRM
3.5
2 Ratings
73% below category average
Social data
00 Ratings
4.02 Ratings
Social engagement
00 Ratings
3.02 Ratings
Integrations with 3rd-party Software
Comparison of Integrations with 3rd-party Software features of Hiver and Infor CRM
Feature
Hiver
-
Ratings
Infor CRM
2.9
4 Ratings
89% below category average
Marketing automation
00 Ratings
3.04 Ratings
Compensation management
00 Ratings
2.71 Ratings
Platform
Comparison of Platform features of Hiver and Infor CRM
One scenario where Hiver works really well is in a shared support or billing inbox or anywhere multiple team members need access to the same messages. For example, when a customer emails about a billing question, we used to reply and manually loop in the billing team or forward the message. That often caused confusion, especially when someone forgot to “reply all” or responded only to the teammate instead of the customer.Now with Hiver, we just assign the conversation to the billing inbox, and whoever is available can respond. Everyone on the team can see the thread, status, and notes, which avoids duplicated efforts and missed replies. We also used to rely on Google Groups, but it wasn’t clear if someone had already replied, and there was no easy way to collaborate behind the scenes. Hiver completely solved that for us.As for situations where Hiver might be less ideal, I’d say if your team isn’t using Gmail or Google Workspace, then it’s probably not a good fit. It’s really designed for teams that live in Gmail so the team doesn't have to learn a new system. I'm sure some businesses will require a more robust ticketing solution but for our use case, this was a perfect option to improve outcomes, client service, and satisfaction.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
If you have a mobile workforce, it likely wouldn't be as appropriate (keep in mind we're using the desktop client, and have very limited experience with the web app). It is well suited if your business needs lots of custom processes- find a good vendor. We utilize SimpleSoft out of Ohio, and they have been excellent. Key question: think about where your business is going to be in 5-10 years, and will this CRM solution be able to grow with us?
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Saleslogix functionality can be managed to a very granular level for each individual using it. Within the users profile you can restrict access to modules, remove write permission, remove export privileges, etc.
Saleslogix has one of the best sync engines I have ever seen. If you allow your outside sales reps to have their own database, they can modify customer record while off line and when they do have internet access they can sync changes in both directions. This functionality works great when you have inside and outside sales staff covering the same territory.
Saleslogix can be customized using Visual Basic Code syntax. This is a positive aspect as well as a negative. Our existing Saleslogix is so customized that if we were to upgrade to 8.0 it would cost us over $20k to redo some of the customizations. Upgrades are frequently incompatible with customizations.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
InforCRM has made dramatic improvements in the web client though in some cases it has been painfully slow to get the most needed things updated. An example is the slow speed of the web client. The newest update is supposed to fix this.
The web client does not autosave, so users have to remember to hit the 'save' button at each screen. This is the biggest complaint of users going from the desktop client to the web client.
I personally would like to see data panes (account, contact, etc.) with the capability to set up a different view for each team and/or security level that would access the data.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Because we've already made the investment in the original on-premise version, the cost per user is relatively low. The product has grown with us and we can now choose a LAN or Web client version and host the site internally, giving us total control of our data. The iPhone and iPad versions allow the sales team quick access in the field and the voice-to-text option is quite handy. SalesLogix doesn't require that our technology stack be constantly up to date which again, keeps our cost down. They are always making enhancements to the product and we can choose to update/upgrade when those enhancements appeal to us enough to justify adding the service pack.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
True ticketing solutions are certainly more robust in that you can typically manage social media channels and phones, etc. But, in my opinion, when you don't have a team solely responsible for managing a ticketing system they can be complicated to implement. With HIVER, we're already all accustomed to managing our own G-Suite inbox, so it was simply a matter of teaching the team how to utilize the solution.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
We selected INFOR CRM over Salesforce simply because it was affordable and didn't have so many 'bells & whistles' that Salesforce has that we were not using. We didn't realize that the compatibility with upgrades were going to be such an issue.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The ROI on showing how many emails are being received and addressed in a timely manner are great for KPIs
the ability to search and ensure emails are not being deleted as an automatic report is sent out the following day saying if any emails were deleted by whom
the ability to automate who gets assigned what emails from specific vendors per entity
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info