Hunter vs. Navattic

The scenario we most commonly use Hunter for is to quickly find and retrieve contact email information. Phone numbers are an added bonus, but they tend to only be available for contacts in the US. SDRs have the extension in order to confirm or to help them "guess" as to what a contact's email address might be. This speeds up our prospecting time considerably. Where Hunter falls short is not being flexible where companies have more than one email format.

Incentivized

Navattic is a powerful tool for product engagement, backed by amazing customer support. Despite its many capabilities, it’s quite intuitive and smooth to use, delivering great value for its cost from the start. Demos and tours look polished and provide a refreshing self-serve experience to users and prospects alike.

Incentivized

• Hunter provides a quick and easy way to look up the email format for any company using the free Google Chrome extension.
• Hunter allows you to upload a bulk list of emails and verify them easily.
• Hunter shows where verified emails were found on web pages and PDF documents. This shows that the emails were published by trusted sources.

Incentivized

• Eye to detail on the visuals used whether modals, tool tips, different type of steps.
• Voice over! Very good introduction
• Easy to use, a plug and play kind of deal which I love

Incentivized

• Hunter is only as valuable as the information it is able to scrape from the internet. If a company has not listed any email addresses online, then Hunter is not going to be able to find it.
• Sometimes Hunter is only able to identify non-personal-specific email addresses (ex: info @, support@, etc.). This makes it difficult to identify personnel emails
• Sometimes companies will have different email domains that Hunter is not able to correlate. For example, when searching for an email address at Lead.com, Hunter is not able to point to ParentCompany.com email addresses that would be more useful.

Incentivized

• Although I like the AI summarizations that highlight and add text in the proper steps, it still needs a human to review
• Some features are hidden within another click like the next/back button or the beacons/highlights. Popular features shouldn't require too many additional clicks to get to.

Incentivized

I think the features are good, but it makes my brain hurt (and feel overtaxed) when I have to jump between searching by name and domain and then searching via a specific email to verify. I wish I could do all of that from one landing page, one über search bar.

Incentivized

The tool is easy to use on it's own but the Navattic team is also phenomenal to work with. They have been instrumental in helping us get set up and confident in building our own demos

Incentivized

Hunter is a good all in one solution, which hasnt always been the case as it used to be a daa only solution. However, other tools like lemlist as slightly more user friendly and make it so simple to build and launch multi-channel campaigns , and do this slightly better than Hunter.

Incentivized

Navattic was about half the price but not half the functionality. There are differences between the two but not enough to justify the price difference.

Incentivized

• Definitely Hunter has built lead lists for our clients in a very fast way for our clients.
• It has managed to cut the times of preparation of lead lists in more than 200% of the time compared to other traditional ways.
• Our clients can now have tons of leads and deliver contents in a faster way to validate these prospects.

Incentivized

• Our demo hub is the website page that contributes and retains most traffic
• Increased time spent on the page
• Reduced bounce rate

Incentivized