IBM Planning Analytics vs. Prophix

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM Planning Analytics
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
IBM Planning Analytics, powered by IBM TM1®, is an integrated planning solution designed to promote collaboration across the organization and help keep pace with the speed of modern business. With its calculation engine, this enterprise performance management solution is designed to help users move beyond the limits of spreadsheets, automating the planning process to drive faster, more accurate results. Use it to unify data sources into one single repository, enabling users to build…
$825
per month 5 users
Prophix
Score 8.5 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
Prophix One, a Financial Performance Platform, is used to improve the speed and accuracy of decision-making within a harmonized user experience. To reduce complexity and uncertainty, the software offers automated insights and planning, budgeting, forecasting, reporting, and consolidation functionalities.N/A
Pricing
IBM Planning AnalyticsProphix
Editions & Modules
Essentials
$825
per month 5 users
Standard
$1,650
per month 10 users
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM Planning AnalyticsProphix
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalOptional
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM Planning AnalyticsProphix
Considered Both Products
IBM Planning Analytics
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
If compared to Excel, it eliminates version control issues and manual consolidation, which saves time and reduces errors.
On the other hand, if we compared with Hyperion, IBM Planning Analytics is more agile and user-friendly, especially with the Excel integration (PAx) and the …
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
IBM Planning Analytics was far more robust and worked well with our existing tools and processes.
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
The overall tool is robust and complete in its capabilities.
It has an edge over other competitors and state of art technology.
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
For strong technical teams and flexibility IBM Planning Analytics is the way to go. For quicker adoption and less technical teams Anaplan is the best option. If consolidation, financials, and moving from legacy tools are main focus than OneStream will be a really good choice. …
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
It is truly hard to compare both products. I like both products and would suggest choosing one but trying both. Some things are better through IBM Planning Analytics and some things are better through the IBM Analytics engine. Ultimately I believe that IBM Planning Analytics …
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
instead several, manual maintained excel spreadsheets, we have now implemented a save repeatable process to get data in and out to the users
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
We chose IBM Planning Analytics because we find that it still uniquely positions with OLAP engine
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
IBM Planning Analytics is my primary focus
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
IBM watsonx.ai and IBM Cognos Analytics
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
In our organization, we chose IBM Planning Analytics because, in our opinion, IBM Planning Analytics has more features
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
IBM Planning Analytics flexibility is what makes it stand out between the others. Generally in other platforms you are restricted to predefined flows. Although it sounds good in the beginning, when you start using those systems you face some challenges when trying to adapt new …
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
Workday Adaptive Planning is really tough to set up and use as a fresher. So I have always faced difficulties helping new joinees to set up and use it. But with IBM Planning Analytics, it is more straightforward and easier to use with a good interface.
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
As it is related to MS Excel, IBM Planning Analytics is a much more robust and complete solution for the CFO or COO in mind. Oracle Hyperion stacks up nicely against IBM Planning Analytics. However, IBM's investment in AI allows Planning Analytics users more options and speed.
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
It includes Oracle Cloud EPM Planning, Anaplan, and Adaptive Insight before deciding to choose IBM Planning Analytics. We selected Planning Analytics because of its work with complicated and many area models, the capability to work with big amounts of data, and compatibility …
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
Other options, namely Anaplan, Oracle EPM Cloud, and SAP Analytics Cloud, were also considered. Anaplan's interface lacked analytical depth. For product design metrics, flexibility was not as good in Oracle EPM Cloud. The final choice was moved by the fact that it was driven …
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
Prior to making the decision to go with IBM Planning Analytics, we had considered such options as Anaplan, Oracle Hyperion, and SAP Analytics Cloud. Despite the collaborative solutions offered by Anaplan and the good connection with other systems by SAP, the superb set of tool …
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
In this case, Vena and Planful are considered as other products that can be compared with IBM Planning Analytics, but among them, IBM Planning Analytics is more optimal in terms of user interface and integration. Its preconfigure risk assessment model and its format and …
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
This was an older verions that was also very good, but the new IBM Planning Analytics is a far better tool that enables better scenario planning or what-if analysis.
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
IBM PA is like having pivot tables on steroids. Possibilities are endless.
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
Ability to plan more products, locations, customers
Less expensive
Client already had IBM PA for FP&A
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
Sandboxing,Integration and Flexibility
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
IBM Planning Analytics is easier to use and setup for me. Easier to make reports. Works fast
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
We have been using IBM Planning Analytics and haven't explored other products that could cover our business needs.
Prophix
Chose Prophix
Prophix was right for what our company wanted and for our size at a good price, we left Hyperion for Prophix
Chose Prophix
We were using Micro before we migrated to Prophix, and I can easily tell that Prophix has a very high advantage over Micro. That's why we left Micro.
Chose Prophix
We previously used Spreadsheet Server to get information out of our ERP (Vista/TC-1). In general, Prophix is faster and more reliable than Spreadsheet server, but the specific integration between Prophix and our ERP (and Project Management Software InEight) has caused us issues
Chose Prophix
Prophix won out for visual aesthetics, flexibility in product use, and the reputation of the support team.
Chose Prophix
I'm not aware of other products or systems we considered. Our implementation was before I joined my current team.
Chose Prophix
Prophix is more user-friendly and easier to navigate.
Chose Prophix
Prophix stands out based on its capabilities for centralizing of financial data, automating workflows, reducing version controls, improving speed, more auditability and better collaboration.
Chose Prophix
User interface is cleaner and allows budget owners to use the system instead of the finance upload.
Chose Prophix
Epicor Financial Planning and Analysis (FP&A)
Chose Prophix
Prophix is so much easier to use that other platforms or products. It can be customized so much easier than other larger, more expensive products. I work for a small university where we have a small finance team and Prophix allows us to tailor reporting to emerging needs in …
Chose Prophix
While others might have an edge in dashboards, Prophix excels at workflows, processes, and reporting.
Chose Prophix
Prophix was already implemented when I joined the company, but in my previous job, we used OneStream, which seemed more complicated to set up and to update behind the scenes if the business changed.
Chose Prophix
In our opinion, Prophix is more flexible and cost-effective.
Chose Prophix
I haven’t used similar products.
Features
IBM Planning AnalyticsProphix
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
7.5
Ratings
1% below category average
Prophix
8.5
Ratings
11% above category average
Pixel Perfect reports7.30 Ratings8.80 Ratings
Customizable dashboards7.30 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates7.70 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
7.6
Ratings
2% below category average
Prophix
8.5
Ratings
9% above category average
Drill-down analysis7.90 Ratings8.90 Ratings
Formatting capabilities7.40 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Integration with R or other statistical packages7.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration7.80 Ratings8.90 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
8.0
Ratings
0% below category average
Prophix
8.7
Ratings
8% above category average
Publish to Web7.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Publish to PDF7.90 Ratings8.90 Ratings
Report Versioning8.30 Ratings8.60 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling7.90 Ratings8.70 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
7.3
Ratings
2% below category average
Prophix
8.5
Ratings
13% above category average
Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)7.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization6.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Predictive Analytics7.80 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Pattern Recognition and Data Mining6.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Access Control and Security
Comparison of Access Control and Security features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
7.8
Ratings
7% below category average
Prophix
8.9
Ratings
6% above category average
Multi-User Support (named login)7.80 Ratings8.80 Ratings
Role-Based Security Model7.40 Ratings8.70 Ratings
Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)8.00 Ratings8.90 Ratings
Report-Level Access Control7.50 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Single Sign-On (SSO)8.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile Capabilities
Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
7.1
Ratings
5% below category average
Prophix
9.2
Ratings
21% above category average
Responsive Design for Web Access7.50 Ratings9.20 Ratings
Mobile Application6.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile5.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting
Comparison of Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
8.7
Ratings
7% above category average
Prophix
8.5
Ratings
5% above category average
Long-term financial planning8.30 Ratings8.60 Ratings
Financial budgeting8.70 Ratings8.80 Ratings
Forecasting9.30 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Scenario modeling9.00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Management reporting8.30 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Consolidation and Close
Comparison of Consolidation and Close features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
8.4
Ratings
8% above category average
Prophix
8.9
Ratings
14% above category average
Financial data consolidation9.20 Ratings8.90 Ratings
Journal entries and reports9.30 Ratings8.90 Ratings
Multi-currency management8.20 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Intercompany Eliminations8.30 Ratings8.60 Ratings
Minority Ownership8.80 Ratings8.80 Ratings
Local and consolidated reporting7.20 Ratings9.20 Ratings
Detailed Audit Trails7.80 Ratings8.60 Ratings
Financial Reporting and Compliance
Comparison of Financial Reporting and Compliance features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
8.4
Ratings
6% above category average
Prophix
9.1
Ratings
14% above category average
Financial Statement Reporting8.00 Ratings9.10 Ratings
Management Reporting8.50 Ratings9.20 Ratings
Excel-based Reporting9.30 Ratings8.80 Ratings
Automated board and financial reporting9.20 Ratings8.70 Ratings
XBRL support for regulatory filing6.80 Ratings9.60 Ratings
Analytics and Reporting
Comparison of Analytics and Reporting features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
8.3
Ratings
3% above category average
Prophix
8.5
Ratings
5% above category average
Personalized dashboards8.90 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Color-coded scorecards7.90 Ratings8.60 Ratings
KPIs8.20 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Cost and profitability analysis8.00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Key Performance Indicator setting8.30 Ratings8.60 Ratings
Benchmarking with external data8.30 Ratings8.60 Ratings
Integration
Comparison of Integration features of Product A and Product B
IBM Planning Analytics
8.7
Ratings
7% above category average
Prophix
8.6
Ratings
6% above category average
Flat file integration8.40 Ratings8.70 Ratings
Excel data integration9.00 Ratings8.60 Ratings
Direct links to 3rd-party data sources8.80 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Best Alternatives
IBM Planning AnalyticsProphix
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Centage
Centage
Score 9.4 out of 10
Centage
Centage
Score 9.4 out of 10
Enterprises
OneStream
OneStream
Score 8.8 out of 10
OneStream
OneStream
Score 8.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM Planning AnalyticsProphix
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(0 ratings)
8.6
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.1
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
7.8
(0 ratings)
8.4
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
9.4
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
8.9
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.3
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
8.4
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
4.0
(0 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
9.1
(0 ratings)
8.3
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
7.6
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
7.8
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM Planning AnalyticsProphix
Likelihood to Recommend
For a CFO or a COO to do budgeting and planning, IBM Planning Analytics would be essential. It is a tool that can take in multiple data sources and showcase them in a multidimensional way. If you are looking just for a BI or reporting tool, Planning Analytics would be considered "overkill".
Read full review
Prophix is best suited if you have a very extensive budgeting process that currently relies on multiple Excel spreadsheets. It is also great if you have on-prem tools that may no longer be supported for reporting. It may not be appropriate if you require an unlimited number of mid-tier users, as it can be very expensive annually. It's definitely not a cheap tool, but the cost can at least be optimized based on users' use cases. In both organizations I've worked for that use it, cost has been mentioned.
Read full review
Pros
  • Handle very large data volumes.
  • Scale to a large number of users.
  • Not having to compromise on business complexity.
  • It can be run by business users.
  • Availability of highly qualified consultants to support businesses.
  • REST API allows for an open eco system and a variety of solutions to extend the product.
  • Vast integration possibilities.
  • AI-infused engine with IBM Watson.
Read full review
  • Reports are very customizable - once you learn how to create reports, it is really easy to design the final output you'd like.
  • The tool is easy to use, especially for those that don't work in the finance function.
  • It offers an excellent workflow capability to send out tasks to cost center owners all over the company.
  • We love the ability to create and customize cubes.
Read full review
Cons
  • sometimes it is hard to produce pixel perfect reports from the Web UI. I know it is not made for this, but still, it'll be great
  • getting in e.g. an Excel file just by drag and drop, and the AI should "understand" what the data is all around
Read full review
  • Ability to filter report views for report binder without creating duplicate reports.
  • More extensive documentation and examples in the ProCalc library.
  • More ProCalc functions that deal with the time dimension and allow functions that can utilize the system date. So if it is day 8 of the month.
  • Ability to save company color scheme for use in reporting.
  • Would like to create a link between the account dimension and another dimension so I can easily report on account properties. For example, an account property could be columns in a report.
  • Would like to see the ability to have a report view on a dashboard. The tables are poorly formatted, and I’d like more formatting ability.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Since IBM Cognos Express is suitable only for medium data warehouse environment, we are not sure if this tool solves the long term need as the business keeps growing rapidly. So its a 50/50 ratio to renew Express license. But having said that, the components of IBM Cognos Express are also available in other Cognos BI suites like Cognos 10.x version. So we will probably upgrade our environment to IBM Cognos 10.x which comes with more new features.
Read full review
The system works well for us, and meets all of our needs. All of our future plans can and will be achieved within Prophix, so there is no need to pursue another product. Prophix has continuously proven to improve their product over the years, which provides an even higher level of confidence in this tool, and future developments
Read full review
Usability
IBM Planning Analytics is generally good in terms of functionalities. It can be used reduce time for budget planning, resource planning, demand forecasting, etc. The performance of IBM Planning Analytics is acceptable, but user interface can be improved. It would be good to see new features that allow users to customise the dashboard.
Read full review
I don't rate anybody a 10 because I believe there's always room for improvement, so I'll go with an 8. And I'm giving 8 because it has helped us do more than we were doing before, and I believe there's still room for improvement.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
No answers on this topic
The availability in Prophix is relatively good. We have occurred random outages in different versions that wipe out data, which can be brought back. Or we have ran into system wide slowness that impacts all users in the system, but we have been able to get more capacity to supply our performance.
Read full review
Performance
No answers on this topic
Prophix has always performed consistently. We are using on-premise so many factors can contribute to slower than desired performance, most having nothing to do with Prophix itself. If we move to the web-client cloud based solution I believe performance will even be better.
Read full review
Support Rating
Although I find the IBM Planning analytics documentation quite time consuming, their support with email and call is something i can term as very considerate and patient, I have had few calls about the features and how i would want to implement them within my projects, and the teams have been super helpful to resolve my issues
Read full review
We’ve gotten moved around a lot and so we don’t always know our pod people. Also when we book sessions with a random person it seems like we have to take the first 15-20 minutes explaining our system and process.
Read full review
In-Person Training
No answers on this topic
We worked with a consultant provided by the vendor for implementation. Training involved online and in person. The in person training was done throughout the implementation. It was very hands on training. As we worked through sections of the set-up, we were training on how to use various features within the product. It made learning the system very easy.
Read full review
Online Training
No answers on this topic
We used our system and created a test cube to work with our own data. We ran through the different functions of Prophix and covered alot of material. We did two sessions a week, with homework tasks assigned. We were able to ask questions and cover any questions during the followup sessions.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
Since company's IT department was not part of the implementation and it was done only by an executive assistant who did not have extensive knowledge about finance and accounting it was done VERY Poorly and haphazardly. Nothing was done properly and it was not planned correctly. It worked for short term but after 2 years we had to re-do all the cubes and it was very hard to fix and correct things
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
For strong technical teams and flexibility IBM Planning Analytics is the way to go. For quicker adoption and less technical teams Anaplan is the best option. If consolidation, financials, and moving from legacy tools are main focus than OneStream will be a really good choice. If deeply invested into SAP already than the SAP BPC will be the best fit to maintain the investment.
Read full review
Prophix is so much easier to use that other platforms or products. It can be customized so much easier than other larger, more expensive products. I work for a small university where we have a small finance team and Prophix allows us to tailor reporting to emerging needs in real time without having to reconfigure clunky systems with expensive modifications
Read full review
Scalability
No answers on this topic
I gave Prophix a 10 on scalability because we currently deploy the solution to department heads across our entire organization and never have any issues with those individuals using or accessing the system to look at their financial information within premade templates . They currently enter budgets and review reports within the system currently. The only issue is they cannot typically use the ad hoc functionality because that would require higher level licenses that cost more and it is not worth it to give them more costly licenses since they really aren't working in the system quite like the robust finance users
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Much higher degree of accuracy in forecasting with the use of predictive analysis from historical data
  • Dozens of man hours saved in routine processes that are now handled with minimal human interaction
  • One system that holds the "source of truth," consolidating multiple systems together that were only accessible individually before
Read full review
  • Reduced time to produce reports and compile budget leaving the team with more time to analyse the data, rather than concentrating on just compiling reports or budgets.
  • Improved visibility and variance reporting capability providing actionable insights to stakeholder.
  • The above points lead to greater buy-in into reporting and planning processes.
Read full review
ScreenShots

IBM Planning Analytics Screenshots

Screenshot of Workflow managementScreenshot of Income statementScreenshot of Margin analysisScreenshot of Metrics managementScreenshot of Income statementScreenshot of Expense analysis

Prophix Screenshots

Screenshot of Prophix One Portal: One single point of entry into Prophix One through its portal simplifies access and authentication but also allows seamless movement between applications.Screenshot of Chart Insights, one of the AI Insights capabilities that utilizes Artificial Intelligence and Natural Language Processing to provide enhanced business awareness.  Chart Insights extends the important details contained within dashboards, and analyzes the complete dataset behind the dashboard, automatically surfacing the data relationships not obvious in dashboard visualizations alone. It then provides a summary of key performance metrics found buried within Prophix charts.  It also summarizes the important insights in plain English.Screenshot of Prophix One Financial Planning & Analysis: Prophix's self-serve dashboards and visualizations are directly integrated with data, workflow tasks, announcements, and external URLs and databases. Dashboard Studio helps users to be informed and make better business decisions.Screenshot of Detailed interactive charts and graphs that Prophix offers to uncover insights. Prophix’s visual analytics are linked directly to data with transaction details.  There is no need to input the numbers.  Prophix does this tedious work, automatically.Screenshot of Prophix’s Workflow Manager, used to assign tasks to users and facilitate approvals across the business.  Stakeholder input can be captured directly with the ability to add comments and notes in a single unified database.Screenshot of Cell Comments, that allow users to add supporting details like notes and attachments to data.  Since comments are stored with the data, they can be viewed in any template along with their trailing history. Cell Comment Reports can also be generated to show all comments from any data view in one convenient report.