TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    IBM Verify

    Score8.7 out of 10
    N/AIBM Verify, formerly known as IBM Cloud Identity, is an identity-as-a-service (IDaaS) offering that aggregates dynamic user, device and environmental context to automate risk protection and continuously authenticate any user to any resource.

    $1.81

    per month per user

    Microsoft Entra ID

    Score8.8 out of 10
    N/AMicrosoft Entra ID (formerly Microsoft Azure Active Directory or Azure AD) is a cloud-based identity and access management (IAM) solution supporting restricted access to applications with Azure Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) built-in, single sign-on (SSO), B2B collaboration controls, self-service password, and integration with Microsoft productivity and cloud storage (Office 365, OneDrive, etc) as well as 3rd party services.

    $6

    per user/per month

    Okta

    Score8.9 out of 10
    N/AOkta is an enterprise grade identity management service, built in the cloud. IT can manage access across any application, person or device. Whether the people are employees, partners or customers or whether the applications are in the cloud, on premises or on a mobile device, Okta helps IT become more secure and maintain compliance. The Okta service provides directory services, single sign-on, authentication, provisioning, workflow, and built in reporting. ment systems.

    $6

    per month per user

    Pricing
    IBM VerifyMicrosoft Entra IDOkta
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Premium P1
    $6.00
    per user/per month
    Premium P2
    $9.00
    per user/per month
    Starter
    $6.00
    per month per user
    Essentials
    $17.00
    per month per user
    Professional
    Inquire for pricing
    Per User Per Month
    Enterprise
    Inquire for pricing
    Per User Per Month
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    IBM VerifyMicrosoft Entra IDOkta
    Free Trial
    YesYesYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoYesNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    YesNoYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional DetailsSample Pricing Breakdown (NOTE: for competitive pricing per contract, please consult with your IBM Security Account Rep) Users: 5,000 SSO* -- USD 1.71 per user per month MFA* -- USD 1.71 per user per month Adaptive Access* -- USD 1.71 per user per month Lifecycle and provisioning** -- USD 2.01 per user per month Identity analytics** -- USD 2.13 per user per month * Single sign-on (SSO), multifactor authentication (MFA) and adaptive access pricing based on total active monthly users per use case. Costs decrease if users are active less than once per month. ** Lifecycle and provisioning and identity analytics pricing based on total users per use case.——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    IBM VerifyMicrosoft Entra IDOkta
    Considered Multiple Products
    IBM
    Chose IBM Verify
    Okta has good user experience for end users and setup process however IBM verify has a stronger capability for integration, auditing. Microsoft Entra integrates well within the Microsoft tech stack, easier for users to adopt due to familiar environment. Store scalability and …
    Incentivized
    Chose IBM Verify
    Compared to Okta, IBM Verify is easier to implement and more user-friendly for our employees. It provides strong security using multi-factor authentication and maintains easy settings. We chose IBM Verify because it met our needs without any significant development work.
    Incentivized
    Chose IBM Verify
    We conducted a comparison study between IBM Verify and Okta as well as Duo Security before making our selection. IBM Verify emerged as the perfect fit because its superior capability to integrate with our current system environment surpassed competitor security solutions. IBM …
    Incentivized
    Chose IBM Verify
    Owing to the general findings formulated in this paper, comparing Okta and Microsoft Entra ID to IBM Verify, the latter appears to be the only tool that delivers a number of features for integrating with legacy systems. However, since IBM Verify has the upper hand in terms of …
    Incentivized
    Chose IBM Verify
    IBM Security Verify stacks up with Microsoft Entra ID better than SecurID due to categories in common such as, Self Service password resets, Multi-Factor Authentication, User Provision and Governance Tools, SSO, and IAM. SecurID not so much because it doesn't have that full …
    Incentivized
    Chose IBM Verify
    These tools provided similar functionality in multi-factor authentication and identity security, but IBM Verify offered stronger enterprise integration, compliance alignment, and reliability for our needs.
    Incentivized
    Chose IBM Verify
    During our proof of concept and demonstrations, we were clearly able to see how much better the identity, access and authorisation features were compared to the competition. We were compelled to make a decision, not only on this, but also on the ease and simplicity of …
    Incentivized
    Chose IBM Verify
    IBM Security Verify is a robust product which has all the features. Its advanced AI capabilities helps it make a superior product when compared to competition. The most important factor with IBM Security Verify is that it comes under the IBM umbrella which makes it more …
    Incentivized
    Chose IBM Verify
    IBM Security Verify is better than its competitors because of its ease of use and implementation.
    Incentivized
    Chose IBM Verify
    Security Verify is a great solution backed by IBM and has evolved over time to become one of the best access management applications on the market.
    Incentivized
    Chose IBM Verify
    I believe that the decision for selecting IBM Security Verify was based on our IT technical analysis but also due to our trust that this provider would deploy a solution according to our needs and expectations. The free trial made it possible to test it and understand, at an …
    Incentivized
    Microsoft
    Chose Microsoft Entra ID
    I try to get rid of Okta, and I'm trying to put everything into Microsoft Entra ID.
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Entra ID
    We've done stuff with Okta for Identity and Duo. Those would probably be the two big ones that I would say that people would recognize and stuff. There's some other smaller players we've talked to, but those are the two big ones that we play with. We're still using it. So, …
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Entra ID
    Microsoft Entra ID is not as stand-alone product as competitors like Okta. It may lack some of the features that competing products have but on the other hand it integrates both technically and license wise with other Microsoft cloud services and is easy to deploy. It is also …
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Entra ID
    Okta One. Log on. Hint, this was the best because we're mainly a Microsoft shop.
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Entra ID
    We use DUO as another IDP solution and we also evaluated Okta as a solution. We didn't have a choice to be honest, because Microsoft products, you can't get away with it, but it's built in and a bunch of other providers have it as authentication, so it's great.
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Entra ID
    Google Directory. We've evaluated Okta as well for SO. Those are the two. I mean, we selected this one because we want it to be a Microsoft shop.
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Entra ID
    We're a Microsoft Native shop, so we're looking at Okta's identity tool, SailPoint and a few other competitors of Venture id. And we decided to go with this one because we're already using Active Directory, so just using the native Microsoft Suites kind of just they integrate …
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Entra ID
    Previously we had worked with Okta, which was kind of using our replacement for active directory server, and I know that has integrations, but we ended up just going with Entra ID just for the ease of access and without having to stack on an additional third party application …
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Entra ID
    EntraID performs better than Okta for digital workload IAM and endpoint security, in particular we went with EntraID due to the CloudSync feature.
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Entra ID
    We looked at Okta. There was another Sammo product. Okta was one of the big-name ones and I forget the other smaller one off end. It's a little less robust, but that's not necessarily a bad thing because it just needs to work and it does that.
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Entra ID
    We are using Microsoft Entra ID for the 200 licenses we have and we use okta for 400 user and the rest is in Keycloak. From user's perspective, the Microsoft Entra ID is mile ahead of the other two as it is built for that purpose, from the Support perspective, it is also much …
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Entra ID
    We integrate with all the other identity providers. For me, as a consultant and engineer, it's very important to embrace the modern features and functionalities being made available in 2026, especially when it comes to platform SSO. And I've been working with Microsoft on that …
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Entra ID
    It's already implemented at most of our customers, so it's already there.
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Entra ID
    Microsoft Entra ID provides best-in-class security features.
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Entra ID
    Microsoft Entra ID offers the same or very similar services to the other products but in a package that is familiar and recognizable to everyone. It enjoys better community support and world-class security and reliability.
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Entra ID
    We find that this is more integrated into various apps, which provides an almost single pane of control for access to our device and user estate.
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Entra ID
    More people are already using it, so makes sense of using this one.
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Entra ID
    Because we use a lot of other Microsoft products, so my inclination is more towards Entra ID because it's a Microsoft system. And we'll find support for Microsoft more than any other software. So that's why I lean more towards Microsoft.
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Entra ID
    The use the flexibility and the easiness of it. We don't need any maintenance or management cost on top of it.
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Entra ID
    Our company ecosystem is microsoft based and using Microsoft Entra ID is very easy, The integration is much easier for microsoft environment as compared to other.
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Entra ID
    Microsoft Entra ID provided better services at an affordable cost.
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Entra ID
    We use DUO on some things and then we use some of Microsoft's endpoint security stuff.
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Entra ID
    Okta has no chance to compete with Microsoft Entra ID's features. Also the usability of microsoft products and user management is easier when you have one product that does almost everything.
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Entra ID
    Selecting Microsoft Entra ID is a good choice over Okta if you already utilize parts of the Microsoft Suite. It is a solid competitor and if your business is already paying for Microsoft products, why not use it? Okta is a great competitor, but simply already using Microsoft …
    Incentivized
    Okta
    Chose Okta
    We previously looked at Azure AD (now known as Microsoft Entra ID) for our IDP (Identity Provider). Okta has an interface that seems easier to navigate and configure than that of Entra ID. Additionally, the wide range of vendors/software that Okta supports made it an easy …
    Incentivized
    Chose Okta
    We have used Azure Entra ID which sometimes lacks compatibility with new SAAS apps and also not so easy to manage user access provisioning and deprovisioning like Okta. Also I believe managing sign-on policies are easy in Okta as comparison to Azure AD.
    Incentivized
    Chose Okta
    Okta is far superior in terms of integrations, user interface, automation, and connectivity. Additionally, Okta offers better support and availability, and a more robust solution across every capacity Entra competes in. Okta simply works, whereas Microsoft Entra has a large …
    Incentivized
    Chose Okta
    Internal expertise was with Okta, we also considered total cost of ownership, admin overhead, and deployment/setup time.
    Incentivized
    Chose Okta
    Okta’s ability to consolidate so many apps in one platform created a very user friendly work environment. It’s robust identity management and security features made it a standout choice for our company as we looked to simplify access management.
    Incentivized
    Chose Okta
    Okta provides a better user experience and a portal to make things simple not only for the admins but also the customers. Compared to Entra and Duo Okta is light years ahead in innovation and user experience.
    Incentivized
    Chose Okta
    At the time when we moved from ADFS to Okta, Okta was the superior product for are use case. There was no ADFS/SAML connection available for for Citrix Cloud. Now, Entra ID has progressed and is supported by almost every application, we might be moving back to Entra ID.
    Incentivized
    Chose Okta
    They had same functionality as them for mobiles and we were moving to Intune anyway.
    Incentivized
    Chose Okta
    I had the opportunity to use Citrix but it was an "heavy" tool. I prefer Okta here.
    Regarding MS Active Directory I think is a good too with good features and not hard to use.
    Incentivized
    Chose Okta
    With respective to user interface and license cost, we thought The Okta Identity Cloud was better than other tools for use. Their customization of license was another reason for us to go with The Okta Identity Cloud over other tools.
    Incentivized
    Chose Okta
    I feel Okta is more advanced over the other providers who branch into too many facets
    Incentivized
    Chose Okta
    Okta was the most expensive choise between than, but still our best bet. This was caused because they were able to integrate with 90% of our software without any headache and 10% with some studies - this work would be higher and requires more working hours from our engineers if …
    Incentivized
    Chose Okta
    I didn't select Okta - it was in place before my arrival. However, I have used Microsoft's SSO product, and I find Okta is easier to use.
    Incentivized
    Chose Okta
    While I wasn't involved in the official purchasing process of Okta, I would imagine that the scalability that Okta provides and usability would be a big differentiator in whether you were to utilize Okta over Azure AD for SSO purposes across a your user base.
    Incentivized
    Chose Okta
    Azure AD had better developer library support and documentation, but we weren't with Okta because it had more flexibility in how user tokens for OIDC could be generated. At the time, a few years ago (2017), Azure only allowed so many AD groups into the token but Okta didn't …
    Incentivized
    Chose Okta
    Okta is the best out of its competitors due to its ease of use, out of the box functionality, and opportunities for customization. It is a good company to work with and strives to be there for its customers. Administration is a breeze and the documentation is quite extensive.
    Incentivized
    Chose Okta
    Our main points of consideration in choosing an identity provider were simplicity of integration into our existing enterprise application suite and cost. Okta Identity Cloud proved to be on par with other contenders in the field in terms of integration capability, and was more …
    Incentivized
    Chose Okta
    Okta is more flexible, easier to use, and continuously gets better. The organization listens well to its users, and enhances the product frequently with what the users are looking for.
    Incentivized
    Chose Okta
    Siteminder---It is an on-premise application which is difficult to integrate with cloud-based applications. As Okta is a cloud application we can integrate both on-premise and cloud applications.
    Ping--It doesn't provide the applications templates which [are] provided by Okta. …
    Incentivized
    Chose Okta
    This is subjective to your own experience, but I do find Okta is far simpler to setup, connect with apps and use. Okta is the front runner in gartner for a reason, Microsoft is improving but [is] still complicated. When choosing apps for your business, consider the ease of use …
    Incentivized
    Chose Okta
    Okta has the best dashboard for navigation and is very end-user friendly. Easy to navigate and configure applications and SSO and a very effective way of managing end-user issues.
    SSO-wise it is the best product in terms of end-user experience; [it's a] seamless process for the …
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    91%
    Would buy again
    48 Answers
    100%
    Would buy again
    227 Answers
    98%
    Would buy again
    129 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    91%
    Delivers good value for the price
    43 Answers
    99%
    Delivers good value for the price
    206 Answers
    99%
    Delivers good value for the price
    103 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    91%
    Happy with the feature set
    48 Answers
    99%
    Happy with the feature set
    225 Answers
    98%
    Happy with the feature set
    129 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    34 Answers
    94%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    155 Answers
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    74 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    95%
    Implementation went as expected
    41 Answers
    95%
    Implementation went as expected
    183 Answers
    99%
    Implementation went as expected
    85 Answers
    Features
    IBM VerifyMicrosoft Entra IDOkta
    Identity Management
    Comparison of Identity Management features of IBM Verify and Microsoft Entra ID and Okta
    Feature
    IBM Verify
    9.3
    55 Ratings
    13% above category average
    Microsoft Entra ID
    8.6
    123 Ratings
    5% above category average
    Okta
    8.8
    159 Ratings
    7% above category average
    ID-Management Access Control8.950 Ratings9.1122 Ratings9.3146 Ratings
    ID Management Single-Sign On (SSO)9.352 Ratings9.5119 Ratings9.4158 Ratings
    Multi-Factor Authentication9.851 Ratings9.2121 Ratings9.2154 Ratings
    Password Management9.348 Ratings8.2113 Ratings7.9147 Ratings
    Account Provisioning and De-provisioning9.347 Ratings8.5114 Ratings8.6133 Ratings
    ID Management Workflow Automation9.350 Ratings8.290 Ratings8.4123 Ratings
    ID Risk Management8.948 Ratings7.797 Ratings8.6116 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    IBM VerifyMicrosoft Entra IDOkta
    Small Businesses
    JumpCloud
    Score9.2 out of 10
    JumpCloud
    Score9.2 out of 10
    JumpCloud
    Score9.2 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    OneLogin by One Identity
    Score9.4 out of 10
    OneLogin by One Identity
    Score9.4 out of 10
    OneLogin by One Identity
    Score9.4 out of 10
    Enterprises
    RSA Access Manager (Discontinued)
    Score10 out of 10
    RSA Access Manager (Discontinued)
    Score10 out of 10
    RSA Access Manager (Discontinued)
    Score10 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    IBM VerifyMicrosoft Entra IDOkta
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.9
    (54 ratings)
    8.9
    (241 ratings)
    8.9
    (200 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    9.1
    (2 ratings)
    9.8
    (16 ratings)
    8.0
    (18 ratings)
    Usability
    7.3
    (16 ratings)
    8.6
    (57 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Availability
    7.7
    (20 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    10.0
    (4 ratings)
    Performance
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    9.0
    (2 ratings)
    Support Rating
    8.2
    (16 ratings)
    7.1
    (21 ratings)
    10.0
    (12 ratings)
    Online Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    5.0
    (1 ratings)
    1.0
    (1 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.7
    (3 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Configurability
    7.1
    (20 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Contract Terms and Pricing Model
    7.3
    (8 ratings)
    7.4
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    9.0
    (2 ratings)
    Professional Services
    8.3
    (5 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.4
    (1 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.4
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    IBM VerifyMicrosoft Entra IDOkta
    Likelihood to Recommend
    IBM
    It is well-suited for managing different users and roles and assigning permissions based on their defined roles. It is well-suited when one needs to add extra layers of authentication for certain roles or users, create custom rules for some users, and so on.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    Overall, the Microsoft Entra ID platform is best utilized by people looking to have one platform that manages all interactions between other platforms. The Microsoft Entra ID platform allows for a seemless SSO integration, and can also integrate with Intune for MDM. Additionally, and probably the most easy to understand integration, is the integration with Active Directory, and controls associated with that.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Okta
    Should be well-suited for a SaaS business organisation as they have a lot of internal applications and need a role-based authentication system between the various teams, improving security and audit log system to account for any breaches. It integrates well with internal applications such as Salesforce and Oracle. Best when need of SSO.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    IBM
    • IBM Security Verify provides comprehensive identity and access management (IAM) capabilities.
    • IBM Security Verify provides multi-factor authentication (MFA) capabilities.
    • IBM Security Verify provides robust identity and access governance capabilities.
    • IBM Security Verify provides comprehensive auditing capabilities.
    • IBM Security Verify provides a comprehensive platform for managing and protecting privileged accounts.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • Application integration is really good for single sign-on and managing identity overall. The correlation with Active Directory on-prem is really good, so we can manage it in a single place. It's easy to manage the users and integrate other Microsoft products. It is the base of everything else.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Okta
    • Centralized control of enterprise passwords
    • Extensive customization of acceptable password criteria
    • One system for Identity and Access Management to learn
    • Scalable throughout the university for all central services
    • Uniform login experience for students, faculty, and staff
    • Single point of response to address termination of access
    • Ability to use FastPass for lower priority systems
    • Excellent support of multi-factor requirements
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    IBM
    • The mobile app can be a bit buggy at times if it gets fixed it would be great.
    • UI seems a bit old compared to modern tools out there.
    • There is a bit of a learning curve; if the developers can make it more intuitive it would be awesome.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • I would like more risk policy suggestions. I guess that situation where we had outsourced employees in a country where somehow their location was changing too often, that we would have room to go, “Hey, this needs to be a lower risk.” Or maybe having easier options to let people log in when they're deemed high risk. It’s tricky because I feel like it’s really easy to do that wrong, but it’s the main area that I think could be improved. I guess also a little bit tighter administrative integration with other Microsoft products.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Okta
    • I do have to reset my password quite frequently. However, I don't think there is really a way to improve this, as it's a good security measure.
    • It makes me re-sign in a couple of times a day, sometimes if I haven't used my laptop for a couple of hours, and sometimes just randomly throughout the day.
    • It doesn't remember my devices, either my laptop or phone. so it always calls that out.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    IBM
    It works flawlessly, i have never faced any major issues with this. It has all the features such as Iam and security management. I think its a good investment and the benefits we reap from this software are worth the price.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    MSFT Entra ID has been essential for managing our geographically dispersed team. We're confident that it will scale with us as grow, and we'll be able to take advantage of additional security and ID management features as they become necessary. Being able to centrally manage our user access from anywhere with a small support team is such a relief.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Okta
    Okta has a passion to provide secure and scalable identity solution. Their passion has come across as advocacy in a way that has deepened my knowledge of the field of authentication. I took identity for granted before but after seeing features such as external authentication I know that Okta can enable my business to reach new heights
    Read full review
    Usability
    IBM
    While setup and implementation takes work and time, the flexibility and possibilities make up for that in the long run. This is not a product you can just install and run, but if you design and implement your ruleset well, it will save you a lot of work afterwards. Just make sure that the systems you want to use it for have an existing and proven connector.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    From a user perspective, 10. From an admin perspective, 7 or 8. From the user perspective, it's very easy to use, but from the admin perspective, there's a lot of things that are not easily clear, testable, or verifiable without just trying a whole bunch of scenarios.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Okta
    Some of its features are great and some are slightly complex and not easy without vendor support.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Reliability and Availability
    IBM
    It has never let us down since its inception and installation. User credentials and secure access have always been guaranteed. Ironclad security (through single sign-on, MFA, etc.) has ensured that our user credential details are safe as is our information/data. The correct access is given to users, based on role-based access with segregation of duty and the principle of least privilege being deployed. The IBM support has also been first class and they have proactively resolved any minor issues we have encountered.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    There has been a handful of outages but they have been either minimal or rarely severe
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Okta
    The Okta Identity Cloud advertises 4 9's of reliability and I would go as far to say that it may even do better than that. As a true Global organization that operates in just about every region of the world, we have yet to have an issue with The Okta Identity Cloud that has impacted our business operations.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Performance
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    Microsoft
    I could probably rate this a 10 but I'm always conservative on giving out perfect scored bt performance has not been a problem for us using Entra ID.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Okta
    From my perspective, for the things that my group uses it for, Okta is very fast. It is as least as fast as the local password database methods that it replaces on our campus enterprise services. I do not believe that it slows anything down at all. In fact, not having to think too much about the login, because they all look the same, probably speeds things up somewhat.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    IBM
    The support team has always been the primary consultation base when we are faced by performance problems. From the deployment stage the team has managed to monitor the operation lifecycle and give best insights based on their observation. It works 24/7 to enhance productive service delivery to clients. The IBM Security Verify Support team has been the main player in the successful performance of this software.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    I have not needed to engage support for anything at this time. I have been able to find the answers either online or in a knowledgebase. I tried to skip the question but it would not let me, so I rated a 9 based on other interactions with Microsoft support I have had
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Okta
    We've had a few support cases over the years and every case has been handled by the Okta support team beautifully. We received clear answers to questions we had regarding setup and even were provided simple to follow guides on how to setup their product to use with custom applications.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Online Training
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    Microsoft
    Most training was internally produced
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Okta
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation Rating
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    Microsoft
    Make sure you use a good partner. Our implementation was a bit longer and more problematic than we expected. Our partner got it done, but, in my opinion, some of their inexperience and staffing issues were evident.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Okta
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    IBM
    We conducted a comparison study between IBM Verify and Okta as well as Duo Security before making our selection. IBM Verify emerged as the perfect fit because its superior capability to integrate with our current system environment surpassed competitor security solutions. IBM Verify demonstrated superior reliability through its enterprise-class scalability and fully transparent auditing mechanisms.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    We've done stuff with Okta for Identity and Duo. Those would probably be the two big ones that I would say that people would recognize and stuff. There's some other smaller players we've talked to, but those are the two big ones that we play with. We're still using it. So, because it was integrated into everything we've already done, it just made it almost indispensable.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Okta
    Okta is far superior in terms of integrations, user interface, automation, and connectivity. Additionally, Okta offers better support and availability, and a more robust solution across every capacity Entra competes in. Okta simply works, whereas Microsoft Entra has a large overhead that is difficult to use when configuring things.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Contract Terms and Pricing Model
    IBM
    The licensing terms were favourable due to their flexibility based on the size and purpose of implementation. The billing frequency is done on quarterly basis. The vendor team has enacted best user policies that gives the company the full control of this platform. It is cost-effective as compared to most security verification tools in the market.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    The features are getting addresses per requirements and their value for Money. The proposed ROI and actual ROI build confidence.
    Read full review
    Okta
    No answers on this topic
    Scalability
    IBM
    No answers on this topic
    Microsoft
    Scalability is pretty trival for Entra ID. It's not difficult to manage a few or many accounts.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Okta
    Being a cloud native application, The Okta Identity Cloud is extremely scalable and easy to setup. By integrating into existing directories and applications via standard techniques and protocols, it is very easy to both initially setup and add additional users as required. Once all the necessary integrations are setup, it's a simple rinse and repeat process to onboard additional users (which can be automated with imports as well)
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Professional Services
    IBM
    In the case of adjustments, we were often able to carry them out completely on our own and only used professional services for new requirements. Particularly in the case of access management, it is very positive that we usually needed IBM for a task in less than an hour and then developed the solution further on our own.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    Microsoft Professional Services' technical knowledge is appreciable as consultants design the solution as per customer requirements. Mapping of features per user specifications and assisting Customer IT engineers to implement so they can manage and administer the services.
    Read full review
    Okta
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    IBM
    • Use of the software has enabled us to track access to our premises and systems, which has, in turn, reduced unauthorised access.
    • The software has enabled us to centralize identify and access management.
    • IBM Verify use in our organisation has reduced security risks by ensuring compliance, streamlining, and automating all critical identity management processes.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • We are doing a lot of sign-ins and working on it, and it worked quite well. We do have Microsoft support, so yes, we can handle all of the small issues we are sometimes having. But if you want to define it, I would say yes, we like it. Overall positive.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Okta
    • Increased user productivity - not fighting with IT all the time!
    • Though there could be a bit more on the 'lost/broken phone' front, the self-service eliminates time that would typically be spent waiting for IT support/admins.
    • An Okta account under a certain domain allows proper access from the get-go, and under certain apps (such as our HRIS), adding members is easy.
    • Improved security - deactivating Okta removes all account access across multiple platforms instantly for leavers.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    IBM Verify Screenshots

    Screenshot of IBM Verify (for CIAM) - Privacy and ConsentScreenshot of IBM Verify - Custom Application TemplateScreenshot of IBM Verify - Select Application TypeScreenshot of IBM Verify - Privacy Policy