Infor VISUAL vs. Viewpoint Spectrum

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Infor VISUAL
Score 7.3 out of 10
N/A
Infor VISUAL is an ERP software focused on manufacturing companies with business intelligence, planning and scheduling, and pricing, quoting, and estimating capabilities, among others.N/A
Viewpoint Spectrum
Score 7.9 out of 10
N/A
Viewpoint Spectrum is a cloud-based construction ERP suite with project management, accounting, resource management, and reporting and analytics. Key features include workflow automation and collaboration tools, document imaging and sharing, cost estimating tools, and RFI management tools.N/A
Pricing
Infor VISUALViewpoint Spectrum
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Infor VISUALViewpoint Spectrum
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsProspective buyers may contact vendor directly for a price quote.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Infor VISUALViewpoint Spectrum
Considered Both Products
Infor VISUAL
Chose Infor VISUAL
Based on use cases and implementation. Scaling and scheduling meet CTO and ETO.
Chose Infor VISUAL
We unfortunately did not evaluate any other ERP software. VISUAL was a legacy system and we determined that changing systems would be too difficult, and not cost effective. We reached out to our local VISUAL rep who knew how the software functioned, but not how to apply it …
Chose Infor VISUAL
SAP Business One was selected for the China Division for cost and ease of training reasons. It does not have the capabilities required for the main office accounting or product engineering. It also was not available at the time of Visual Manufacturing selection.
Epicor Eclipse …
Chose Infor VISUAL
VTA doesn't even come close to Ascentis in the realm of timekeeping.
Chose Infor VISUAL
In Vendor/Application Selection INFOR ERP rated high in Production Capability and Shop Floor Management. INFOR ERP was weaker in financials. INFOR ERP appears to be strong for retail and order (pick/pack/ship) fulfillment operations. INFOR ERP Management offered aggressive …
Viewpoint Spectrum
Chose Viewpoint Spectrum
The cloud-based system is great, and the ease of use compared to other systems is why we chose it.
Chose Viewpoint Spectrum
Viewpoint Spectrum allows us to have one platform to do payroll, invoice for projects, and manage the cost of a project. Whereas Procore didn't have those features and we were using multiple other platforms to do all of those things.
Chose Viewpoint Spectrum
Spectrum, when compared to Simply accounting, is better. It has more options, and it is easy to navigate. Spectrum meets our needs better. Spectrum, when compared to Sage 300 Construction and Real Estate, is better. Spectrum has better connectivity between its project …
Chose Viewpoint Spectrum
Not sure how comparable these software are. Both are great and were used for different reasons for different companies and circumstances. I use Viewpoint Spectrum for the Roadway Contruction industry and SAP for the chemical manufacturing world. There are similarities but a lot …
Chose Viewpoint Spectrum
Spectrum is much more comprehensive than its competitors, and provides a much deeper level of insight into project costing. From bidding to project closeout, Spectrum's software allows for cohesiveness and fluidity where other programs are very segmented and difficult to track.
Chose Viewpoint Spectrum
Quickbooks Enterprise is much easier to use with a lot of the same more advanced features. From my experience, I wouldn't recommend Viewpoint Spectrum
Chose Viewpoint Spectrum
Viewpoint is much more user friendly than Sage 300, but is more limited (less customizable). It is not easy to get custom reports out of Viewpoint, whereas Sage is perfect for customization. With that comes more attention to detail in Sage, from all users, to avoid erroneous …
Chose Viewpoint Spectrum
Spectrum is the only one I have used since starting here 2 years ago.
Chose Viewpoint Spectrum
Viewpoint Spectrum is much more construction based.
Chose Viewpoint Spectrum
I originally came off of the American Contractor when it reached its end of life, and my company converted to using Spectrum. American Contractor didn't give us half the visibility that Spectrum does - we still had to rely heavily on outside systems and processes to gain a full …
Chose Viewpoint Spectrum
Prior to acquisition by Viewpoint and then Trimble, the customer support was a major selling point of the software. Unfortunately at this time, that is no longer the case.
Chose Viewpoint Spectrum
Foundation has some nice features that Spectrum doesn't and vice versa. Procore is much more complicated to use but it has better company wide reporting. I think Viewpoint will be a better choice in the long term. They are rolling out updates all the time. The cost is …
Chose Viewpoint Spectrum
This is my first construction job and Spectrum is the only software I've used. The company used to use Sage
Chose Viewpoint Spectrum
Spectrum seems to be a better option for now since current leadership is comfortable with the financial aspect that Spectrum bring but some in the leadership team are not happy with the other offers that Trimble has.
Chose Viewpoint Spectrum
On my old accounting software one feature I miss is the feature where I could run a GL detail report and actually click on a line to see the actual entry.
Chose Viewpoint Spectrum
We selected Viewpoint Spectrum because it allowed us to run our construction and projects department along with our service department all in one application. We are into year five with Viewpoint Spectrum and are still very pleased with our decision.
Chose Viewpoint Spectrum
I have only evaluated the products. I chose Spectrum because it was (at the time) relatively inexpensive or on par with the others and seemed like the best option that fits our business model. It has not proven to be very costly for what we are getting in my opinion and nothing …
Chose Viewpoint Spectrum
Have not previously utilized any construction software. Our company has been on Viewpoint Spectrum for over 10 years.
Chose Viewpoint Spectrum
I wasn't part of the evaluation, but I did give input on what I thought of Viewpoint Spectrum before we bought it. I had used Timberline and Sage, before we got to Spectrum.
Chose Viewpoint Spectrum
Spectrum is an ERP system that was built with construction in mind. It has more applicability vs. Dynamics, which is used across many types of companies.
Chose Viewpoint Spectrum
I investigated Sage, Timberline, ConMast, and Quickbooks some 25 years ago. Viewpoint Spectrum was the best overall in most coverage and flexibility, ease of use, and mastery. I do not have any knowledge on other software currently.
Chose Viewpoint Spectrum
We stayed with Spectrum for what we thought would be an easy upgrade and transition. However, we are evaluating how we are going to use ViewpointOne Teams because we've suffered many roadblocks to daily use like daily logs and uploading of photos using the app. Also, choosing …
Chose Viewpoint Spectrum
We originally had Jonas Premier prior to Viewpoint based on cost and flexibility (report writing). However, we discovered that Jonas reports are not available as described in the demo. And reports were not easy to read because they had to be created. It was challenging to …
Features
Infor VISUALViewpoint Spectrum
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Infor VISUAL
1.0
Ratings
153% below category average
Viewpoint Spectrum
5.3
Ratings
35% below category average
API for custom integration1.00 Ratings5.30 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Infor VISUAL
9.0
Ratings
7% above category average
Viewpoint Spectrum
8.3
Ratings
1% below category average
Single sign-on capability9.00 Ratings9.50 Ratings
Role-based user permissions9.00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Infor VISUAL
4.0
Ratings
60% below category average
Viewpoint Spectrum
3.6
Ratings
70% below category average
Dashboards8.00 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Standard reports2.00 Ratings3.30 Ratings
Custom reports2.00 Ratings2.50 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
Infor VISUAL
7.4
Ratings
4% below category average
Viewpoint Spectrum
8.9
Ratings
14% above category average
Accounts payable9.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Accounts receivable9.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Global Financial Support10.00 Ratings9.30 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers8.00 Ratings9.40 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations10.00 Ratings8.70 Ratings
Configurable Accounting7.00 Ratings9.20 Ratings
Standardized Processes9.00 Ratings9.40 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
Infor VISUAL
8.0
Ratings
0% above category average
Viewpoint Spectrum
6.2
Ratings
25% below category average
Inventory tracking6.00 Ratings5.10 Ratings
Automatic reordering7.00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Location management10.00 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
Infor VISUAL
9.7
Ratings
20% above category average
Viewpoint Spectrum
7.8
Ratings
1% below category average
Pricing10.00 Ratings7.20 Ratings
Order entry10.00 Ratings7.20 Ratings
Cost of goods sold10.00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Order Orchestration10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Credit card processing00 Ratings8.80 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
Infor VISUAL
8.6
Ratings
13% above category average
Viewpoint Spectrum
8.1
Ratings
7% above category average
Billing Management8.00 Ratings9.50 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management10.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management10.00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting10.00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Period Close9.00 Ratings8.80 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Product A and Product B
Infor VISUAL
7.2
Ratings
5% below category average
Viewpoint Spectrum
-
Ratings
Project Costing5.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Cost Capture8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Product A and Product B
Infor VISUAL
3.2
Ratings
80% below category average
Viewpoint Spectrum
-
Ratings
Production Process Design2.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Production Management5.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Configuration Management5.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Work Execution2.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs2.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Product A and Product B
Infor VISUAL
2.0
Ratings
114% below category average
Viewpoint Spectrum
-
Ratings
Inventory Planning2.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Product A and Product B
Infor VISUAL
2.0
Ratings
114% below category average
Viewpoint Spectrum
-
Ratings
Product Master Data Management2.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Infor VISUAL
-
Ratings
Viewpoint Spectrum
5.0
Ratings
39% below category average
Pay calculation00 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Benefit plan administration00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Direct deposit files00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Product A and Product B
Infor VISUAL
3.0
Ratings
80% below category average
Viewpoint Spectrum
6.7
Ratings
5% below category average
Project Planning and Scheduling00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers00 Ratings7.10 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality00 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools00 Ratings7.20 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Product A and Product B
Infor VISUAL
-
Ratings
Viewpoint Spectrum
7.8
Ratings
10% above category average
Bids Analyzed and Compared00 Ratings8.80 Ratings
Contract Authoring00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Contract Repository00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated00 Ratings6.80 Ratings
Supplier Management00 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Infor VISUALViewpoint Spectrum
Small Businesses
Zoho One
Zoho One
Score 9.3 out of 10
Zoho One
Zoho One
Score 9.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Zoho One
Zoho One
Score 9.3 out of 10
Infor VISUAL
Infor VISUAL
Score 7.3 out of 10
Enterprises
24SevenOffice
24SevenOffice
Score 9.0 out of 10
24SevenOffice
24SevenOffice
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Infor VISUALViewpoint Spectrum
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.0
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Usability
10.0
(0 ratings)
8.7
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
8.5
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.0
(0 ratings)
6.4
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
2.0
(0 ratings)
8.9
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
6.6
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
7.6
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Infor VISUALViewpoint Spectrum
Likelihood to Recommend
The original version of Visual Manufacturing (Lilly Software) was intended for mechanical manufacturing. It was adapted at our facility (we were not the first) to accomodate electronic manufacturing. For electronic manufacturing process control it is not ideal when referencing in-line or custom processes used to build product. For material control it is excellent unless a modification to a standard product is required (and we did this on 60% of product going out the door). The co-product feature that removes material from an assembly requires the creator of the work order to calculate the percentage of cost the removed items are from the completed product. On the business operations side regional tax reports were difficult to extract and an external module to go into the data base and extract that had to be created. The system itself was stable for the most part. Occasional "data collisions" corrupted transactions at times. The accounting procedures in place found them by the end of the month .where they were corrected. For a small business with less formal processes Infor Visual can be used with little training for the operators. If the processes need a higher level of accountability and control the processes can be formalized with workflow scripts to ensure that higher level of control.
Read full review
Viewpoint Spectrum would be fine for small to medium-sized companies. It would be great for transitioning from an in-house paper-based process, especially since it's designed with small construction companies in mind. They're making it even easier for smaller companies by offering additional features that you'd normally have to find in other products. However, companies can easily outgrow this system. We have about 15 years of data in the system, over 300 active jobs, and nearly 1,500 employees. In the past 3 years we've noticed slower performance and frequent locks in the system that require intervention from a system administrator. We moved to the cloud about 2 years ago and this has made troubleshooting even more difficult as we don't have the same access that we did before to resolve performance issues.
Read full review
Pros
  • Part/BOM libraries
  • Traceability from customer order to work order
  • Job status representation
Read full review
  • Dashboards make navigating to the crucial information quick and easy.
  • The layout with what we affectionately call the job info bar helps our project teams to quickly get where they need to go in the system.
  • Crystal reports are easily managed and integrated with Spectrum, giving us great flexibility in custom reports.
  • With a little training, and I mean a little, Spectrum is user friendly. Easy to create favorites/shortcuts for ease of use.
Read full review
Cons
  • At times a "shadow part" is necessary in the manufacturing process. This shadow part does not require an inventory transaction but is made a as a separate process - sometimes out of sequence to the general process flow. Infor Visual ver 6.3.5 does not have that capability.
  • When generating forms for business and manufacturing operations Infor Visual ver 6.3.5 has a limited number of options. To change or add forms requires an unsupported editor. When the stock and custom options are depleted an outside programming module is required as well as programmers to develop the forms.
  • While free software upgrades to the main operations modules have been part of the maintenance agreement. One upgrade required database and hardware support not justifiable for the current business model. The system was frozen at the current version at that time.
  • There is no easy way to differentiate between engineering documentation and production documentation.
Read full review
  • Subcontract Kiosk can be glitchy - allows subs to overbill on subcontract billing items
  • Document Imaging can be glitchy - often says users do not have adequate security to view/add documents, but they do - if they sign out and back in, it works fine
  • At times, support can be lacking - sometimes case responses are delayed or you get an incorrect answer
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Good Technical and Customer Support during and after implementation tasks. Good Project Plan and Management support for implementation and post implementation. Financial functionality could be more comprehensive particularly with Budgeting and Cash Management. Inventory Management capability was adequate but could be more comprehensive as well. "Out of the Box" functionality was adequate but requested add-ons and enhancements seemed to be a bit pricey.
Read full review
It checks all of our boxes at the moment.
Read full review
Usability
Because of use cases and easy implementation and the vertical and horizontal scaling.
Read full review
Some things in Spectrum are NOT that intuitive, but I think knowledge of the software just comes with time. There are still some things I need assistance with in Spectrum but I'm very comfortable with my day to day items now that I've been using it for years. However, if there is something I don't do often or haven't done before, I don't find the software to be that intuitive, I actually find the logic on some things to be a little weird but it's fine once I know how to do it.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
No answers on this topic
Very little down time. They host our system.
Read full review
Performance
No answers on this topic
For the most part the product is very reliable. Since we are hosted we sometimes have connectivity issues but I would say that is more our ISP than Spectrum.
Read full review
Support Rating
As we have seen the live environment and the use cases where we implement.
Read full review
The support has recently changed. Last year, you could call in and get an immediate response. Now that doesn't seem possible unless you have an urgent situation with access to the software, payroll or payables. I have found that using chat or e-mail works nicely for the most part, but sometimes I feel it would be easier if someone from support would jump on our site and take a first-hand look rather than going back and forth
Read full review
Online Training
No answers on this topic
Our trainer was excellent and navigated the time zone differences expertly. She gave us test assignments to complete and was available for questions at any time.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Could have used more hands-on approach. There are multiple webinars and information sessions but until you actually use the system, these are not very helpful.
Read full review
It is important to have a strong implementation partner. It made the transition from our old system to the new system easier.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
We unfortunately did not evaluate any other ERP software. VISUAL was a legacy system and we determined that changing systems would be too difficult, and not cost effective. We reached out to our local VISUAL rep who knew how the software functioned, but not how to apply it more appropriately to our business model, so we continued on with what we had rather than looking elsewhere.
Read full review
Spectrum, when compared to Simply accounting, is better. It has more options, and it is easy to navigate. Spectrum meets our needs better. Spectrum, when compared to Sage 300 Construction and Real Estate, is better. Spectrum has better connectivity between its project management system compared to Sage 300 Construction and Real Estate. Spectrum, when compared to CMIC, I believe they are equal. CMiC has a better project management system, but Spectrum has an easier accounting system to navigate.
Read full review
Scalability
No answers on this topic
You can grant user specific access which is nice. Project managers do not need all the same modules as Accounting. But Accounting does need access to PM modules as well
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Good Billing provided
  • Easy to implement and use
  • scales vertical and horizontal
Read full review
  • Viewpoint Spectrum has allowed us the opportunity to be proactive in analyzing the costs for a project in time to make a difference in the outcome of the project. It has allowed us defense in supporting our communications with the project owners.
  • Viewpoint Spectrum has allowed us to become more productive with its accounting software and the cohesion between the modules. It has definitely streamlined the processing necessary to account for the business.
Read full review
ScreenShots