Upland Kapost helps you create and distribute meaningful content to support the buyer journey for B2B companies.
$1
per month
OpenText Magellan
Score9 out of 10
N/A
OpenText Magellan Analytics Suite leverages a comprehensive set of data analytics software to identify patterns, relationships and trends through data visualizations and interactive dashboards.
N/A
Pricing
Kapost
OpenText Magellan
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Kapost
OpenText Magellan
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
Kapost
OpenText Magellan
Content Creation
Comparison of Content Creation features of Kapost and OpenText Magellan
Feature
Kapost
8.2
9 Ratings
5% above category average
OpenText Magellan
-
Ratings
Ideation
8.07 Ratings
00 Ratings
Approval workflows
8.09 Ratings
00 Ratings
Content collaboration
8.09 Ratings
00 Ratings
Content calendar
8.09 Ratings
00 Ratings
Network for content licensing/production
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Content Publishing
Comparison of Content Publishing features of Kapost and OpenText Magellan
Feature
Kapost
8.0
9 Ratings
2% above category average
OpenText Magellan
-
Ratings
Content hub
7.18 Ratings
00 Ratings
Forms / Gated content
8.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Embedded CTAs
7.93 Ratings
00 Ratings
Content distribution
9.07 Ratings
00 Ratings
Content promotion
8.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
Content automation
8.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Content Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Content Reporting & Analytics features of Kapost and OpenText Magellan
Feature
Kapost
8.0
7 Ratings
8% above category average
OpenText Magellan
-
Ratings
Audience profiling and targeting
8.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Closed-loop tracking and reporting
8.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
Content performance analytics
8.07 Ratings
00 Ratings
Campaign optimization dashboard
8.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Competitive analytics
7.92 Ratings
00 Ratings
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Kapost and OpenText Magellan
Feature
Kapost
-
Ratings
OpenText Magellan
7.0
2 Ratings
15% below category average
Customizable dashboards
00 Ratings
7.02 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Kapost and OpenText Magellan
Feature
Kapost
-
Ratings
OpenText Magellan
8.3
3 Ratings
4% above category average
Drill-down analysis
00 Ratings
8.03 Ratings
Formatting capabilities
00 Ratings
8.03 Ratings
Integration with R or other statistical packages
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Kapost and OpenText Magellan
Feature
Kapost
-
Ratings
OpenText Magellan
8.3
2 Ratings
1% above category average
Publish to Web
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Publish to PDF
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Report Versioning
00 Ratings
9.02 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Kapost and OpenText Magellan
Kapost has potential to be a great asset in small and large orgs. If you're not producing a great deal of content, or coordinating across a large team, there's still tremendous value, but it scales as your org scales because it makes it easier to coordinate and manage large teams and large content archives.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
If you do not have a large budget and are a large organization, I would steer clear of Actuate. If you are looking to do very complex washboarding, I would not use them. Your developers have to be very skilled to work with this. Plan to bring in consultants if necessary to help your process. Adhoc reporting is weak. If your pricing is user based and you expand, this could be very expensive.
Filtering: If you make the most out of your custom details and custom fields, you can gain newfound access to materials that may have long been lost in the ether. It's really easy for us, for instance, to see all of our videos at once. Or everything targeting a certain buying stage. Or you can keyword search to see everything on one topic.
Workflows: It's really nice to lay out "who sees what when" in a digital way, because everyone involved on an asset can easily see what stage things are at. You can also set deadlines to tasks, which seems a bit more firm than a casual email, because you can visually see how meeting your deadline fits within the whole timeline.
Calendars: The calendar feature is nice for us because we have a blog, so we can see when everything is (supposed) to go live. It's easy to see when I, as a copy editor, should be expecting work, so I can align my day accordingly. Way better than the old-fashioned "mental note" system.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Social media distribution needs improvement. Specifically a calendar for planned Tweets and a better way to schedule multiple shares of the same content.
System performance is somewhat slow.
Should be an easier way to make changes, like adding custom fields or publication destinations, to all content types, rather than one at a time.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
We are using some other systems that might have replaced Kapost, but none of them had the workflow functionality we were looking for. So, we're sticking with Kapost for now.
I am no longer working for the company that was using Actuate but I believe they would continue to use it because the stitching costs would be to high. It would require a complete rewrite of the reports and the never version of Actuate (BIRT) even required an almost complete report rewrite
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The calendar view is a great feature and so are the custom views. It is relatively easy to see a clear view of what content the user is responsible for and then the due dates associated to it. The ability to create and update workflows for the team is easy to navigate and keeps us on track.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
It is quite intuitive to use. It is fit specifically for doing sentiment, emotion, and intention analysis as well as text classification and text summarization. I would have given 10 if it is fit for the purpose of doing image processing and analysis as well. There is a huge market to analyze video and image data.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The reputation of the product matches up to its reputation as one of the leaders in the space. I love that you can share and access content at your fingertips from anywhere. The downside is that it does not have the prettiest interface but you can get over this with its functionality.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Workfront has a lot of great features, but Kapost was the right tool for what we needed at the time. With a team of our size, we had to make sure we weren't biting off more than we could chew and the project never got off the ground. We had to be thoughtful with how we rolled it out.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
It is vastly superior to these in many ways, for complex reporting it is a much more sophisticated solution. Visualizations are very good. Javascript extensibility is very powerful, others don't support this or as well. Pentaho and MS are both OLAP oriented. Pentaho is moving more toward big data, which was not our primary focus. Others are stuck in the Crystal Reports Band metaphor.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Actuate can handle 50 to 60 sub reports inside a report very well.
Dynamically creating the datasource, chart, graph, reports are the main advantages. We can do any level of drilling, and can create a performance matrix dashboard efficiently.