Lane Four vs. Salesforce Revenue Cloud

Lane Four is very well suited for high velocity sales, success, support and implementation teams. Using Lane Four helps our business units with organization and planning for onboarding handoffs and project management scenarios. It can be random at times and I often don't trust that it is distributing accounts and projects evenly across teams

Incentivized

What I like best is the ease of use to be able to track all opportunities and quotes in my daily sales tracker I also like the fact that you can reorganize the view for your opportunities. For instance, it is very similar to a spreadsheet where you can filter them by date, dollar amount, name, and several other ways. I found this to be less appropriate when we have to do multiple roles while assigning one task to multiple users. Column resizing within the Quote Line Editor is not supported in the Salesforce mobile app.

• Routing
• Project assignment
• Salesforce integration

Incentivized

• It does a lot of pricing models really well. So like tiered pricing when you're selling a product has tiered pricing.
• The out of the box approval functionalities is really good. It can trigger approvals based on a ton of different custom criteria.
• The data it creates and tracks is really accurate and robust.

Incentivized

• Sometimes a project remains unassigned
• Often there are routing issues
• I don't get notifications if an account has been assigned to me

Incentivized

• Our Salesforce is very messy, which tells me it's not super easy to clean up.
• I always have a really hard time removing a contacts from an account - it seems like you can't simply remove the relationship so we have lots of people named DO NOT CONTACT or things of that nature.
• Sometimes when saving it doesn't seem like things actually save.

Incentivized

The company is very easy to work with and is growing by leaps and bounds. We do not anticipate switching vendors anytime in the near future

I would give it an eight because it's very customizable in the way that you want to create it. I think I'm just docking points because sometimes there can be a little too much customization, which can make it a little complicated, but it just depends on the complexity of your business and how you guys build it out in the first place.

Incentivized

There have been some issues with multi-year pricing of certain products and services which we have been assured will be resolved but I guess are still underway, the support team apart from this has not been needed much and in the rare scenarios, it has been needed the resolutions of conflicts has been prompt and quick, so the overall support would have my high regards for being so helpful and customer-oriented so as to assure good performance of their toolset and customer satisfaction.

Incentivized

I have used LeanData at other organizations but was never involved in the buying process. Both tools are made to support similar use cases (routing, assignment, handoffs, implementation projects, etc.). I don't have any insight into how much these tools or others in the space stack up cost-wise or what the ROI is

Incentivized

There is no comparison to a fully functional instance of CPQ. Nothing comes close due to the amount of customization and ease of use that CPQ offers once it's fully built out. Other solutions may be easier to build or administer, but for the users and business needs, CPQ is the best solution possible.

Incentivized

• Time saving
• Efficiency of routing
• Less than ideal transparency for account handoffs

Incentivized

• Easy access to reporting on closed-won, closed-lost, and open quotes.
• Accuracy in data referenced in a quote - it's typically accurate as it is pulled directly from opportunity, looking up to associated subscription start/end dates, etc..
• We lose valuable time in creating quotes ourselves. Quotes were requested and created through sales ops previously, sales did not have access to the excel templates used to generate quotes.

Incentivized