LaunchDarkly vs VWO

• Feature Flagging.
• A/B Testing.
• Giving any users access to edit feature flags.
• Simple UI to interact with.

Read full review

• When designing A/B variations I can choose to either use the visual editor or to make the changes using code. I particularly like using jQuery.
• VWO offers the ability to keep long term track of the performance of your goals.
• I can easily identify recordings of users that dropped out of a funnel and watch those.
• There is live chat to get support, with great response times and which is very helpful.
• You are forced to create observations and hypotheses when creating a test, which is a great way to make sure that you are actually testing something worthwhile.
• You can group tests together so that you can rule out interaction effects between tests that you are running at the same time.

Read full review

• The messaging around features - especially those that turn on/off traffic for prod - could be clearer.
• It's a little clunky to switch between projects & doesn't remember my default project for some reason.
• I would like to make changes on my phone - not sure if they have a mobile app.

Read full review

• The user interface within VWO does take a bit of time to get used to, especially as it pertains to switching back and forth between tests. When running multiple experiments on a site at a time, a clear and succinct dashboard for everything in one place would be helpful (as opposed to needing to switch between A/B, multivariate, etc).

Read full review

• Saved engineering time.
• Increased speed to market for new features.
• Enabled iterative development with easier feature flagging.

Read full review

• We've been able to roll out new design patterns with confidence that short term revenue is not negatively effected.
• We've had more wins than losses, as the company is just ramping up a testing strategy. We know percentage of wins will go down as we optimize, but VWO has been vital on making calculated steps along the way.

Read full review