LeadLander is essentially an IP reverse look-up tool. It does a reverse look-up of the IP address to distinguish between corporate visitors and “home/ISP” users.
Although having somewhat similar functionality as web analytics products like Google Analytics and WebTrends, it is actually designed for a different user base. While web analytics tools are typically designed to provide metrics such as bounce rates, unique visitors, and length/depth of stay to help marketers optimize website content,…
$25
Per User Per Month
Siteimprove
Score 9.1 out of 10
N/A
The Siteimprove platform offers tools used to create digital experiences optimized for quality, accessibility, analytics, and SEO. Sitemprove offers content insights and recommendations in a prioritized list to improve the impact of changes. It is available through three solution packages (Inclusivity, Content Experience, and Marketing Performance).
Market Manager: Strategic Partners & Performance Based Partnerships
Chose LeadLander
LeadLander and Hot Jar don't necessarily compete against one another but they work well together. LeadLander lets us know what companies are visiting our site and Hot Jar tells us what those people do when they get to the site. Together we can make better decisions on how to …
Both Pardot and Drift have web page lookup but they don't have the catalog of IP addresses that Leadlander provides. We have been using LeadLander for so long, my boss is afraid to give it up. Unfortunately, we haven't tried either of the other two products for this purpose but …
ActOn also provides website analytics, however if we have a contact in our CRM - it will tell us each morning if that specific contact visited our website rather than just a company name. It is interesting to note that both ActOn and Leadlander often have different results and …
LeadLander is a critical tool for the business development department. Out of the pillar tools in the department, LeadLander is a necessary solution for prospecting and lead generation. In regards to how LeadLander compares to the competition, I would say it is a small foot …
In terms of WCAG, accessiBE is the more value oriented product with easy to understand results, less false positives, better WCAG results. That said, it's also a single focused tool, whereas Siteimprove is geared towards overarching web governance. There are simply no other …
Siteimprove is superior to Ahrefs due to it's clean and intuitive user interface and seamless navigation. Ahrefs contains a more robuts data set but the information is often difficult to locate and take action on because of how it's displayed to users. Siteimprove has less data …
I prefer Siteimprove to all above for their easy to view and use dashboards. The visual aspect of SiteImprove makes it easy to pick up for everyone - as we have experienced in our team. We've only had 1 training session on it, as opposed to the multiple for the other things we …
Siteimprove provides richer features when it comes to how granular you can define policies and metrics for search engine optimization and content relevance. It is also much easier to set up and maintain the sites that you want to administer. However, pricing wise is more costly …
Compared to any other tool I've used, Siteimprove is the best. Many tasks that I used to do manually have become more accessible and faster due to it. The visual scanning of issues is what makes it the best. It's simple to find problems, fix them, and track how far we've come. …
I do like Siteimprove, but we are moving on to Monsido purely for costs. Monsido costs a third less than Siteimprove and offers the same functionality.
We have used or tested other tools that get installed on a computer or that are hosted online, but none of them offer the features that come with Siteimprove. TotalValidator Pro will check your site for accessibility issues, but it is a manual check and there is no historical …
Lead Lander is great for an organization that is trying to get a better handle on who is visiting their website. Not just the website in general but you can look to see who is visiting each page within a site. This is beneficial when using the data to make digital marketing decisions, especially PPC.
Simple, easy-to-deploy accessibility that automatically scans, remediates and provides proof of compliance once the process is complete. It is ideal for people who want to make their website much more accessible and provide their users with an intuitive adjustable interface.
The dashboard is very nice. I love that it is the first thing you see when you log in.
For us, being able to leave notes on organizations is key. That way we know the last time they looked at our information, who contacted the organization and what the conversation entailed. There is never any question of what has happened in the past.
I also really enjoy being able to do Lead Scoring. This makes it super easy for the field especially to see who is accessing the pages most important to them. The fact that the colors display in the daily email alerts is really beneficial.
User-friendly customisable dashboards, easy to make a dashboard from a template, or create your own, and add in whichever 'widgets' are relevant for what you are looking at
Flagging words to review, allowing users to check and confirm if the word is 'accepted' or is a misspelling
We were not aware of the ability to sync with SalesForce and/or LinkedIn with our initial deployment of the product. With more hands on training and even online courses available, Leadlander could increase and accelerate usage of their product
I don't like that there are different navigation paths to go from point A to point B. When I want to navigate to a specific place, I have more than one way to get there, which means I have to make a decision about how I want to there and I'd rather the designer make that design based on what would be most efficient for me.
Currently, we have not went out to look for another tool because we are happy with LeadLanders' performance. If we were to be approached by any of their competitors, we would look to investigate the difference and similarities between the tools. In the past, we used a tool that provided images and steps taken to show the route a prospect takes and I found that to be very interesting.
Tool has undergone numerous changes, both to function and UX/CX. Makes it less than user friendly at times. But on the other hand, that does indicate a willingness to improve the product in a continual manner - which they've done nearly year after year - but it's always a case of who moved my cheese with each new iteration.
I've used support often and it has been responsive, thorough and considerate of our needs. I can get a tech right away, they understand the issue, and work with us to resolve it. Often the problem is with the site we are trying to scan, sometimes it is with their product. I appreciate that they go beyond support into continually helping us implement SiteImprove in more places with 3rd party integration.
Siteimprove provides richer features when it comes to how granular you can define policies and metrics for search engine optimization and content relevance. It is also much easier to set up and maintain the sites that you want to administer. However, pricing wise is more costly which can be a constraint for smaller organizations.
We have won many new customers that visited our website but didn't request a demonstration. Therefore, the return is at least two or three customers a year.
I often chase after business that is not a good fit for our product. Many companies are too small or use the wrong platform for our solution.
Frequently, we receive prospective leads that can't be identified.
It's a great way to come up with new companies that perhaps you didn't think about as leads.