LexisNexis InterAction is a fully-featuerd customer relationship management (CRM) software.
N/A
Oracle CPQ
Score5.5 out of 10
N/A
Oracle CPQ is a cloud-based application that helps sellers configure the right mix of products or services and create accurate, professional quotes to quickly meet their customers’ pricing needs.
$240
per month per user
Pricing
LexisNexis InterAction+
Oracle CPQ
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
CPQ Pricing
$240.00
per month per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
LexisNexis InterAction+
Oracle CPQ
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
LexisNexis InterAction+
Oracle CPQ
Sales Force Automation
Comparison of Sales Force Automation features of LexisNexis InterAction+ and Oracle CPQ
Feature
LexisNexis InterAction+
5.1
1 Ratings
42% below category average
Oracle CPQ
-
Ratings
Customer data management / contact management
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Workflow management
3.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Territory management
3.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Opportunity management
5.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integration with email client (e.g., Outlook or Gmail)
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Interaction tracking
3.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Channel / partner relationship management
6.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customer Service & Support
Comparison of Customer Service & Support features of LexisNexis InterAction+ and Oracle CPQ
Feature
LexisNexis InterAction+
8.7
1 Ratings
12% above category average
Oracle CPQ
-
Ratings
Case management
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Call center management
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Help desk management
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Marketing Automation
Comparison of Marketing Automation features of LexisNexis InterAction+ and Oracle CPQ
Feature
LexisNexis InterAction+
8.0
1 Ratings
3% above category average
Oracle CPQ
-
Ratings
Lead management
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Email marketing
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
CRM Project Management
Comparison of CRM Project Management features of LexisNexis InterAction+ and Oracle CPQ
Feature
LexisNexis InterAction+
4.7
1 Ratings
48% below category average
Oracle CPQ
-
Ratings
Task management
5.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Billing and invoicing management
4.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting
5.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
CRM Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of CRM Reporting & Analytics features of LexisNexis InterAction+ and Oracle CPQ
Feature
LexisNexis InterAction+
4.3
1 Ratings
56% below category average
Oracle CPQ
-
Ratings
Forecasting
4.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Pipeline visualization
4.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customizable reports
5.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of LexisNexis InterAction+ and Oracle CPQ
Feature
LexisNexis InterAction+
4.3
1 Ratings
56% below category average
Oracle CPQ
-
Ratings
Custom fields
4.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Custom objects
4.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Scripting environment
4.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
API for custom integration
5.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of LexisNexis InterAction+ and Oracle CPQ
Feature
LexisNexis InterAction+
8.0
1 Ratings
5% below category average
Oracle CPQ
-
Ratings
Single sign-on capability
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Social CRM
Comparison of Social CRM features of LexisNexis InterAction+ and Oracle CPQ
Feature
LexisNexis InterAction+
4.5
1 Ratings
50% below category average
Oracle CPQ
-
Ratings
Social data
4.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Social engagement
5.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integrations with 3rd-party Software
Comparison of Integrations with 3rd-party Software features of LexisNexis InterAction+ and Oracle CPQ
Feature
LexisNexis InterAction+
5.0
1 Ratings
40% below category average
Oracle CPQ
-
Ratings
Marketing automation
5.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Compensation management
5.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Platform
Comparison of Platform features of LexisNexis InterAction+ and Oracle CPQ
Feature
LexisNexis InterAction+
5.0
1 Ratings
42% below category average
Oracle CPQ
-
Ratings
Mobile access
5.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
CPQ
Comparison of CPQ features of LexisNexis InterAction+ and Oracle CPQ
It's well suited to organizations that intend to dedicate the staff to maintaining it as recommended in best practices material. It's much too large and complicated if it's only to be used as an address book and in those cases, a much simpler CRM might work better.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I think CPQ had worked so well for our company because of the widespread nature of our associates and tracking orders that were being placed in multiple time zones. My team specifically needed a way of analyzing these orders to track our progress in real time and sort out any supply orders before they became an issue. If you are in a centralized location with a smaller team then this may not yield much use to you.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Significant setup time, cost, and maintenance. We have to use an implementation partner
Does not always play well with other software, even Oracle software. While this is improved and being further improved, that it was a third party acquisition means things sometimes require a little extra care
Additional setup documentation and first walkthroughs would be helpful, especially if it was all in one place
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
So far it is all good with BigMachines, looking for new features since Oracle acquisition has created a lot of expectations. We have outlined our limitations (out of box functionality) in our periodic customer successor advice meetings for a while, hope we get a resolution soon. Also, the BigMachines user license fee has increased a lot in the last three years.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The software UI can be as complex or as simple as you need it to be (depending on the business). It does require training others on quote configuration and the order in which to build out order positions prior to configuring a quote. Once users are trained;however, it is fairly straight-forward. The UI is still more static than other new wizard/drag-and-drop models, but it get's the job done
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
It depends upon the day however there are so many failure points with online services, including our internet service, that this is probably closer to 9 with the latest version
Some specific support personal was good and fixed some problems fast using proper solutions. But when one of them went to sleep when we had critical issues and they do unreported commits to our production environment which caused issues and they were hiding it?? you can not give more than a two (maybe even that is too much). They also failed to add a feature for us which also bring the grade down.
They have pretty good training. Our business analysts have been able to go to entry and advanced level training. They have a train the trainer model. Our business analyst attended training, then trained the rest of our staff.
It was a much more technical implementation than we thought. It involved much more code.
Future releases have made and will make administering the tool easier.
EDL consulting had one good developer, but when he was moved off, they were horrible to work with.
The BMI sales team does a “BOA” or a “Business Operation Assessment” which is extremely valuable, not only for them to scope an implementation and get more reach within the organization, but it is also a documentation of business process that most organizations don’t have. It highlights inefficiencies and allows for correction during implementation.
Having a dedicated team (in-house) for implementation is key
Oracle engagement is ahead. They are active in the development of the tool and provide great support after implementation. They also listen to their customers and offer opportunities to feedback and provide input through activities like the customer advisory board forum.
I'm only in the IT department so I'm not really sure about ROI but IA does much more than our marketing department is using it for. I would think the company is paying a lot of money for something that isn't being utilized.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Increased Sales Rep efficiency. Being able to create multiple quotes ACCURATELY and quickly was a game changer.
Large implementation time. It's a little difficult to fit BMI into a SCRUM style build, with multiple working models and prototypes of all 3 simultaneously.
A larger fee for licensing and implementation cost. ROI wouldn't be realized in the first year.