ManageEngine Applications Manager vs. ManageEngine Site24x7

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
ManageEngine Applications Manager
Score 7.7 out of 10
N/A
ManageEngine Applications Manager is an application performance management solution that also provides the ability to manage end user experience of enterprise Internet Services and hosted Web Services.
$395
per year per user
ManageEngine Site24x7
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Site24x7 from ManageEngine is a full-stack application, website, server, cloud and network monitoring tool. Site24x7 offers code-level diagnostics and customizable error thresholds, end-to-end monitoring with topology visualization tools, and mobile accessibility.
$9
10 monitors
Pricing
ManageEngine Applications ManagerManageEngine Site24x7
Editions & Modules
Professional Edition
$395
per year per user
Enterprise Edition
$9,595
per year per user
Starter
$9.00
10 monitors
Pro
$35.00
40 Monitors
Classic
$89.00
100 Monitors
Elite
$225.00
250 Monitors
Enterprise
$449.00
500 Monitors
Enterprise Plus Web
$899.00
2500 Monitors
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ManageEngine Applications ManagerManageEngine Site24x7
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptional$1 monitors
Additional DetailsEach Pack will also support additional benefits such as Network interfaces, Applogs, Alert credits etc. You can also, purchase add-ons to create custom pricing options. Please visit the vendor's pricing page, for more information.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
ManageEngine Applications ManagerManageEngine Site24x7
Considered Both Products
ManageEngine Applications Manager
Chose ManageEngine Applications Manager
Improved vendor management, ensuring that vendors meet SLAs and contractual obligations.
Chose ManageEngine Applications Manager
Port monitoring is the main reason to switch from other products and have the best support response from ManageEngine.
Chose ManageEngine Applications Manager
We have AppManager plugin from Opmanger, works really well as it is in one console.
Chose ManageEngine Applications Manager
The ease of implementation, administration, maintenance and integration with the multiple types of monitors that the platform can collect (DATABASE, PROCESSES, SERVICES, PERFORMANCE, STORAGE, TABLESPACE, PORTS, DATA FOLDERS, CLOUD APPS, VIRTUALIZATION COMPONENTS, etc.) It took …
Chose ManageEngine Applications Manager
ManageEngine Application Manager provides comprehensive support and documentation, making it easy for IT teams to get up to speed quickly and troubleshoot issues as they arise.
Chose ManageEngine Applications Manager
We selected Managed Engine due to its comprehensive monitoring capabilities, which aligned perfectly with our requirements. It offered the best value for money, making it the ideal choice for optimizing our monitoring needs.
Chose ManageEngine Applications Manager
The support for distributed tracing and logging provided by ManageEngine Application Manager enables IT teams to quickly identify the root cause of performance issues across multiple tiers of applications and infrastructure.
Chose ManageEngine Applications Manager
APM is not resource hungry it does not impact resource usage when in use.
Chose ManageEngine Applications Manager
As per our Infrastructure It satisfied all our needs and more importantly it is pocket Friendly.
so far it is a good to go Tool.
Chose ManageEngine Applications Manager
No other products we have used so far. We are happy with the APM product currently being used as a 3-rd party tool to manage servers' health and availability. We are happy with the services all the time and highly recommend using them in organizations or cloud environments or …
Chose ManageEngine Applications Manager
Other solutions like Microsoft EM and SCCM can be interdependent and cause all sorts of issues and additional costs. I think software should be optionally integrated and work on its own as a standalone solution. I like that ManageEngine allows for specific use of its software …
ManageEngine Site24x7
Chose ManageEngine Site24x7
Site24x7 [All-in-One Monitoring] has some similarities to ThousandEyes. Especially in the troubleshooting aspect where both offer Web performance waterfall charts to analyze the issue better. Both have cloud-based servers globally that allow to determine performance on the …
Chose ManageEngine Site24x7
Manage engine had OPs manager for alerting and security monitoring alerts, but is just not as robust an offering as [Site24x7 All-in-One Monitoring] (RUM.APM features etc..). Originally we had used Nagios on low, to no-cost linux platform, but Nagios will require license also, …
Chose ManageEngine Site24x7
Initially, it came down to price. But, if you don't mind having a cloud monitoring solution (versus on-prem) then in my opinion Site24x7 is much easier to setup/manage/configure/use than other options I have managed in the past. Adding monitors takes seconds and I spend almost …
Chose ManageEngine Site24x7
The biggest difference between Site24x7 and products like PRTG, Nagios, or Icinga, is that Site24x7 is hosted off the network, completely externally. The others do a great job on network alerts-- and some can even be configured to send SMS or phone calls with the right …
Chose ManageEngine Site24x7
Each solution excels in their own areas. Site24x7 provides the easiest and most cost-effective transactional monitoring from the previous and existing solutions which we use. However, Solarwinds Orion suite, which includes the virtualization manager, gives us full-stack …
Chose ManageEngine Site24x7
I haven't had a lot of experience evaluating Datadog but from the research and basic demo that we got I understand that it is significantly more expensive, but it does seem to have more AI features and can assist in predicting when/if applications or essential services may go …
Chose ManageEngine Site24x7
site24x7 is really unique, I have been using it for many years and always recommend it in my classes. It is ideal for monitoring all web, apps, servers together in one place. Never let a website go down again.
Chose ManageEngine Site24x7
I selected this [roduct because I needed something really quick to deploy and that we could easily integrate with our environment without having to deal with firewall setup and other stuff.
Chose ManageEngine Site24x7
Simply put, Alertsite from Smartbear is a great product, with top-notch functionality. However, the cost of the platform when using multi-step transactions is incredibly pricey and the cost does not scale well when you want to increase your monitoring. Site24x7 alleviates the …
Chose ManageEngine Site24x7
While Applications Manager and CA CEM can give a deep understanding of the services and applications, neither can compare with the shear speed at which Site24x7 can provide for the web performance of sites and how customer satisfaction is associated as well!!!
Features
ManageEngine Applications ManagerManageEngine Site24x7
Application Performance Management
Comparison of Application Performance Management features of Product A and Product B
ManageEngine Applications Manager
9.2
Ratings
16% above category average
ManageEngine Site24x7
-
Ratings
Application monitoring9.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Database monitoring9.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Threshold alerts8.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Predictive capabilities9.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Application performance management console9.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Collaboration tools9.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Out-of-the box templates to monitor applications9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Application dependency mapping and thresholding9.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Virtualization monitoring8.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Server availability and performance monitoring9.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Server usage monitoring and capacity forecasting8.90 Ratings00 Ratings
IT Asset Discovery9.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Monitoring Tasks
Comparison of Monitoring Tasks features of Product A and Product B
ManageEngine Applications Manager
-
Ratings
ManageEngine Site24x7
8.4
Ratings
0% below category average
Remote monitoring00 Ratings9.10 Ratings
Network device monitoring00 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Multiple Server Monitoring00 Ratings8.60 Ratings
Multi-device monitoring00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Automated alerts and notifications00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Management Tasks
Comparison of Management Tasks features of Product A and Product B
ManageEngine Applications Manager
-
Ratings
ManageEngine Site24x7
7.4
Ratings
9% below category average
Policy-based automation00 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Reporting
Comparison of Reporting features of Product A and Product B
ManageEngine Applications Manager
-
Ratings
ManageEngine Site24x7
8.5
Ratings
3% above category average
Performance data reports00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Customizable reporting00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Data visualization00 Ratings8.80 Ratings
Risk analysis00 Ratings8.60 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
ManageEngine Applications Manager
-
Ratings
ManageEngine Site24x7
6.6
Ratings
15% below category average
Antivirus and malware management00 Ratings6.60 Ratings
Best Alternatives
ManageEngine Applications ManagerManageEngine Site24x7
Small Businesses
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.8 out of 10
Amazon CloudWatch
Amazon CloudWatch
Score 7.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
ManageEngine Site24x7
ManageEngine Site24x7
Score 10.0 out of 10
ScienceLogic AI Platform
ScienceLogic AI Platform
Score 8.8 out of 10
Enterprises
ManageEngine Site24x7
ManageEngine Site24x7
Score 10.0 out of 10
ScienceLogic AI Platform
ScienceLogic AI Platform
Score 8.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
ManageEngine Applications ManagerManageEngine Site24x7
Likelihood to Recommend
9.3
(0 ratings)
8.6
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.1
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
ManageEngine Applications ManagerManageEngine Site24x7
Likelihood to Recommend
Managed Engine Applications Manager excels in monitoring virtual machine databases and general system health. However, it isn't designed for monitoring items like UPS (Uninterruptible Power Supply) systems. Its strengths lie in optimizing IT infrastructure, while UPS monitoring would be better suited to managed engine opsmanager.
Read full review
I have tried other tools (PRTG etc) in the past, and switched from US monitor to [Site24x7 All-in-One Monitoring], for all the built-in features and ability to implement by using with or without the agents deployed (ip discovery LAN). This is one tool that encompasses the entire organization and allows that single pane of glass feel (NOC screen view) for an accurate virtual snapshot of your entire organization, either cloud and/or LAN.
Read full review
Pros
  • Intuitive ease of the administration interface
  • Improvements and security fixes that are quickly integrated with frequent updates
  • Visibility into the status of our services and the end user experience (End to End)
  • Reports associated with attributes of services, applications or containers that help us detect certain flaws in our services.
Read full review
  • Alerts: Site24x7 can be configured to send alerts in all sorts of ways, from email, to text messages, to even direct automated phone calls.
  • Internal monitoring: An agent installed on one or more machines can monitor internal connectivity to other network devices. This means if connectivity to a server goes down, we often know about it before users alert us.
  • External monitoring: Site24x7 also watched our websites and sends alerts if they're unreachable. It uses multiple locations to do so, which means if there's a partial network outage in some part of the country, we know who is affected.
Read full review
Cons
  • Plugin Quirks where it times out
  • Navigation through some of the screen seems a bit confusing
  • Consistency such as where license info is location between op and app manager are in different places. Better if it were consistent
  • Maintenance schedules in different locations in both Op and App manger product, needs consistency. They are all Zoho products!!
Read full review
  • I wish the advanced monitors were not so expensive.
  • It is a cloud solution, so it is necessary to open up outbound ports in all security zones.
  • If you lose outbound internet service, all your internal servers will throw alarms and life gets extremely noisy.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
For the the trust, security and support that ManageEngine Application Manager has given us, for 12 years as clients, has made us very satisfied and grateful for the response times to resolve doubts or needs that we have had.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
The intuitive ease of the administration interface, the new features, improvements and security fixes that are quickly integrated with frequent updates. Tuning or more detailed reports associated with attributes of services, applications or containers that help us detect certain flaws in our services. The capacity for improvements that are implemented and the ease of integrating new monitors into the product, which we need, gives us the speed and ease of preventing interruptions or events that helps us avoid.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
The trust, security and support that ManageEngine Application Manager has given us, for 12 years as clients, has made us very satisfied and grateful for the response times to resolve doubts or needs that we have had.
Read full review
I have only had to use support once, so I can't go into much detail about their support team. The one time I did use it the response was fast but the resolution took some time.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Other solutions like Microsoft EM and SCCM can be interdependent and cause all sorts of issues and additional costs. I think software should be optionally integrated and work on its own as a standalone solution. I like that ManageEngine allows for specific use of its software and not forcing users into an unneeded license or contract.
Read full review
Site24x7 [All-in-One Monitoring] has some similarities to ThousandEyes. Especially in the troubleshooting aspect where both offer Web performance waterfall charts to analyze the issue better. Both have cloud-based servers globally that allow to determine performance on the Internet. Site24x7 has more features available so we selected it instead.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • By providing valuable insights into application performance and resource utilization, it has contributed to better decision-making and resource allocation.
  • It has helped us identify and resolve performance issues more quickly, minimizing the impact on business operations.
  • ManageEngine Application Manager has improved our ability to monitor and manage critical applications, reducing downtime and improving overall productivity.
Read full review
  • Positivity wise, we're spending a third of what we were on our website monitoring, this has allowed us to focus funding elsewhere (namely SolarWinds).
  • We have enhanced our core monitoring by now also being able to provide better coverage, whereas we were handicapped with our previous supplier due to the scaling costs of multi-step transactions.
  • The general feeling from our IT staff is that the platform is not great, which obviously reduces confidence in the ability for the platform to provide accurate monitoring data for our websites.
Read full review
ScreenShots

ManageEngine Applications Manager Screenshots

Screenshot of InsightsScreenshot of InsightsScreenshot of DashboardScreenshot of Forecast reportsScreenshot of Real-user monitoring

ManageEngine Site24x7 Screenshots

Screenshot of Component wise metric breakdown in a Webpage Speed (Browser) monitorScreenshot of Summary page for a windows server monitorScreenshot of Response time and outages summary for a DNS server monitorScreenshot of Summary page for traces run on a Java applicationScreenshot of Desktop and mobile view of a Website monitorScreenshot of Homepage view