TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Zelta

    Score8 out of 10
    N/AZelta is a cloud-based unified clinical data management and acquisition platform with customizable modules, that can be tailored to the meet the needs of clinical trials and accelerate outcomes.N/A

    OpenText Documentum

    Score9 out of 10
    N/AOpenText acquired Documentum from Dell EMC in 2017, and now supports the enterprise content management (ECM) system. The vendor says users can build content-centric applications and solutions from collaborating on business documents to delivering case-based applications to managing highly precise processes in the most regulated business environments.N/A
    Pricing
    ZeltaOpenText Documentum
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    ZeltaOpenText Documentum
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    YesYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalOptional
    Additional DetailsSubscription - For larger organizations and those who need a predictable budget. Most modules included without incurring additional fees. Eligible for volume discounts. Pay per use - For organizations that need flexibility without a long term contractual commitment. Transparent a la carte pricing, no minimums. Fees start when trial goes live.—
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    ZeltaOpenText Documentum
    Considered Both Products
    Merative
    No answer on this topic
    OpenText
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    100%
    Would buy again
    20 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    16 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    95%
    Happy with the feature set
    19 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    6 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    92%
    Implementation went as expected
    11 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    ZeltaOpenText Documentum
    Enterprise Content Management
    Comparison of Enterprise Content Management features of Zelta and OpenText Documentum
    Feature
    Zelta
    -
    Ratings
    OpenText Documentum
    9.2
    7 Ratings
    13% above category average
    Content capture & imaging00 Ratings10.07 Ratings
    File sync, storage & archiving00 Ratings9.07 Ratings
    Document management00 Ratings9.07 Ratings
    Records management00 Ratings9.07 Ratings
    Content search & retrieval00 Ratings9.07 Ratings
    Enterprise content collaboration00 Ratings9.07 Ratings
    Content publishing & creation00 Ratings9.07 Ratings
    Security, risk management & information governance00 Ratings10.07 Ratings
    Contract lifecycle management00 Ratings9.07 Ratings
    Automated workflows00 Ratings9.03 Ratings
    Artificial intelligence00 Ratings9.03 Ratings
    Mobile support00 Ratings9.03 Ratings
    Integration00 Ratings10.03 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    ZeltaOpenText Documentum
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    Egnyte
    Score9.3 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    No answers on this topic
    Epicor ECM
    Score7.7 out of 10
    Enterprises
    No answers on this topic
    Dashpivot - By Sitemate
    Score10 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    ZeltaOpenText Documentum
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.0
    (20 ratings)
    9.0
    (10 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    9.1
    (2 ratings)
    8.0
    (4 ratings)
    Usability
    8.0
    (19 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Availability
    8.2
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Performance
    7.3
    (1 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    9.0
    (20 ratings)
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    8.2
    (2 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Configurability
    8.2
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    7.3
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    7.3
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    7.3
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    7.3
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    ZeltaOpenText Documentum
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Merative
    Zelta is a good tool for companies currently utilizing multiple software platforms to create and monitor clinical trial information. Due to the price, it is best suited for large pharmaceutical manufacturers with active pipelines and high R&D spend. Zelta's value is more limited to smaller, more focused companies.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    Documentum is best used in medium to large institutions that can afford it, have alternate solutions for web publishing, and who have either in-house developers or can hire good Documentum developers (not the ones who know Java but do not understand ECM). It is, in my opinion, the best heavy duty ECM solution out there, assuming OT is not gutting it as we speak. That is my only hesitation to not giving it a 10, OpenText is an unknown quantity in this and I worry that they will only support Documentum until they have figured out how to fill the gap between Documentum and OT and then offer a migration path to OT with a Documentum sunsetting as an incentive.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Merative
    • It is highly customizable and easy to program.
    • There is a wide variety of data that can be collected from IRB/site information to clinical data.
    • Zelta provides comprehensive edit language to program for accurate results.
    • Page dynamics are very useful when including or hiding certain data questions.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    • Records management: Compared to other content management systems, this provides a efficient and scalable solution. It gives lot of flexibility in managing the content as Records or Legal holds.
    • Workflow system has external plugins to connect with FAX, Mail, Database and FTP servers etc. which gives an option to integrate with any system with documentum.
    • Creation of websites and maintenance is easy. Content authors can create the pages with effective mechanism.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Merative
    • We cannot have multiple study accesses for a study in the studies supported by Zelta. eg. Coder and Data manager.
    • Though all the study-build related errors are flagged on the study-build page, some errors like incorrect dynamics applied, which eventually affects the subject PDF extraction, reports, etc.
    • When the study is imported from another Zelta studies, certain attributes remain running in the background even if it seems to be disabled.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    • WDK framework has been the biggest drawbacks from the application speed point of view, as well as client complexity and not so natural look and feel. Yes, with the latest releases much of these features are improved.
    • EMC is very expensive to buy, own and support, where some products require many dependent Docuemntum products to be installed to work at its best.
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Merative
    We are satisfied from our experience with Zelta by Merative, the close collaboration we have with the Zelta team is also something we value. We plan to use Zelta for a long time
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    Stability is a key factor as well as its flexibility. Also, any organization that deploys Documentum will have made a significant investment in terms of time and money, so not renewing its commitment can come with a significant cost. That said, the decision to deploy Documentum initially should come only after extensive evaluation, knowing that once deployed it will likely remain the platform of choice.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Merative
    Zelta has many different functionalities as well as modules that can be used depending on what the sponsor wants. I like that they are optional so that when building a study, you can give the sponsor options if they want them or not. Many of the optional models I like to use (Training Tracking for example) as they make tracking Site training so much easier than sending training forms out.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    No answers on this topic
    Reliability and Availability
    Merative
    available when needed
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    No answers on this topic
    Performance
    Merative
    some audit reports are difficult to download and take time subject pdf also takes some time to download
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    Merative
    Our organization has been using both Zelta and in-house applications. The main considerations on which one to use for a particular study is time to get the databases running, cost, and ease of use. For some studies, the time and cost of using Zelta are negative factors, and an in-house system is selected.
    Read full review
    OpenText
    Support is better than with ECM, but could use some improvement.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Online Training
    Merative
    very efficient self training
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation Rating
    Merative
    again not sure about it, I wasn't part of our organization yet
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Merative
    It was easier to understand the usability of the software [Zelta]. For our engineers [it] was easier to migrate our data, and fully set up everything. We found out that comparing other software[s], this one is safe, easy to use, has more functionalities, [and it's] easier to work with team members everywhere making clinical trials more efficient.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    At the time it was purchased it was one of the best, most robust solutions available on the market.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Merative
    • Time savings regarding how long it takes to make an EDC Live.
    • Reduced EDC Go Live time by at least half (from 60 days to 30).
    • Was able to take an EDC live in 14 days on a few occasions.
    • Seamless RTSM IRT integration without adding time to Go Live.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    OpenText
    • After this product, the client is able to manage content security and due to it, the client is able to use the business process, and this really reduces effort and increases the profit in business.
    • It provides integration with SAP easily which really helps the client to manage this effectively and with minimum effort system is ready to use.
    • Also searching, automated flows also create a bigger impact and reduce a lot manual effort.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Zelta Screenshots

    Screenshot of the ePRO DiaryScreenshot of Local LabsScreenshot of Medical Coding with AIScreenshot of Site user data entryScreenshot of the Study Connect DashboardScreenshot of the Study Designer Logic Editor