Mhelpdesk vs. SAP Field Service Management

Mhelpdesk is perfect for smaller companies and mid-sized companies I would say. Larger companies may need something a little more advanced for lack of better words or able to handle thousands upon thousands of constant work orders, etc. Smaller companies or companies that are mid-size would benefit from this program the most as it provides the necessary programming to succeed along with its ease of use.

Incentivized

It covers all standard functionalities one business is looking for there jobs and outages to be planned using skills , dispatching, scheduling, Time and material and activities with Smartforms along with the review processes All type of outages can be taken care in terms of predictive maintainance, preventive or emergency or onsite job repair process etc

• The timer to track the technicians time is wonderful.
• Integrates well with QuickBooks.
• The mobile app is great.

• In my experience, SAP Field Service Management is user friendly
• SAP Field Service Management has good integration with c4c and s4
• In my experience, SAP Field Service Management has easy configuration

Incentivized

• mHelpDesk lacks in its expansion ability of multiple administrator types. We have executive level, midlevel, and department level administrators in addition to the tech, managers, etc. working directly with the system. It seems we are always about one admin level shy of what we need and are unable to create it.
• mHelpDesk sometimes has difficulty with its mobile tracking either being accurate as seen by the administrators or in locking up the mobile devices of the techs. It is not a constant issue yet one which occurs often enough to be of note.
• mHelpDesk doesn't track automatically so our mobile techs can shut that off. While that may be a disciplinary operational issue for us as well, we should be able to lock that setting "on" so our users are tracked which using the app.

Incentivized

• In my opinion, there is room for improvement for SAP Field Service Management to be More user friendly
• I think there is room for improvement for SAP Field Service Management to be More offline

Incentivized

The staff at Mhelpdesk have been incredible. They are consistently adding new features and are willing to work with us to meet our company's needs

Though it is good tool but still having issues with stability and need good amount of technical support to implement. The Industry still do not have good resource available for supporting this product. SAP should provide lighter user manuals/ set up documents. The ones which are already there looks very complex and requires lot of time to go through

Incentivized

It works well for most of what we need. It integrates well w/ quickbooks. We would like to see it integrate w/ outlook.

Rigidity in screen enhancements. It very much relies on smarts forms which is good but it lacks the features like Inspection rounds which is more data driven for Inspections.

Incentivized

Support is not very good. Actually one way to support this product is to have flexible and robust support. As it is a relatively new product and continuously evolving so it is better that SAP provide quick support on issues which may feel are trivial.

Incentivized

When we first started using Mhelpdesk, RepairShopr was just a blip on our radar and didn't have the feature-set that Mhelpdesk did. RepairShopr looked great, but the Mhelpdesk had a lot more features. Every 6 months or so, I'd check on RepairShopr and it was growing fast and adding new features all the time. After a few years - the difference was night and day so we switched to RepairShopr and it's been a much better fit for our business.

Incentivized

I haven't worked with others.

Incentivized

• It has overall been positive

Incentivized

• Better usability for dispatchers and technicians
• Faster and more clear service for Customers
• Increase in revenue from Service

Incentivized