TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Microsoft Dynamics GP vs. Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Microsoft Dynamics GP

    Score5.4 out of 10
    N/AMicrosoft Dynamics GP is an ERP software with accounting capabilities. It includes various packs for customizability and features tailored to specific industries’ needs. GP is offered as a perpetual license or subscription.N/A

    Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne

    Score6.9 out of 10
    N/AAn ERP primarily aimed at medium-sized companies that combines financial management capabilities contain the familiar general ledger along with expense management, accounts payable and receivable (AP/AR), advanced cost accounting, and fixed asset accounting.N/A
    Pricing
    Microsoft Dynamics GPOracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Microsoft Dynamics GPOracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Microsoft Dynamics GPOracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
    Considered Both Products
    Microsoft
    Chose Microsoft Dynamics GP
    Microsoft Dynamics GP is one of the best ERP's for a medium or small business in the market today. When we were looking for the right software, it had already a connection developed with our 3rd party logistics system, so the decision was pretty easy since the logistic / supply …
    Incentivized
    Oracle
    Chose Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
    JD Edwards Enterprise is more robust than NetSuite or MSD GP. It has significantly more experience in the field. However, it's also an aging application and not nearly as agile as those two. I've also found resources to be less expensive with a broader knowledge of the …
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    33%
    Would buy again
    2 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    83%
    Delivers good value for the price
    5 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    83%
    Happy with the feature set
    5 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    Microsoft Dynamics GPOracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
    Payroll Management
    Comparison of Payroll Management features of Microsoft Dynamics GP and Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
    Feature
    Microsoft Dynamics GP
    6.4
    20 Ratings
    17% below category average
    Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
    7.5
    11 Ratings
    0% below category average
    Pay calculation6.219 Ratings9.010 Ratings
    Benefit plan administration5.815 Ratings8.09 Ratings
    Direct deposit files7.518 Ratings8.09 Ratings
    Salary revision and increment management6.517 Ratings00 Ratings
    Reimbursement management6.016 Ratings00 Ratings
    Customization
    Comparison of Customization features of Microsoft Dynamics GP and Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
    Feature
    Microsoft Dynamics GP
    4.3
    27 Ratings
    55% below category average
    Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
    8.0
    16 Ratings
    6% above category average
    API for custom integration2.526 Ratings8.013 Ratings
    Plug-ins6.021 Ratings8.015 Ratings
    Security
    Comparison of Security features of Microsoft Dynamics GP and Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
    Feature
    Microsoft Dynamics GP
    6.8
    40 Ratings
    18% below category average
    Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
    8.5
    21 Ratings
    1% above category average
    Single sign-on capability5.532 Ratings9.015 Ratings
    Role-based user permissions8.140 Ratings8.021 Ratings
    Reporting & Analytics
    Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Microsoft Dynamics GP and Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
    Feature
    Microsoft Dynamics GP
    5.3
    41 Ratings
    38% below category average
    Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
    7.7
    18 Ratings
    2% above category average
    Dashboards3.429 Ratings7.013 Ratings
    Standard reports6.139 Ratings8.017 Ratings
    Custom reports6.439 Ratings8.015 Ratings
    General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
    Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Microsoft Dynamics GP and Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
    Feature
    Microsoft Dynamics GP
    5.0
    48 Ratings
    42% below category average
    Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
    7.2
    23 Ratings
    7% below category average
    Accounts payable6.345 Ratings7.022 Ratings
    Accounts receivable5.736 Ratings8.020 Ratings
    Cash management6.336 Ratings00 Ratings
    Bank reconciliation5.541 Ratings00 Ratings
    Expense management4.431 Ratings00 Ratings
    Time tracking8.014 Ratings00 Ratings
    Fixed asset management4.428 Ratings00 Ratings
    Multi-currency support2.619 Ratings00 Ratings
    Multi-division support3.026 Ratings00 Ratings
    Regulations compliance3.214 Ratings00 Ratings
    Electronic tax filing9.012 Ratings00 Ratings
    Self-service portal7.012 Ratings00 Ratings
    Global Financial Support6.07 Ratings8.015 Ratings
    Primary and Secondary Ledgers4.721 Ratings8.017 Ratings
    Intercompany Accounting3.618 Ratings00 Ratings
    Localizations4.513 Ratings00 Ratings
    Journals and Reconciliations4.526 Ratings8.017 Ratings
    Enterprise Accounting2.616 Ratings00 Ratings
    Configurable Accounting3.517 Ratings8.016 Ratings
    Centralized Rules Framework3.214 Ratings00 Ratings
    Standardized Processes6.119 Ratings7.019 Ratings
    Inventory Management
    Comparison of Inventory Management features of Microsoft Dynamics GP and Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
    Feature
    Microsoft Dynamics GP
    4.2
    26 Ratings
    54% below category average
    Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
    7.9
    16 Ratings
    1% below category average
    Inventory tracking5.524 Ratings7.016 Ratings
    Automatic reordering1.013 Ratings8.012 Ratings
    Location management4.018 Ratings10.014 Ratings
    Manufacturing module3.515 Ratings00 Ratings
    Order Management
    Comparison of Order Management features of Microsoft Dynamics GP and Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
    Feature
    Microsoft Dynamics GP
    3.6
    25 Ratings
    69% below category average
    Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
    7.2
    17 Ratings
    10% below category average
    Pricing3.718 Ratings8.016 Ratings
    Order entry3.721 Ratings9.016 Ratings
    Credit card processing1.012 Ratings6.88 Ratings
    Cost of goods sold5.025 Ratings8.113 Ratings
    Order Orchestration4.99 Ratings9.08 Ratings
    End-to-end order visibility3.312 Ratings00 Ratings
    Order exception Resolution3.37 Ratings00 Ratings
    Subledger and Financial Process
    Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Microsoft Dynamics GP and Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
    Feature
    Microsoft Dynamics GP
    -
    Ratings
    Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
    7.0
    21 Ratings
    8% below category average
    Billing Management00 Ratings8.015 Ratings
    Cash and Asset Management00 Ratings7.018 Ratings
    Travel & Expense Management00 Ratings9.012 Ratings
    Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting00 Ratings5.710 Ratings
    Period Close00 Ratings8.916 Ratings
    Project Financial Management
    Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Microsoft Dynamics GP and Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
    Feature
    Microsoft Dynamics GP
    -
    Ratings
    Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
    7.2
    11 Ratings
    5% below category average
    Budgeting and Forecasting00 Ratings5.38 Ratings
    Project Costing00 Ratings7.09 Ratings
    Cost Capture00 Ratings6.88 Ratings
    Capital Project Management00 Ratings6.99 Ratings
    Customer Contract Compliance00 Ratings6.06 Ratings
    Project Revenue Recognition00 Ratings7.56 Ratings
    Project Execution Management
    Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Microsoft Dynamics GP and Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
    Feature
    Microsoft Dynamics GP
    -
    Ratings
    Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
    8.8
    6 Ratings
    22% above category average
    Project Planning and Scheduling00 Ratings8.06 Ratings
    Task Insight for Project Managers00 Ratings9.05 Ratings
    Project Mobile Functionality00 Ratings8.05 Ratings
    Definable Resource Pools00 Ratings8.04 Ratings
    Grants Management
    Comparison of Grants Management features of Microsoft Dynamics GP and Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
    Feature
    Microsoft Dynamics GP
    -
    Ratings
    Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
    7.4
    6 Ratings
    1% below category average
    Award Lifecycle Management00 Ratings7.05 Ratings
    Procurement
    Comparison of Procurement features of Microsoft Dynamics GP and Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
    Feature
    Microsoft Dynamics GP
    -
    Ratings
    Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
    6.9
    13 Ratings
    3% below category average
    Bids Analyzed and Compared00 Ratings4.36 Ratings
    Contract Authoring00 Ratings7.55 Ratings
    Contract Repository00 Ratings7.04 Ratings
    Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated00 Ratings8.09 Ratings
    Supplier Management00 Ratings7.011 Ratings
    Risk Management
    Comparison of Risk Management features of Microsoft Dynamics GP and Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
    Feature
    Microsoft Dynamics GP
    -
    Ratings
    Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
    7.6
    4 Ratings
    12% above category average
    Risk Repository00 Ratings8.34 Ratings
    Control Management00 Ratings8.04 Ratings
    Control Efficiency Assessments00 Ratings7.23 Ratings
    Issue Detection00 Ratings6.73 Ratings
    Remediation and Certification00 Ratings7.83 Ratings
    Logistics
    Comparison of Logistics features of Microsoft Dynamics GP and Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
    Feature
    Microsoft Dynamics GP
    -
    Ratings
    Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
    6.9
    10 Ratings
    2% below category average
    Transportation Planning and Optimization00 Ratings7.06 Ratings
    Transportation Execution Management00 Ratings7.07 Ratings
    Trade and Customs Management00 Ratings5.55 Ratings
    Fulfillment Management00 Ratings8.07 Ratings
    Warehouse Workforce Management00 Ratings8.06 Ratings
    Manufacturing
    Comparison of Manufacturing features of Microsoft Dynamics GP and Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
    Feature
    Microsoft Dynamics GP
    -
    Ratings
    Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
    7.0
    9 Ratings
    7% below category average
    Production Process Design00 Ratings4.86 Ratings
    Production Management00 Ratings4.38 Ratings
    Configuration Management00 Ratings8.35 Ratings
    Work Execution00 Ratings9.07 Ratings
    Manufacturing Costs00 Ratings9.08 Ratings
    Supply Chain
    Comparison of Supply Chain features of Microsoft Dynamics GP and Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
    Feature
    Microsoft Dynamics GP
    -
    Ratings
    Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
    6.3
    13 Ratings
    15% below category average
    Forecasting00 Ratings5.410 Ratings
    Inventory Planning00 Ratings8.013 Ratings
    Performance Monitoring00 Ratings8.08 Ratings
    Product Lifecycle Management
    Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Microsoft Dynamics GP and Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
    Feature
    Microsoft Dynamics GP
    -
    Ratings
    Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
    8.0
    7 Ratings
    8% above category average
    Proposal Management00 Ratings8.04 Ratings
    Product Master Data Management00 Ratings8.05 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Microsoft Dynamics GPOracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
    Small Businesses
    QuickBooks Self-Employed (discontinued)
    Score4.3 out of 10
    Zoho One
    Score9.2 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    MYOB
    Score8.3 out of 10
    Zoho One
    Score9.2 out of 10
    Enterprises
    No answers on this topic
    Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
    Score4.8 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Microsoft Dynamics GPOracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
    Likelihood to Recommend
    4.0
    (54 ratings)
    10.0
    (25 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    9.9
    (7 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Usability
    5.4
    (10 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Availability
    10.0
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Performance
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    7.0
    (5 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    8.2
    (3 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    CPA Rating
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Microsoft Dynamics GPOracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Microsoft
    Microsoft Dynamics GP is well-suited for our environment, as we pay a diverse group of employees, including on-the-road drivers, shop employees (some in other locations), and office employees. It easily tracks time off, taxes, pay, etc. The reporting allows us to verify with our drivers how they are paid each week, whether it be through mileage or stop-offs.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    If there are lot of complicated systems this might not be the best system. If you have only some complexity Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is a product a technical or application person can wrap their hands around and understand the whole system.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Microsoft
    • Great Plains started as back office/accounting, and that is still it's strong suit.
    • SQL and the GP programming language, Dexterity, provide a robust, scalable, and stable platform with well documented maintenance and repair procedures. Relatively easy to manage, tune, and support.
    • Microsoft support for GP verges on "particularly well". Doesn't quite get there but good enough once you know what you're doing
    • Strong partner network, including the GP User Group (GPUG)
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    • The new versions (9.2) of JDE has so much open functionality and really gives the user control over the screens and what they want to see. Love that the layout of the screen is really up to the user and what they want to see it along with freezing columns and creating favorites for way access.
    • It is so flexible with the system platforms that it can run on and so easy to customize since it supports so many databases.
    • It is intuitive and does not need to have a lot of training on how to use the software.
    • It's just a great ERP software and one of the better ones I've seen.
    • Oracle is FINALLY starting to listen to the users and SIGs and putting enhancements into the system which makes life easier for us business users.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Microsoft
    • With respect to the allocations, once the expense is entered into the allocation account, you lose the ability to run any detail on just the total of the expense. It would be nice if you could run a trial balance on the allocation accounts the same way you can with regular accounts.
    • I've always thought security set up could be a bit simpler. It actually has gotten better through the years. Specifically, with eight separate entities, it would be nice to have a "master" setup where you could call up one group entity, assign the users rights, and then be finished. Currently, whenever I have a new user, I have to call up each individual entity and select all of the features I want the user to have. That means I have to do eight steps for each user.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    • The Configurable Network Language (CNC) is a proprietary protocol, and it can be difficult to source resources that understand this language well.
    • It has some inherent limitations with generating PDF or printable files. Most organizations use a third party platform like Creat!form or Bottomline to solve this.
    • No built in credit card processing solution, and no plug-and-play eCommerce or webstore capabilities available.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Microsoft
    Due the economic challenges that Puerto Rico is having, the company has had to merge some companies in order to be more efficient. It has been easy in GP to process those merges, even thought we had to spend days to accomplish that the process was smooth and accurate. In addition we were able to streamline the purchasing and sales process and the organization is confident to keep renewing GP for the future versions.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    No answers on this topic
    Usability
    Microsoft
    Though it is a basic accounting package, I believe some users do not find the old style menus and navigation options intuitive. There is also a great lack of training resources in the market, so users have to learn the product without guidance a lot, resulting in inefficient workflows and misuse or misunderstanding of many features.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    great design and continuous improvements
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Microsoft
    The rating is directed to the thrid party serive provider that we use. I do not now how good the Microsoft direct support is.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation Rating
    Microsoft
    Basically the challenge with this implementation was the Business Portal, too many errors and even the aplication is up and running the users are still having issues. We will start planning the migraton to GP 2015 soon.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Microsoft
    I come from a strong background of using SAP. SAP doesn't have the flexibility of GP, an example would be SAP doesn't allow core mods, if they catch you, you lose support. Microsoft doesn't really care about mods, but they will be quick to have the vendor you used support your issue if it is caused by those mods. With SAP your company adapts to the software, where with GP you adapt the software to you.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    It is simple to use and implement as compared to complex softwares in the market that may take ample amount of time to implement. The budget is also slightly less to provide the same functionality that other softwares are providing. Also having Oracle database that comes with the system is much easier to handle and use and have much security.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Scalability
    Microsoft
    The functionality that GP and related ISV solutions offer and the ease of integration of GP to other systems makes it an extremely scalable solution
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    Microsoft
    • Microsoft Dynamics GP allows my clients to move from a paper or spreadsheet based company to an integrated, electronic, streamlined business. I love being able to help clients gain efficiencies through the use of Microsoft Dynamics GP.
    • Microsoft Dynamics GP allows for better customer service because everything is at our fingertips. If someone calls questioning an invoice, we can easily look it up. If someone calls stating they paid an invoice with a certain check number, we can quickly run a query to find that particular check number to see where it was applied.
    • Having everything on a single platform provides ease of use for upgrades, backups and end user training. There is only one software to learn!
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Oracle
    • Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne's advantage is significant cost savings and operational improvements when you run Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne in the Oracle Cloud. Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne offers the only no-compromise enterprise cloud platform for moving Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne, its associated database systems, an ecosystem of apps to the cloud. Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne's One-Click Provisioning tool allows you to deploy Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne on the Oracle Cloud in hours, not days while maintaining the integrity of existing customized apps.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots