Microsoft Dynamics GP vs. SAP BPC (Business Planning and Consolidation)

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Microsoft Dynamics GP
Score 5.3 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Dynamics GP is an ERP software with accounting capabilities. It includes various packs for customizability and features tailored to specific industries’ needs. GP is offered as a perpetual license or subscription.N/A
SAP BPC (Business Planning and Consolidation)
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
The SAP BPC software is designed to help users plan and achieve a faster, more accurate close. The SAP BPC software aims to help users spend more time growing their business and less time closing books. The vendor’s value proposition is that their software delivers planning, budgeting, forecasting, and financial consolidation capabilities in a single application. This, in turn, enables them to easily adjust plans and forecasts, speed up budget and closing cycles, and ensure compliance with…N/A
Pricing
Microsoft Dynamics GPSAP BPC (Business Planning and Consolidation)
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Microsoft Dynamics GPSAP BPC (Business Planning and Consolidation)
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Microsoft Dynamics GPSAP BPC (Business Planning and Consolidation)
Features
Microsoft Dynamics GPSAP BPC (Business Planning and Consolidation)
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
6.5
20 Ratings
15% below category average
SAP BPC (Business Planning and Consolidation)
-
Ratings
Pay calculation6.319 Ratings00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration6.015 Ratings00 Ratings
Direct deposit files7.518 Ratings00 Ratings
Salary revision and increment management6.517 Ratings00 Ratings
Reimbursement management6.016 Ratings00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
4.3
27 Ratings
55% below category average
SAP BPC (Business Planning and Consolidation)
-
Ratings
API for custom integration2.526 Ratings00 Ratings
Plug-ins6.021 Ratings00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
7.1
40 Ratings
14% below category average
SAP BPC (Business Planning and Consolidation)
-
Ratings
Single sign-on capability5.932 Ratings00 Ratings
Role-based user permissions8.240 Ratings00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
5.4
41 Ratings
36% below category average
SAP BPC (Business Planning and Consolidation)
-
Ratings
Dashboards3.529 Ratings00 Ratings
Standard reports6.239 Ratings00 Ratings
Custom reports6.539 Ratings00 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
5.1
48 Ratings
39% below category average
SAP BPC (Business Planning and Consolidation)
-
Ratings
Accounts payable6.445 Ratings00 Ratings
Accounts receivable5.936 Ratings00 Ratings
Cash management6.436 Ratings00 Ratings
Bank reconciliation5.741 Ratings00 Ratings
Expense management4.531 Ratings00 Ratings
Time tracking8.014 Ratings00 Ratings
Fixed asset management4.628 Ratings00 Ratings
Multi-currency support2.919 Ratings00 Ratings
Multi-division support3.026 Ratings00 Ratings
Regulations compliance3.314 Ratings00 Ratings
Electronic tax filing9.012 Ratings00 Ratings
Self-service portal7.012 Ratings00 Ratings
Global Financial Support6.07 Ratings00 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers4.721 Ratings00 Ratings
Intercompany Accounting3.918 Ratings00 Ratings
Localizations4.513 Ratings00 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations4.726 Ratings00 Ratings
Enterprise Accounting2.916 Ratings00 Ratings
Configurable Accounting4.217 Ratings00 Ratings
Centralized Rules Framework3.914 Ratings00 Ratings
Standardized Processes6.219 Ratings00 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
4.6
26 Ratings
46% below category average
SAP BPC (Business Planning and Consolidation)
-
Ratings
Inventory tracking6.324 Ratings00 Ratings
Automatic reordering1.013 Ratings00 Ratings
Location management4.018 Ratings00 Ratings
Manufacturing module4.715 Ratings00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
3.7
25 Ratings
68% below category average
SAP BPC (Business Planning and Consolidation)
-
Ratings
Pricing3.518 Ratings00 Ratings
Order entry3.521 Ratings00 Ratings
Credit card processing1.012 Ratings00 Ratings
Cost of goods sold5.325 Ratings00 Ratings
Order Orchestration5.49 Ratings00 Ratings
End-to-end order visibility3.912 Ratings00 Ratings
Order exception Resolution3.57 Ratings00 Ratings
Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting
Comparison of Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
SAP BPC (Business Planning and Consolidation)
7.6
41 Ratings
8% below category average
Long-term financial planning00 Ratings7.435 Ratings
Financial budgeting00 Ratings8.037 Ratings
Forecasting00 Ratings7.840 Ratings
Scenario modeling00 Ratings7.336 Ratings
Management reporting00 Ratings7.840 Ratings
Consolidation and Close
Comparison of Consolidation and Close features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
SAP BPC (Business Planning and Consolidation)
7.1
40 Ratings
12% below category average
Financial data consolidation00 Ratings8.336 Ratings
Journal entries and reports00 Ratings7.130 Ratings
Multi-currency management00 Ratings6.728 Ratings
Intercompany Eliminations00 Ratings6.630 Ratings
Minority Ownership00 Ratings7.020 Ratings
Local and consolidated reporting00 Ratings6.133 Ratings
Detailed Audit Trails00 Ratings8.227 Ratings
Financial Reporting and Compliance
Comparison of Financial Reporting and Compliance features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
SAP BPC (Business Planning and Consolidation)
7.0
40 Ratings
14% below category average
Financial Statement Reporting00 Ratings8.035 Ratings
Management Reporting00 Ratings6.840 Ratings
Excel-based Reporting00 Ratings7.139 Ratings
Automated board and financial reporting00 Ratings6.130 Ratings
Analytics and Reporting
Comparison of Analytics and Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
SAP BPC (Business Planning and Consolidation)
5.5
36 Ratings
38% below category average
Personalized dashboards00 Ratings5.024 Ratings
Color-coded scorecards00 Ratings6.422 Ratings
KPIs00 Ratings3.031 Ratings
Cost and profitability analysis00 Ratings7.528 Ratings
Key Performance Indicator setting00 Ratings4.024 Ratings
Benchmarking with external data00 Ratings7.018 Ratings
Integration
Comparison of Integration features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics GP
-
Ratings
SAP BPC (Business Planning and Consolidation)
6.1
39 Ratings
31% below category average
Flat file integration00 Ratings6.735 Ratings
Excel data integration00 Ratings6.437 Ratings
Direct links to 3rd-party data sources00 Ratings5.125 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Microsoft Dynamics GPSAP BPC (Business Planning and Consolidation)
Small Businesses
QuickBooks Self-Employed (discontinued)
QuickBooks Self-Employed (discontinued)
Score 6.6 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Zoho Books
Zoho Books
Score 9.1 out of 10
Centage
Centage
Score 9.4 out of 10
Enterprises
SAP Cloud ERP
SAP Cloud ERP
Score 8.6 out of 10
OneStream
OneStream
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics GPSAP BPC (Business Planning and Consolidation)
Likelihood to Recommend
6.0
(51 ratings)
7.3
(41 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.9
(7 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
6.0
(7 ratings)
9.0
(2 ratings)
Availability
10.0
(2 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Performance
7.0
(1 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
7.0
(5 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.2
(3 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
6.7
(39 ratings)
Product Scalability
9.1
(1 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Microsoft Dynamics GPSAP BPC (Business Planning and Consolidation)
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
Microsoft Dynamics GP is well-suited for our environment, as we pay a diverse group of employees, including on-the-road drivers, shop employees (some in other locations), and office employees. It easily tracks time off, taxes, pay, etc. The reporting allows us to verify with our drivers how they are paid each week, whether it be through mileage or stop-offs.
Read full review
SAP
SAP BPC (Business Planning and Consolidation) overall is a good package and has helped improve our reporting a lot whilst also making it more efficient due to the reliability of data input / output. There are limitations like graphs being so limited in functionality and reports failing when too much data being processed however i would recommend to others.
Read full review
Pros
Microsoft
  • Great Plains started as back office/accounting, and that is still it's strong suit.
  • SQL and the GP programming language, Dexterity, provide a robust, scalable, and stable platform with well documented maintenance and repair procedures. Relatively easy to manage, tune, and support.
  • Microsoft support for GP verges on "particularly well". Doesn't quite get there but good enough once you know what you're doing
  • Strong partner network, including the GP User Group (GPUG)
Read full review
SAP
  • SAP BPC is real time data. You can send information into the system and see it reflected in your reports immediately. Other systems may require a manual push into a reporting system.
  • SAP BPC is a shared reporting tool, so multiple users can be working in a model/environment at the same time, real time. This is especially helpful if your workbooks incorporated multiple processes requiring multiple users to get into the same model.
  • SAP BPC is a powerful tool designed to help all facets of the company, from cash flow to capital expenditures to headcount management to financial planning to consolidation.
Read full review
Cons
Microsoft
  • With respect to the allocations, once the expense is entered into the allocation account, you lose the ability to run any detail on just the total of the expense. It would be nice if you could run a trial balance on the allocation accounts the same way you can with regular accounts.
  • I've always thought security set up could be a bit simpler. It actually has gotten better through the years. Specifically, with eight separate entities, it would be nice to have a "master" setup where you could call up one group entity, assign the users rights, and then be finished. Currently, whenever I have a new user, I have to call up each individual entity and select all of the features I want the user to have. That means I have to do eight steps for each user.
Read full review
SAP
  • SAP should focus on delivering one single product for planning, consolidation and budgeting needs rather than providing a large list of options to choose from.
  • The product is not very user-friendly compared to other cloud competitors. There is a heavy dependency on IT teams.
  • SAP BPC should come up a pure cloud option.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Microsoft
Due the economic challenges that Puerto Rico is having, the company has had to merge some companies in order to be more efficient. It has been easy in GP to process those merges, even thought we had to spend days to accomplish that the process was smooth and accurate. In addition we were able to streamline the purchasing and sales process and the organization is confident to keep renewing GP for the future versions.
Read full review
SAP
No answers on this topic
Usability
Microsoft
Though it is a basic accounting package, I believe some users do not find the old style menus and navigation options intuitive. There is also a great lack of training resources in the market, so users have to learn the product without guidance a lot, resulting in inefficient workflows and misuse or misunderstanding of many features.
Read full review
SAP
Unlike other SAP traditional products, SAP BPC was meant to be simple and familiar to financial users
Read full review
Support Rating
Microsoft
The rating is directed to the thrid party serive provider that we use. I do not now how good the Microsoft direct support is.
Read full review
SAP
We need a big support team with various skillset like BPC, ABAP, BW, HANA, FICO etc
Read full review
In-Person Training
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
SAP
SAP BPC training content and trainers are very good. The training is structured and provides a very good understanding of the product features and functionalities. I attended 6 separate training sessions of week-long or more. I had very good experience in all the sessions. The training is organized very well.
Read full review
Online Training
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
SAP
SAP Training contents are very good, informative and exhaustive.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Microsoft
Basically the challenge with this implementation was the Business Portal, too many errors and even the aplication is up and running the users are still having issues. We will start planning the migraton to GP 2015 soon.
Read full review
SAP
The implementation was carried out in two phases spread over a period of 4 years with 2 upgrades in between. We also had multiple upgrades to HANA.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
I come from a strong background of using SAP. SAP doesn't have the flexibility of GP, an example would be SAP doesn't allow core mods, if they catch you, you lose support. Microsoft doesn't really care about mods, but they will be quick to have the vendor you used support your issue if it is caused by those mods. With SAP your company adapts to the software, where with GP you adapt the software to you.
Read full review
SAP
With Hyperion we struggled as it didn’t have integrated planning and consolidation, whereas BPC does have it. BPC is easier for reporting as it is Excel-based. Also BPC has prepackaged business process flows that helped a lot. Hyperion on the other hand has a faster response time for user queries or report generation.
Read full review
Scalability
Microsoft
The functionality that GP and related ISV solutions offer and the ease of integration of GP to other systems makes it an extremely scalable solution
Read full review
SAP
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Microsoft
  • Microsoft Dynamics GP allows my clients to move from a paper or spreadsheet based company to an integrated, electronic, streamlined business. I love being able to help clients gain efficiencies through the use of Microsoft Dynamics GP.
  • Microsoft Dynamics GP allows for better customer service because everything is at our fingertips. If someone calls questioning an invoice, we can easily look it up. If someone calls stating they paid an invoice with a certain check number, we can quickly run a query to find that particular check number to see where it was applied.
  • Having everything on a single platform provides ease of use for upgrades, backups and end user training. There is only one software to learn!
Read full review
SAP
  • When originally implemented (as the predecessor product Outlooksoft) BPC took ASU from trying to budget and forecast for a 2B enterprise out of spreadsheets and into a far more consolidated tool. It has saved us considerable time over the years and paid for itself several times over.
  • BPC also allows us to present our budget in multiple different views to support management, board and departmental reporting.
Read full review
ScreenShots

SAP BPC (Business Planning and Consolidation) Screenshots

Screenshot of SAP BPC Home ScreenScreenshot of SAP BPC Web ClientScreenshot of SAP BPC DashboardScreenshot of SAP BPC Web Report