Mikogo is a free screen sharing solution with built-in VoIP for online meetings, web presentations, web conferencing and sales demos.
$156
Annually
HighQ
Score8 out of 10
N/A
HighQ Collaborate, now from Thomson Reuters (acquired 2019) is a cloud-based enterprise collaboration platform, featuring secure file sharing but also means for sharing documents with users outside the enterprise, as well as a user-interface optimized for mobile devices and intuitive interface, with real-time communication.
N/A
Pricing
Mikogo
HighQ
Editions & Modules
Basic Annual
$156
Annually
Professional Annual
$228
Annually
Professional Lifetime
$456
Lifetime License per User
Team Annual
$468
Annually
Team Lifetime
$936
Lifetime License [Unlimited Users]
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Mikogo
HighQ
Free Trial
Yes
No
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
Enterprise plans are also available for larger organizations, with a custom number of users, meeting participants, and channels. Master Administration and Web API integrations are also available. Contact Mikogo for further information.
—
More Pricing Information
Features
Mikogo
HighQ
Performance & Compatibility of Online Events Software
Comparison of Performance & Compatibility of Online Events Software features of Mikogo and Thomson Reuters HighQ
Feature
Mikogo
3.1
4 Ratings
87% below category average
Thomson Reuters HighQ
-
Ratings
High quality audio
4.14 Ratings
00 Ratings
High quality video
4.14 Ratings
00 Ratings
Low bandwidth requirements
1.14 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mobile support
3.22 Ratings
00 Ratings
Screen Sharing
Comparison of Screen Sharing features of Mikogo and Thomson Reuters HighQ
Feature
Mikogo
6.0
4 Ratings
28% below category average
Thomson Reuters HighQ
-
Ratings
Desktop sharing
2.24 Ratings
00 Ratings
Whiteboards
9.82 Ratings
00 Ratings
Online Meetings / Events
Comparison of Online Meetings / Events features of Mikogo and Thomson Reuters HighQ
Feature
Mikogo
3.0
4 Ratings
93% below category average
Thomson Reuters HighQ
-
Ratings
Calendar integration
1.12 Ratings
00 Ratings
Meeting initiation
1.24 Ratings
00 Ratings
Record meetings / events
2.14 Ratings
00 Ratings
Slideshows
7.63 Ratings
00 Ratings
Online Events Collaboration
Comparison of Online Events Collaboration features of Mikogo and Thomson Reuters HighQ
Feature
Mikogo
2.1
4 Ratings
118% below category average
Thomson Reuters HighQ
-
Ratings
Live chat
1.24 Ratings
00 Ratings
Audience polling
3.13 Ratings
00 Ratings
Q&A
2.13 Ratings
00 Ratings
Online Events Security
Comparison of Online Events Security features of Mikogo and Thomson Reuters HighQ
Feature
Mikogo
1.5
4 Ratings
137% below category average
Thomson Reuters HighQ
-
Ratings
User authentication
1.23 Ratings
00 Ratings
Participant roles & permissions
1.13 Ratings
00 Ratings
Confidential attendee list
2.13 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Mikogo and Thomson Reuters HighQ
Feature
Mikogo
-
Ratings
Thomson Reuters HighQ
8.2
2 Ratings
6% above category average
Task Management
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Scheduling
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Workflow Automation
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Mobile Access
00 Ratings
9.32 Ratings
Search
00 Ratings
9.62 Ratings
Visual planning tools
00 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
Communication
Comparison of Communication features of Mikogo and Thomson Reuters HighQ
Feature
Mikogo
-
Ratings
Thomson Reuters HighQ
8.6
2 Ratings
8% above category average
Chat
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Notifications
00 Ratings
9.02 Ratings
Discussions
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Surveys
00 Ratings
6.01 Ratings
Internal knowledgebase
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
File Sharing & Management
Comparison of File Sharing & Management features of Mikogo and Thomson Reuters HighQ
Pros Mikogo is well-suited and cost-effective for the small business Simple & well-designed; easy to figure out. Works best for one-on-one client support. Cons No live customer support Free version has limited features (e.g. no invite meeting allowed) Trial version only 14 days
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
HighQ Collaborate is well suited to situations where a law firm maintains numerous documents for a client and the client needs access to them on a regular basis. For example, we may store the client's minute book (which is relatively common for a large corporate law firm to do), but the client may need access to documents in that minute book on a regular basis. Likewise, we have an internal system at the firm for hosting digital versions of closing books, however, many clients would not have a similar system because they would only receive closing books irregularly. USBs get lost and the client might not want to put the closing book on the main server where anyone can access it. By putting the closing book on the extranet site, the individuals in the client's organization who should be able to access the closing book can do so.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
It is just not that exciting. We host documents on there for clients but the extranet sites have ultimately turned out to not be a product that our clients are clamoring for or that we are regularly pushing.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The interface is easy to use and overall the software seems pretty robust (I haven't had any crashes yet), so I haven't had to use the support very often. Likewise, I don't think I've ever had a client e-mail me with questions or issues - the software is pretty idiot-proof.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Mikogo has simple features and is easy to use. If you don't need lots of bells and whistles and just want to screen share or video conference on a small scale Mikogo works best. Join.me & TeamViewer are a bit confusing for the novice small business person. My experience with LogMeIn has been that it's sluggish. GoToMeeting works great but is pricey for the small firm that mainly does one-to-one support/training. I couldn't get Zoom to work right.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I feel that HighQ does not really have any real competition in this space because it simply accomplishes its goals far better than the competition at lower cost, while requiring less training and administration.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info