Mimecast Cloud Archive vs. WinRAR

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Mimecast Cloud Archive
Score 9.2 out of 10
N/A
Mimecast Cloud Archive provides an archive storage solution for data retention, as well as search and retrieval of email, attachments and MS Teams conversations. The cloud archiving solution offers search capabilities for employees and automated tools for administrators that simplify management of mailboxes, e-discovery and litigation support.N/A
WinRAR
Score 9.8 out of 10
N/A
WinRAR products provide individuals, businesses, government agencies and many other industries with a solution for sharing and storing data. It is distributed by win.rar GmbH, the official distributor of WinRAR and RARLAB products since February 2002. win.rar GmbH is registered in Germany and is represented worldwide by local partners in more than 70 countries on six continents.N/A
Pricing
Mimecast Cloud ArchiveWinRAR
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Mimecast Cloud ArchiveWinRAR
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Mimecast Cloud ArchiveWinRAR
Considered Both Products
Mimecast Cloud Archive
Chose Mimecast Cloud Archive
We had used Sophos Reflect in the past before moving to Mimecast Cloud Archive. The tool was good but not as user friendly to use on a day to day basis and the setup was much more involved than Mimecast Cloud Archive was. I have also used checkpoint in the past which did not …
Chose Mimecast Cloud Archive
To achieve the same outcomes, a mix of in-place archive & litigation hold rules needs to be implemented. This is quite convoluted, not to mention we usually encounter a poor experience when working with Exchange eDiscovery/Purview.
Chose Mimecast Cloud Archive
Does use Proofpoint in the past and it come better product than it.
Chose Mimecast Cloud Archive
Mimecast Cloud Archive is by far the better system. Firstly it integrates into existing security services provided by Mimecast and overall it is built purely for email and large volumes of both users and emails.
Chose Mimecast Cloud Archive
Its much faster to search for and send the emails as opposed to Kaseya where you need to restore the backup before you are able to search through the emails
Chose Mimecast Cloud Archive
We loved the intuitive dashboard and user management aspect and almost zero touch once configured, the ability for it to archive everything sent and received how quick it is to be able to delegate a former employees archive to someone else the ability to export content and …
Chose Mimecast Cloud Archive
Mimecast gave us some extra features that we believed were beneficial to our business. Removing the archive from the Microsoft hardware was also good to allow separation. Plus, adding the optional exchange backup made Mimecast a clear choice.
Chose Mimecast Cloud Archive
Mimecast has been the best archiving system so far that I've evaluated and/or used with the most "useful" features and best integration.
Chose Mimecast Cloud Archive
Mimecast was easier to use, had more features, and better priced.
Chose Mimecast Cloud Archive
Mimecast is overall a bit better value for the effort
Chose Mimecast Cloud Archive
The product offering is comparable, while the price is significantly less expensive in contrast to those offered by rivals. Additionally, the solution offers simple indexing and recovery, and it is nicely integrated into a variety of different ecosystems. Connecting across …
Chose Mimecast Cloud Archive
The product offering is similar but the cost is lower in comparison to competitors. Also, the product is well integrated into various ecosystems and provides easy recovery and indexing. There are various connectors and APIs available which makes it easy to connect across …
Chose Mimecast Cloud Archive
I was not involved in a decision-making process to purchase my podcast although I have used other tools in the past and my has the easiest interface to use And navigate. The learning curve is very short using this product. It’s a big benefit and plus that you were able to …
Chose Mimecast Cloud Archive
I have only ever compared it to Barracuda's Archive One which is no longer available or supported.
Chose Mimecast Cloud Archive
As opposed to its competitors, Mimecast Could Archive is a product designed IN the cloud. The other products were all basically traditional appliances hosted in the cloud and come with many limitations that Mimecast doesn't have. The ease of management and use of Mimecast is …
Chose Mimecast Cloud Archive
Mimecast has been identified by Gartner as the top product in its magic quadrant. We found the product the easiest to implement with the best support and feature set. It has been very reliable and when we have had questions, feature requests or problems, the company has been …
Chose Mimecast Cloud Archive
Mimecast was a more complete and mature solution in our evaluation. Their services go far beyond just email archiving. Cost and the fact it is a cloud solution is a benefit.
Chose Mimecast Cloud Archive
One of the big features of Mimecast is the ability to send large files. We used to use CItrix Sharefile for this but switched over to Mimecast's LFS for one large reason...since we are archiving all of our mail in Mimeast anyway we would have wanted these attachments, even if …
Chose Mimecast Cloud Archive
Users are not able to delete emails hence Mimecast EIA becomes a very useful tool during e-discovery. For EOA, they offer an inplace archive which means that emails can be deleted if the service is not turned on.
WinRAR

No answer on this topic

Best Alternatives
Mimecast Cloud ArchiveWinRAR
Small Businesses
Cove Data Protection
Cove Data Protection
Score 9.1 out of 10
Cove Data Protection
Cove Data Protection
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Cove Data Protection
Cove Data Protection
Score 9.1 out of 10
Cove Data Protection
Cove Data Protection
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
Microsoft Exchange
Microsoft Exchange
Score 8.7 out of 10
Microsoft Exchange
Microsoft Exchange
Score 8.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Mimecast Cloud ArchiveWinRAR
Likelihood to Recommend
9.4
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.6
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
7.7
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Availability
8.5
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
7.9
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
6.8
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Mimecast Cloud ArchiveWinRAR
Likelihood to Recommend
Given all the threats that are out there and the fact many come in via email, I think Mimecast is a great solution for any business of any size. If your business is heavily regulated then you have even more reason to use Mimecast. You might be able to do a lot of these things yourself but why would you? Mimecast employees are experts, the best in the industry, at knowing how email works and how to protect it.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Pros
  • It archives every email into and out of your enterprise including mail between internal users. This provides a legally acceptable archive that we can access at any point to find emails whether we need just one from a year ago or a lot to enter into a court case.
  • Since we have our MX record pointing to them first, they host all of our email in the cloud so users can access it even in the event our local email repository is down. We used this feature quite well during this past years Hurricane season.
  • Mimecast has a feature that allows me to sandbox all links, in emails, before users are redirected to them. This has saved us several times in that users clicked on links they should not have but Mimecast intercepted the request and stopped the user from going to the site.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Cons
  • Provide the option to select the home screen/page
  • Provide the ability to search only using a time range in the case where no keyword or sender can be remembered (can limit search period to 3-6months)
  • Allow the user to be able to reset their own password themselves
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Likelihood to Renew
If it was my choice, I would renew our use of Mimecast Cloud Archive. The biggest reason is that we already have it setup, we know the platform, it works for us. But we also like how easy it is to navigate the admin porta, and the other features that we have used like dmarc manager make it an event better use case for us.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
The archive is easy to use and the searching is highly customizable. You can easily search based on timeframe, sender, recipient, words, phrases, and attachments. The ability to search keywords within attachments, body, and subject line is incredibly helpful. We're able to quickly and easily find what we're looking for.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Reliability and Availability
There is never an issue. Everytime I have needed to access my own personal search archive or globally search across the whole business it works each time. I cannot recall a time where the service was down when needed to be used and all our staff use it daily.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Performance
The stability of the tool is the biggest factor, it has a fantastic uptime and the loading speed is exceptional. Long gone are the days of waiting for Outlook to open up a traditional PST archive, I can simply click, find what I need and go, usually, before outlook has opened the archive. It is an exceptionally efficient tool.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
It does a good job. The support team of the product was good and responsive and was also able to fix the issues I was experiencing at the time. It isn't perfect and takes some time to set up properly in the environment but once set up the product does what it is supposed to do which is what you are paying for.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
We used Mimecast professional services for the implementation and it was flawless as we were migrating from a competitor's product. The only downside was the amount of time required to ingest all the data as this was coming from a few different sources and in some cases it took months to migrate and index all the content. Apart from that the process was very well guided, with plenty of communication all throughout and without any major issues or downtime.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
We had used Sophos Reflect in the past before moving to Mimecast Cloud Archive. The tool was good but not as user friendly to use on a day to day basis and the setup was much more involved than Mimecast Cloud Archive was. I have also used checkpoint in the past which did not have as many features as Mimecast Cloud Archive and had less value for the cost of the licensing at the time.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • Before we enabled our Mimecast archive, we had multiple cases of users who had 10k+ emails "disappear" and could not find them. Trying to figure this out with Microsoft is near impossible. IT spent 5-10 hours on each situation trying to find, recover, and move the emails back into the user's mailbox.
  • A couple term cases happened as well where the user deleted everything in their mailbox and recoverable area had be cleared automatically by the time we found out. One of them would have been 28k emails and would take days to recover.
  • Since having Mimecast, it is a matter of going to the mailbox in the Sync and Recover and clicking a few things and restoring all the data. Super easy and restoring the data takes less time than manually doing it with a Microsoft Content Search export.
  • We are talking a few minutes vs 5-10+ hours.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots

Mimecast Cloud Archive Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of