TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Contact about Miro

Please fill out the form below to get in touch.

Miro

Connect with Miro

What are you interested in?

Already have an account?

You hereby consent to have TrustRadius share the information supplied on this form with Miro so that Miro and TrustRadius may contact you in regard to the information requested.

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    FigJam

    Score8 out of 10
    N/AFigJam is an online interactive whiteboard from Figma headquartered in San Francisco, presently in beta (2021) but available to the public in a free trial. The vendor states that in 2022, FigJam will have plans for $0, $8, and $15 per editor, per month.

    $5

    per month per editor

    Miro

    Score9 out of 10
    N/AMiro is a web-based Collaborative Whiteboard platform that provides teams with an infinite digital canvas for visual planning, diagramming, and workflow mapping. The platform integrates a spatial user interface with automated drawing tools and natural-language processing (NLP) to structure freeform ideas into defined project workflows and database schemas.

    $10

    per month per user

    Pricing
    FigJamMiro
    Editions & Modules
    FigJam Professional
    $36
    per year per editor
    FigJam Organization
    $60
    per year per editor
    1. Free - To discover what Miro can do. Always free
    $0
    2. Starter - Unlimited and private boards with essential features
    $8
    per month (billed annually) per user
    3. Business - Scales collaboration with advanced features and security
    $16
    per month (billed annually) per user
    4. Enterprise - For work across the entire organization, with support, security and control, to scale
    contact sales
    annual billing per user
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    FigJamMiro
    Free Trial
    YesYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
    Additional Details—Monthly billing also available at $10 per month for the Starter plan, or $20 for the Business plan.
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    FigJamMiro
    Considered Both Products
    Figma
    Chose FigJam
    Positive: FigJam is cheaper than Miro and allows connecting with FigJam, where we design our user interfaces. FigJam is more complete and visually appealing than draw.io, although draw.io is free. FigJam allows calls, which both competitors do not. Negative: Miro has …
    Incentivized
    Chose FigJam
    It is similar, but it provides more usable solutions for brainstorming sessions and presentation purposes. Now empowered with AI and some new cool stuff, it may be the most dangerous competitor to FigJam. However, it will win the race if FigJam is more responsive and gets more …
    Incentivized
    Chose FigJam
    FigJam works best in pair with Figma, as it allows you to keep track of your project in one place, supporting all phases of the process. The functionality is more intuitive, quick, and efficient. Visually, I also prefer it more —it’s more enjoyable and playful, making the …
    Incentivized
    Chose FigJam
    Microsoft Whiteboards are better, in my opinion, but not friendly with Figma files (can't export layered assets, raster only). Better in the sense that the drawing and and marker tools felt more natural and the AI features are just better, like auto-shapes, vs. FigJam's …
    Incentivized
    Chose FigJam
    I feel like Figjam is great at at what it does. It provides a great overall place to be able to use a virtual whiteboard and help teams collaborate. Especially remote teams. It actually does it better than others. There are some tools such as InVision Freehand that at the …
    Incentivized
    Miro
    Chose Miro
    we had tried draw.io, FigJam google whiteboard earlier as well so they work well for basic, but Miro is the easier and more functionality than these apps. in the Miro have the more feature like real time editing and team collaboration and remote team, so Miro is better …
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    Both FigJam and ClickUp have similar features where we can do collective brainstorming and idea mapping. We have gone back to Miro from both of those platforms because of the intuitive nature and usability of the Miro interface. Surprisingly, we do still pay for ClickUp and …
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    Miro offers greater versatility and scalability than Mural and FigJam for cross-functional use. FigJam primarily serves design teams, while Mural focuses on structured workshops, and Miro supports a much broader array of use cases, including strategy, marketing, client …
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    I tried other tools like Mural and FigJam before using Miro. FigJam was easy to understand, but it felt too simple for the kind of big projects my team works on. Mural was fine, but it did not have enough features to handle complex work or large teams. Miro worked much better …
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    Compared to these, Miro stood out for its balance of usability, scalability, and template ecosystem. It offers a more mature set of facilitation tools than Microsoft Whiteboard, greater flexibility than FigJam for large-scale enterprise workshops, and stronger adoption ease …
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    FigJam is mostly known by UXers and regular Figma users. Miro is known by everyone.
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    For the moment, we are more familiar with Miro and its boards, because we have known the templates and tools for some time. In the future, however, I believe that FigJam, being linked to Figma and detailed design, will replace it, because it is convenient to have the …
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    lucidspark is doing great but still delivers a disjointed experience (some features in Lucid Chats, others in Lucid Spark) - They do a better job providing pages inside the document - also more flexibility with customization

    FigJam is deeply integrated to Figma, so brings some …
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    The difference between the mentioned above are product And the Miro is that the Miro comes with multiple features which is not available in the above mentioned software and it's not up to the mark as compared to our daily needs in the organisation and Miro is fulfilling most of …
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    It was the tool available within the enterprise environment that is approved for use. Generally lower barrier to entry and requires less approval.
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    I have used Figma and an Excel sheet to brainstorm and create diagrams. Both are useful, but I found Miro to be more flexible when working with large groups and other types of projects. What I like most about Miro is that it brings all our tasks into a single workspace, like …
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    We also tried Figma, MS Whiteboard, Google Forms, and Notion. Compared to these platforms, Miro felt more flexible for our team collaboration. We liked how simple it was to organize our ideas, create workflows, and collaborate with our team members. We selected Miro because it …
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    We also evaluated tools such as Figma, Notion, and Jamboard for diagram creation. While those tools are useful, Miro provides a better overall experience for workflow diagrams and project planning. because Miro is offering a large variety of templates, easy-to-use collaboration …
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    Figma is simpler, embedded in our design tool, and more ¨fun¨ Miro is more serious, for diagram building and stakeholder workshops.
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    Ok, how is LucidSpark and MS Whiteboard not on this list? Miro is generally better than these three options, but you lose the obvious enterprise-wide integration that MS folks usually get with their suite, which is a clear drawback. The obvious reasons Miro is better are its …
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    We find Miro very user friendly and from dev point of view documentation is much easier than others.
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    Miro is more powerful than these tools, has some cool features but it's not as good the way it's designed. In my opinion, the general usability is where it suffers the most.
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    Figma: best for design/prototyping. Miro wins when the goal is to align, map processes, and make group decisions (without relying on a design workflow).

    Notion: best for final documentation and knowledge base. Miro is better for thinking through and building the visual …
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    I just think Miro's interface design and usage is better than figJams, it just feels and work better
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    Its so easy and fast to use.
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    Miro offer flexibility,many pre-made templates and real time collaboration.
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    all in one, upto some extent
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    I find Miro much easier to use in terms of usability and much more inviting to use. I also observe the people that use it for the first time with the people that participated in our workshops that they don't find it intimidating, which is an importanting to make the people …
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    We prefer Miro over any other utility because of the following reasons:

    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    83%
    Would buy again
    5 Answers
    97%
    Would buy again
    6204 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    83%
    Delivers good value for the price
    5 Answers
    98%
    Delivers good value for the price
    4108 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    67%
    Happy with the feature set
    4 Answers
    98%
    Happy with the feature set
    6247 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    98%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    2535 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    97%
    Implementation went as expected
    2711 Answers
    Best Alternatives
    FigJamMiro
    Small Businesses
    Whimsical
    Score9.4 out of 10
    Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite
    Score9 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Whimsical
    Score9.4 out of 10
    Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite
    Score9 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Whimsical
    Score9.4 out of 10
    Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite
    Score9 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    FigJamMiro
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.0
    (6 ratings)
    8.9
    (6393 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.2
    (199 ratings)
    Usability
    8.6
    (3 ratings)
    8.5
    (774 ratings)
    Availability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.7
    (24 ratings)
    Performance
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.6
    (24 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.1
    (71 ratings)
    In-Person Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.0
    (4 ratings)
    Online Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.6
    (11 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.9
    (3660 ratings)
    Configurability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.6
    (19 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (4001 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.8
    (24 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.9
    (12 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.1
    (13 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    FigJamMiro
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Figma
    If you're working in small product teams, like triads, and already using Figma, this is a no brainer for white boarding, quick/fast sketches, wireframing, collaborative doodling ... it gets less appropriate with large teams, infrequent. IMO, due to the way in which they price, it's better to keep the inner circle small-ish.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Miro
    We work on a lot of materials across different media. Sketches could be on real paper and later scanned, or on iPad and photoshops. Prototypes could be digital CAD models or 3D-printed models and later captured with cameras. Renderings be in another programs. So having Miro as whiteboard and being able to put all kind of materials (in forms of pictures or links) in one place and arrange them in a structural way is a huge productivity advantage for us.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Figma
    • One file, auto updated, no need to get latest
    • Easy to preview
    • Lack of client is benefit to some (not me)
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Miro
    • Makes internal coordination between admin team and tutors extremely painless. It's like a single place where everyone can drop ideas, get updates and notes without loss of context which usually happens in long email threads.
    • Versioning and board history are handled very well, which drastically reduces the workload. They help me track how a policy or math guideline has evolved, and also make it easy to revert changes if something doesn't work.
    • Comments stick exactly where they are meant to, making internal reviews much clearer. Admins don't have to guess which note refers to which rule or section.
    • Exports are clean, so even non-Miro teammates get it instantly.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Figma
    • It misses easy-to-use pre sets of diagrams. The ones presented seem to be not native and hard to use. Miro is a good benchmark.
    • Navegating throught projects in the main page is confusing, specially when people are not admin users.
    • It should suggest ways of organizing the pages designers do, specially when the project is big and have many pages and sections.
    • It could have, for example, a draft version for every page, so that one can hide it when they finish the work, but can open it whenever something needs to be modified, versioning the job.
    Read full review
    Miro
    • Sometimes locating information on a bigger board is quite difficult as the information starts to look less sorted. So there can be a little bit of improvement in terms of bigger boards
    • Complex features are hard to navigate and implement without a proper hand. A little bit of intuitivity can help fix that, especially for beginners
    • In my opinion, a few more formatting tools for a legal workflow would really be a great add on
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Figma
    No answers on this topic
    Miro
    Miro saves my day. I would spend at least 4x more time on documenting my projects and work without this tool. It support my day to day role and helps me be successful while saving my capacity. It is not only very easy to start working on it without additional training required, but also adapts to any use case that I might need to implement
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Figma
    I don't use it often, because the organization I work in uses a different environment on a commo basis. This is rather used between the designers, who prototype the solutions in Figma - they just have it as a workbook/notebook for their ideas. However, if those need to be shared with stakeholders or other organization members, the designers are expected to use a different environment.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Miro
    What elevates usability for me is how easily the software keeps everyone on the same page during the live session. When a team member is explaining a complex diagram, I can simply click on their avatar to instantly track their cursor and see the exact same perspective they are looking at, which is awesome.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Reliability and Availability
    Figma
    No answers on this topic
    Miro
    I have not encountered events where Miro is not available. It is quite nice and reliable to be fair, even on my freemium version (startup) I don't have reliability issues. It does have sometimes where the screen refresh or "freezes" or "consumes a lot of data" and we have to rewind windows and the likes, this instances are very less
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Performance
    Figma
    No answers on this topic
    Miro
    I took the loading quickly to be related to availability which I commented on before, so ditto with those comment on load time here. Although to reemphasize, Miro doesn't crash or just refuse to load like some other programs. The weak point of Miro for me is integration of files like Word, Excel, or PowerPoint (especially the later two). When you embed these, it gets slow, and complicated to bring them up while you're in the application.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Figma
    No answers on this topic
    Miro
    We have never reached out to or contacted support because Miro's platform has been incredibly intuitive and user-friendly. The comprehensive resources available, such as tutorials, documentation, and community forums, have provided all the guidance we needed. The seamless integration with our existing tools and the reliability of the platform have ensured that we rarely encounter issues that require external assistance. This self-sufficiency has allowed us to focus more on our projects and collaboration without interruptions. Overall, our experience with Miro has been smooth and efficient, eliminating the need for additional support
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Online Training
    Figma
    No answers on this topic
    Miro
    There was a series of webinars which Miro hosted with our organization that went over the basics, then progressively became more advanced with additional sections. The instructors were knowledgeable, and provided examples throughout the sessions, as well as answered peoples' questions. There was ample time and experience on the calls to cover a range of topics. The instructors were also very friendly and sociable, as well as honest. Of course Miro isn't a "God-tool" that does absolutely everything, but the instructors were aware and emphasized the strengths where Miro had them and sincerely accepted feedback.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    Figma
    No answers on this topic
    Miro
    Easy to learn, Miro has a series of videos on YouTube that effectively taught this program to my team members and me. The program is drag-and-drop and works excellently. People pick up on how to use it efficiently, and it's great for organizing ideas more freely. This product is more challenging for some older audiences who are not accustomed to using a touchpad, but for most, it was very easy to use.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Figma
    FigJam works best in pair with Figma, as it allows you to keep track of your project in one place, supporting all phases of the process. The functionality is more intuitive, quick, and efficient. Visually, I also prefer it more —it’s more enjoyable and playful, making the experience much more engaging.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Miro
    I like that Miro is something that anyone from any department can pick up, use and understand. You do not need specific domain knowledge. Miro has clean UI so running complex exercises becomes easier and can be easily shared across tools/platforms. Managing large number of participants on Miro is easier. FigJam on the other side is simpler and suits the needs of quick and simple brainstorm
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Scalability
    Figma
    No answers on this topic
    Miro
    Maybe is possible now so... Could be useful to manage in some way source code for the projects? not to edit so when we make solutions with different components in MIro, maybe each component could redirect to the source code of this component
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Figma
    • FigJam saves a lot of time ... it's nice to have all my visual notes/sketches within Figma itself where a lot of design work lives
    • The project organization and other features contribute to the ease of answering that age old question ... "where can I find that mockup?"
    • Dev Mode is pretty cool. Not many use it, so some designers may spend unnecessary time spec'ing out things that no one will appreciate, let alone look at.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Miro
    • Miro has helped increase productivity within teams because all the brainstorming, planning, and collaborative tasks can now be done within one tool.
    • Conversations about projects and decision-making processes are now quicker, allowing teams to plan and document their work much faster.
    • Working remotely has become much better because everyone can collaborate through Miro, eliminating communication gaps.
    • It has become easier to create documentation and follow up on meetings, saving time during the process.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Miro Screenshots

    Screenshot of Miro's design sprint templates, used to solve big challenges, create new products or improve existing ones.Screenshot of the Sprint Planning features in Miro, that assists Development Teams in creating a transparent understanding of what can be built and how. Users can run sprints and turn a team into creative and active participants. Today, many organizations use Agile tools to manage software development and other non-IT projects.Screenshot of the PI Planning Template that brings teams toward one vision of what stories to develop. Used to manage a backlog, increase productivity, and build the foundation for a successful PI Planning event. Miro’s PI Planning Template helps to get an overview of any PI Planning event, with step-by-step frames to guide the process.Screenshot of diagrams, concept maps, and system mapping templates used to communicate complex flows and create a shared understanding. Users can check off all the essential steps of the diagramming process and gain a complete overview of operations with Miro's diagramming templates collection.