Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Okta
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
Okta is an enterprise grade identity management service, built in the cloud. IT can manage access across any application, person or device. Whether the people are employees, partners or customers or whether the applications are in the cloud, on premises or on a mobile device, Okta helps IT become more secure and maintain compliance. The Okta service provides directory services, single sign-on, authentication, provisioning, workflow, and built in reporting. ment systems.
$6
per month per user
PingOne from Ping Identity
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
The PingOne Cloud Platform from Ping Identity in Denver, Colorado is an identity management and access solution (IAM) for enterprises. Features of the products include single sign-on, multi-factor authentication, user management with directory, provisioning and deprovisioning. The solution is presented as a comprehensive, standards-based platform that allows users and devices to securely access any service, application or API from any device. Designed for hybrid IT…
$20,000
per year
Sentry Login
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
N/A
$4.95
per month
Pricing
OktaPingOne from Ping IdentitySentry Login
Editions & Modules
Starter
$6.00
per month per user
Essentials
$17.00
per month per user
Professional
Inquire for pricing
Per User Per Month
Enterprise
Inquire for pricing
Per User Per Month
Essential
$20,000
per year
Plus
$40,000
per year
Premium
Contact Sales
Sentry
$4.95
per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
OktaPingOne from Ping IdentitySentry Login
Free Trial
YesYesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsTry PingOne for Customers for free. Sign up for a free 30-day trial of PingOne for customers.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
OktaPingOne from Ping IdentitySentry Login
Considered Multiple Products
Okta
Chose Okta
Ping is a hybrid Identity management too ie it works on cloud and on prem both. As majority of our servers are on cloud, we chose Okta
Ping was providing WLP solutions and again this was not something we needed at that time so Okta was our choice. Plus the terms of contract were …
Chose Okta
Ultimately, we found Okta stood out for its ease of integration across a wide range of applications, vendor-neutral approach, and overall user experience, which aligned best with our needs.
Chose Okta
Okta is far superior in terms of integrations, user interface, automation, and connectivity. Additionally, Okta offers better support and availability, and a more robust solution across every capacity Entra competes in. Okta simply works, whereas Microsoft Entra has a large …
Chose Okta
Azure AD is very restrict to Microsoft tools only, although it's possible to use tools outside Microsoft, the security provided wasn't the best. In my case, where most of my company tools are outside Micrisoft, Okta is a very reliable option as it's neutral and compatible to …
Chose Okta
Internal expertise was with Okta, we also considered total cost of ownership, admin overhead, and deployment/setup time.
Chose Okta
Okta over Ukg Pro choosen just for simple and straight forward reason is SSO/MFA login ,security is been taken care. We have automated onboarding with Okta where UKG I feel is more inclined towards payroll stuff. So in all Okta offers flexibility where I can use multiple …
Chose Okta
Okta’s ability to consolidate so many apps in one platform created a very user friendly work environment. It’s robust identity management and security features made it a standout choice for our company as we looked to simplify access management.
Chose Okta
Okta and Auth0 are similar in a number of ways, but ultimately they serve different cases. Okta is likely the preferred option for scenarios where IT or other admin staff need the ability to control account access for other staff members.
Chose Okta
It’s conditional access and Zero Trust policies give us strong security control without complicating user experience and we no longer require on-prem AD set ups, which is a huge plus for us due to its cloud directory capabilities.
Chose Okta
The only others services that I use for password storage are my google work account and Apple iCloud. Overall, I'd rank apple the lowest . Gmail is the most convenient in terms of quickly going to a site and having the password prefill. Where Okta is better than Google though, …
Chose Okta
We selected Okta since as I mentioned earlier, speed means a lot to our account. The reason behind that is because it enables us a lot faster and utilize our apps better. Do not get me wrong, PingOne is a great app, its just that the app itself does not have the processing …
Chose Okta
Substantial ease of accessibility, usability, and compatibility, along with superior platform of integration towards a simplified central hub feature set.
Chose Okta
We use the Twilio Authy app to authenticate for our payroll/benefits application, and prefer Okta to the Twilio application. It is more user-friendly and easier to install and manage.
Chose Okta
- Many features like SSO, MFA, API access management etc.
- Integration with third party apps
- Company needs
Chose Okta
This was compared to Cisco Duo which we had previously for MFA along with Okta for application access.
Chose Okta
Microsoft Entra ID and OneLogin by One Identity
Chose Okta
Okta is worlds better than any other IDP Solution that I have come across.
Their documentation on integrations is STELLAR, their support staff is knowledgeable and awesome, their service is reliable and just works.
Chose Okta
Okta provides a better user experience and a portal to make things simple not only for the admins but also the customers. Compared to Entra and Duo Okta is light years ahead in innovation and user experience.
Chose Okta
Previous to Okta, we did not have a central cloud IdP system, each app had it's own authentication and authorization internally. That led to a fairly messy and divergent situation where every system had a different method and look for authentication and authorization. …
Chose Okta
I'd say that Okta handles authentication more efficiently than Duo. It covers more applications and is easier to manage.
Chose Okta
We have no experience with other products. In the past we have considered to implement Google SSO and Apple SSO, we did some partial development, but we never released those changes.
PingOne from Ping Identity
Chose PingOne from Ping Identity
The Ping products work. They can integrate with any application. They are significantly more reliable. The vendor is responsive and works with us. Other solutions are unreliable, the vendors are inflexible, their solutions are inflexible, and their support is inflexible. These …
Chose PingOne from Ping Identity
PingOne from Ping Identity is the clear winner here. I can say this because the cost of their service is very worth it, and their service offers more than their competitors. In addition to that, this software is still improving daily, which only means that there is still more …
Chose PingOne from Ping Identity
This solution is selected before my time so, not much influence ,but product allow to customized and require decent ping skills to configure the solution. Okta and Other solutions are well suited in this category with some positive and some negative capabilities. it must say …
Chose PingOne from Ping Identity
We tested PingOne but our security team was not happy with it (because of cloud exposure).
We tested PingId as well but our security team was not happy with it (because of cloud exposure).
We [spent] some time on PingDataGovernance but so far we don't have any use case for this …
Chose PingOne from Ping Identity
All contenders were capable, but we had scale concerns with NetIQ's architecture. In the end, what set Ping apart from the others was their level of engagement in understanding our use cases up front during the RFP stage and how they were focused on what we needed more than …
Chose PingOne from Ping Identity
I found both platforms compelling from an ease of use and user experience perspective. The decider for me was cost driven as I had already used Ping to drive a self-service transformation in a prior organization, and I intended to do the same at this one. Okta had issues with …
Chose PingOne from Ping Identity
Two-way authentication and ease of use. I've used several applications that just email a link but never ask for a verification code. By entering the verification code you are sure that the site is safe, secured, and reliable. Using Ping, we can ensure no one other than you will …
Sentry Login

No answer on this topic

Features
OktaPingOne from Ping IdentitySentry Login
Identity Management
Comparison of Identity Management features of Product A and Product B
Okta
8.8
Ratings
7% above category average
PingOne from Ping Identity
9.3
Ratings
12% above category average
Sentry Login
-
Ratings
ID-Management Access Control9.20 Ratings10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
ID Management Single-Sign On (SSO)9.30 Ratings10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Multi-Factor Authentication9.10 Ratings9.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Password Management8.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Account Provisioning and De-provisioning8.80 Ratings8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
ID Management Workflow Automation8.50 Ratings9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
ID Risk Management8.60 Ratings8.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
OktaPingOne from Ping IdentitySentry Login
Small Businesses
1Password
1Password
Score 9.3 out of 10
1Password
1Password
Score 9.3 out of 10
1Password
1Password
Score 9.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
RSA Access Manager (Discontinued)
RSA Access Manager (Discontinued)
Score 10.0 out of 10
RSA Access Manager (Discontinued)
RSA Access Manager (Discontinued)
Score 10.0 out of 10
RSA Access Manager (Discontinued)
RSA Access Manager (Discontinued)
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises
RSA Access Manager (Discontinued)
RSA Access Manager (Discontinued)
Score 10.0 out of 10
RSA Access Manager (Discontinued)
RSA Access Manager (Discontinued)
Score 10.0 out of 10
RSA Access Manager (Discontinued)
RSA Access Manager (Discontinued)
Score 10.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
OktaPingOne from Ping IdentitySentry Login
Likelihood to Recommend
8.9
(0 ratings)
9.5
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Availability
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
10.0
(0 ratings)
8.6
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
1.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
6.4
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
6.4
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
OktaPingOne from Ping IdentitySentry Login
Likelihood to Recommend
Should be well-suited for a SaaS business organisation as they have a lot of internal applications and need a role-based authentication system between the various teams, improving security and audit log system to account for any breaches. It integrates well with internal applications such as Salesforce and Oracle. Best when need of SSO.
Read full review
The products we're using work well and are reliable. We've had very few outages, and when we have, their support team has been highly responsive and addressed the issues quickly. They are very customer focused and have been great partners throughout the relationship. I'm looking to adopt more of their technologies over the coming year.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Pros
  • Centralized control of enterprise passwords
  • Extensive customization of acceptable password criteria
  • One system for Identity and Access Management to learn
  • Scalable throughout the university for all central services
  • Uniform login experience for students, faculty, and staff
  • Single point of response to address termination of access
  • Ability to use FastPass for lower priority systems
  • Excellent support of multi-factor requirements
Read full review
  • It is very simple to onboard the application
  • It provide lot of flexibility with SSO functions
  • It helped reducing the cost.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Cons
  • I'm not sure it's really a room for improvement thing, but due to the granularity offered by Okta, sometimes it can be challenging to find exactly what you're looking for.
  • There was an instance in which we had issues getting SAML configured for an application. I feel this challenge was mostly user error (on our part) because we didn't realize the SAML instructions were SPECIFIC to each app integration and changed (codes) each time. We attempted to mirror the settings/configurations of an existing app (same app, but different domain). I think having a note somewhere that indicated that the instructions were unique to each integration would have saved us a bit of time. Again, I'm not sure this is really an issue with Okta though, more of a user learning curve thing.
  • Sometimes searching for things is a challenge (without the "Rockstar" add-in). For example, if you have a user group called "Okta_users_everyone", searching for "everyone" will not find it. You have to search for the beginning of the object name (not just any part of it). The ability to search partial or wildcard would greatly enhance search functionality.
Read full review
  • There are times that the response time is quite slow.
  • Since this is built on Google Cloud, there are moments when we encounter errors when logging in or looping in Google.
  • UI could be improved.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Likelihood to Renew
Okta has a passion to provide secure and scalable identity solution. Their passion has come across as advocacy in a way that has deepened my knowledge of the field of authentication. I took identity for granted before but after seeing features such as external authentication I know that Okta can enable my business to reach new heights
Read full review
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Usability
Some of its features are great and some are slightly complex and not easy without vendor support.
Read full review
Easy to use; all UI's are user friendly and easy to learn.[The] possibility to use API is [a] big value as well. We really like integration with CyberArk; with it we can manage privileged accounts according to company standards without breaking any rules, and we can be 100% sure that only approved persons will have administrative access.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Reliability and Availability
The Okta Identity Cloud advertises 4 9's of reliability and I would go as far to say that it may even do better than that. As a true Global organization that operates in just about every region of the world, we have yet to have an issue with The Okta Identity Cloud that has impacted our business operations.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Performance
From my perspective, for the things that my group uses it for, Okta is very fast. It is as least as fast as the local password database methods that it replaces on our campus enterprise services. I do not believe that it slows anything down at all. In fact, not having to think too much about the login, because they all look the same, probably speeds things up somewhat.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
We've had a few support cases over the years and every case has been handled by the Okta support team beautifully. We received clear answers to questions we had regarding setup and even were provided simple to follow guides on how to setup their product to use with custom applications.
Read full review
Ping's support is willing and attentive, but if I am in a position to engage them I am often at a point where most of the usual support engineers would not be in a position to answer the questions I have. However, Ping has been more than willing to engage their product and development teams with our organization as we take advanced deployment and use case challenges to them.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Okta is far superior in terms of integrations, user interface, automation, and connectivity. Additionally, Okta offers better support and availability, and a more robust solution across every capacity Entra competes in. Okta simply works, whereas Microsoft Entra has a large overhead that is difficult to use when configuring things.
Read full review
We tested PingOne but our security team was not happy with it (because of cloud exposure). We tested PingId as well but our security team was not happy with it (because of cloud exposure). We [spent] some time on PingDataGovernance but so far we don't have any use case for this product. We started exploration for PingDataSync (to synchronize two different LDAP directories), [and] so far it looks promising.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Scalability
Being a cloud native application, The Okta Identity Cloud is extremely scalable and easy to setup. By integrating into existing directories and applications via standard techniques and protocols, it is very easy to both initially setup and add additional users as required. Once all the necessary integrations are setup, it's a simple rinse and repeat process to onboard additional users (which can be automated with imports as well)
Read full review
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • Reduces password fatigue and keeps all my apps together in a central location for easy access throughout the day. Adding new apps is simple.
  • I am more productive by using the centralized app's portal rather than logging in to lots of different applications.
  • Nothing is automated through OKTA but it does improve our security.
Read full review
  • Flexibility is key, we can integrate with any solution.
  • Single control plane for all authentication.
  • A single provider for all authentication needs simplifies the stack and solution, and therefore the maintenance experience for users.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots