OpenText Content Suite Platform vs. Oracle Aconex

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
OpenText Content Suite Platform
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
The OpenText Content Suite Platform oversees the lifecycle management of information across the enterprise from capture through archiving and disposition. With agile information governance to address the latest data governance and data privacy best practices, the vendor states their Content Suite reduces risk and empowers organizations to focus on using information to drive strategic growth and productivity.N/A
Oracle Aconex
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
Aconex is a cloud collaboration platform for the global construction industry which allows the user to quickly find what is needed with a single source of truth for communications, documents, processes, and models. Aconex was acquired and is now supported by Oracle since 2017.N/A
Pricing
OpenText Content Suite PlatformOracle Aconex
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
OpenText Content Suite PlatformOracle Aconex
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
OpenText Content Suite PlatformOracle Aconex
Features
OpenText Content Suite PlatformOracle Aconex
Enterprise Content Management
Comparison of Enterprise Content Management features of Product A and Product B
OpenText Content Suite Platform
8.4
7 Ratings
4% above category average
Oracle Aconex
-
Ratings
Content capture & imaging9.07 Ratings00 Ratings
File sync, storage & archiving9.07 Ratings00 Ratings
Document management9.07 Ratings00 Ratings
Records management8.06 Ratings00 Ratings
Content search & retrieval8.07 Ratings00 Ratings
Enterprise content collaboration9.07 Ratings00 Ratings
Content publishing & creation8.06 Ratings00 Ratings
Security, risk management & information governance8.06 Ratings00 Ratings
Contract lifecycle management8.07 Ratings00 Ratings
Automated workflows9.06 Ratings00 Ratings
Artificial intelligence7.05 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile support9.05 Ratings00 Ratings
Integration8.06 Ratings00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
OpenText Content Suite Platform
-
Ratings
Oracle Aconex
5.0
4 Ratings
43% below category average
Dashboards00 Ratings5.04 Ratings
Standard reports00 Ratings5.04 Ratings
Custom reports00 Ratings5.04 Ratings
Construction Project & Field Management
Comparison of Construction Project & Field Management features of Product A and Product B
OpenText Content Suite Platform
-
Ratings
Oracle Aconex
7.4
5 Ratings
0% below category average
Plan distribution & viewing00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Plan markups & sharing00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Issue tracking & punchlists00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Photo documentation00 Ratings5.04 Ratings
Jobsite reports00 Ratings5.04 Ratings
Document sharing00 Ratings6.05 Ratings
RFI tools00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Collaboration & approvals00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
As-built drawings00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Best Alternatives
OpenText Content Suite PlatformOracle Aconex
Small Businesses
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.5 out of 10
FollowUp CRM
FollowUp CRM
Score 10.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
MediaValet
MediaValet
Score 9.0 out of 10
InEight
InEight
Score 8.5 out of 10
Enterprises
MediaValet
MediaValet
Score 9.0 out of 10
InEight
InEight
Score 8.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
OpenText Content Suite PlatformOracle Aconex
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(9 ratings)
9.0
(5 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Availability
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
OpenText Content Suite PlatformOracle Aconex
Likelihood to Recommend
OpenText
Great for content management and records even for organizations whose staff are not much experienced in the technical backgrounds as it's easy to use and no previous knowledge on HTML is required. It is great for storing invoices and payment proofs and for organizations dealing with global clients for general use documents.
Read full review
Oracle
Large, Multi-Party Capital Projects
Scenario: Major construction or infrastructure projects involving owners, designers, multiple contractors, subcontractors, and regulators. Why Aconex Fits: Provides a neutral, single source of truth across many independent organizations. Strong permissioning and data ownership model builds trust between parties. Scales well to very high document volumes and long project durations. Example Use: Design development and construction documentation for a multi-year infrastructure project with hundreds of external users.
Read full review
Pros
OpenText
  • Document Management is being done well since it allows you to put in a corporate folder structure that applies to the business unit you currently work in.
  • Records Management works well in this organisation as it allows you to classify the document according to the file plan, as well as manage it according to the retention schedule for tat file plan.
  • The ability to collaborate on files works really well. You can share with users within your group, as well as allow other users access to the files for either read access to read/write access.
  • Access control of the folder and even individual files allows you to ensure only necessary people can have the right type of access. This is especially welcome in the government environment where document management is of utmost importance.
Read full review
Oracle
  • The existence of insurance and permit tracking.
  • Budgetary control measures and expense monitor.
  • Job costing and logistical management.
  • Skills and competencies improvement.
Read full review
Cons
OpenText
  • The user interface and configurability of that interface lack a lot of flexibility and modern tools.
  • There needs to be stronger and more powerful integration to electronic forms and workflow capabilities which are core to modern ECM.
  • Management of audit and content history needs to be modernized and made more dynamic and sustainable.
Read full review
Oracle
  • Sharing of projects comments and document can be more efficient.
  • Estimation capabilities can be improved.
  • The initial configuration can easily confuse the beginners.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
OpenText
The staff is comfortable with it and I doubt they'd change at this point.
Read full review
Oracle
No answers on this topic
Usability
OpenText
Strong for Core Content and Records Management
Effective for Non-Technical Users (with the right configuration)
Read full review
Oracle
Requires a better interface that allows you to find all tools in order to utilise all functions.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
OpenText
I never had any issues with access internally or via VPN. But, the response via VPN, was a bit slow.
Read full review
Oracle
No answers on this topic
Performance
OpenText
  • I used OpenText nearly every day and I never had any performance issues that I can recall. That said, it's not terribly fast either.
Read full review
Oracle
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
OpenText
OpenText has an outstanding support and knowledge base. All problems which couldn't be solved by us (high complexity cases) were promptly resolved and the resolution also shared with us.
Read full review
Oracle
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
OpenText
No, it's pretty easy to implement and use.
Read full review
Oracle
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
OpenText
Having used OpenText Content Suite for a long time, I can say it stands the competition. It offers many versions which is unlike many products in its category. Also, while it is not affordable, I believe the cost is justified considering what a business can achieve with this software.
Read full review
Oracle
Aconex's document control workflow allows for multiple versions of the same revision, enabling markups to be seen and document history as appropriate. This is on par with SOLIDWORKS EPDM, and is by far better than InEight's TeamBinder, as the originator and uploader of the document are able to change the version without the need for an administrator.
Read full review
Return on Investment
OpenText
  • With OpenText Content Suite, we can easily keep documents safe
  • Document collaboration is easy with OpenText
  • We can easily handle invoicing and automation thanks to features such as content capture and imaging.
  • With OpenText Content Suite, there is better file sync and archiving
Read full review
Oracle
  • Reductions in print costs alone (subcontractor bid process) paid completely for the use of the product. Further benefits to all project participants included process streamlining and 100% access to all project documentation (Drawings, Specifications, Contracts, Notices of Change, Change Orders etc.) from any online source including mobile devices. Benefits probably accounted for 150% of product cost.
  • Intangible benefits included reduced exposure to claims as a result of good (and agreed process tracking).
Read full review
ScreenShots

Oracle Aconex Screenshots

Screenshot of Avoid the limitations of manual correspondence with a standardized digital process that provides project-wide access and visibilityScreenshot of Automate and standardize any inspection process with Aconex Field—one mobile app for safety walks, quality checks, defecting, and more.Screenshot of Gain visibility into budgets, forecasts, and projective outcomes to enable early corrective action.