OpenText Content Suite Platform vs. QT9 QMS

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
OpenText Content Suite Platform
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
The OpenText Content Suite Platform oversees the lifecycle management of information across the enterprise from capture through archiving and disposition. With agile information governance to address the latest data governance and data privacy best practices, the vendor states their Content Suite reduces risk and empowers organizations to focus on using information to drive strategic growth and productivity.N/A
QT9 QMS
Score 9.8 out of 10
N/A
QT9 Quality Management System is a quality management platform designed to ensure compliance with a large number of regulations and policies and to automate paper-bound processes in the interest of increasing efficiency.N/A
Pricing
OpenText Content Suite PlatformQT9 QMS
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
OpenText Content Suite PlatformQT9 QMS
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
OpenText Content Suite PlatformQT9 QMS
Considered Both Products
OpenText Content Suite Platform
Chose OpenText Content Suite Platform
In my opinion, OpenText Content Suite Platform provides more powerful product and highly integrated solutions more than OCR solution that Abbyy provides.
I think OpenText Content Suite Platform obviously provides stronger support and services that Abbyy support and services …
Chose OpenText Content Suite Platform
OpenText comes in different versions and you are able to choose depending on your departmental or organizational needs. In terms of functionality and capabilities, it was able to offer more value as it checked all the boxes in terms of long-time retentions, reporting …
Chose OpenText Content Suite Platform
OpenText Content Suite Platform replaced an existing Records Management solution and checked all of the boxes in regards to capabilities surrounding search, physical objects, long-term retention, and reporting capabilities.
Chose OpenText Content Suite Platform
Having used OpenText Content Suite for a long time, I can say it stands the competition. It offers many versions which is unlike many products in its category. Also, while it is not affordable, I believe the cost is justified considering what a business can achieve with this …
Chose OpenText Content Suite Platform
OpenText Content Suite has been an amazing addition to our business thanks to its many features and capabilities. The fact that OpenText offers many versions makes its products competitive because there is so much we can accomplish with these products. Price wise, OpenText …
Chose OpenText Content Suite Platform
OpenText is stronger in the management of high volume and secure information. However, SharePoint, while less functional from a document management perspective, provides a much stronger user interface which eases user adoption and the presentation of content. SharePoint also …
Chose OpenText Content Suite Platform
SharePoint is not very strong on records management as part of the base system. So after evaluation, it was found to not comply to all needs and therefore discarded. We also evaluated Afresco which is an opensource offering. The problem was that we could not find enough people …
Chose OpenText Content Suite Platform
I also used Tridion while at AP. It's tougher to learn (HTML knowledge is very helpful), but it is a much more powerful CMS. Tridion allows for language variation, more customization and the embedding of HD video. OpenText was a legacy system of our internal site. Tridion was …
QT9 QMS
Chose QT9 QMS
We have not used any other systems Prior to QT9 QMS our systems were all manual and down through excel and email.
Features
OpenText Content Suite PlatformQT9 QMS
Enterprise Content Management
Comparison of Enterprise Content Management features of Product A and Product B
OpenText Content Suite Platform
8.4
Ratings
4% above category average
QT9 QMS
-
Ratings
Content capture & imaging9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
File sync, storage & archiving9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Document management9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Records management8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Content search & retrieval8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Enterprise content collaboration9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Content publishing & creation8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Security, risk management & information governance8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Contract lifecycle management8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Automated workflows9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Artificial intelligence7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile support9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Integration8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
OpenText Content Suite PlatformQT9 QMS
Small Businesses
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.3 out of 10
Polarion ALM
Polarion ALM
Score 9.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
MediaValet
MediaValet
Score 8.8 out of 10
Polarion ALM
Polarion ALM
Score 9.9 out of 10
Enterprises
MediaValet
MediaValet
Score 8.8 out of 10
Polarion ALM
Polarion ALM
Score 9.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
OpenText Content Suite PlatformQT9 QMS
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(0 ratings)
9.4
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(0 ratings)
9.4
(0 ratings)
Availability
8.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Performance
8.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
OpenText Content Suite PlatformQT9 QMS
Likelihood to Recommend
Your organisation has to support the type of document and records management needed for this to work. In an organisation that only needs to store documents and maybe share with many different parties, this might not be the best-suited software. In a large organisation with stringent document and records management policies, this suite is well suited. It makes management of documents across business units easy to manage and control.
Read full review
I like using QT9 because it's easy to use, easy to train others and is very user friendly. QT9 has all that we need to be successful. Our data tracking, corrective actions, documentation tracking and the reporting of that data is extremely easy to use and implement. We also think that the EC process is very useful for updating designs
Read full review
Pros
  • ECM OpenText version is secure and easy to use
  • The different versions makes it easy to accomplish different tasks . We have more than three versions deployed in our company
  • The software is highly scalable
  • There are many customization options
  • The software is relatively affordable
Read full review
  • We store current documents
  • We record nonconforming products and resolution
  • We manage our vendor quality/SCAR process
Read full review
Cons
  • The user interface and configurability of that interface lack a lot of flexibility and modern tools.
  • There needs to be stronger and more powerful integration to electronic forms and workflow capabilities which are core to modern ECM.
  • Management of audit and content history needs to be modernized and made more dynamic and sustainable.
Read full review
  • canned reports
  • adapting for other standards such as ASME requirements
  • adding two approval points in the NCPs - one for immediate disposition and one for final verification with multiple sign offs for each
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
The staff is comfortable with it and I doubt they'd change at this point.
Read full review
document tracking and updating has been clearer.
Read full review
Usability
Strong for Core Content and Records Management
Effective for Non-Technical Users (with the right configuration)
Read full review
The system is very user friendly
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
I never had any issues with access internally or via VPN. But, the response via VPN, was a bit slow.
Read full review
QT9 QMS has always been available. Even in instances where there would be an update, notifications would be sent out to provide a heads up to the users. Any issues where QT9 QMS would have problems, glitches, or run slow, support was always available to take care of the issues.
Read full review
Performance
  • I used OpenText nearly every day and I never had any performance issues that I can recall. That said, it's not terribly fast either.
Read full review
I give it a 10 as the information is always readily available. As for speed, For the most part, loading of the sometimes takes a little longer than others. There are occasional times that it does run a little slow, but when that happens, the support team has always been there to help.
Read full review
Support Rating
OpenText has an outstanding support and knowledge base. All problems which couldn't be solved by us (high complexity cases) were promptly resolved and the resolution also shared with us.
Read full review
The usability and clarity of documentation and tracking is fantastic. Calibration is always open and trackable as well.
Read full review
In-Person Training
No answers on this topic
I had online training which was wonderful. The training was open and inviting to ask questions. I came on just after QT9 QMS was accepted in the company. SO I was in almost at the ground floor.
Read full review
Online Training
No answers on this topic
Training was open and was able to ask any questions. This provided clarity in all the areas that I would use. There has been training readily offered by the QT9 company and provided opportunities to grow our understanding of the software and additional ways that we could utilize it.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No, it's pretty easy to implement and use.
Read full review
It went well and is used daily.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
OpenText comes in different versions and you are able to choose depending on your departmental or organizational needs. In terms of functionality and capabilities, it was able to offer more value as it checked all the boxes in terms of long-time retentions, reporting capabilities, physical objects, and searches are great.
Read full review
We have not used any other systems Prior to QT9 QMS our systems were all manual and down through excel and email.
Read full review
Scalability
No answers on this topic
We have sites in many different areas within and outside of our current state. The use of QT9 QMS allows all sites to be in one database so everyone has the same information. The rollout of the software was rather easy as online training could be used for all sites and provided an excellent tool for all areas.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • With OpenText Content Suite, we save time thanks to its features such as imaging
  • Mobile support is amazing and this makes working anywhere easy
  • Since it is very secure, we do not have to worry about content
  • The collaboration features make it even better by improving the user experience.
Read full review
  • visiablity of controlled documents and those that are out for revision has been good
  • great central hub to allow users from other facitilities to use the same documents/processes
  • visiabiliy of the status of the engineering changes
Read full review
ScreenShots