Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
OpenText Documentum
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
OpenText acquired Documentum from Dell EMC in 2017, and now supports the enterprise content management (ECM) system. The vendor says users can build content-centric applications and solutions from collaborating on business documents to delivering case-based applications to managing highly precise processes in the most regulated business environments.N/A
PDFTables
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
PDFTables is made by The Sensible Code Company, based in London. PDFTables focus is converting tables accurately from PDF documents to XLSX, CSV or XML. The tool also converts the text around the tables. PDFTables is available as a web service, via API or as an On-Premises Enterprise solution. The Enterprise solution allows customers to convert sensitive data securely within their own network, ensuring a secure process. The API allows batch conversion and the option to convert only selected…
$30
Tungsten Capture
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Tungsten Capture (formerly Kofax Capture) is a suite of multichannel document capture applications.
$3,500
per year
Pricing
OpenText DocumentumPDFTablesTungsten Capture
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
1000 pages
$30.00
5,000 pages
$100.00
10000 pages
$200.00
10,000 - 100,000 pages
$200.00-$2000.00
Kofax Capture
$3,500
per year
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
OpenText DocumentumPDFTablesTungsten Capture
Free Trial
NoYesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoYesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesYesNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsYou can set your own page credits from 5,000 up to 100,000 pages, at a cost of $0.02 per page. You can purchase as many page credits as you require, there will be no limit on your account.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
OpenText DocumentumPDFTablesTungsten Capture
Features
OpenText DocumentumPDFTablesTungsten Capture
Enterprise Content Management
Comparison of Enterprise Content Management features of Product A and Product B
OpenText Documentum
9.2
7 Ratings
13% above category average
PDFTables
-
Ratings
Tungsten Capture
-
Ratings
Content capture & imaging10.07 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
File sync, storage & archiving9.07 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Document management9.07 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Records management9.07 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Content search & retrieval9.07 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Enterprise content collaboration9.07 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Content publishing & creation9.07 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Security, risk management & information governance10.07 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Contract lifecycle management9.07 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Automated workflows9.03 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Artificial intelligence9.03 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile support9.03 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Integration10.03 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
OpenText DocumentumPDFTablesTungsten Capture
Small Businesses
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.7 out of 10
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.7 out of 10
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
MediaValet
MediaValet
Score 9.0 out of 10
MSB Docs
MSB Docs
Score 9.4 out of 10
MSB Docs
MSB Docs
Score 9.4 out of 10
Enterprises
MediaValet
MediaValet
Score 9.0 out of 10
Tungsten Capture
Tungsten Capture
Score 8.0 out of 10
M‑Files
M‑Files
Score 8.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
OpenText DocumentumPDFTablesTungsten Capture
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(10 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
9.2
(9 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.0
(4 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Performance
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
5.0
(1 ratings)
Implementation Rating
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
OpenText DocumentumPDFTablesTungsten Capture
Likelihood to Recommend
OpenText
Documentum is best used in medium to large institutions that can afford it, have alternate solutions for web publishing, and who have either in-house developers or can hire good Documentum developers (not the ones who know Java but do not understand ECM). It is, in my opinion, the best heavy duty ECM solution out there, assuming OT is not gutting it as we speak. That is my only hesitation to not giving it a 10, OpenText is an unknown quantity in this and I worry that they will only support Documentum until they have figured out how to fill the gap between Documentum and OT and then offer a migration path to OT with a Documentum sunsetting as an incentive.
Read full review
PDFTables
No answers on this topic
Tungsten Automation (formerly Kofax)
Kofax [Capture] meets our needs and for the most part is easy to use and setup. Configuration could be a little bit easier. The scripting language is a double edge sword if you will. It gives you nearly unlimited possibilities to script what you need, but the downside is you have to script it. Does a good job at batching and scanning documents. The tool integrates well into our workflow which makes our business partners happy and in turn provides for happy customers.
Read full review
Pros
OpenText
  • Records management: Compared to other content management systems, this provides a efficient and scalable solution. It gives lot of flexibility in managing the content as Records or Legal holds.
  • Workflow system has external plugins to connect with FAX, Mail, Database and FTP servers etc. which gives an option to integrate with any system with documentum.
  • Creation of websites and maintenance is easy. Content authors can create the pages with effective mechanism.
Read full review
PDFTables
No answers on this topic
Tungsten Automation (formerly Kofax)
  • The VRS application included with Kofax Capture is the best image pre-processing platform available on the market today. It can handle a wide array of common document problems such as skew, flipping, wrinkles, lines, and dots.
  • The platform is incredibly scriptable and can be customized to handle all sorts of unusual document contents to allow information to be extracted that many other platforms just struggle on. Table extraction, line item matching, and smart extraction are all strong points with this platform.
  • Through the use of SBL and .NET the platform can be expanded and scaled quite easily to allow for the software to be integrated into existing business processes and platforms with ease.
Read full review
Cons
OpenText
  • WDK framework has been the biggest drawbacks from the application speed point of view, as well as client complexity and not so natural look and feel. Yes, with the latest releases much of these features are improved.
  • EMC is very expensive to buy, own and support, where some products require many dependent Docuemntum products to be installed to work at its best.
Read full review
PDFTables
No answers on this topic
Tungsten Automation (formerly Kofax)
  • We struggled with configuring Kofax with AP Automation. We used to receive vouchers in different formats by different companies, by different departments. The people from different departments used to scan those vouchers through regular scanners to a central location, which ended up as image pdfs. We fed these image pdfs through Kofax Capture for character recognition, which was painful as the accuracy of recognition was 50 to 60%.
  • Having a connectors with a workflow tool would be helpful where people can validate and approve the output.
  • More samples and documentation related to use of API in .NET applications would be a good improvement, that would help users to adapt the product easily into their organization.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
OpenText
Stability is a key factor as well as its flexibility. Also, any organization that deploys Documentum will have made a significant investment in terms of time and money, so not renewing its commitment can come with a significant cost. That said, the decision to deploy Documentum initially should come only after extensive evaluation, knowing that once deployed it will likely remain the platform of choice.
Read full review
PDFTables
No answers on this topic
Tungsten Automation (formerly Kofax)
Cost of Kofax is high, however the cost to benefit scenarios always pay off.
Read full review
Usability
OpenText
No answers on this topic
PDFTables
No answers on this topic
Tungsten Automation (formerly Kofax)
It's good.
Read full review
Support Rating
OpenText
Support is better than with ECM, but could use some improvement.
Read full review
PDFTables
No answers on this topic
Tungsten Automation (formerly Kofax)
Haven't really used their support yet
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
OpenText
At the time it was purchased it was one of the best, most robust solutions available on the market.
Read full review
PDFTables
No answers on this topic
Tungsten Automation (formerly Kofax)
Quality of data capture. Automatic data integration with Oracle and SAP ERP. Automatic image integration with Oracle and SAP ERP. Automatic invoice booking in Oracle and SAP ERP.
Read full review
Return on Investment
OpenText
  • After this product, the client is able to manage content security and due to it, the client is able to use the business process, and this really reduces effort and increases the profit in business.
  • It provides integration with SAP easily which really helps the client to manage this effectively and with minimum effort system is ready to use.
  • Also searching, automated flows also create a bigger impact and reduce a lot manual effort.
Read full review
PDFTables
No answers on this topic
Tungsten Automation (formerly Kofax)
  • We were able to decrease personnel expenditures as there was not a need for individuals to index documents prior to incorporating them into the record.
Read full review
ScreenShots

PDFTables Screenshots

Screenshot of Converted PDF bank statement to ExcelScreenshot of PDFTables homepage