OpenText Documentum vs. QEdge

Documentum is best used in medium to large institutions that can afford it, have alternate solutions for web publishing, and who have either in-house developers or can hire good Documentum developers (not the ones who know Java but do not understand ECM). It is, in my opinion, the best heavy duty ECM solution out there, assuming OT is not gutting it as we speak. That is my only hesitation to not giving it a 10, OpenText is an unknown quantity in this and I worry that they will only support Documentum until they have figured out how to fill the gap between Documentum and OT and then offer a migration path to OT with a Documentum sunsetting as an incentive.

Incentivized

QEdge all software are well suited for organisation where regulatory acceptation are more as compared to other non regulated industry. Its is best for organisation where work flow is scattered and need to convert in to organised work flow. It is less suited for organisation with smaller number of employee with limited budget.

Incentivized

• Records management: Compared to other content management systems, this provides a efficient and scalable solution. It gives lot of flexibility in managing the content as Records or Legal holds.
• Workflow system has external plugins to connect with FAX, Mail, Database and FTP servers etc. which gives an option to integrate with any system with documentum.
• Creation of websites and maintenance is easy. Content authors can create the pages with effective mechanism.

Incentivized

• QEdge all software are compliant to pharmaceutical regulatory standard.
• It is customisation as per our requirements.
• There integration with each other reduce duplication of work.

Incentivized

• WDK framework has been the biggest drawbacks from the application speed point of view, as well as client complexity and not so natural look and feel. Yes, with the latest releases much of these features are improved.
• EMC is very expensive to buy, own and support, where some products require many dependent Docuemntum products to be installed to work at its best.

• Dashboard functionality need to implement for QMS tracking.
• Change control report generation is not customisation as per requirement.
• System assign same number for different QMS like CAPA.

Incentivized

Stability is a key factor as well as its flexibility. Also, any organization that deploys Documentum will have made a significant investment in terms of time and money, so not renewing its commitment can come with a significant cost. That said, the decision to deploy Documentum initially should come only after extensive evaluation, knowing that once deployed it will likely remain the platform of choice.

Incentivized

The QEdge rating reflects both its strengths and shortcomings. Its compliance tools, automation features, and scalability shine, ensuring efficiency and consistency. Its service and support from vendor also appreciable. However, due to some scope of improvement in software which could easy our task during routine work. I have given 8 rating out of 10.

Incentivized

Support is better than with ECM, but could use some improvement.

Incentivized

At the time it was purchased it was one of the best, most robust solutions available on the market.

Incentivized

• After this product, the client is able to manage content security and due to it, the client is able to use the business process, and this really reduces effort and increases the profit in business.
• It provides integration with SAP easily which really helps the client to manage this effectively and with minimum effort system is ready to use.
• Also searching, automated flows also create a bigger impact and reduce a lot manual effort.

Incentivized

• Its increased productivity and expedite document approval process.
• Improved organisation alignment with regulatory authorities
• Document tracking and traceability become easier

Incentivized