TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    OpenText Documentum

    Score9 out of 10
    N/AOpenText acquired Documentum from Dell EMC in 2017, and now supports the enterprise content management (ECM) system. The vendor says users can build content-centric applications and solutions from collaborating on business documents to delivering case-based applications to managing highly precise processes in the most regulated business environments.N/A

    Visual Studio Test Professional

    Score7 out of 10
    N/AAn add-on for the Visual Studio IDE, Visual Studio Test Professional subscription helps teams drive quality and speed. It includes test case management and collaboration features that streamline quality control and support continuous delivery.

    $2,169

    for the first year (renews at $869)

    Pricing
    OpenText DocumentumVisual Studio Test Professional
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    OpenText DocumentumVisual Studio Test Professional
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    YesNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    OpenText DocumentumVisual Studio Test Professional
    Considered Both Products
    OpenText
    No answer on this topic
    Microsoft
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Would buy again
    12 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    91%
    Delivers good value for the price
    10 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    12 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    9 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    12 Answers
    Features
    OpenText DocumentumVisual Studio Test Professional
    Enterprise Content Management
    Comparison of Enterprise Content Management features of OpenText Documentum and Visual Studio Test Professional
    Feature
    OpenText Documentum
    9.2
    7 Ratings
    13% above category average
    Visual Studio Test Professional
    -
    Ratings
    Content capture & imaging10.07 Ratings00 Ratings
    File sync, storage & archiving9.07 Ratings00 Ratings
    Document management9.07 Ratings00 Ratings
    Records management9.07 Ratings00 Ratings
    Content search & retrieval9.07 Ratings00 Ratings
    Enterprise content collaboration9.07 Ratings00 Ratings
    Content publishing & creation9.07 Ratings00 Ratings
    Security, risk management & information governance10.07 Ratings00 Ratings
    Contract lifecycle management9.07 Ratings00 Ratings
    Automated workflows9.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Artificial intelligence9.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Mobile support9.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Integration10.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    OpenText DocumentumVisual Studio Test Professional
    Small Businesses
    Egnyte
    Score9.3 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    Epicor ECM
    Score7.7 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Enterprises
    Dashpivot - By Sitemate
    Score10 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    OpenText DocumentumVisual Studio Test Professional
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.0
    (10 ratings)
    7.0
    (15 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    8.0
    (4 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.0
    (10 ratings)
    Performance
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    8.5
    (10 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    OpenText DocumentumVisual Studio Test Professional
    Likelihood to Recommend
    OpenText
    Documentum is best used in medium to large institutions that can afford it, have alternate solutions for web publishing, and who have either in-house developers or can hire good Documentum developers (not the ones who know Java but do not understand ECM). It is, in my opinion, the best heavy duty ECM solution out there, assuming OT is not gutting it as we speak. That is my only hesitation to not giving it a 10, OpenText is an unknown quantity in this and I worry that they will only support Documentum until they have figured out how to fill the gap between Documentum and OT and then offer a migration path to OT with a Documentum sunsetting as an incentive.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    It would be well suited if we used it with Azure DevOps as we can effortlessly integrate the test cases and even stories or tasks to stay on track with our work. Those test cases can even be reused across multiple projects. Using any other third-party tools, such as Jira, can be less appropriate, as it's not a Microsoft tool, and its capabilities will be limited.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    OpenText
    • Records management: Compared to other content management systems, this provides a efficient and scalable solution. It gives lot of flexibility in managing the content as Records or Legal holds.
    • Workflow system has external plugins to connect with FAX, Mail, Database and FTP servers etc. which gives an option to integrate with any system with documentum.
    • Creation of websites and maintenance is easy. Content authors can create the pages with effective mechanism.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • Availability of the desktop client or the web interface. The web interface being the favorite and providing a better experience.
    • It enables you to write unit tests with so much ease.
    • Allows the recording and repeating of manual tests
    • It can be set up for collaboration.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    OpenText
    • WDK framework has been the biggest drawbacks from the application speed point of view, as well as client complexity and not so natural look and feel. Yes, with the latest releases much of these features are improved.
    • EMC is very expensive to buy, own and support, where some products require many dependent Docuemntum products to be installed to work at its best.
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • The user community of the Visual Studio Test product is weak. For instant problems with this product, it is necessary to quickly reach the source of the error.
    • Licence fees need to be more reasonable. License prices need to be reduced so that they can easily compete with free testing tools.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    OpenText
    Stability is a key factor as well as its flexibility. Also, any organization that deploys Documentum will have made a significant investment in terms of time and money, so not renewing its commitment can come with a significant cost. That said, the decision to deploy Documentum initially should come only after extensive evaluation, knowing that once deployed it will likely remain the platform of choice.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    Usability
    OpenText
    No answers on this topic
    Microsoft
    It is very usable if you are familiar with Visual Studio to begin with. If you are new to the interface, it can be a long ramp up period for Testers not used to the GUI. There is always the web option which seems to be more intuitive for many Testers.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    OpenText
    Support is better than with ECM, but could use some improvement.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    Visual Studio Test Professional is backed up by the full support of the Microsoft Corporation. That means twenty-four/seven customer support by quality, highly-trained professionals who understand every possible issue that you have experienced before. They are nice, efficient, and highly professional. I recommend them.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    OpenText
    At the time it was purchased it was one of the best, most robust solutions available on the market.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    The visual Studio Test tool is faster than other tools. Since the development and testing processes are in one tool, it is more profitable in terms of cost. It is more inconvenient to write a test case in DevOps.
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    OpenText
    • After this product, the client is able to manage content security and due to it, the client is able to use the business process, and this really reduces effort and increases the profit in business.
    • It provides integration with SAP easily which really helps the client to manage this effectively and with minimum effort system is ready to use.
    • Also searching, automated flows also create a bigger impact and reduce a lot manual effort.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • One of the positive ROIs of Visual Studios is the fact that it makes producing our work at a quick rate, things like Intellisense make our work get produced at a much higher rate which is good for our return of investment.
    • Testing by the developers has increased by 23%, we now take the time to actually test our product before we send it to our QA people.
    • I am not aware of any negative ROI aspects to our company that have been found.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots