Oracle CPQ is a cloud-based application that helps sellers configure the right mix of products or services and create accurate, professional quotes to quickly meet their customers’ pricing needs.
$240
per month per user
Sage 300
Score6.8 out of 10
N/A
Sage 300 (formerly Sage 300 ERP) is a business management solution that includes strong accounting and financials, as well as multi-currency and multi-language capabilities. Built on accounting best practices, users will be able to track, control, and plan the financial health of their business.
$1,655
Lifetime License per Seat
Pricing
Oracle CPQ
Sage 300
Editions & Modules
CPQ Pricing
$240.00
per month per user
Sage 300 ERP Standard
$1,655
Lifetime License per Seat
Sage 300 ERP Advanced
$1,665
Lifetime License per Seat
Sage 300 ERP Premium
$1,665
Lifetime License (unlimited seats)
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Oracle CPQ
Sage 300
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
Our pricing is by module and by license and can range depending on what the customers requirements are. Most of our financial and operational modules are $1655.00 each, plus user license, plus an annual business care of 24%.
More Pricing Information
Features
Oracle CPQ
Sage 300
CPQ
Comparison of CPQ features of Oracle CPQ and Sage 300
Feature
Oracle CPQ
6.7
18 Ratings
26% below category average
Sage 300
-
Ratings
Quote sharing/sending
7.017 Ratings
00 Ratings
Product configuration
8.017 Ratings
00 Ratings
Configuration options
8.017 Ratings
00 Ratings
Pricing rules
7.016 Ratings
00 Ratings
Price adjustment
5.017 Ratings
00 Ratings
Purchase history and open contracts
6.016 Ratings
00 Ratings
Guided selling/Sales portal
7.016 Ratings
00 Ratings
CPQ reporting & analytics
7.017 Ratings
00 Ratings
CPQ-CRM integration
7.015 Ratings
00 Ratings
Attachments to quotes
5.017 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order capturing
7.07 Ratings
00 Ratings
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Oracle CPQ and Sage 300
Feature
Oracle CPQ
-
Ratings
Sage 300
9.3
11 Ratings
21% above category average
Pay calculation
00 Ratings
9.411 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
00 Ratings
9.46 Ratings
Direct deposit files
00 Ratings
9.311 Ratings
Salary revision and increment management
00 Ratings
9.39 Ratings
Reimbursement management
00 Ratings
9.38 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Oracle CPQ and Sage 300
Feature
Oracle CPQ
-
Ratings
Sage 300
6.2
11 Ratings
20% below category average
API for custom integration
00 Ratings
9.39 Ratings
Plug-ins
00 Ratings
3.010 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Oracle CPQ and Sage 300
Feature
Oracle CPQ
-
Ratings
Sage 300
9.5
18 Ratings
15% above category average
Single sign-on capability
00 Ratings
9.514 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
00 Ratings
9.518 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Oracle CPQ and Sage 300
Feature
Oracle CPQ
-
Ratings
Sage 300
9.3
20 Ratings
17% above category average
Dashboards
00 Ratings
9.39 Ratings
Standard reports
00 Ratings
9.320 Ratings
Custom reports
00 Ratings
9.318 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Oracle CPQ and Sage 300
Feature
Oracle CPQ
-
Ratings
Sage 300
7.1
21 Ratings
7% below category average
Accounts payable
00 Ratings
9.521 Ratings
Accounts receivable
00 Ratings
9.520 Ratings
Cash management
00 Ratings
9.313 Ratings
Bank reconciliation
00 Ratings
6.620 Ratings
Expense management
00 Ratings
9.312 Ratings
Time tracking
00 Ratings
1.05 Ratings
Fixed asset management
00 Ratings
3.06 Ratings
Multi-currency support
00 Ratings
1.010 Ratings
Multi-division support
00 Ratings
9.510 Ratings
Regulations compliance
00 Ratings
9.39 Ratings
Electronic tax filing
00 Ratings
4.07 Ratings
Self-service portal
00 Ratings
1.07 Ratings
Global Financial Support
00 Ratings
9.34 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
00 Ratings
9.35 Ratings
Intercompany Accounting
00 Ratings
9.47 Ratings
Localizations
00 Ratings
1.04 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations
00 Ratings
9.59 Ratings
Enterprise Accounting
00 Ratings
9.36 Ratings
Configurable Accounting
00 Ratings
9.37 Ratings
Centralized Rules Framework
00 Ratings
9.35 Ratings
Standardized Processes
00 Ratings
9.37 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Oracle CPQ and Sage 300
Feature
Oracle CPQ
-
Ratings
Sage 300
5.2
13 Ratings
33% below category average
Inventory tracking
00 Ratings
1.012 Ratings
Automatic reordering
00 Ratings
9.37 Ratings
Location management
00 Ratings
9.311 Ratings
Manufacturing module
00 Ratings
1.07 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Oracle CPQ and Sage 300
I think CPQ had worked so well for our company because of the widespread nature of our associates and tracking orders that were being placed in multiple time zones. My team specifically needed a way of analyzing these orders to track our progress in real time and sort out any supply orders before they became an issue. If you are in a centralized location with a smaller team then this may not yield much use to you.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
Sage 300cloud is a great option when it comes to cloud accounting/tracking software. In comparison to Sage's other products, Sage 300cloud is the only cloud/web based option with modern UI's and more intuitive interfaces. Additionally, Sage 300cloud offers an entire system of customer integrations that become available dependent on subscription level. Sage 300cloud also offers integrations between other Sage products (AP, CRM, etc) that allows for better automation and efficiency
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Significant setup time, cost, and maintenance. We have to use an implementation partner
Does not always play well with other software, even Oracle software. While this is improved and being further improved, that it was a third party acquisition means things sometimes require a little extra care
Additional setup documentation and first walkthroughs would be helpful, especially if it was all in one place
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
So far it is all good with BigMachines, looking for new features since Oracle acquisition has created a lot of expectations. We have outlined our limitations (out of box functionality) in our periodic customer successor advice meetings for a while, hope we get a resolution soon. Also, the BigMachines user license fee has increased a lot in the last three years.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
It is a solid stable product with a large user community and large ISV community. Support and Training are easy to access and obtain and there is larger reseller channel to ensure the firm you work with is honest. It is scalable and there are multiple deployment and payment options.
The software UI can be as complex or as simple as you need it to be (depending on the business). It does require training others on quote configuration and the order in which to build out order positions prior to configuring a quote. Once users are trained;however, it is fairly straight-forward. The UI is still more static than other new wizard/drag-and-drop models, but it get's the job done
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Sage 300cloud is intuitive and user friendly after some training. It does require implementation and training but once that's done, this software is easy to use and navigate. Support for Sage 300cloud is spot on and offers assistance over the simplest to [the] most complex of tasks. Finding information or learning new tasks within Sage 300cloud is relatively easy and educational.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
It depends upon the day however there are so many failure points with online services, including our internet service, that this is probably closer to 9 with the latest version
Some specific support personal was good and fixed some problems fast using proper solutions. But when one of them went to sleep when we had critical issues and they do unreported commits to our production environment which caused issues and they were hiding it?? you can not give more than a two (maybe even that is too much). They also failed to add a feature for us which also bring the grade down.
Turnover is high in the Sage Support department so sometimes it is difficult to get a rep who knows the issue well. Reps are good and getting assistance when they need it. Sometimes support is more interested in closing issue than actually solving problem. It can be difficult at times to have issues escalated but overall the support is good.
They have pretty good training. Our business analysts have been able to go to entry and advanced level training. They have a train the trainer model. Our business analyst attended training, then trained the rest of our staff.
It was a much more technical implementation than we thought. It involved much more code.
Future releases have made and will make administering the tool easier.
EDL consulting had one good developer, but when he was moved off, they were horrible to work with.
The BMI sales team does a “BOA” or a “Business Operation Assessment” which is extremely valuable, not only for them to scope an implementation and get more reach within the organization, but it is also a documentation of business process that most organizations don’t have. It highlights inefficiencies and allows for correction during implementation.
Having a dedicated team (in-house) for implementation is key
Oracle engagement is ahead. They are active in the development of the tool and provide great support after implementation. They also listen to their customers and offer opportunities to feedback and provide input through activities like the customer advisory board forum.
Sage 300 cloud is much more detailed than the other. About the same in being user friendly A better layout Saves time for doing the schedules for Audits Mobile Access Sage 300cloud can manage all different industries
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Increased Sales Rep efficiency. Being able to create multiple quotes ACCURATELY and quickly was a game changer.
Large implementation time. It's a little difficult to fit BMI into a SCRUM style build, with multiple working models and prototypes of all 3 simultaneously.
A larger fee for licensing and implementation cost. ROI wouldn't be realized in the first year.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info