Chose Proposable
I selected Proposable because of the solution to our needs vs cost balance. I think Proposable has a lot of room for improvement, but if you need to integrate with Salesforce without spending a fortune, this is your way to go.
Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
---|---|---|---|---|
PandaDoc | N/A | PandaDoc headquartered in San Francisco offers their eponymous electronic signature platform for sales teams, containing sales proposal automation and CPQ (configure, price, quote) features, and integration with CRMs. | $19 per user/per month | |
Proposable | N/A | Proposable is a sales proposal automation software solution offered by Proposable. | $19 per user/per month |
PandaDoc | Proposable | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Editions & Modules |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
Entry-level Setup Fee | Optional | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
Additional Details | PandaDoc offers a free eSign plan and 3 paid packages for eSigning and document automation starting at $19 per month per user. All plans include unlimited documents and eSignatures. Evaluations start with a free 14-day trial. | — | ||||||||||||||
More Pricing Information |
PandaDoc | Proposable | |
---|---|---|
Considered Both Products | PandaDoc No answer on this topic | Proposable |
Top Pros |
|
|
Top Cons |
|
|
PandaDoc | Proposable | ||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Proposal Creation & Organization |
| ||||||||||||||||||
Proposal Collaboration & Workflow |
| ||||||||||||||||||
Proposal Delivery |
|
PandaDoc | Proposable | |
---|---|---|
Small Businesses | PDFfiller Score 9.0 out of 10 | QuoteWerks Score 9.2 out of 10 |
Medium-sized Companies | MSB Docs Score 9.7 out of 10 | QuoteWerks Score 9.2 out of 10 |
Enterprises | DocuSign Score 8.4 out of 10 | Conga CPQ Score 7.9 out of 10 |
All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
PandaDoc | Proposable | |
---|---|---|
Likelihood to Recommend | 8.9 (270 ratings) | 8.3 (3 ratings) |
Likelihood to Renew | 9.0 (18 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Usability | 8.0 (23 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Availability | 9.1 (4 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Performance | 9.6 (21 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Support Rating | 5.2 (23 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Implementation Rating | 6.3 (4 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Configurability | 2.8 (3 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Ease of integration | 9.0 (20 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Product Scalability | 8.6 (4 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Vendor post-sale | 9.9 (20 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
Vendor pre-sale | 6.7 (4 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
PandaDoc | Proposable | |
---|---|---|
Likelihood to Recommend | PandaDoc | Proposable |
Pros | PandaDoc | Proposable |
Cons | PandaDoc | Proposable |
Likelihood to Renew | PandaDoc | Proposable No answers on this topic |
Usability | PandaDoc | Proposable No answers on this topic |
Reliability and Availability | PandaDoc | Proposable No answers on this topic |
Performance | PandaDoc | Proposable No answers on this topic |
Support Rating | PandaDoc | Proposable No answers on this topic |
Implementation Rating | PandaDoc | Proposable No answers on this topic |
Alternatives Considered | PandaDoc | Proposable |
Scalability | PandaDoc | Proposable No answers on this topic |
Return on Investment | PandaDoc | Proposable |
ScreenShots | PandaDoc Screenshots |