ProcessMaker is a process automation platform that helps organizations optimize and scale their business operations. By combining workflow automation, AI-driven decision-making, and advanced analytics, ProcessMaker empowers businesses to streamline complex processes, improve efficiency, and enhance customer experiences.
N/A
Zoho Flow
Score 9.7 out of 10
N/A
Zoho Flow allows the user to integrate business apps to automate a workflow.
$29
per month (for 5k tasks per month)
Pricing
ProcessMaker
Zoho Flow
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Standard
starting at $29
per month starting with 5k tasks per month
Professional
starting at $49
per month starting with 10k tasks per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ProcessMaker
Zoho Flow
Free Trial
Yes
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
Optional
Additional Details
—
Discount available for annual pricing. Higher monthly task volume available.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
ProcessMaker
Zoho Flow
Features
ProcessMaker
Zoho Flow
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
ProcessMaker
7.8
3 Ratings
7% above category average
Zoho Flow
-
Ratings
API for custom integration
7.83 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
ProcessMaker
8.6
11 Ratings
10% above category average
Zoho Flow
-
Ratings
Dashboards
8.911 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standard reports
8.911 Ratings
00 Ratings
Custom reports
8.09 Ratings
00 Ratings
Process Engine
Comparison of Process Engine features of Product A and Product B
ProcessMaker
8.9
10 Ratings
22% above category average
Zoho Flow
-
Ratings
Process designer
9.99 Ratings
00 Ratings
Process simulation
8.38 Ratings
00 Ratings
Business rules engine
9.99 Ratings
00 Ratings
SOA support
9.910 Ratings
00 Ratings
Process player
8.08 Ratings
00 Ratings
Form builder
7.98 Ratings
00 Ratings
Model execution
8.38 Ratings
00 Ratings
Business Process Automation
Comparison of Business Process Automation features of Product A and Product B
ProcessMaker
8.1
3 Ratings
17% above category average
Zoho Flow
-
Ratings
Business Process Modeling
8.33 Ratings
00 Ratings
Decision Modeling
8.33 Ratings
00 Ratings
Code-Based Automation
8.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
No-Code Automation
7.73 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cloud Data Integration
Comparison of Cloud Data Integration features of Product A and Product B
The task mining component is well suited for processes where there are a lot of steps performed in a variety of systems, particularly by a single individual on a team. It also requires a robust activity ID to be able to track an activity. It is not well suited when trying to track a process where the content is in an email.
For small—to medium-sized connections between different applications, Zoho Flow is quick and easy to set up and test. However, as a Flow becomes more complicated with multiple connections and decisions, it becomes more difficult to track errors and faults and manage changes. Some of this is due to the history not being detailed enough, and some is just the UI, where you can't zoom in and out and clearly see connecting lines for flows.
User interface. It is clean and easy to understand. You won't get overwhelmed the second you log in.
The workflow maker. With a drag and drop interface, you can easily visualize and implement what you want on the screen. Out of all the programs we tested, this one had the easiest process maker and designer.
Ease of understanding. My biggest recommendation would be that this program is easy to access for anyone. There are complications (see negatives) but this program can be implemented quickly and efficiently, and nearly anyone can learn to use it. You will not feel like you are in the dark with it.
Complications when you get to the more advanced pieces. When trialing, I found that the more advanced a process got, the more complicated it got for me in coding. When you begin using the more advanced features, you will find that you need to have a basic knowledge of coding - otherwise you won't go any further. This was my sole issue. Unfortunately, it was one that would have brought the school to a grinding halt if they were to ever get more complicated than they were.
I gave this overall rating for ProcessMaker due to its overall flexibility, design and ease of use for most. Examples of this from us include it being an excellent and trustworthy tool for automating processes, the abilities and capabilities for real-time process tracking and the web-based accessibility and implementation which allows for easy access and management of the tool.
Flow can accomplish almost anything you want to do. It's imperfect, but it could be with just a few more features and better error management/visibility. For someone who's not a developer, this is a no-brainer. Having used other products in the past, like Zapier, this is as easy to use, if not even easier.
I've reached out to the support team several times with assistance requests in Zoho Flow. Each time the team has answered my questions promptly and accurately. And because we are mainly integrating other Zoho apps their teams are perfectly positioned to solve our problems.
Before making the decision to get ProcessMaker, we assessed different and best options in the market, which are also quite competitive. KiSSFLOW, Blueworks Live, and Bizagi, being the most relevant and ADONIS, to mention the ones we consider the most relevant and capable of meeting our needs. In the end, we went for ProcessMaker because of mainly three things as described before: 1. Real-time process status tracking. 2. Metrics and dashboards. 3. Ease of use for constructing diagrams.
I've used Zapier and both programs are similar. Zapier has deeper integrations or more apps to integrate with but considering Flow's association with other Zoho apps this does it for us!
The capability is robust and quite industry agnostic. It would benefit significantly with some out of the box models - e.g. procure to pay on SAP and similar. They could also develop industry specific examples which could kickstart the implementation for organizations.
I'm using Communication edition to introduce BPMN in my organization. I can build the first process in a short time, make my boss more confident with my job.
But, with ProcessMaker, we need more time to design code to handle the process, and without PHP/Javascript Programmer, it seems hard to work with more and more processes online.
However, IE Browser is not well supported, somewhat let the user confuse.