Quo (formerly OpenPhone) is a business phone and VoIP solution designed to help maintain work life balance. Features include incoming call identification, set business hours, contact ownership information to associate calls to teammembers, etc., to help organize call responding.
$19
per month per user
Sprinklr Service
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Sprinklr Service is a cloud-native unified customer service platform powered by AI that enables customer and agent experience across 30+ digital, social and voice channels, and delivers real-time insights. Enables customers to interact with a brand on their preferred channel for consistent brand experience. Empowers agents with unified/360 customer view and recommends the most relevant responses with AI to improve agent productivity and experience.…
$249
per month per seat
Pricing
Quo
Sprinklr Service
Editions & Modules
Starter
$19
per month per user
Business
$33
per month per user
Scale
$47
per month per user
Enterprise
Custom Pricing
Self-Serve Customer Service Solution
$249
per month per seat
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Quo
Sprinklr Service
Free Trial
Yes
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
Optional
Additional Details
Discounts available for annual pricing.
Omnichannel
Automation, AI and Insights
Reporting
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Quo
Sprinklr Service
Features
Quo
Sprinklr Service
Cloud PBX
Comparison of Cloud PBX features of Product A and Product B
Quo
5.3
5 Ratings
41% below category average
Sprinklr Service
-
Ratings
Hosted PBX
4.24 Ratings
00 Ratings
Multi-level Interactive Voice Response (IVR)
4.25 Ratings
00 Ratings
User templates
7.44 Ratings
00 Ratings
Call reports
4.24 Ratings
00 Ratings
Directory of employee names
6.64 Ratings
00 Ratings
Call Management
Comparison of Call Management features of Product A and Product B
Quo
6.9
9 Ratings
19% below category average
Sprinklr Service
-
Ratings
Answering rules
6.66 Ratings
00 Ratings
Call recording
6.68 Ratings
00 Ratings
Call park
6.65 Ratings
00 Ratings
Call screening
6.67 Ratings
00 Ratings
Message alerts
8.27 Ratings
00 Ratings
VoIP system collaboration
Comparison of VoIP system collaboration features of Product A and Product B
Quo
5.4
10 Ratings
39% below category average
Sprinklr Service
-
Ratings
Video conferencing
4.22 Ratings
00 Ratings
Audio conferencing
4.25 Ratings
00 Ratings
Video screen sharing
5.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Instant messaging
8.210 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mobile apps
Comparison of Mobile apps features of Product A and Product B
Quo
5.4
10 Ratings
39% below category average
Sprinklr Service
-
Ratings
Mobile app for iOS
4.210 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mobile app for Android
6.65 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contact Center Software
Comparison of Contact Center Software features of Product A and Product B
Quo
-
Ratings
Sprinklr Service
7.1
2 Ratings
17% below category average
Agent dashboard
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Validate callers
00 Ratings
6.02 Ratings
Outbound response
00 Ratings
6.02 Ratings
Call forwarding
00 Ratings
7.02 Ratings
Click-to-call (CTC)
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Warm transfer
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Predictive dialing
00 Ratings
5.02 Ratings
Interactive voice response
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
REST APIs
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Call scripts
00 Ratings
7.02 Ratings
Call tracking
00 Ratings
7.02 Ratings
Multichannel integration
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
CRM software integration
00 Ratings
6.02 Ratings
Workforce Optimization (WFO)
Comparison of Workforce Optimization (WFO) features of Product A and Product B
If you have more than 2 people in your organization, then this will save you so much time. Delegation is the key to starting a business. Even when you're a 1 person show, being able to present to your user base the differentiation of options for client communications is critical. As a founder, feeling compelled to be always on is something I strive not to be. OpenPhone gives you that flexibility. I have found it to be less appropriate in complex HIPPA compliant areas, but that is it. OpenPhone really does seem to suit an open array of use cases.
Sprinklr Service has always been well-suited for all of the work we do. As it's all social media content, and most require responses or escalations, Sprinklr Service covers all of that. The only time I think we wouldn't need it is if we were working with a much smaller client who didn't need us to have eyes on so many platforms at once.
Automated notifications for certain types of content or posts from certain users
The reporting options are fantastic.
We've integrated a chatbot seamlessly with Sprinklr modern care so our team members can pick up a conversation if our bot isn't able to provide an answer.
I find it difficult to dive into analytics for each social post. The reporting tool gives me an overview of the channels but I would love to look at a breakdown of each post performance.
You currently can't add closed caption subtitles to videos uploaded through Sprinklr so this results in having to revert to the native platform.
I would love to be able to set up a newsfeed that includes posts from a number of our partner accounts, so I can keep up to date with what they're posting.
The biggest reason we renewed, and kept up with Sprinklr Modern Care is because it is an active community and there is customer buy-in already. They continue to update and improve the product, but more importantly, the customers are using it. It's easy to switch products when it's not an active component in your daily structure, but switching and migrating the data or providing alternatives becomes difficult when customers have grown accustomed to a specific experience. As long as they continue to improve the available features and the community stays active, renewed use will continue.
In my experience, App features are buggy and confusing, and they often don't match the descriptions and screenshots in their documentation. In fact, many of their help links go to 404 "page not found" errors. In my experience, there are frequent outages and quality issues. My customers prefer to talk to me on a different line, because they find it difficult to understand me on OpenPhone.
I've spent year designing products so I'm a tough judge when it comes to other solutions. It's clear that Sprinklr Modern Care was designed for the average online consumer with a very user friendly interface. They have made improvements to the admin tools to make that area of the product easier to use as well.
No issues with system availability. They manage updates in off-peak hours and I usually don't notice the changes until I log into the system the next day.
Performance is great and is not negatively effecting our processes. We have to make sure it doesn't effect out load times. Not currently seeing any issues with widgets affecting page load times.
In my experience, their support feels like the opposite of support. They send you in circles, never directly answer questions, provide vague suggestions with unwanted platitudes, and they often take days between responses to provide that. For me, it's a frustrating experience that leaves you with a net loss of time and energy versus before you reached out to them. In my opinion, you definitely don't get "support".
I know the Sprinklr conference calls have been helpful, but sometimes submitting a ticket can be a little daunting. In the past, we've included information in screenshots that are then asked for by a member of the support staff. The turnaround time has been between 3 days, which isn't horrible.
Basic setup took me less than 30 minutes. This includes initial configuration, putting in the initial content, and getting the look-and-feel customized. The domain routing took the normal lag time any other website or blogging service. The really important thing was to get the user accounts setup and begin seeding the system with content before a public launch.
OpenPhone has an easier user interface than Grasshopper. Years ago when I was using Grasshopper, I recall that their user interface looked antiquated and full of complications. They would also update the interface just as everyone was getting used to using it. OpenPhone has many more functions. Grasshopper's app did not offer basic functions such as in-app texting between team members, and its call transfer function was incredibly complicated to use. In my opinion, Grasshopper was an inferior service/product in almost every way.
First, we had a social studio which was good in terms of functionalities but slow. After that, we had the chance to use Talkwalker & social bakers which were good tools yet not enough compares to Sprinklr
In my experience, Billing lacks transparency, and they have made billing errors (overcharging me) since I started using them. I think the "trust registration" is an insane ripoff charging around $20 for every attempt. Crazy.
Increased employee efficiency: Having a clear, one-stop "shop" where users can leave feedback, ask questions, and find bug fixes or workarounds has saved me (and other community managers at my company) loads of time that was once spent responding to numerous emails on an individual basis.
Better customer service: Since everyone in the company is alerted of what's being written on our forum, it's easy to spot a high-priority issue, delegate to the person in charge, resolve it, and respond as soon as possible.