RunRun.it is a project management solution built around task management to drive productivity.
$8
per month per user
Wrike
Score 8.6 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Wrike is a project management and collaboration software. This solution connects tasks, discussions, and emails to the user’s project plan. Wrike is optimized for agile workflows and aims to help resolve data silos, poor visibility into work status, and missed deadlines and project failures.
$240
per year 2 users (minimum)
Pricing
Runrun.it
Wrike
Editions & Modules
Free
$0
Business
$8
per month per user
Enterprise
$25
per month per user
Wrike Free
$0
per month per user
Wrike Team
$10
per month (billed annually) per user (2-15 users)
Wrike Business
$25
per month (billed annually) per user (5-200 users)
Apex
Request a quote
per month per user
Pinnacle
Request a quote
per month per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Runrun.it
Wrike
Free Trial
Yes
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
14 days free to evaluate the software with up to 100 employees in your account. After this period ends, our plans are pre-paid, which means that the client makes the payment before using the software.
Every premium plan begins with a 14-day trial period.
I’ve used and evaluated Asana, monday.com, and Runrun.it before settling on Wrike, and here’s why I chose Wrike. While Asana and monday.com are great for simple task management and visually appealing interfaces, I found them lacking the depth of customization and scalability …
Features
Runrun.it
Wrike
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Runrun.it
8.5
3 Ratings
9% above category average
Wrike
8.0
914 Ratings
3% above category average
Task Management
10.03 Ratings
9.1905 Ratings
Resource Management
10.02 Ratings
7.8777 Ratings
Gantt Charts
7.01 Ratings
7.9635 Ratings
Scheduling
9.02 Ratings
8.3791 Ratings
Workflow Automation
7.52 Ratings
7.9782 Ratings
Team Collaboration
7.33 Ratings
8.6905 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology
8.33 Ratings
7.7503 Ratings
Support for Waterfall Methodology
7.52 Ratings
8.0452 Ratings
Document Management
5.02 Ratings
7.6761 Ratings
Email integration
7.73 Ratings
7.7682 Ratings
Mobile Access
10.01 Ratings
7.9658 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking
9.03 Ratings
7.7427 Ratings
Change request and Case Management
10.01 Ratings
7.723 Ratings
Budget and Expense Management
10.01 Ratings
7.6325 Ratings
Professional Services Automation
Comparison of Professional Services Automation features of Product A and Product B
Apropriado para gestão de tempo, organização de demandas e planejamentos, tanto de forma micro quanto de alta gestão. Inapropriado para trabalhos colaborativos na área de geração de ticket. Falta um canal de comunicação mais fluído e com mais ferramentas de suporte. Provavelmente uma interface com o hangout ou chats do e-mail cadastrado facilitassem essa comunicação. Suitable for time management, organization of demands, and planning, both on a micro level and high management. Inappropriate for collaborative work in the area of ticket generation. There is a lack of a more fluid communication channel and more support tools. Probably an interface with Hangouts or email chats would facilitate this communication.
I believe it's well suited if you have multiple jobs/projects that you need to keep organized. We work with multiple job types from print/creative to web, copy and digital ads so it helps us stay organized. I don't think it would be suitable for a company that doesn't have a lot of jobs to manage. We average over 1,200 requests a year.
Painel do tempo da atividade poderia ser melhorado para retirar as horas excedentes. The activity time panel could be improved to remove the excess hours.
visualização inicial ser direto a do seu painel. initial visualization should be directly from your dashboard.
organização das atividades entregues. Melhor visualização. organization of the submitted activities. Better visualization.
I wish that Wrike had more drag and drop functionality that would be connected to assignee and also I wish that the finish date of a task would update to the date where you checked completed. It does not do that. Also finishing a task doesn't move the start date of the next task it "protects your time in that way", but our management team wants us to quickly see what we have down the pipeline rather than having to scroll down the list of upcoming tasks.
It does take some time and work to really understand and use it properly, but I think the accessibility to help and documentation make that completely feasible. Once you know how to use it, I find it to be very user-friendly, and have very few complaints.
Over two years of (almost) daily usage without outages. Don't remember any errors. I give it 9 only because some Wrike plugins (for online document edit) are based on NPAPI architecture. These types of plugins are being phased out in new browsers, and NPAPI plugins are disabled by default in recent versions of Chrome so you have to do some browser adjustments when you switch browsers or move to another computer.
Wrike tasks loads fine, but I hate clicking files and wait for a bit of time since it is powerpoint or word, Wrike assumes I want to open those on Wrike. My suggestion is to link it to office 365 so we do not need Wrike based decoder for PPTX and DOCX
During my learning phase with Wrike, I initially struggled with setting up automation rules and request forms. However, Wrike support was always my go-to, resolving issues within seconds or minutes. Their assistance made the learning process much easier. My best experience was receiving step-by-step screenshots to follow, with the support team on standby until I was completely satisfied.
I love the Wrike training options. Wrike Discover has tons of courses, learning plans, certifications, etc. This is an area where Wrike definitely shines! I wish these resources were more in your face for new people, because it seems like a lot of coworkers didn't know all of this training was available to them.
There are a lot of bells and whistles in Wrike, and not all of it is easy or intuitive to understand once it's plopped in your lap. It's easier when there are a few choice people who understand Wrike as a platform and articulate it in such a way where it makes it easy to pass it along to others in the group
Jira did not at all help us get our work done as content creators. I think that was because Jira wasn't quite right for our uses. Wrike fits our needs so much better. I can't tell you enough the relief I felt when we adopted Wrike and I never had to use Jira again.
The sky is the limit for what can be done in Wrike. We started with 1 use case and within 5 months we migrated several key business practices over to Wrike because they were easier to manage. Use cases so far: process improvement, management review, corrective actions, maintenance requests, month-end financial closing, and document management. As we grow, it's easy to imagine putting even more into Wrike where it becomes a cornerstone for how we do business
Different teams (e.g., contracting, compliance, provider relations) can view updates in real time, comment directly on tasks, and escalate items when needed.
Wrike allows us to template the contracting process (from intake to signature) to ensure consistency across payers and reduce administrative overhead.
Leadership can see the status of negotiations at a glance, identify bottlenecks, and prioritize resources accordingly.